That would involve either driving or flying to Laughlin and staking real money. The combined cost of that would be, from all accounts, greater than the potential profits from anyone who's been posting details about their travails with dice setting. In other words, if anyone out there actually can influence the dice, they're not posting here about it.
True. I guess what I'm saying is that I want to hear someone say they went to Laughlin, staked real money, and performed a dice "influencing" experiment. Even if they lose, I would give them credit for at least having the guts to put their money where their mouth is, and trying to influence the dice in a real world laboratory.
Also, I like the use of the word "influence", as though they are coaxing the dice into certain numbers. "Come on, honies, just three more hard 10s, and we'll all go get a nice steak dinner!"
On the other hand, there seem to be as many potential way to set and/or throw and/or bet on the dice as there are dice shooters. I've seen stories about people doing sliding techniques, gentle soft throwing, controlled bouncing, stacked dice, crossed-sixes, parallel sixes, flying-V, you name it. I think controlled throwing is probably more of a mental endeavor than you think -- you have to know how you're altering the dice probabilities so you know how much to bet and where. The fact that the OP, according to his records, demonstrated a very high level of dice control but did not see a profit is a perfect example.
31 hard 10's
14 " 4's
24 " 6's
23 " 8's
the software showed using the paralell sixes set I would have had an edge on the hard 6 and 8 but those are not bets I would normally make nor is that a set I have used. I also would not think enough of my ability to duplicate this in a casino enviornment to make the hardway bets. The hardway set is really a seven avoidance set more than a set to actually hit the hardways. There is an explanation in one of the Wizards craps appendix's.
One of my expectations for this test was that using the all seven set would produce a higher SRR than the hardway set because it would take a primary hit to roll a seven and it takes away the dreaded double pitch which produces the seven in the hardway set. The SRR for the all sevens set was only 5.1. This is because my percentage of hardways was 13.28% with random being 11.11%. My double pitch percentage was only 9.61% with random being 11.11%. I am going to do this test again just to compare results after I get back from my trip.
I also agree that card counting and controlled throwing of the dice are not the same thing. In Black jack once the cards are dealt you either have an edge or you do not and it changes with every deal either to your advantage or disadvantage until the shuffle where it goes back to the starting point for that game with it's particular rules. In craps wether you control the dice or not every throw has the same built in house edge for the bets you are placing. I know in my case I am not skilled enough to think that I can throw the dice consistently enough to change the house edge to a player edge. But I can count well enough to know if I have an edge or not. Now having big enough kahuna's to bet your edge is a different story
However, this might influence me to forgoe the come bets and just do place bets.
Why don't you simply record the face number on each cube, and then calculate the theoretical based on your results?
It would be far more interesting to view the chi square and the standard deviation graph for the individual outcomes.
Also, if you're testing your throwing abilities, then please tell us that you're are using new dice and not the voided ones.