For example, if you're satisfied playing twenty lines at a penny per line, then you would only be looking at a $0.20 total bet. American Original machines, the old school ones, are such that you only have to bet a total of a penny if you can tolerate that, (YUCK!) by betting only one line at one credit per line!
However, many of the newer machines that are coming out seem to be more expensive. You have games like Yardbirds, Antony & Cleopatra and whatever the hell else is on those banks upon which I believe the minimum bet is $0.50 for all games. You have some Quick Hit machine with what appears to be three games on it (but a bonus that applies to all three) that is a, 'Penny,' machine, but the only possible bet amounts are $1.00, $2.00 and $3.00. You have Buffalo Gold upon which the minimum bet is $0.60, and the new Buffalo machines with the Progressive upon which the minimum bet is $0.75 (as I recall) and one must bet $3.00 or $3.75 to qualify for the Progressive. (Also, as I recall)
There are countless other examples of games that start at $0.50, or more, I'm not listing them all.
Again, I don't know if you tend to prefer new machines over old, but if you do, those machines probably have a higher minimum bet than they did just a few years ago. The result of that, of course, is that you pop in a twenty and are essentially starting out with fewer spins, so sometimes the $20 goes away faster than it used to.
The $20 anecdote I don't take to be literal. You might not know the setting there was, but could make three assumptions. They're better, they're about the same, or they're worse. It would be a strange thing having a casino loosen up without a marketing campaign and seeking credit, wanting to gain credibility over competitors. Even being the same is less likely. People don't expect casinos to change their ways, they expect casinos to make more money without increased demand, by keeping more. Slots slip sliding away is always the expectation unless being proven wrong.
There might be people who think casinos cheat on video poker, but I've never suspected it. If the pay table is the same, I expect probability constant, and fair as always. You don't think the same on slots, because you expect a good thing to not last. They're worse off to begin with, but casinos can hide behind the secrecy and volatility. If you after years have any expectations about worst case scenarios, nightmare scenarios, when it seems different, either you were always wrong assuming or you were right, but now the assumptions are wrong. If you really had choices, things might be different, but slot holds seem identically any place you might travel.
It's best to give up on slots, not to be lured by small investments and big rewards. If you designed a mouse trap, you would not want the mouse getting that cheese, and especially not getting it without being caught. Slots are not much about gambling anymore but paying to see pictures compulsively, never satisfying.
Even quarter and dollar machines are like that now. $10 minimum.Quote: Mission146I don't believe that the machines are becoming tighter, per se, just that they are becoming more expensive. I don't pretend to know what kind of machine you like to play, Nathan, but what I do know is that several new machines (especially at the penny denomination) don't necessarily have the capability for you to directly choose how many lines you wish to play and how much per line.
The casinos got to get rid of buckets, many slot techs, some tellers. All of those things contributed to a huge upsurge in slot revenue. Against that went the more expensive leases and electronic cabinet purchases, and a big jump in royalty pricing with all the tie-in themes for movies, cartoons, celebrities rather than gaming centric but royalty free symbols and themes.
I don't know what the net wound up being over, say, the last 20 years on all that, but my impression is that both the casinos and the distributors made a lot of money in the way up ,then stagnated the last 5 or so years comparatively. The cabinets and royalties keep going up, but the gains from TITO and pennies with aggregate minimums have leveled out.
So now, they have to find more ways to improve the bottom line, and it seems to come in 2 places; lower overall return to player, and many fewer and lower big wins. I am sourly amused every time I hit a "big win" on machines, specifically wms and bally, that gets all the bells and whistles for a 3x total bet win. I suppose on a 50 line machine, with a single.line pay, that.amounts to 150x that line bet, and that's how it's justified, but it doesn't pay doodly-squat when you're forced to play all 50 lines.
/minirant
If casinos want to lower them, leave a suitcase, write those checks, bada bing, bada boom, state minimum now lower.Quote: Mission146There are many state laws mandating minimum returns, and those laws apply to any individual machine in the state in question.
In a place like Nevada, nothing besides the manufacturers not even making one, but they do.Quote: IndyJeffreyAre there laws mandating minimum returns? What's to prevent a casino from a 20% return machine sprinkled throughout the property?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hkhjZ00rsHQ
He says 80-something-96% and also mentions must hits being paid out solely on the basis of a predetermined jackpot amount being reached.
Quote: onenickelmiracleIf casinos want to lower them, leave a suitcase, write those checks, bada bing, bada boom, state minimum now lower.
Have you heard of any case in which a state minimum was lowered? I'm not saying there hasn't been, but I've not heard of it happening. Besides, most machines return considerably better than most state minimums, with a few exceptions. By, 'Considerably better,' I mean two percent or more base pays in excess of the minimums.
Could be 80%. I saw 81% once.Quote: onenickelmiracleAs far as Buffalo go, some of those with the massive progressive, rumor is they can be as low as 84%.
Harrah's often has ordinary 1c slots at 85%. Most Indian casinos set 1c slots at 87-89%. Loosest casino I know has most 1c slots at 93%.
If you hang around casinos long enough, you can get a peek at configuration screens (especially when new machines are being installed, or a machine has a problem). You might even find a machine left in configuration mode, where you can look at all the setup screens to your heart's content... :-)
---
If you look at UNLV stats on Vegas, slot hold in 2015 has increased about 1% across the board (tighter machines), but slot revenues have stayed stable (which means play dropped)...casinos might do better if they had looser slots.
Maryland, bada bing, bada boom.Quote: Mission146Have you heard of any case in which a state minimum was lowered? I'm not saying there hasn't been, but I've not heard of it happening. Besides, most machines return considerably better than most state minimums, with a few exceptions. By, 'Considerably better,' I mean two percent or more base pays in excess of the minimums.
Was sure it changed, definitely was requested. 100xOdds can chime in to clarify.
The casinos were definitely able to change how much they keep relative to the state's share
Also, in fairness, the requirements ARE higher than in most other states, such as no individual machine allowed to have a theoretical RTP of less than 87%.
Casinos should never have invested so heavily in expensive 'themed' slots. The players have to pay those royalties, the casino just fronts the money. Where do you think the higher royalties will be coming from... the casino accepting looser machines? Get real.
I understand that in Nevada the state minimum is well below all Veas casinos settings.
Other states and Indian casinos don't really have to report to anyone so what do you think is happening?
Locals can afford to play slots... its not a two week vacation for them. They can spend two hours and leave. Vacationers and conventoneers have to max out their time and that is costly.
If you don't get meal comps and room comps these days, its like movie-concession prices in the casinos.
Getting so that the only gambling that is affordable is risky onlie gambling or the local Indian unsupervised but no-airfare gambling.
Quote: NathanI remember a guy saying something like "In 2013, a $20 would yield my wife and I enough for dinner for both of us at a fine restaurant and movie and snacks for both of us.
Yeah, and in 1971 five bucks filled up the tank in a muscle car and you'd buy a six pack with the change.
*sigh*
Quote: MrVYeah, and in 1971 five bucks filled up the tank in a muscle car and you'd buy a six pack with the change.
*sigh*
To be fair, minimum wage was $1.60 in 1971! A full 8 hour shift was $12.60! And that's before taxes, insurance, health, etc! Your take home pay a day would have only been about $8 a day! Your take home pay would be roughly $80 every two weeks! Things being cheaper in 1971 than 2017 evens out with how extremely low minimum wage was back then. ;)
Quote: kravanot sure how to send a post on someone elses thread. I went to horseshoe today. I played $150 worth of 50c 2 credit slots. The best line hit I had was 5x the bet. Most of the time out of $20 I put in I got maybe 3 hits out of that 20 total. I took the last $50 tried to make the money back. Went to a $1 triple double star machine. I put the tito in and didn't get $1 hit the entire time. $0 for the whole tito,. Not even a 5x different 7's. Never going back to Horseshoe again. I consider that damn tight when the best line hit on atleast 6 different machines is only a 5x bet. $5.00 for $1 bet is the best I got
Bad runs happen like that from time to time. I got a 32 spin bonus on Lotus Flower, got only about 25 times my bet. Now, that's an extremely bad bonus considering the fact that I had 32 spins! So, I empathize with you.
Tighter machines boosted profits in 2013-2016 compared to 2009-2012, but people didn't play as much as 2006-2008. (UNLV reports)Quote: MobcasinosI don't think slots are much tighter today compare to 2013.
December slot hold, slot revenue (millions) - Las Vegas Strip.
2016 8.06% 258
2015 7.09% 255
2014 6.51% 237
2013 7.06% 255
2012 5.99% 219
2011 5.82% 211
2010 5.66% 198
2009 6.48% 221
2008 5.91% 228
2007 5.93% 266
2006 5.63% 252
December slot hold, slot revenue (millions) - State
2016 6.94% 604
2015 6.19% 565
2014 6.15% 559
2013 6.20% 558
2012 5.31% 492
2011 5.19% 481
2010 5.27% 474
2009 5.72% 509
2008 5.81% 574
2007 5.57% 646
2006 5.17% 610
http://gaming.unlv.edu/reports/6_month_NV.pdf
http://gaming.unlv.edu/reports/NV_dec.pdf
http://gaming.unlv.edu/reports.html
Quote: MobcasinosI don't think slots are much tighter today compare to 2013. What I think is bet is increasing year after years.
Not that I do slots, but surely the slots are getting FASTER per game and expecting more coin input per game. Thus more profit to the casino per unit of time without needing to alter the house edge
Quote: OnceDearNot that I do slots, but surely the slots are getting FASTER per game and expecting more coin input per game. Thus more profit to the casino per unit of time without needing to alter the house edge
Oddly enough, it's my impression that slots are much faster due to multiline, commonly 30 lines or more required on penny slots, but much slower overall due to very extended bonus rounds (in time). The bonus rounds are worth a lot less than they used to be, but they give you quite a show. Some go 5-7 minutes or more on a good bonus.
Quote: mamatTighter machines boosted profits in 2013-2016 compared to 2009-2012, but people didn't play as much as 2006-2008. (UNLV reports)
Yup. It's amazing how one tiny little Great Recession will decrease gaming revenue. But, the data sure seem to suggest NV has tighter slot machines now than previously.
Saw a guy hit an $1,800+ jackpot on a $0.05 bet (in 2016). He was down to his last dollar, and betting $0.05 at a time.Quote: fastXXXeddieI hate that most penny slots now require a minimum bet to get a bonus. Loved in past to pay 9 lines at 1 cent each and play a long bonus. Great way to kill time waiting for poker table to open. Once hit for $100 on a straight 9 cent bet. People kept saying I should have been betting more. YEAH, and I would have been broke 2 hours ago.
On the game he played, the bonuses have 30 lines, even if you bet 1 line.
IF he had bet $0.50 (1 line x 10 units, $0.05 machine), he might have gotten $18,000+.
Quote: mamatSaw a guy hit an $1,800+ jackpot on a $0.05 bet (in 2016). He was down to his last dollar, and betting $0.05 at a time.
On the game he played, the bonuses have 30 lines, even if you bet 1 line.
IF he had bet $0.50 (1 line x 10 units, $0.05 machine), he might have gotten $18,000+.
Now that is a "one nickel miracle "!
I wouldn't think it would get tighter.Quote: onenickelmiracleI won $1.20 on Wonder 4 Buffalo super feature betting $1.60. I had $3 another time, thought it was a fluke, yet still an indicator of a miserable setting. People can still hit, but lots of garbage not letting you play. They're getting tighter than a fresh butt hole at a prison.
Not after the first night or shower, but walking in, their sphincter must quiver.Quote: AxelWolfI wouldn't think it would get tighter.
Quote: NathanIn my personal opinion, a bonus should never pay LESS than your bet.
that's fine but expect your potential winnings in the bonus rounds and on regular spins to be slightly less
Quote: NathanIn my personal opinion, a bonus should never pay LESS than your bet.
Hey Now!
I agree.
There are very few bonus slots that work that way in the first place.Quote: flysrbHey Now!
I agree.
IMO it shouldn't say winner if the pay is less than your bet. It should just say, awarded, or you got some back.
Quote: AxelWolfThere are very few bonus slots that work that way in the first place.
IMO it shouldn't say winner if the pay is less than your bet. It should just say, awarded, or you got some back.
All VP machines should do the same then on the 1 for 1 pays. Should say "push 5"
Lightning has to hit somewhere.
Quote: onenickelmiracleAs far as Buffalo go, some of those with the massive progressive, rumor is they can be as low as 84%. Someone recently on a forum mentioned they saw the setting on one of those. It was completely ignored by a poster from the business who commented, so I'm led to believe it could be so true nobody wants to speak of it. It was either the one with the must hits or a WAP, don't remember.
I was at MGM Detroit playing the new Walking Dead and the machine wouldn't take money. The tech opened it up and went through some things and I saw the board wit the settings . The RTP was 79%! I thought that was illegal? I tried to look up what the minimum pay rate in Michigan was, but couldn't find it.
Quote: GarytI was at MGM Detroit playing the new Walking Dead and the machine wouldn't take money. The tech opened it up and went through some things and I saw the board wit the settings . The RTP was 79%! I thought that was illegal? I tried to look up what the minimum pay rate in Michigan was, but couldn't find it.
http://www.americancasinoguide.com/casinos-by-state/michigan-casinos.html
"The only casinos in Michigan not on indian reservations are located in downtown Detroit. All three are open 24 hours and offer the following games: blackjack, craps, roulette, baccarat, mini-baccarat, Caribbean stud poker, three-card poker, pai gow poker, let it ride, big 6 wheel and casino war. No public information is available about the payback percentages on Detroit’s gaming machines."
"Indian casinos in Michigan are not required to release information on their slot machine payback percentages. However, according to officials at the Michigan Gaming Control Board, which is responsible for overseeing the tribal-state compacts, “the machines must meet the minimum standards for machines in Nevada or New Jersey.” In Nevada the minimum return is 75% and in New Jersey it’s 83%. Therefore, Michigan’s Indian casinos must return at least 75% in order to comply with the law. "
Seems plausible but my god that is really low. The machines I have seen for the walking dead werent even linked progressives.
On a good note, I have seen a new "penny" slot set at 95%, it didn't last long at that location and I don't expect to see it around much. );
I get my share of the occasional hand pays, and am otherwise doing OK with them.
Do you hear anyone complaining? My rule of thumb, the number of vocal people being negative increases more and more, the more the returns go down. I remember when Soaring Eagle changed from certified hot slots(manufacturer's best return) covering half the floor to completely eliminating it, the number of dissidents went from almost zero to hundreds on the Facebook page. I remember back in the day playing at Mountaineer, negativity central, but because the people didn't feel things were very fair odds wise. Then going to Seneca Niagara and practically hearing nothing. Things were better there, much fairer. Complaining about bad luck is one thing, but when the volume is loud enough, it's not just bad luck. It's a foolish thing to automatically discount complaints about a casino as just being poor losers, but it's much more complex.Quote: MrVSlots in the tribal casinos I play at in Oregon are no tighter now than they've ever been, so far as I can tell.
I get my share of the occasional hand pays, and am otherwise doing OK with them.
On a related note, some casinos seem to have an unusual number of positive posts on Facebook pages. Coincidentally Seneca. Seneca is no longer a super fair place, and I think they hire marketing companies to post false posts from fake facebook profiles. Your post would be a good example of what you might see, not saying you're lying, but such a post is in the same style. It's always going to be true, there will be less positive posts than negative posts, because people don't see a reason to waste time saying things are acceptable, but will take time to state why something is unacceptable.
Some 1c slots are 96%.Quote: AxelWolfAll the new fancy "penny" machines seem to be set low.
Yes, there are always exceptions to rules or Advantage play wouldn't be a thing. I'm talking about randomly selecting a penny machine on the floor.Quote: mamatSome 1c slots are 96%.
Yesterday
Bonus round
0