Poll
No votes (0%) | |||
2 votes (28.57%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
1 vote (14.28%) | |||
1 vote (14.28%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
1 vote (14.28%) | |||
2 votes (28.57%) |
7 members have voted
As usual, I'm using capital letters on the names of the bets Player and Banker, to differentiate those actually playing the game.
My challenge to the forum is to name any casino on the face of the earth that offers Chemin de Fer. I admit my knowledge of the gambling scene in Europe could be better, but in my four trips to Europe I've never knowingly seen anything but baccarat/punto banco (depending on the language).
The question for the forum is what countries have you seen Chemin de Fer played in?
I would be shocked to learn that a game so similar to an actual game only exists in fiction.
On the other hand, I would totally accept that it only exists in history.
Perhaps that's the answer. No casino offers it, any more.
And considering the current state of casino rules and regulations, it's hard to believe allowing a single bettor to make decisions that affect other bettors, could fly past regulators today.
Quote: DJTeddyBearAnd considering the current state of casino rules and regulations, it's hard to believe allowing a single bettor to make decisions that affect other bettors, could fly past regulators today.
This happens today in blackjack where back betting is allowed. You don't see it much in the US, but you see it a lot in Macau.
Also note that anybody can bet the entire amount of the bank, rendering all other bets void; if you ever hear somebody call out "Banco," this is what it means.
In terms of Chemin de Fer, I have heard the term "baccarat" used in two different ways. First, the way it was used in the original Casino Royale; it means a score of zero (the way "blackjack" means a 2-card 21). Second, and I'm not sure entirely how this worked, but it referred to a variation on CdF where there were two player hands in addition to the bank's hand.
The website of the Casino de Monte-Carlo says it runs Chemin de Fer, but only in its private areas.
Quote: ThatDonGuyThe website of the Casino de Monte-Carlo says it runs Chemin de Fer, but only in its private areas.
Not that I'm disputing that, but how is the casino compensated for the use of their building if the players are just playing against each other other? It is like California blackjack where the players not acting as the banker pay a commission to the house?
http://www.casinovenezia.it/en/chemin-de-fer.html
Quote: WizardNot that I'm disputing that, but how is the casino compensated for the use of their building if the players are just playing against each other other? It is like California blackjack where the players not acting as the banker pay a commission to the house?
I figured it would be more like how a Vegas casino makes money on its poker tables, but according to the website, the casino takes a 5% commission on all bank wins.
20 players would bet Player and Banker about half-half.
There would be no end of arguments to take a card or not.
After the play it would make the fights in BJ in US look like child play.
There is no more commission Baccarat here. It is all B6 win half bet.
It would take ages for the dealer to dish out the win minus the 5%.
Casino get twice as many rounds per hour than with the commission bac.
And they can employ a novice dealer and not one who is good at maths.
Quote: WizardNot that I'm disputing that, but how is the casino compensated for the use of their building if the players are just playing against each other other? It is like California blackjack where the players not acting as the banker pay a commission to the house?
In Germany, it is offered in Stuttgart and Hohensyburg.
The casino Collects a commission on the bank sum. I.e. The money the banker brings into the game. The players can wager up to that amount only. (no commission)
Quote: ThatDonGuyI figured it would be more like how a Vegas casino makes money on its poker tables, but according to the website, the casino takes a 5% commission on all bank wins.
The terminology is going to get confusing, so, again, I'm using capital letters for the bets and lower case for those actually playing the game.
So, could it be said that the players who are not banking must have the Player hand? And the player banking has the Banker hand? If the Banker hand wins then the players on Player lose the full amount, the house takes a 5% rake, and the banker on Banker keeps the rest? If there is a Player total of five do they let the player with the largest bet make the decision on what to do?
Quote: WizardThe terminology is going to get confusing, so, again, I'm using capital letters for the bets and lower case for those actually playing the game.
So, could it be said that the players who are not banking must have the Player hand? And the player banking has the Banker hand? If the Banker hand wins then the players on Player lose the full amount, the house takes a 5% rake, and the banker on Banker keeps the rest? If there is a Player total of five do they let the player with the largest bet make the decision on what to do?
Yes that is correct. I called a host of mine that did work in Europe at M.C. and he did confirm that. (Caps for the wagers and non-caps to describe the players) Where as the player (gambler) can elect to shout out "Bank" which will announce he/she is going to act as the Bank/Banker. He/She has to cover all Players wagers (those gamblers wagering on the Players side, they cannot wager Bank) and the banker will take all there wagers if the Bank wins the hand.
And yes, there is an option for a third card at times, but my contact could not remember the exact rules. And yes, the house/casino takes a commission on the total Banker win. This is the true high roller atmosphere of Baccarat.
Quote: Baccaratfrom79Yes that is correct...
Thank you for the confirmation!
Quote: Baccaratfrom79I do remember a South American player at Vegas in 2013 telling me he played in somewhere in South America???
That is surprising. Baccarat is not very popular in South America, even among the few Asians there. Roulette is the hot game, in Argentina and Uruguay at least.
Quote: Baccaratfrom79The guy was definitely South American. I think from Brazil. He was telling me he plays Chemin. I took it that, he was referring to S. America but maybe it was another locale??
Is there any chance is was a translation thing and he was really referring to baccarat?
Quote: WizardIs there any chance is was a translation thing and he was really referring to baccarat?
Clearly we were talking about this because I was mentioning Monte Carlo and private games. He was telling me he plays it and went through the banker banking the wagers of the other players. Mentioned paying the house a vig on the winning Banker wagers off the total dollar, etc. I just took it that he was playing it somewhere in S. America.
Quote: Baccaratfrom79Clearly we were talking about this ...
Thank you.
In the Bond novels (and one early film) you see Bond deliberately playing differently, arguing (feebly) that this is what makes a good player: knowing when to deviate from the statistics. I guess Varmenti and the like read too much spy fiction.
Quote: kubikulannAs I understand it, the present (seemingly complicated) rules for card-drawing at Baccarat are just the freezing of the perfect strategy for both sides in the original game of Chemin-de-Fer.
In the Bond novels (and one early film) you see Bond deliberately playing differently, arguing (feebly) that this is what makes a good player: knowing when to deviate from the statistics. I guess Varmenti and the like read too much spy fiction.
Quote: Baccaratfrom79An experienced player will use his experience to wager and capitalize on an easy winning decision.
Quote: kubikulannAs I understand it, the present (seemingly complicated) rules for card-drawing at Baccarat are just the freezing of the perfect strategy for both sides in the original game of Chemin-de-Fer.
That is correct.
To expand on my last post, baccarat is what would happen if you forced the Player to hit on 5. The Banker strategy that follows is optimal. However, in Chemin de Fer, where there is free will, the Player should randomize and sometimes stand on 5. The Banker strategy should randomize on three plays, as my page explains.