rose030784
rose030784
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 4
Joined: Mar 24, 2011
March 24th, 2011 at 12:43:32 PM permalink
I use the intermediate strategy for JorB VP. I am confused about #12 (AKQJ unsuited) & #13 (2 suited high cards). If I get AKQJ but 2 are suited, why should I keep only the 2 suited if the AKQJ is ranked higher? In other words, why is AKQJ unsuited a better hand than AKQJ with 2 suited? Or am I misreading the rule. Doesn't AKQJ unsuited mean all four have to be different suits? Thanks.
RobSinger
RobSinger
  • Threads: 5
  • Posts: 199
Joined: Oct 6, 2010
March 24th, 2011 at 1:28:50 PM permalink
Quote: rose030784

I use the intermediate strategy for JorB VP. I am confused about #12 (AKQJ unsuited) & #13 (2 suited high cards). If I get AKQJ but 2 are suited, why should I keep only the 2 suited if the AKQJ is ranked higher? In other words, why is AKQJ unsuited a better hand than AKQJ with 2 suited? Or am I misreading the rule. Doesn't AKQJ unsuited mean all four have to be different suits? Thanks.



I don't know where you're reading that but a completely unsuited AKQJ is worth about 2.5c less than AKQJ with two of the high card suited, and it's because of the possibilities of either a flush, SF or RF where in the first instance you have none of those.
rose030784
rose030784
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 4
Joined: Mar 24, 2011
March 24th, 2011 at 1:39:36 PM permalink
Thanks. I agree with your logic but I got this from the wizard of odds intermediate table which seems to say the opposite. See #12 & #13. Here's the link:
RobSinger
RobSinger
  • Threads: 5
  • Posts: 199
Joined: Oct 6, 2010
March 24th, 2011 at 1:52:04 PM permalink
I'm not following you. Here's what #'s 12 & 13 say and they're not related to your question:

2 5 7 J J — High pair vs. 4 to a flush: Keep high pair
8 9 T J J — High pair vs. 4 to a straight: Keep high pair
MathExtremist
MathExtremist
  • Threads: 88
  • Posts: 6526
Joined: Aug 31, 2010
March 24th, 2011 at 3:17:36 PM permalink
See the second numbers 12 and 13 (further down the page). By inference, "unsuited" means that the four high cards have at least 2 suits and no more than two of any one suit, since if you had 3 to the royal you'd hold that instead (see rule 7). What that means is that, for a hand like Ah Ks Qh Js 3c, you'd hold all four high cards instead of just two suited ones. There are some exceptions to that rule, such as if you had QJ suited (just hold that instead) but generally the ordering is accurate. Remember, this isn't an optimal strategy, it's near-optimal.
"In my own case, when it seemed to me after a long illness that death was close at hand, I found no little solace in playing constantly at dice." -- Girolamo Cardano, 1563
teddys
teddys
  • Threads: 150
  • Posts: 5527
Joined: Nov 14, 2009
March 24th, 2011 at 3:50:31 PM permalink
The Wizard has condensed/conflated some strategy decisions for his intermediate strategy.

AKQJ unsuited is better than two suited high cards, unless the two suited high cards are a QJ.

This little distinction won't save you all that much money over the long run, hence the easy-to-remember rule to always hold the AKQJ.
"Dice, verily, are armed with goads and driving-hooks, deceiving and tormenting, causing grievous woe." -Rig Veda 10.34.4
rose030784
rose030784
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 4
Joined: Mar 24, 2011
March 25th, 2011 at 12:16:38 PM permalink
I get it now. AKQJ unsuited does NOT mean 4 different suits only. The chart should really just say AKQJ period because if 3 or 4 were suited you would have a higher ranked hand. Thanks.
JIMMYFOCKER
JIMMYFOCKER
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 540
Joined: Jan 24, 2011
March 29th, 2011 at 11:05:56 AM permalink
Quote: RobSinger

I'm not following you. Here's what #'s 12 & 13 say and they're not related to your question:

2 5 7 J J — High pair vs. 4 to a flush: Keep high pair
8 9 T J J — High pair vs. 4 to a straight: Keep high pair



If one doesn't know this, abandon JOB.
  • Jump to: