I also wouldn't be surprised if casinos are just compensating for his losses somehow as well.
Quote: ChumpChangeThere's new US laws coming out and new international laws coming out and it's forcing YouTube to demand ID, or they will use their all-knowing AI to determine if you are over 18. Gambling videos are not kid videos. This is a developing story. Makes me wonder if this website will have to go behind a paywall. If they are trying to make the internet kid-friendly, they are going to shut down the vast majority of the internet.
link to original post
I would not recommend giving ID to Google or any Google property such as YouTube. Post your stuff on Rumble. Nice clean interface, no digital mess or invasive practices.
Quote: ChumpChangeI don't approve of the content creators on Rumble.
link to original post
Then create some content there! Then there will be at least one you like. (Or maybe not, who knows?)
Quote: AutomaticMonkeyQuote: ChumpChangeThere's new US laws coming out and new international laws coming out and it's forcing YouTube to demand ID, or they will use their all-knowing AI to determine if you are over 18. Gambling videos are not kid videos. This is a developing story. Makes me wonder if this website will have to go behind a paywall. If they are trying to make the internet kid-friendly, they are going to shut down the vast majority of the internet.
link to original post
I would not recommend giving ID to Google or any Google property such as YouTube. Post your stuff on Rumble. Nice clean interface, no digital mess or invasive practices.
link to original post
Sadly, Google got my docs back when they were feigning commitment to the "don't be evil" motto. They don't forget things, and migration would be a pain.
I haven't found a satisfactory alternative.
Quote: DieterQuote: AutomaticMonkeyQuote: ChumpChangeThere's new US laws coming out and new international laws coming out and it's forcing YouTube to demand ID, or they will use their all-knowing AI to determine if you are over 18. Gambling videos are not kid videos. This is a developing story. Makes me wonder if this website will have to go behind a paywall. If they are trying to make the internet kid-friendly, they are going to shut down the vast majority of the internet.
link to original post
I would not recommend giving ID to Google or any Google property such as YouTube. Post your stuff on Rumble. Nice clean interface, no digital mess or invasive practices.
link to original post
Sadly, Google got my docs back when they were feigning commitment to the "don't be evil" motto. They don't forget things, and migration would be a pain.
I haven't found a satisfactory alternative.
link to original post
So your saying you got Scroogled
Quote: rainmanQuote: DieterQuote: AutomaticMonkeyQuote: ChumpChangeThere's new US laws coming out and new international laws coming out and it's forcing YouTube to demand ID, or they will use their all-knowing AI to determine if you are over 18. Gambling videos are not kid videos. This is a developing story. Makes me wonder if this website will have to go behind a paywall. If they are trying to make the internet kid-friendly, they are going to shut down the vast majority of the internet.
link to original post
I would not recommend giving ID to Google or any Google property such as YouTube. Post your stuff on Rumble. Nice clean interface, no digital mess or invasive practices.
link to original post
Sadly, Google got my docs back when they were feigning commitment to the "don't be evil" motto. They don't forget things, and migration would be a pain.
I haven't found a satisfactory alternative.
link to original post
So your saying you got Scroogled
link to original post
The only part I feel jammed by is they've increased the service charges because of the Gemini rollout. I don't use it, I can't disable it, I can't opt out of paying for it.
I really need to check how much it bumped the bill. I can only imagine people will scream if pricing quadrupled with no chance to avoid it.
Quote: Roberto21Just wondering all y’all opinion on what you think of Vegas Matt’s content strategy. He’s lost over 400k this year alone, I assume it must be a result of bad variance but still can he recover from this to make the channel profitable? Do you think the ‘Get even, or get even worse’ strategy is too volatile for a slot channel that might be demonetized in years to come? Curious to hear your thoughts, opinions, ideas on this. I simply only follow him for the win/loss tally or the $500+ spins at this point.
link to original post
https://slate.com/life/2025/03/las-vegas-matt-youtube-gambling-casino-slots-hotel.html
“People give estimates of what they think we’re making, and it’s always way low,”
“Our watch hours on YouTube [in December 2024] were, like, 5.7 million hours. And there’s a commercial every 10 minutes.”
John Cerasani is all over FB (and I do not mean Fontainebleau) but his content seems to consist mostly of grim faced attempts to dig himself out of a hole playing blackjack. That sort of thing is tiring to me. He has tried to spice it up with a somewhat cute busty companion or two.
Quote: 100xOddsQuote: Roberto21Just wondering all y’all opinion on what you think of Vegas Matt’s content strategy. He’s lost over 400k this year alone, I assume it must be a result of bad variance but still can he recover from this to make the channel profitable? Do you think the ‘Get even, or get even worse’ strategy is too volatile for a slot channel that might be demonetized in years to come? Curious to hear your thoughts, opinions, ideas on this. I simply only follow him for the win/loss tally or the $500+ spins at this point.
link to original post
https://slate.com/life/2025/03/las-vegas-matt-youtube-gambling-casino-slots-hotel.html
“People give estimates of what they think we’re making, and it’s always way low,”
“Our watch hours on YouTube [in December 2024] were, like, 5.7 million hours. And there’s a commercial every 10 minutes.”
link to original post
I honestly read,"5.7 million as ," YouTube revenue is 5.7 million DOLLARS at first and I thought,"That's actually REALLY good money to be getting from YouTube for doing something he enjoys doing anyways!" 😀 and then I saw the part where he says his YouTube revenue is actually always way low and I saw ,"5.7 million HOURS, and it's not REVENUE and I thought,"Yikes!" 😬
Lady Luck said something like," Miran and I play high because we can afford to because Miran and I have REALLY high paying Careers and can afford to lose big money. We lose more money than we win. Don't let the constant $10,000 spins and $100,000 wins make you think we get our big money from gambling and making Slot videos on YouTube. Most of our money comes from our successful Careers, not from gambling and making Slot videos on YouTube."
I thought that was a REALLY refreshing thing for her to say that she and Miran actually lose more than they win and the bulk of their money comes from their successful Careers and not from gambling and making Slot videos on YouTube, 😀💡 but I later learned that they quit their successful Careers to be full time Gamblers! 🤦♀️ They should have kept the successful Careers and kept the gambling and making Slot videos as a hobby! 💡
Vegas Matt’s losses sound unentertainingly low compared to Adnin Ross’. Perhaps he loses in an entertaining manner?
For that matter how many views would an MDawg baccarat video where I dump a quarter mill get? Versus where I win a couple hundred thousand?
Quote: NathanQuote: 100xOddsQuote: Roberto21Just wondering all y’all opinion on what you think of Vegas Matt’s content strategy. He’s lost over 400k this year alone, I assume it must be a result of bad variance but still can he recover from this to make the channel profitable? Do you think the ‘Get even, or get even worse’ strategy is too volatile for a slot channel that might be demonetized in years to come? Curious to hear your thoughts, opinions, ideas on this. I simply only follow him for the win/loss tally or the $500+ spins at this point.
link to original post
https://slate.com/life/2025/03/las-vegas-matt-youtube-gambling-casino-slots-hotel.html
“People give estimates of what they think we’re making, and it’s always way low,”
“Our watch hours on YouTube [in December 2024] were, like, 5.7 million hours. And there’s a commercial every 10 minutes.”
link to original post
I later learned that they quit their successful Careers to be full time Gamblers! 🤦♀️ They should have kept the successful Careers and kept the gambling and making Slot videos as a hobby! 💡
link to original post
The allure of easy YT revenue and the spotlight will mess with anyone's heads! Even someone who worked hard in a reputable field their whole life couldn't resist the idea of literally playing games for 6 figures a month! Imagine how bad it is for compulsive gamblers? Just look at Victor and Slot Lady Sara and how far they've fallen!
If it's a wheel bonus, a market to bet on which wedge. When the bonus plays out, bet on how many straw, wood, gold, platinum mansions will land. Bet on the number of units the bonus will pay. Bet on the number of retriggers the bonus will have. Bet on "back to back" bonuses occurring within 10 spins of each other.
This concept would need coordination with the streamer because they have to slow down play to let markets get bids. But I can see this working with Vegas Matt and crew because his co-streamers would be in there gambling on these markets with the viewers. The haters can bet against them. Someone willing to track all these events with AI could have an edge in their bets. Something like a 4 hour Thursday night event.
maybe you should try that and let us knowQuote: MDawg“People give estimates of what they think we’re making, and it’s always way low” means that he makes a lot more than what people think.
Vegas Matt’s losses sound unentertainingly low compared to Adnin Ross’. Perhaps he loses in an entertaining manner?
For that matter how many views would an MDawg baccarat video where I dump a quarter mill get? Versus where I win a couple hundred thousand?
link to original post
1. The losses are real and fully documented — W2-Gs, tax records, casino accounts. $400k in documented losses is not staged.
2. But the revenue side is substantial enough that it doesn't matter. A channel with that kind of viewership (high-value gambling audience demographic) generates significant YouTube ad revenue, plus sponsorships from online casinos, sportsbooks, and gambling-adjacent brands that pay premium rates because the audience is pre-qualified gamblers with disposable income. That demographic commands some of the highest CPMs on the platform.
3. The "Get even or get even worse" strategy is actually savvy content design, not just a gambling philosophy. It creates narrative tension that keeps viewers coming back. The channel isn't optimized for gambling profit — it's optimized for content engagement, which is a different objective function entirely.
The real risk isn't variance — it's platform risk. If YouTube significantly tightens gambling content monetization (they've already restricted some of it), the revenue calculus changes fast. That's the actual sustainability question, not whether the losses are too high.
From a pure gambling perspective though: $400k/year at negative EV means you'd need extraordinary revenue to justify it as an entertainment budget. For most people that math doesn't work. For him, it clearly does.
I posted on the Slotlady thread about Vegas Matt’s latest escapade because it seems like the OG slot channel thread.
If you think about it, Vegas Matt and crew got lucky (with great timing) and won 250 times their wager unit. I’ve done that on my home slot machine, but I’m wagering one dollar units.
Could this big payday be actually a boon to casinos? Will other slot influencers now have to match the bar that has been raised? Will it cause disaster to ordinary people who think they could also win big by betting big?
These questions and more…
See The Biggest LoserQuote: From SlateMorrow eventually found his calling in multilevel marketing (or, as he calls it, “network marketing”). He claims to have earned “millions” this way, a feat that would make him the exception to the 99 percent who fail to break even after getting wrapped up in the industry. He got his start in 1989 with a company called FundAmerica, which offered members rebates on airline tickets and long-distance telephone calls. (Its founder was arrested in 1990, and FundAmerica filed for bankruptcy months later.) Morrow told me he then became a top earner at Vemma, a dietary supplement company that was shut down in 2015 following a lawsuit from the Federal Trade Commission. (The agency alleged that, among other things, Vemma systematically preyed upon college students.)
Before I could even mount a follow-up question to Morrow about this, he instinctively launched into his defense. It’s as simple as this: MLMs get a bad rap because the wrong people are involved in them. His good name has been tarnished by too many creeps and weirdos. Their failures aren’t just that they can’t motivate others to sign up to sell weight-loss products, Morrow said. The problem is much bigger than that—they don’t have any friends in the first place.
“So many people fail, and they don’t want to take responsibility for their failure. They blame the industry. They say, ‘Oh it’s a scam,’ ” he said. For the first time in our entire day together, there is a flash of venom. “But the reality is, nobody likes you, and you failed because you couldn’t get anyone to join.”
Quote: SlotStrat[says some things]
link to original post
Variance is the least of their problems. The losses at their level of play should be very predictable. Some of them are playing 20-30 spins per minute normally with bursts of 60+ spins per minute. There are extreme outliers, but the risk is so small.
Not that there is not risk, but it is on the casino side rather than youtube. Youtube is trash with no concern for problem gambling or whatever. Casinos do not have that luxury. Their scummy behavior gets noticed. And it is popular to hate casinos right now. Boston Globe, I think, just did a story about exploiting persons of Asian descent.
The content of these videos is not being monitored by anyone. Currently, most casinos simply ignore it. When I put on my savvy investigative journalist hat, I rarely get responses about the casinos allowing their properties to be used to promote problem gambling (possibly while paying) or videos that spread misinformation. Like, when someone makes a video "I am risking my rent money on one outing of blackjack", the casino just pretends it is not happening. Youtube will likely say it just for entertainment, so wevs. Wevs, indeed.
Quote: itsmejeff"Vegas Matt" is Stephen Morrow. He is the king of Las Vegas MLM totally legitimate businesses. He got in on the top on many of them and allegedly later recruited his kid to lure college kids into the mix.
See The Biggest LoserQuote: From SlateMorrow eventually found his calling in multilevel marketing (or, as he calls it, “network marketing”). He claims to have earned “millions” this way, a feat that would make him the exception to the 99 percent who fail to break even after getting wrapped up in the industry. He got his start in 1989 with a company called FundAmerica, which offered members rebates on airline tickets and long-distance telephone calls. (Its founder was arrested in 1990, and FundAmerica filed for bankruptcy months later.) Morrow told me he then became a top earner at Vemma, a dietary supplement company that was shut down in 2015 following a lawsuit from the Federal Trade Commission. (The agency alleged that, among other things, Vemma systematically preyed upon college students.)
Before I could even mount a follow-up question to Morrow about this, he instinctively launched into his defense. It’s as simple as this: MLMs get a bad rap because the wrong people are involved in them. His good name has been tarnished by too many creeps and weirdos. Their failures aren’t just that they can’t motivate others to sign up to sell weight-loss products, Morrow said. The problem is much bigger than that—they don’t have any friends in the first place.
“So many people fail, and they don’t want to take responsibility for their failure. They blame the industry. They say, ‘Oh it’s a scam,’ ” he said. For the first time in our entire day together, there is a flash of venom. “But the reality is, nobody likes you, and you failed because you couldn’t get anyone to join.”Quote: SlotStrat[says some things]
link to original post
Variance is the least of their problems. The losses at their level of play should be very predictable. Some of them are playing 20-30 spins per minute normally with bursts of 60+ spins per minute. There are extreme outliers, but the risk is so small.
Not that there is not risk, but it is on the casino side rather than youtube. Youtube is trash with no concern for problem gambling or whatever. Casinos do not have that luxury. Their scummy behavior gets noticed. And it is popular to hate casinos right now. Boston Globe, I think, just did a story about exploiting persons of Asian descent.
The content of these videos is not being monitored by anyone. Currently, most casinos simply ignore it. When I put on my savvy investigative journalist hat, I rarely get responses about the casinos allowing their properties to be used to promote problem gambling (possibly while paying) or videos that spread misinformation. Like, when someone makes a video "I am risking my rent money on one outing of blackjack", the casino just pretends it is not happening. Youtube will likely say it just for entertainment, so wevs. Wevs, indeed.
link to original post
So his birthname isn't even Matt? It's Stephen? WTF 🤨😐
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1457907612531156
He's going for the grand, currently at 230.
shhhh... quiet
:)

