SOOPOO
SOOPOO 
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
  • Threads: 108
  • Posts: 6697
January 18th, 2013 at 10:24:00 AM permalink
Quote: tupp

Not sure how this discussion became another "let's pick on Ahigh" thread, but how is this for a coherent claim:

"A good dice influencer can roll 15 or fewer sevens out of 100 rolls consistently."

How about that for a coherent claim?



THANK YOU!
So now I can make a bet offer. 15 OR FEWER consistently! So at WORST 15 consistently!

So 150 out of 1000 would be the WORST .... I'll bet $1000 you cant find a guy to roll 150 or fewer 7's in 1000 rolls. Pay me double if he can't roll fewer than 160. Find a fool who thinks they can do it! Casino rules.... dice in air and must hit back of table... I'll bet if anyone says they can do it that Aaron would be kind enough to host the event!
boymimbo
boymimbo
Joined: Nov 12, 2009
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 5994
January 18th, 2013 at 10:25:02 AM permalink
Actually, Ahigh, I would say you are a definite dice influencer if you recorded fewer than 1,590 sevens in 10,000 rolls or less than 294 sevens in 2,000 rolls.

That would put you in the top 1%.

If you are recording 240 or less 7s in 1600 rolls (15%) that is putting you in the top 3.8%.
----- You want the truth! You can't handle the truth!
boymimbo
boymimbo
Joined: Nov 12, 2009
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 5994
January 18th, 2013 at 10:26:02 AM permalink
Random roller's odds of throwing 150 or less 7s of 1000 is 8.4%
----- You want the truth! You can't handle the truth!
SOOPOO
SOOPOO 
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
  • Threads: 108
  • Posts: 6697
January 18th, 2013 at 10:28:16 AM permalink
Quote: boymimbo

Random roller's odds of throwing 150 or less 7s of 1000 is 8.4%



I'll take that chance. Since I know there is no such thing as a dice influencer, as the Wizard would say, it is a good bet for me. Of course I may lose, it seems, 8.4% of the time!
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 11933
January 18th, 2013 at 10:28:44 AM permalink
deleted
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
boymimbo
boymimbo
Joined: Nov 12, 2009
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 5994
January 18th, 2013 at 10:38:19 AM permalink
No, the odds of throwing 1,500 or less sevens in 10K rolls is 0.00031%. It's sufficient.
----- You want the truth! You can't handle the truth!
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 11933
January 18th, 2013 at 10:42:25 AM permalink
deleted
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
tupp
tupp
Joined: Feb 9, 2012
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 519
January 18th, 2013 at 10:50:09 AM permalink
Quote: SOOPOO

So 150 out of 1000 would be the WORST .... I'll bet $1000 you cant find a guy to roll 150 or fewer 7's in 1000 rolls.

Nope.

We are not betting on whether or not we can find a DI -- we have a bet IF we can find a DI.

Also, no more than 100 or 200 rolls in a single session, and it might not be easy getting a DI to shoot for more than one session (if we can find one at all).

In addition, I don't have $1000 to bet, but I'll wager $100.


Quote:

Pay me double if he can't roll fewer than 160.

No. Let's stick to the original "coherent" statement.
Ahigh
Ahigh
Joined: May 19, 2010
  • Threads: 86
  • Posts: 5114
January 18th, 2013 at 11:18:48 AM permalink
Here's the majority of the rolls I have recorded:

http://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/craps/5411-has-anyone-ever-seen-a-real-study-on-dice-control/18/#post188271
CrapsForever
CrapsForever
Joined: Mar 6, 2012
  • Threads: 27
  • Posts: 517
January 18th, 2013 at 11:33:43 AM permalink
....................
Craps is the most "Jekyll and Hyde" casino game ever invented!

  • Jump to: