Parralel 6s

I have a dice set that I have found success with, times in the casino rolling 25 or 40 times... I would say 3 of my last 30 rolls was "god roll"

The local casino has a nice soft table with dice that I assume aren't regularly changed for their stadium betting. There are many terminals that allow electronic betting on the outcome of live blackjack, roulette, baccarat and craps games taking place live in the casino. Shooters take turns throwing at the real table and dealers will substitute throwing dice from a cup if no players want to roll. I am sure there is some frequency to changing the dice and cards but come to think of it I have not seen them ever do so. I have had numerous sessions spanning shift change when playing these electronic stadium games.

Five red dice feel heavy and land rather consistently on the short, soft table. I suspect they are rarely changed and the corners feel less sharp than most at other tables.

I am finding success using the Parralel 6s set pictured below. Sometimes to move quickly I won't even bother with the faces matching, I just care that the two axis faces are 5 and the 2

My theory is that each throw will on average see one die bounce and land on a 5 or 2 side if I am intentionally attempting to avoid that happening. This results in combinations where rolling a seven is impossible. If both dice land perfectly straight my only outs are 6-1 and 1-6... if both dice bounce onto axis numbers than I am out only with 5-2 and 2-5

I will attempt to track my play tomorrow when I give this another whirl

Until someone can demonstrate this with a robotic arm, its gonna fall on deaf ears for most analytical people.

We know the roulette trackers have gotten good enough in a lab setting, but are still impractical for casino play.

Interesting approach with the Parallel 6s set. Soft tables definitely make a difference for controlled shooters. Curious to see your tracking results - sample size matters a lot with dice setting claims. Good luck tomorrow.

The soft table and heavier dice detail is interesting, that’s one of the few scenarios where consistency might even be testable but I’m with the skeptics on needing real tracking though.
Long rolls happen naturally, so the data will matter more than the feel of the set.
Curious what the numbers look like once you log a few sessions.

The theory about sets and soft tables is interesting - but honestly, without a lot of statistics, it's hard to tell skill from variance. I sometimes play online games for comparison
- and it's clear how randomness quickly evens out series.

Quote: Se7enOut

[snip]

I am finding success using the Parralel 6s set pictured below. Sometimes to move quickly I won't even bother with the faces matching, I just care that the two axis faces are 5 and the 2

My theory is that each throw will on average see one die bounce and land on a 5 or 2 side if I am intentionally attempting to avoid that happening. This results in combinations where rolling a seven is impossible. If both dice land perfectly straight my only outs are 6-1 and 1-6... if both dice bounce onto axis numbers than I am out only with 5-2 and 2-5

I will attempt to track my play tomorrow when I give this another whirl
link to original post

You never posted an image, but from examining this it seems you set the dice so that the 5 and 2 are the axis, not the 4 and 3

" one die bounc[ing] and land[ing] on a 5 or 2 side... results in combinations where rolling a seven is impossible" .... Well, you have found something interesting there, confirming my belief that every angle, every nook and cranny, with no wrinkle unexplored and no stone unturned, everything that is, has been thoroughly and exhaustively examined by players when it comes to the game of craps, this to the nth and done long before any of us was ever born. So ... we can be sure that you are not the first to find a way to make rolling a 7 impossible. The question now becomes whether you, as opposed to your predecessors, can actually make this work [I'm assuming others failed]

Your statement that you evidently feel that it requires that you are"intentionally attempting to avoid that happening" stands out. This appears to say that you believe the dice have consciousness of your thoughts, and act on them, OR there is something you are doing, like a flick of the wrist, that you found does the opposite action of what you are trying to avoid. This has taken me into the weeds and I will not stay there till you give me some confidence that it isn't, in fact, scenario uno, your thinking the dice are acting on your thoughts

also, fiddling with some dice, I see 7 is still possible with 4 and 3 coming up . So for 7 to not result, the 5 or the 2 has to have lost all momentum and be certain to be one of the results while the other die can have all 4 results but has to stay on axis

no?