Thread Rating:

vonnegut
vonnegut
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 13
Joined: May 28, 2014
Thanked by
Forager
January 10th, 2019 at 6:32:57 PM permalink
Quote: FinsRule

Allowing AP play makes no sense on any level for casinos. I have no idea why they allow it. If I owned a casino, I’d set every slot, table game and vp to pay 95-99%.

I’d offer no free play and only give hotel and buffet comps.



I look at this from a poker player's perspective, and I strongly disagree enough to post.

A poker room manager can look at a professional poker player the same way a casino manager looks at an AP. Every dollar a pro poker player takes out of the cardroom is a dollar that would likely have been raked off if it had gone to a rec. If you owned a poker room, maybe you'd opt to increase the rake collection to a point where +EV play became impossible... say 10% of each pot, no cap. I've seen rakes this high in Caribbean casinos. This pretty much makes sure that every player who comes in will be a loser in the long run.

It also completely kills the games.

Cardroom managers should think of pro poker players as basically a marketing cost. They go around bragging about their wins to their friends and family, bringing more interest to the game. They fill seats, giving social proof to the random recs that pass by. Many of the pros who THINK they are beating the game, are actually longterm losers who will eventually rake off just like those random recs they look down on... or lose it in -EV pit games. It is much cheaper to create an ecosystem where a few 1/2nl grinders can beat the game than to pay prop players and shills to fill those 1/2 seats.

Casinos really should be thinking of APs in the same way. They are very good for the longterm health of the industry.

Incidentally, this is why I'm much more bullish on IGT stock than any other slot machine manufacturer. They actually seem to get this concept... that if you make a variable state machine capable of being vultured, you are never going to have an empty seat for long. And even if it's just some AP going through GE coins or UXP multipliers, it gives the illusion of action to the random rec who is there for a conference and trying to decide between the Buffalo Grand machine or the Sphinx 4d.

I haven't seen the numbers, but I'd bet that all things being equal, a slot machine that is vulnerable to advantage play overall will outperform one that isn't.
I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center.
FinsRule
FinsRule
  • Threads: 128
  • Posts: 3914
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
January 10th, 2019 at 6:36:06 PM permalink
I respect your opinion, but I don’t think you can compare poker players to AP.
vonnegut
vonnegut
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 13
Joined: May 28, 2014
January 10th, 2019 at 6:38:34 PM permalink
Well... I just did. So I guess you can.
I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center.
TomG
TomG
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 2426
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
January 10th, 2019 at 6:51:00 PM permalink
Quote: vonnegut

Well... I just did. So I guess you can.



But the comparison fails. When a winning poker player plays at a casino, it increases their revenue by adding to the rake. When a winning video poker player plays at a casino, it decreases their revenue by losing money to him.

-----

The higher level video poker players that I know are doing as well as ever (some even better than ever, giving up other plays to focus more time on VP). But they are definitely spreading their action around a lot more. Based on that, I would say not dead, just harder to find. At the lower levels, from my perspective, it's the same as it always has been in Las Vegas.
terapined
terapined
  • Threads: 89
  • Posts: 6092
Joined: Dec 1, 2012
January 10th, 2019 at 7:16:25 PM permalink
Quote: vonnegut

I look at this from a poker player's perspective, and I strongly disagree enough to post.

A poker room manager can look at a professional poker player the same way a casino manager looks at an AP..




I just don't buy this
I play at some crowded poker rooms
Tampa Hard Rock generally has 30 to 40 tables going
The Tampa Hard Rock could care less if some pros are in the room.
The cardroom is going to make good money regardless
but
They will watch their BJ tables closely
beachbumbabs
beachbumbabs
  • Threads: 100
  • Posts: 14260
Joined: May 21, 2013
January 10th, 2019 at 8:50:44 PM permalink
Welcome back to the forum, vonnegut.

I highly recommend vonnegut's recent blog post. Might give folks some idea where he's coming from on this. I too think it's a flawed analogy in some ways, but I take his point.
If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.
tringlomane
tringlomane
  • Threads: 8
  • Posts: 6281
Joined: Aug 25, 2012
January 10th, 2019 at 8:59:27 PM permalink
Quote: terapined

I just don't buy this
I play at some crowded poker rooms
Tampa Hard Rock generally has 30 to 40 tables going
The Tampa Hard Rock could care less if some pros are in the room.
The cardroom is going to make good money regardless
but
They will watch their BJ tables closely



Florida had restrictive poker rules until a few years ago. Give it another decade; they won't be that busy.
PokerGrinder
PokerGrinder
  • Threads: 26
  • Posts: 5013
Joined: Apr 30, 2015
January 10th, 2019 at 9:37:54 PM permalink
Quote: beachbumbabs

Welcome back to the forum, vonnegut.

I highly recommend vonnegut's recent blog post. Might give folks some idea where he's coming from on this. I too think it's a flawed analogy in some ways, but I take his point.


Thanks for the heads up on the blog post, it was a good read!
You can shear a sheep a hundred times, but you can skin it only once. — Amarillo Slim Preston
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26435
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
January 10th, 2019 at 9:50:39 PM permalink
Quote: TomG

But the comparison fails. When a winning poker player plays at a casino, it increases their revenue by adding to the rake. When a winning video poker player plays at a casino, it decreases their revenue by losing money to him.



I agree 100%.

I've heard vonnegut's argument before. Some AP's think they are actually healthy for the gaming business by giving recreational players hope of winning. I think they say this to give themselves a sense of economic worth to society. However, most people don't care if other players win or lose and I suspect those few who do care prefer other players to lose, so that the casino remains financially healthy and more inclined to be generous to their customers and profitable to their stock-holders.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
bobbartop
bobbartop
  • Threads: 133
  • Posts: 2594
Joined: Mar 15, 2016
January 10th, 2019 at 11:22:11 PM permalink
Quote: TomG

When a winning video poker player plays at a casino, it decreases their revenue by losing money to him.



At the risk of repeating myself ad nauseum, the above doesn't apply to some winning APs playing progressive video poker. An AP playing a 7-5 Bonus Poker progressive with an 8000 coin jackpot is playing a winning game. As long as the casino is not giving him too much in mailers or benefits, the casino is winning off his play. The jackpot is "banked". That leaves him playing a 98% base game. If this AP adjusts his strategy to play more aggressively toward the jackpot, he's losing even more on the base game, but winning more on the whole, and so is the casino, a win-win, symbiotic relationship.

So I would set my casino up like that, and roll out the red carpet for certain APs, like the Progressive Video Poker Symbionese Liberation Army.
'Emergencies' have always been the pretext on which the safeguards of individual liberty have been eroded.
bobbartop
bobbartop
  • Threads: 133
  • Posts: 2594
Joined: Mar 15, 2016
January 10th, 2019 at 11:30:21 PM permalink
Quote: Wizard

I agree 100%.

I've heard vonnegut's argument before. Some AP's think they are actually healthy for the gaming business by giving recreational players hope of winning. I think they say this to give themselves a sense of economic worth to society. However, most people don't care if other players win or lose and I suspect those few who do care prefer other players to lose, so that the casino remains financially healthy and more inclined to be generous to their customers and profitable to their stock-holders.



I may be wrong, but didn't Bill Zender basically believe in ignoring most green chip play? I am still of the opinion that a full crowd attracts more people, meaning an overall increase in the casino's profit. Just get them in and under your roof, the rest will all work out.

I'm also pretty sure Zender PROVED that poor penetration costs the House money.
'Emergencies' have always been the pretext on which the safeguards of individual liberty have been eroded.
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
  • Threads: 164
  • Posts: 22272
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
January 11th, 2019 at 2:09:29 AM permalink
I would have nothing but advantage play stuff, once all the Pros were doing their thing I would let them all win a little, then I would gaff the hell out of everything.

It must just be variance, boys.

(-;
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
terapined
terapined
  • Threads: 89
  • Posts: 6092
Joined: Dec 1, 2012
January 11th, 2019 at 5:02:12 AM permalink
Quote: tringlomane

Florida had restrictive poker rules until a few years ago. Give it another decade; they won't be that busy.



????????
Do you live in Florida?
Its been 10 years since they uncapped poker. Not a few years.
The poker room has grown the last 10 years. Really grown.
The last 10 years, they have moved the poker room 3 times because the room needed to be expanded 3 times due to massive business
You obviously don't understand gambling in Florida
The Hard Rock Tampa is one of the busiest casinos in the country
They keep expanding because business is growing. Its like the 6th largest casino on the planet
They will continue to make tons of money into the next decade
That's guaranteed because they have a monopoly
No competition for hundreds of miles
A huge city like Orlando, where do you go to play poker, you drive to Tampa
tringlomane
tringlomane
  • Threads: 8
  • Posts: 6281
Joined: Aug 25, 2012
January 11th, 2019 at 7:16:38 AM permalink
Quote: terapined

????????
Do you live in Florida?
Its been 10 years since they uncapped poker. Not a few years.
The poker room has grown the last 10 years. Really grown.
The last 10 years, they have moved the poker room 3 times because the room needed to be expanded 3 times due to massive business
You obviously don't understand gambling in Florida
The Hard Rock Tampa is one of the busiest casinos in the country
They keep expanding because business is growing. Its like the 6th largest casino on the planet
They will continue to make tons of money into the next decade
That's guaranteed because they have a monopoly
No competition for hundreds of miles
A huge city like Orlando, where do you go to play poker, you drive to Tampa



We're both wrong. But you're closer than me.

It's been since uncapped since July 1, 2010. But happy for you that Florida still acts like they are poker circa 2006 apparently. It's been dead in STL for years. And we had a $500 loss limit every two hours until 2008.

https://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/state--regional/limit-poker-becomes-legal-florida/wZp0EkODmGzv4FOAbfZ8VP/
SOOPOO
SOOPOO
  • Threads: 121
  • Posts: 10942
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
January 11th, 2019 at 7:36:00 AM permalink
Quote: terapined

If I am not a professional gambler
Why cant I itemize and deduct my losses



Ed, since I know you are a single guy, and I have a general idea about your income, you will most likely just use the 'standard deduction' which will exceed any combination of itemized deductions, including gambling losses. I am not an expert, but pretty sure that's how it works.
FinsRule
FinsRule
  • Threads: 128
  • Posts: 3914
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
January 11th, 2019 at 7:36:01 AM permalink
Is Ameritstar STL still the best casino? I think it’s my favorite non-Vegas casino I’ve been to.

FinsRule casino would be modeled after that.
mcallister3200
mcallister3200
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 3577
Joined: Dec 29, 2013
January 11th, 2019 at 8:14:34 AM permalink
Quote: FinsRule

Is Ameritstar STL still the best casino? I think it’s my favorite non-Vegas casino I’ve been to.

FinsRule casino would be modeled after that.



Lol. I would answer no, but to do so would be to acknowledge that they were the best? Will assume was meant as a joke.
Nathan
Nathan
  • Threads: 65
  • Posts: 3675
Joined: Sep 2, 2016
January 11th, 2019 at 9:00:14 AM permalink
IINM, Blackjack seems to be getting more and more attention and popularity nowadays over both Video Poker and normal Poker.
In both The Hunger Games and in gambling, may the odds be ever in your favor. :D "Man Babes" #AxelFabulous "Olive oil is processed but it only has one ingredient, olive oil."-Even Bob, March 27/28th. :D The 2 year war is over! Woo-hoo! :D I sometimes speak in metaphors. ;) Remember this. ;) Crack the code. :D 8.9.13.25.14.1.13.5.9.19.14.1.20.8.1.14! :D "For about the 4096th time, let me offer a radical idea to those of you who don't like Nathan -- block her and don't visit Nathan's Corner. What is so complicated about it?" Wizard, August 21st. :D
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 16282
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
Thanked by
beachbumbabs
January 11th, 2019 at 9:47:56 AM permalink
Many people are talking about blackjack. I think it has something to do with how well Fredrick Douglass is doing.
The difference between fiction and reality is that fiction is supposed to make sense.
KevinAA
KevinAA
  • Threads: 18
  • Posts: 283
Joined: Jul 6, 2017
January 11th, 2019 at 4:12:52 PM permalink
In the real world (in Reno anyway), the casinos that do have 99% VP have installed both 98% and 99% machines on the floor. You have to look at the paytable to see which one is 98% and which one is 99%. They are usually in different sections of the floor, but one casino has a 98% Bonus Poker machine sitting right next to a 99% Bonus Poker machine.

It seems that most VP players do not look at the paytable. They just sit down and start playing. So if half the machines are 98% and half are 99%, the casino's overall VP payback is 98.5%. It seems that more than half are 98%. If the casino gets greedy and makes them all 98%, a bunch of people (such as myself) will never visit.

In addition, not everyone is a good VP player. Every so often I watch someone else play, and it is rare for someone to hold just A when there is a two to a royal TA. That is the most common mistake.

I also frequently see people hold JQA different suits instead of JQ.

Many people are what I call "royal flush guy". Royal Flush Guy holds whatever cards are in a royal flush, like suited KA instead of a pair of 5's. This is much more common when there is a progressive jackpot. The jackpot never gets high enough to do that, but when people see a five quarters jackpot of $1,100, they become Royal Flush Guy, and the casino makes more money off them. The extra 100 bucks in the jackpot came from a very small portion of previous bets that did not win a royal flush. Royal Flush Guy makes the casino so much money with his bad play, the casino could simply donate 100 dollars to the jackpot and still make money.

Yesterday I saw the absolute worst VP player ever. She would hold 2 and 9 of the same suit (two to a flush!) instead of a single J. She would hold suited QK and an unsuited J. She would hold 3 to an inside straight (like 357, different suits) instead of an A. She was much, much worse than Royal Flush Guy. She was "Atrocious Video Poker Player Gal".

It's similar to blackjack, where the house edge is 0.6% if you play basic strategy and don't make side bets. But the vast majority of players do make side bets, and most people make basic strategy mistakes, like splitting a pair of 4's when you can't double after split (or splitting a pair of 6's vs dealer 9, and so on). Splitting is fun, right! And then some people are absolutely terrible, like hitting 17 or 18. The dealer will say "are you sure?" and they go with this gut feeling that the next card is really small. I was told that the average blackjack player loses 5% of the bet. Wow, that is significantly more than 0.6%!

So you people can stop fretting over the existence of the very low house edge games of video poker and blackjack. There are so few people who play them with basic strategy, let alone perfect strategy, that it doesn't matter. If everyone played VP or BJ with basic strategy, the casino would be alarmed at the huge drop in profits and rip out those games and install more slot machines.

The fact that those games exist at all is proof that the casino is not going to go out of business, and it's not a non-profit that makes just enough from the slots to pay expenses.
bobbartop
bobbartop
  • Threads: 133
  • Posts: 2594
Joined: Mar 15, 2016
January 11th, 2019 at 7:29:04 PM permalink
Quote: KevinAA


Many people are what I call "royal flush guy". Royal Flush Guy holds whatever cards are in a royal flush, like suited KA instead of a pair of 5's.



Here's a few interesting hands. Say, for whatever reason, you're playing 9-6-5 Double Bonus. The hand consists of 'JT9' suited and an offsuited small pair.

JT922 hold the 22
JT933 hold the 33
JT944 hold the 44
JT955 hold the JT9
JT966 hold the JT9
JT977 hold the 77
'Emergencies' have always been the pretext on which the safeguards of individual liberty have been eroded.
djatc
djatc
  • Threads: 83
  • Posts: 4477
Joined: Jan 15, 2013
January 12th, 2019 at 12:27:52 AM permalink
I think I mentioned this a while back but I've seen 4 to a straight with 1 deuce, ace and a wild on deuces, and 77K or something like that. Gotta love those people

EXCEPT when they are playing 4 hands on 100 play when it's the only machine that can get reasonable coin in (like on quarters) :(
"Man Babes" #AxelFabulous
tringlomane
tringlomane
  • Threads: 8
  • Posts: 6281
Joined: Aug 25, 2012
January 12th, 2019 at 8:40:14 AM permalink
Quote: FinsRule

Is Ameritstar STL still the best casino? I think it’s my favorite non-Vegas casino I’ve been to.

FinsRule casino would be modeled after that.



Overall it's near the top in the state, impressive for 17 years since its last major remodel. But since boyd took it over that might change. And earning status though VP is shot now.

Quote: mcallister3200

Lol. I would answer no, but to do so would be to acknowledge that they were the best? Will assume was meant as a joke.



I think he meant the "best casino in Missouri", which I would lean toward "no, but it's close to it". I personally like River City better. Both casinos are examples of well-run casinos though.
FinsRule
FinsRule
  • Threads: 128
  • Posts: 3914
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
January 12th, 2019 at 8:57:44 AM permalink
Quote: tringlomane

Overall it's near the top in the state, impressive for 17 years since its last major remodel. But since boyd took it over that might change. And earning status though VP is shot now.



I think he meant the "best casino in Missouri", which I would lean toward "no, but it's close to it". I personally like River City better. Both casinos are examples of well-run casinos though.



I did mean best casino in STL area. Ameristar has friendly dealers, good game variety, good food and atmosphere. Checked all the boxes. River City was fine too.
KevinAA
KevinAA
  • Threads: 18
  • Posts: 283
Joined: Jul 6, 2017
January 12th, 2019 at 9:09:17 AM permalink
Quote: djatc

I think I mentioned this a while back but I've seen 4 to a straight with 1 deuce, ace and a wild on deuces, and 77K or something like that. Gotta love those people

EXCEPT when they are playing 4 hands on 100 play when it's the only machine that can get reasonable coin in (like on quarters) :(



There is one casino here where the only 99% VP is 100 draw poker. I have done 5c denom and 4 hands just because of the pay table. I don't like it, though, because the card pictures and buttons are smaller than single draw VP which gets annoying. I also did 20c denom (max choice) and just 1 hand, effectively doing single draw VP for $1/hand total bet. That's even more annoying because almost all of the screen is full of blank cards. My attempt to win $800 on a royal flush didn't work the one time I tried that.

I forgot to mention another thing that people do that increases the house edge -- betting less than 5 coins. Bet 1,2,3 or 4 kind of randomly. Bet 4 is such a dumb move. To save 25 cents on the bet, you're willing to "lose" $750 (as in, win $750 less) if you get a royal flush? LOL
tringlomane
tringlomane
  • Threads: 8
  • Posts: 6281
Joined: Aug 25, 2012
Thanked by
RogerKint
January 12th, 2019 at 9:23:45 AM permalink
Quote: KevinAA

I forgot to mention another thing that people do that increases the house edge -- betting less than 5 coins. Bet 1,2,3 or 4 kind of randomly. Bet 4 is such a dumb move. To save 25 cents on the bet, you're willing to "lose" $750 (as in, win $750 less) if you get a royal flush? LOL



A lot of people will bet 4 at bars because the bartender will tell them it's a minimum $1 bet to get a comp drink and they don't know any better. Lol
Sandybestdog
Sandybestdog
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 328
Joined: Feb 3, 2015
Thanked by
tringlomane
January 17th, 2019 at 6:25:35 PM permalink
I can think of one possible benefit of putting 99%+ machines at a casino. If it attracts higher stakes players who would normally not play and they put a lot of coin in through, it raises the overall coin in of all machines but also raises the total slot payout percentage. If these machines break even or only hold 1% after factoring comps and freeplay, it’s a benefit to the casino if they wish to tout their higher slot payouts than their competition. This could draw more ploppies to play slots thinking they are getting better return than the casino down the street when in fact they are not.
  • Jump to: