Roulette - bet 33 numbers in clusters
November 16th, 2010 at 7:33:22 PM
permalink
What if instead of blindly betting 1-33, I excluded 3 numbers that are next to each other?
By that - I mean if 6, 20, and 32 are all next to each other, bet the other 33 numbers. My way of thinking is that instead of having
5 areas of doom on the roulette wheel, I only have to worry about the zeroes, and the 3 number cluster. I could reduce the threat
a bit further if my cluster focused around one of the zeroes. The ball would have a wider margin for error.
The problem is this can't be tested on a computer, since this idea involves physics and not just a random number generator.
Would this work? Or would I just be better off betting 2 grids?
By that - I mean if 6, 20, and 32 are all next to each other, bet the other 33 numbers. My way of thinking is that instead of having
5 areas of doom on the roulette wheel, I only have to worry about the zeroes, and the 3 number cluster. I could reduce the threat
a bit further if my cluster focused around one of the zeroes. The ball would have a wider margin for error.
The problem is this can't be tested on a computer, since this idea involves physics and not just a random number generator.
Would this work? Or would I just be better off betting 2 grids?
November 16th, 2010 at 8:33:36 PM
permalink
No, it wouldn't work. There is no way to beat roulette with a system. People have been trying for 200 years and so far it hasn't been done. A bunch of negatives never add up to a positive.
"It's not called gambling if the math is on your side."
November 16th, 2010 at 9:06:24 PM
permalink
Quote: rocketmanWhat if instead of blindly betting 1-33, I excluded 3 numbers that are next to each other?
By that - I mean if 6, 20, and 32 are all next to each other, bet the other 33 numbers. My way of thinking is that instead of having
5 areas of doom on the roulette wheel, I only have to worry about the zeroes, and the 3 number cluster. I could reduce the threat
a bit further if my cluster focused around one of the zeroes. The ball would have a wider margin for error.
The problem is this can't be tested on a computer, since this idea involves physics and not just a random number generator.
Would this work? Or would I just be better off betting 2 grids?
There is exactly the same chance of the ball landing in one of three numbers that are widely separated on the wheel, as of the ball landing in one of three numbers that are adjacent to one another.
Beating roulette is impossible. Furthermore, every idea you can possibly think of to try to beat it has already been thought of (and in many cases, tested in the casino) by thousands, if not millions, of other people.
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality.---George Bernard Shaw
November 17th, 2010 at 9:52:21 PM
permalink
I'm sorry, Im new to this site, and didnt notice there was a betting system section. Can a mod move it? Thanks
