turn, river POSSIBLITY OF READY HANDS AND DRAW HANDS FOR ALL STARTING HANDS OF POKER

turn, river POSSIBLITY OF READY HANDS FOR ALL STARTING HANDS OF POKER

for flop, it is the older thread. i wanted to change it into one thread only : flop turn and river. but not possible.

for the two tables, as i mentioined, i made a way to check it: all ready hands possiblity*starting hand possiblity, and add up all 169 hands. the numbers must be the same with 6 cards and 7 cards poker possiblity. i did it, it is right.

there is another good thing for "it is right'. it is to check: the possiblity of comparing 2 hands winning possiblity: like Ak vs 22. as i mentioned in another thread. there is a small differences in numbers among 888poker(the strangest one, when we change order of 2 cards, numbers are different), cardschat and WIZARD'JB, (for mine, that hand, my number is the same as Wizard). later, i compared other hands, all are different. i am in doubt with my calcluation when my numbers are a a litte different with wizard, today, i used that file to input hands of only 1 player. and another player. to compare number with file of '7 cards poker possiblity', because the file of '7 cards poker possiblity' is self-provable. the number is just the same. so i am convinced my calculation is right.

there is another reason fo my writing this thinking down, because in blackjack, i wrote a thread: "a basic stratgey mistake in single deck for 77VS10 single deck". i doubted tilll now. but from what i did in poker, i may view it as i may be doing it seriously and right.

i am going to copy tables in another message.

That's a lot of calculations. Congratulations on achieving your goal.

1. It would certainly help in the future if you would put a line or two of text in each post that labels/explains what the table is. For example, the reader has to work some to figure out which of the above tables is the turn and which is the river.

2. Sometimes we use T to mean "10" because it is clearer when listing hands in this format.

3. I imagine you recognize the limitations on these calculations, but I'll state them anyway. In Texas hold'em there is a dramatic difference between a poker hand where the key cards are all on the board versus a hand where your hole cards are essential to making the hand.

Example: With a 5-5 hand, a royal flush means that all five RF cards are on the board and you have a 100% chance of tie-ing and a zero chance of winning. However, with a 5-5 hand, a 3-of-a-kind must necessarily be a board with a third 5 and no other poker value (I.e., no flush or straight or other pairs in the five common cards) - therefore a 5-5 hand that makes a 3oak will win a large majority of the time versus an opponent and is a much better outcome than making a royal flush.

Really, making a pair that is on the board is not good news for a player, whereas making a pair that involves one of the player's hole cards is much more powerful. Your tables don't capture that, so its hard to know what to make of them.

thanks,gordonm888.

on pairing, yes, if there is a pair on board, i put also this possibility in the table(our own hand). it is not practical to use this table then, i just want to to make it full.
for the boarded pair and set or the same suit, what i want is to make other full tables to judge other's hands possiblity based on our own two cards. will this make more sense?

i still have no clue how to merge it together. but i will try.