Pay table clarity feedback
Poll
 | 2 votes (40%) | ||
| No votes (0%) | |||
| | 3 votes (60%) | ||
| No votes (0%) |
5 members have voted
June 25th, 2014 at 3:28:41 PM
permalink
Hey all,
After a recent meeting for potential placements the operator and myself have decided to redo the Money$uit 31 pay tables to make them a bit easier to understand for players and dealers. The old tables are still on my website demo, however below are the new ones.
Please let me know if you like these much better than the old by voting or commenting.
P.S. these are little crude but they serve their purpose...
Thanks!
Edit: images removed and replaced by new ones in a later post...
After a recent meeting for potential placements the operator and myself have decided to redo the Money$uit 31 pay tables to make them a bit easier to understand for players and dealers. The old tables are still on my website demo, however below are the new ones.
Please let me know if you like these much better than the old by voting or commenting.
P.S. these are little crude but they serve their purpose...
Thanks!
Edit: images removed and replaced by new ones in a later post...
.
June 25th, 2014 at 3:39:08 PM
permalink
Brent, exactly how will these payouts be displayed to the players, and more importantly, the dealers ?
Shed not for her
the bitter tear
Nor give the heart
to vain regret
Tis but the casket
that lies here,
The gem that filled it
Sparkles yet
June 25th, 2014 at 3:43:28 PM
permalink
I absolutely hate it. Having the "MS" before each hand value is confusing and not necessary. You have the column header for MoneySuit and Non-MoneySuit so I think the payoffs should be listed the same way under both columns.
You can't know everything, but you can know anything.
June 25th, 2014 at 3:47:18 PM
permalink
Quote: BuzzardBrent, exactly how will these payouts be displayed to the players, and more importantly, the dealers ?
These are the paytables that will be present on the layout for the player's spots and the dealers area next to the tray. The old ones combines the Money$uit and non-Money$uit totals so people had some confusion distinguishing what got paid to what totals. Now by splitting them it is a simple as when you have a money$uit hand you look at one side and when you have a non-money$uit hand you look to the other.... Do you agree?
You can compare the new and old by looking at the site...
.
June 25th, 2014 at 3:48:10 PM
permalink
Quote: DRichI absolutely hate it. Having the "MS" before each hand value is confusing and not necessary. You have the column header for MoneySuit and Non-MoneySuit so I think the payoffs should be listed the same way under both columns.
Ok, that is an easy fix. Thank you. Without the M$ you like them better this way?
.
June 25th, 2014 at 4:20:00 PM
permalink
It has to be as simple and as easy as possible to get. In this regard, the designer's familiarity and comfort with his game is a drawback.
1. I'd have columns "MoneySuit" and "other suit/off suit"
2. NO "MS" or "M$" - the concept is clear, and the acronym isn't.
3. I'd align same values on the same line, leading out to the columns that have "Money suit" and "other suit/other"
1. I'd have columns "MoneySuit" and "other suit/off suit"
2. NO "MS" or "M$" - the concept is clear, and the acronym isn't.
3. I'd align same values on the same line, leading out to the columns that have "Money suit" and "other suit/other"
Beware of all enterprises that require new clothes - Henry David Thoreau. Like Dealers' uniforms - Dan.
June 25th, 2014 at 4:50:48 PM
permalink
Better?
.
June 25th, 2014 at 4:59:11 PM
permalink
Yup!
Much better, clearer; the "MS" thing was too cryptic.
Much better, clearer; the "MS" thing was too cryptic.
Beware of all enterprises that require new clothes - Henry David Thoreau. Like Dealers' uniforms - Dan.
June 25th, 2014 at 5:01:51 PM
permalink
That is much cleaner and looks 100% better than the previous one.
You can't know everything, but you can know anything.
June 25th, 2014 at 5:37:57 PM
permalink
Great, thank you guys very much.
.
July 3rd, 2014 at 3:08:45 PM
permalink
Definite improvement. Good job, Brent.
If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.
