Not sure how this discussion became another "let's pick on Ahigh" thread, but how is this for a coherent claim:
"A good dice influencer can roll 15 or fewer sevens out of 100 rolls consistently."
How about that for a coherent claim?
So now I can make a bet offer. 15 OR FEWER consistently! So at WORST 15 consistently!
So 150 out of 1000 would be the WORST .... I'll bet $1000 you cant find a guy to roll 150 or fewer 7's in 1000 rolls. Pay me double if he can't roll fewer than 160. Find a fool who thinks they can do it! Casino rules.... dice in air and must hit back of table... I'll bet if anyone says they can do it that Aaron would be kind enough to host the event!
That would put you in the top 1%.
If you are recording 240 or less 7s in 1600 rolls (15%) that is putting you in the top 3.8%.
Random roller's odds of throwing 150 or less 7s of 1000 is 8.4%
I'll take that chance. Since I know there is no such thing as a dice influencer, as the Wizard would say, it is a good bet for me. Of course I may lose, it seems, 8.4% of the time!
So 150 out of 1000 would be the WORST .... I'll bet $1000 you cant find a guy to roll 150 or fewer 7's in 1000 rolls.
We are not betting on whether or not we can find a DI -- we have a bet IF we can find a DI.
Also, no more than 100 or 200 rolls in a single session, and it might not be easy getting a DI to shoot for more than one session (if we can find one at all).
In addition, I don't have $1000 to bet, but I'll wager $100.
No. Let's stick to the original "coherent" statement.Quote:
Pay me double if he can't roll fewer than 160.