Poll

10 votes (62.5%)
2 votes (12.5%)
3 votes (18.75%)
1 vote (6.25%)

16 members have voted

DJTeddyBear
DJTeddyBear
  • Threads: 211
  • Posts: 11063
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
December 31st, 2013 at 11:04:21 AM permalink
This is gonna sound weird coming from me, particularly since I'm a dealer for a pub poker league who has picked up the nickname, "Rules Guru."

Part of the reason I want opinions is because, in the league, we try to keep it friendly, so we tend to let some of the rules slide a little in the interest of keeping it friendly. Then again, we do not allow string bets, and follow the oversize chip rule.

In both of the cases below, we ask the player what their intention is. But in a casino, asking for clarification isn't an option. What's your decision?


Case 1 -

The blinds are $1/$2. It gets raised to $6. A re-raise would be a minimum of $10. A player who has not put any chips in yet puts in two $5 chips without saying anything. Is it a call or a raise?


Case 2 -

The blinds are $1/$2. It gets limped around to the small blind who puts in a $5 chip without saying anything, and leaves the $1 chip there. Is it a call or a raise?
I invented a few casino games. Info: http://www.DaveMillerGaming.com/ ————————————————————————————————————— Superstitions are silly, childish, irrational rituals, born out of fear of the unknown. But how much does it cost to knock on wood? 😁
MidwestAP
MidwestAP
  • Threads: 22
  • Posts: 1264
Joined: Feb 19, 2012
December 31st, 2013 at 11:50:45 AM permalink
In #1, the player is putting in the minimum number of oversize chips to call the current bet. Without announcing 'raise' I believe it should be ruled a call, not a raise.

In #2, the player put in two chips when only one was needed to make the call, in this case I think it should be ruled a raise.
DJTeddyBear
DJTeddyBear
  • Threads: 211
  • Posts: 11063
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
December 31st, 2013 at 11:54:30 AM permalink
Quote: MidwestAP

In #1, the player is putting in the minimum number of oversize chips to call the current bet. Without announcing 'raise' I believe it should be ruled a call, not a raise.

I agree.

Quote: MidwestAP

In #2, the player put in two chips when only one was needed to make the call, in this case I think it should be ruled a raise.

I disagree. The player DID put in the minimum oversized chip - one $5 chip. He merely forgot to remove the $1 small blind chip.
I invented a few casino games. Info: http://www.DaveMillerGaming.com/ ————————————————————————————————————— Superstitions are silly, childish, irrational rituals, born out of fear of the unknown. But how much does it cost to knock on wood? 😁
AceCrAAckers
AceCrAAckers
  • Threads: 30
  • Posts: 377
Joined: Jul 12, 2011
December 31st, 2013 at 12:02:41 PM permalink
Case 1 is a call. There can be no ambiguity to the intention. If the player put 10 white chips, it would clearly be a raise. Should they have a single $10 chip, it would be taken as a call just as if the player put a single green chip. Two red chips is just a call.

Case 2, has a little more room for interpertation. It would be a raise if I had to decide. If the player took back the $1 chip, it would be considered a call. If the player put a green chip without saying anything, is there a question on intent?

I have also seen raises in a 1/2 game where the big blind raise to $12 and cut out a this amount and places it in the middle of the pot and takes back the $2. As a dealer, you want to keep the integrity of the game without being too over bearing. Also, you want to keep the game as fair as possible. In these cases, the player is not doing anything to get an edge.
Edward Snowden is not the criminal, the government is for violating the constitution!
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 11933
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
December 31st, 2013 at 12:34:24 PM permalink
deleted
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
sodawater
sodawater
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 3321
Joined: May 14, 2012
December 31st, 2013 at 1:53:44 PM permalink
Quote: DJTeddyBear

This is gonna sound weird coming from me, particularly since I'm a dealer for a pub poker league who has picked up the nickname, "Rules Guru."

Part of the reason I want opinions is because, in the league, we try to keep it friendly, so we tend to let some of the rules slide a little in the interest of keeping it friendly. Then again, we do not allow string bets, and follow the oversize chip rule.

In both of the cases below, we ask the player what their intention is. But in a casino, asking for clarification isn't an option. What's your decision?


Case 1 -

The blinds are $1/$2. It gets raised to $6. A re-raise would be a minimum of $10. A player who has not put any chips in yet puts in two $5 chips without saying anything. Is it a call or a raise?



This is universally, unequivocally a call.


Quote: DJTeddyBear

Case 2 -

The blinds are $1/$2. It gets limped around to the small blind who puts in a $5 chip without saying anything, and leaves the $1 chip there. Is it a call or a raise?



I would rule this a call. He needs to announce raise when putting in a single oversized chip. Doesn't matter if he has a white chip he COULD have called with or not. It's still a call without saying the word raise. The fact that most experienced players would "take back" the white chip doesn't change the fact that he put one single oversized chip in the pot, and didn't announce raise, so it is a call.

In practice, this happens in the casino and the dealers usually ask "call or raise" -- which is ridiculous, because if you have to ask it is a call. However, no one really cares at small stakes to object.
paisiello
paisiello
  • Threads: 21
  • Posts: 546
Joined: Oct 30, 2011
December 31st, 2013 at 5:46:36 PM permalink
Quote: sodawater

This is universally, unequivocally a call..


Not sure why you would say this but in SoCal this would always be considered a raise unless the table were to unanimously allow the player to declare it as a call retroactively.
Quote: sodawater

I would rule this a call. He needs to announce raise when putting in a single oversized chip. Doesn't matter if he has a white chip he COULD have called with or not. It's still a call without saying the word raise.

In SoCal this is called the "One Chip Rule": if only one chip is used to bet and nothing is said then it is considered a call by default.
sodawater
sodawater
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 3321
Joined: May 14, 2012
December 31st, 2013 at 6:00:26 PM permalink
both cases are the one chip rule. in the first case, the player owes $6. he puts in one red chip and another red chip without saying anything. the second red chip is the "one oversized chip" that has to be considered a call. it's the same as if he had 1 red chip in the BB, it was raised to $6, and he put another red chip in.
paisiello
paisiello
  • Threads: 21
  • Posts: 546
Joined: Oct 30, 2011
December 31st, 2013 at 6:39:55 PM permalink
You are probably right on that. Many players think wrongly that a minimum raise needs to be twice the bet anyway and so assume that the play would be a call.
Buzzard
Buzzard
  • Threads: 90
  • Posts: 6814
Joined: Oct 28, 2012
December 31st, 2013 at 6:56:05 PM permalink
Both are a call all day long in any place I ever played. And if a player made this move more than once, he would probably be asked to leave. And not politely !
Shed not for her the bitter tear Nor give the heart to vain regret Tis but the casket that lies here, The gem that filled it Sparkles yet
98Clubs
98Clubs
  • Threads: 52
  • Posts: 1728
Joined: Jun 3, 2010
December 31st, 2013 at 7:02:04 PM permalink
Quote: DJTeddyBear

Case 1 -

The blinds are $1/$2. It gets raised to $6. A re-raise would be a minimum of $10. A player who has not put any chips in yet puts in two $5 chips without saying anything. Is it a call or a raise?


Case 2 -

The blinds are $1/$2. It gets limped around to the small blind who puts in a $5 chip without saying anything, and leaves the $1 chip there. Is it a call or a raise?



I'll take a left-field approach to these, to see what others think...

Case ONE: Look at the chip-stack of the $10 Player... if there are Whites (presumed $1 chips) in it, then the Two Reds are a Raise. If no white chips, then the bet is $6 with $4 returned.

Case TWO: Look at the chip-stack of the $5 +$1 Player, if there are no white chips availible, its a call with $4 returned, if there are white chips availible, the bet stands as a $1 Call + $4 raise.

In both cases the chip-stack did the talkin', either the Player had no chips to properly bet the intent, or the chips represent the intended wager having the neccesary chips to wager properly.

IMHO these are fair and firm rules.
Some people need to reimagine their thinking.
charliepatrick
charliepatrick
  • Threads: 39
  • Posts: 3017
Joined: Jun 17, 2011
December 31st, 2013 at 7:10:02 PM permalink
Personally I think they are both calls using the logic that no additional unnecessary chips to exceed the call value were placed in the pot. I have had an experience - btw I'll never play there again - where "money didn't talk" and placing more chips than necessary (say 3x$5 to call a $4 bet) without saying "raise" (or its equivalent) was considered a call. So nowadays, on the rare occasions I play, I always make my intentions clear.
Buzzard
Buzzard
  • Threads: 90
  • Posts: 6814
Joined: Oct 28, 2012
December 31st, 2013 at 7:17:00 PM permalink
" IMHO these are fair and firm rules. " So now as a player i have to inventory the chip stacks of a player to know if he called or raiesd. Oh, is that a white chip next to his stack of reds, dealer, I am on his immediate left and can't see? NO WAY

It's a call both times and any dealer who disagrees has seen his last tip from me and most other players. It may indeed be unintentional, but it is a classic move. Next better reraises and the " caller " say, I only called !
Shed not for her the bitter tear Nor give the heart to vain regret Tis but the casket that lies here, The gem that filled it Sparkles yet
MrCasinoGames
MrCasinoGames
  • Threads: 200
  • Posts: 14339
Joined: Sep 13, 2010
December 31st, 2013 at 7:28:39 PM permalink
Both cases are calls.
Stephen Au-Yeung (Legend of New Table Games®) NewTableGames.com
Buzzard
Buzzard
  • Threads: 90
  • Posts: 6814
Joined: Oct 28, 2012
December 31st, 2013 at 7:34:03 PM permalink
And Stephen is indeed a valid expert in this field. To say nothing of his insane ability with poker chips.
Shed not for her the bitter tear Nor give the heart to vain regret Tis but the casket that lies here, The gem that filled it Sparkles yet
DJTeddyBear
DJTeddyBear
  • Threads: 211
  • Posts: 11063
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
January 1st, 2014 at 3:06:09 AM permalink
Quote: 98Clubs

I'll take a left-field approach to these, to see what others think...

Case ONE: Look at the chip-stack of the $10 Player... if there are Whites (presumed $1 chips) in it, then the Two Reds are a Raise. If no white chips, then the bet is $6 with $4 returned.

Case TWO: Look at the chip-stack of the $5 +$1 Player, if there are no white chips availible, its a call with $4 returned, if there are white chips availible, the bet stands as a $1 Call + $4 raise.

In both cases the chip-stack did the talkin', either the Player had no chips to properly bet the intent, or the chips represent the intended wager having the neccesary chips to wager properly.

IMHO these are fair and firm rules.

Sorry 98, but as Buzz attempted to say, it is nobody's responsibility to inventory any player's stack. The entire point of the Oversize Chip Rule means that, regardless of what a player has, a single large chip is a call - even if the player has a mountain of whites!

For the record, I believe that both are calls, but thanks to everyone who thinks otherwise. It confirms that there is plenty of confusion in this matter.
I invented a few casino games. Info: http://www.DaveMillerGaming.com/ ————————————————————————————————————— Superstitions are silly, childish, irrational rituals, born out of fear of the unknown. But how much does it cost to knock on wood? 😁
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
  • Threads: 170
  • Posts: 22704
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
January 1st, 2014 at 5:45:13 AM permalink
Quote: Buzzard

Both are a call all day long in any place I ever played. And if a player made this move more than once, he would probably be asked to leave. And not politely !

I don't know where you are playing poker at but that's just hogwash. Vegas poker rooms have a very long, long leash.
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
Buzzard
Buzzard
  • Threads: 90
  • Posts: 6814
Joined: Oct 28, 2012
January 1st, 2014 at 10:33:41 AM permalink
You assumed that the dealer would be asking that player to leave. I would explain the rules politely to a player, but if it happened again I would be the one asking him to leave. Politely of course and even willing to step outside to go into further detail if necessary.
Either the player tried making a move again or he doesn't understand the rules and should come back when his actions will not be disruptive to the game.
Shed not for her the bitter tear Nor give the heart to vain regret Tis but the casket that lies here, The gem that filled it Sparkles yet
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
  • Threads: 170
  • Posts: 22704
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
January 1st, 2014 at 10:43:26 AM permalink
Quote: Buzzard

You assumed that the dealer would be asking that player to leave. I would explain the rules politely to a player, but if it happened again I would be the one asking him to leave. Politely of course and even willing to step outside to go into further detail if necessary.
Either the player tried making a move again or he doesn't understand the rules and should come back when his actions will not be disruptive to the game.

This is not a big deal the way he described it, I see it all the time. I have yet to see a player use this as a move. Its only a few chips more. Usually the dealer just corrects the bet and they move on. Occasionally someone will bitch and claim it was a call or raise depending on the the ruling made.
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
Buzzard
Buzzard
  • Threads: 90
  • Posts: 6814
Joined: Oct 28, 2012
January 1st, 2014 at 10:47:14 AM permalink
I have seen this and other moves too often. All of a sudden the player remembers he did not say raise and wants a ruling. Usually he wanted to gain a little info without committing chips. Sometimes another player will think it was a raise and muck his hand. There is a reason why in both examples it is ABSOLUTELY a CALL !
Shed not for her the bitter tear Nor give the heart to vain regret Tis but the casket that lies here, The gem that filled it Sparkles yet
mickeycrimm
mickeycrimm
  • Threads: 62
  • Posts: 2299
Joined: Jul 13, 2013
January 1st, 2014 at 10:54:44 AM permalink
Quote: Buzzard

Both are a call all day long in any place I ever played. And if a player made this move more than once, he would probably be asked to leave. And not politely !



In a competitive market throwing players out on such flimsy grounds will kill your games. Tough talking players will also send them down the street to your competition.
"Quit trying your luck and start trying your skill." Mickey Crimm
Buzzard
Buzzard
  • Threads: 90
  • Posts: 6814
Joined: Oct 28, 2012
January 1st, 2014 at 10:58:33 AM permalink
Aw Mickey I said I would be polite. Player could always move to another table. Or just say he make a mistake. But if I was convinced he was making a move, well that's another story. I usually play low limits and welcome novices to play. As long as it just a 2/4 game I always show my winning hand even I have no callers. Hell, it's only a game.
Shed not for her the bitter tear Nor give the heart to vain regret Tis but the casket that lies here, The gem that filled it Sparkles yet
paisiello
paisiello
  • Threads: 21
  • Posts: 546
Joined: Oct 30, 2011
January 1st, 2014 at 11:27:13 AM permalink
Quote: Buzzard

Hell, it's only a game.

Heck, it's only money!
beachbumbabs
beachbumbabs
  • Threads: 101
  • Posts: 14268
Joined: May 21, 2013
January 1st, 2014 at 11:28:57 AM permalink
Quote: 98Clubs

Quote: DJTeddyBear

Case 1 -

The blinds are $1/$2. It gets raised to $6. A re-raise would be a minimum of $10. A player who has not put any chips in yet puts in two $5 chips without saying anything. Is it a call or a raise?


Case 2 -

The blinds are $1/$2. It gets limped around to the small blind who puts in a $5 chip without saying anything, and leaves the $1 chip there. Is it a call or a raise?



I'll take a left-field approach to these, to see what others think...

Case ONE: Look at the chip-stack of the $10 Player... if there are Whites (presumed $1 chips) in it, then the Two Reds are a Raise. If no white chips, then the bet is $6 with $4 returned.

Case TWO: Look at the chip-stack of the $5 +$1 Player, if there are no white chips availible, its a call with $4 returned, if there are white chips availible, the bet stands as a $1 Call + $4 raise..



But then what does the server coming back with his drink get tipped with, if not the whites he was reserving for her?
If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.
Switch
Switch
  • Threads: 12
  • Posts: 934
Joined: Apr 29, 2010
January 1st, 2014 at 11:42:38 AM permalink
Both cases are 'Calls'.
Buzzard
Buzzard
  • Threads: 90
  • Posts: 6814
Joined: Oct 28, 2012
January 1st, 2014 at 3:32:47 PM permalink
Another expert has spoken. CASE CLOSED
Shed not for her the bitter tear Nor give the heart to vain regret Tis but the casket that lies here, The gem that filled it Sparkles yet
  • Jump to: