Using martingale to scalp a win in MLB Postseason
Compare Online MLB Odds
Baseball : MLB Today
| Upcoming matches | Game | Money Line | Spread | Total | Featured Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu Apr 10th 1pm Cleveland Guardians Chicago White Sox | Cleveland Guardians - Chicago White Sox |  -215 | 100 |  102 ⇘1.00 | The Cleveland Guardians take on the Chicago White Sox in a tightly contested MLB matchup. Both teams have shown fluctuating form throughout the season, making betting predictions challenging. |
Show all mlb Odds
October 3rd, 2010 at 10:41:24 AM
permalink
I read about this somewhere but don't remember the exact way to do it. Most of the time MLB postseason games go more than 4 games. All of the time it is impossible to lose more than 4 in the series. So martingaling a team means you need 1+2+4+8=15 units.
So, the strategy (not system) went this way. Bet enough to win 15 units on the favorite. Then bet on the underdog each game, martingaling your bet if they lose. Then you stand the best chance of winning the most. If it goes to 7 games a person could have a guaranteed payday.
I don't call this "hedging" as much as I call it "scalping." Similar to an equities trader who takes a small profit on a short-term situation. No one everf went broke taking profits. So, is this a viable strategy? Am I missing an improtant part of it?
So, the strategy (not system) went this way. Bet enough to win 15 units on the favorite. Then bet on the underdog each game, martingaling your bet if they lose. Then you stand the best chance of winning the most. If it goes to 7 games a person could have a guaranteed payday.
I don't call this "hedging" as much as I call it "scalping." Similar to an equities trader who takes a small profit on a short-term situation. No one everf went broke taking profits. So, is this a viable strategy? Am I missing an improtant part of it?
All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others
