Poll
![]() | 1 vote (12.5%) | ||
![]() | 1 vote (12.5%) | ||
No votes (0%) | |||
![]() | 2 votes (25%) | ||
![]() | 1 vote (12.5%) | ||
![]() | 1 vote (12.5%) | ||
![]() | 1 vote (12.5%) | ||
![]() | 1 vote (12.5%) | ||
![]() | 1 vote (12.5%) | ||
![]() | 3 votes (37.5%) |
8 members have voted
December 19th, 2017 at 11:33:06 AM
permalink
One video poker game I've never fully understood the rules for is Powerhouse Poker. It is probably the most popular video poker variant not covered on WoO because I can't perfectly quantify the rules. What we do know is that if player gets a paying hand on the deal, he wins bonus hands. Some of these bonus hands will have a multiplier. The game tells you the number of bonus hands and the maximum multiplier, but not an average multiplier or a sum of multipliers. In playing 9-5 Jacks 5-play at VideoPoker.com, I've gathered the sum of the multipliers for only the bottom three hands, as follows:
Here are some examples by hand dealt:
Jacks or better: 1-1-3, 1-2-2 (both total 5)
Two pair: 1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-2 (total of 10)
Three of a kind: 2-1-1-3-1-1-3-2-1, 3-2-1-3-1-1-1-1-2 (total of 15)
Can anyone explain what is going on with the higher hands on the deal?
The question for the poll is do you play Powerhouse Poker?
* Verified by Miplet
Hand | Base pay | Number bonus hands | Maximum multiplier | Sum of multipliers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Royal flush | 800 | 3 | 3 | ? |
Straight flush | 50 | 3 | 3 | ? |
Four of a kind | 25 | 3 | 3 | ? |
Full house | 9 | 9 | 5 | ? |
Flush | 5 | 9 | 5 | 35* |
Straight | 4 | 9 | 5 | ? |
Three of a kind | 3 | 9 | 5 | 15 |
Two pair | 2 | 9 | 2 | 10 |
Jacks or Better | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
Here are some examples by hand dealt:
Jacks or better: 1-1-3, 1-2-2 (both total 5)
Two pair: 1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-2 (total of 10)
Three of a kind: 2-1-1-3-1-1-3-2-1, 3-2-1-3-1-1-1-1-2 (total of 15)
Can anyone explain what is going on with the higher hands on the deal?
The question for the poll is do you play Powerhouse Poker?
* Verified by Miplet
Last edited by: Wizard on Dec 19, 2017
“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” -- Carl Sagan
December 19th, 2017 at 11:39:04 AM
permalink
I've played it on the site but wouldn't for real money.
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
December 19th, 2017 at 12:15:57 PM
permalink
My flush had 1-3-4-4-4-4-5-5-5 for a sum of 35
“Man Babes” #AxelFabulous
December 19th, 2017 at 12:35:25 PM
permalink
Quote: mipletMy flush had 1-3-4-4-4-4-5-5-5 for a sum of 35
Was this for 9-5 Jacks? If not, what was the base pay on a flush?
“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” -- Carl Sagan
December 19th, 2017 at 1:25:01 PM
permalink
Yes.Quote: WizardWas this for 9-5 Jacks? If not, what was the base pay on a flush?

“Man Babes” #AxelFabulous
December 19th, 2017 at 1:39:32 PM
permalink
Thank you.
“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” -- Carl Sagan
December 19th, 2017 at 1:39:46 PM
permalink
Full house 1-4-5-5-5-5-5-5-5 for 40


“Man Babes” #AxelFabulous
December 19th, 2017 at 1:46:14 PM
permalink
Another flush 2-2-3-3-5-5-5-5-5 total 35. Pic available if needed.
3rd flush 2-2-3-4-4-5-5-5-5 for 35
3rd flush 2-2-3-4-4-5-5-5-5 for 35
“Man Babes” #AxelFabulous
December 19th, 2017 at 1:49:17 PM
permalink
Here is a similar table for 10-play 9-5 Jacks or Better.
There is some discussion about the question at hand in the VideoPoker.com forum but nobody there seems to know the answer or even understand what the question is.
Hand | Base pay | Number bonus hands | Maximum multiplier | Value of bonus hands |
---|---|---|---|---|
Royal flush | 800 | 9 | 2 | ? |
Straight flush | 50 | 9 | 2 | ? |
Four of a kind | 25 | 9 | 2 | ? |
Full house | 9 | 9 | 10 | ? |
Flush | 5 | 9 | 10 | ? |
Straight | 4 | 9 | 10 | ? |
Three of a kind | 3 | 9 | 10 | 30 |
Two pair | 2 | 9 | 10 | 20 |
Jacks or Better | 1 | 9 | 2 | 10 |
There is some discussion about the question at hand in the VideoPoker.com forum but nobody there seems to know the answer or even understand what the question is.
“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” -- Carl Sagan
December 19th, 2017 at 1:57:17 PM
permalink
interesting.. like Double Pay except you get a random return for winning dealt hands in the form of random bonus hands instead of a fixed amount.
and to add to the variance, some of the bonus hands are multiplied.
an action junkie's dream!
the sum of the multipliers are fixed for each type of winning dealt hand?
and you cant calc the returns?
have you asked the manufacturer?
and to add to the variance, some of the bonus hands are multiplied.
an action junkie's dream!
the sum of the multipliers are fixed for each type of winning dealt hand?
and you cant calc the returns?
have you asked the manufacturer?
Craps is paradise (Pair of dice).
Lets hear it for the SpeedCount Mathletes :)