It is played out of an eight deck shoe, automatic, not continuous shuffler. For what it's worth, it seemed to be two decks cut.
The rules are: If the dealer has a 10 up, he first checks for blackjack. If he has a suited blackjack with a 10 up, the blackjack is discarded and the rules are as below...... this seems to negate 1/8 of the dealers blackjacks.
If the dealer has a 10 up and does not have blackjack, the dealer then checks again, and if he has a hard 20, he discards those two cards, and then "all subsequent dealer hand are discarded until the dealer ends up with two cards that up not both 10 value cards or a blackjack- the hand is then played out as in the regular game"
additionally, player may elect to double on any number of cards.
A dealer total of 22 will push or remaining hands except blackjack. [Mike blackjack switch, or power blackjack]
Blackjack pays 1 1/2 to 1, you can double on any number of cards, even after splitting. One card on split aces.. I don't think you can re split aces.
Can somebody run the numbers on this game, and also the basic strategy, house advantage etc.
I don't think somebody would spend the time and write up a math report for you on your request or demand for it, if your are not the Nevada Gaming Commission who needs it, even to post it at this site for our enjoyment and interest. Gaming mathematicians generally charge a worthy fee for their efforts to produce or to see their reports, and they are generally not released until a game is very thoroughly established after a field trial, and Mike Shackleford deems it worthy to be released on his gaming math site. We assume that such a report was done for the Nevada Gaming commission - for the game to be approved for play in a Nevada Casino, such as Binions.
Maybe you can contact the distributor of this game, and see if they send you a free copy of this math report.
Quote: sg49
Can somebody run the numbers on this game, and also the basic strategy, house advantage etc.
Contact Switch (a member of this forum), he is the inventor of this game. Also blackjack switch, power blackjack and Neverbust Blackjack.
0.80% (no resplit Aces) and 0.73% (resplit Aces allowed)
Both with 8 decks, player doubles on any number of cards, DOA, DAS
Quote: SwitchI'm distributing my games in Nevada and I haven't got a problem divulging the house edge which is:-
0.80% (no resplit Aces) and 0.73% (resplit Aces allowed)
Both with 8 decks, player doubles on any number of cards, DOA, DAS
Seems fair - a little more fun than regular BJ, a little more expensive than regular BJ.
Enjoyed the game and thanks for response
Quote: sg49Right now, just Binion's? any more casinos in NV or SoCal?
Enjoyed the game and thanks for response
It's on trial until September. Eureka Casino, Mesquite, also has the game.
Quote: buzzpaffGreat opportunity for a cheating dealer !!!
How? Dealer has to reveal their hand at the end of the round.
from a SPOOK at another table.
Not telling SWITCH anything he does not know!
So there are no additional security issues with the hole card in this game.
Quote: SwitchBy placing the cards in a particular angle, the dealer can use a peeker to check whether the hole card is "Ace or non-Ace" (with a '10' up-card) or "10 or non-10" (with an 'Ace' up-card).
So there are no additional security issues with the hole card in this game.
Also, 10 or non 10 with a 10 up, if I'm reading correctly and 20s are discarded in some cases? So both top corners of the holecard would be checked in that case? Still not a security issue, but unusual.
Quote: rdw4potusAlso, 10 or non 10 with a 10 up, if I'm reading correctly and 20s are discarded in some cases? So both top corners of the holecard would be checked in that case? Still not a security issue, but unusual.
Correct, a 10-value card is checked both ways in the peeker.
Quote: sg49next question...is the intent that the dealer burns all suited BJ or 10 up BJ?
Dealer burns all hard 20s (not ace-9), and ten-up suited blackjacks.
I played this one today too. It seemed to take ages for the dealer to get a hand to burn. As I waited I saw the dreaded dealer 22 several times.
Saw this when I googled burn blackjack. Even more interesting was the following description for " face cards "
Aces count as either 1 or 11, dressed cards as 10, and remaining cards according to their number values.
Quote: WizardI played this one today too. It seemed to take ages for the dealer to get a hand to burn.
When trying simulations of the more gimmicky VP games (Ace Invaders, Chase the Royal, Quick Quads, Dream Card, etc) I've noticed at first all I do is wait for the gimmick/special feature to kick in. And in the meantime you can lose an awful lot of simulated credits...
Anyway, it seems gimmicky table games, even BJ-based, are no different. It's good to know that.
I played this one today too. It seemed to take ages for the dealer to get a hand to burn.
in an infinite deck, shouldn't a dealer get a 10/10 twenty 16/169 of the time? [4/13 x 4/13]
Quote: sg49in an infinite deck, shouldn't a dealer get a 10/10 twenty 16/169 of the time? [4/13 x 4/13]
Yes. I think I went through about five decks waiting for one.
Quote: WizardQuote: sg49in an infinite deck, shouldn't a dealer get a 10/10 twenty 16/169 of the time? [4/13 x 4/13]
Yes. I think I went through about five decks waiting for one.
You also get a slight advantage around 20% of the time when the dealer has a 10 up and reveals that they do not have 20.
Quote: buzzpaffI think the waiting to get a hand that pays is why Let It Ride is slowing fading away!
I agree. But at the same time, it's odd that MS Stud seems to be picking up steam. MS Stud is basically the same game in reverse, isn't it?
Have you had a chance to score this game....Love to see what you think
Quote: sg49Hi Wiz-Have you had a chance to score this game....Love to see what you think
Yes. I have not had a chance to write it up yet.
As always, I welcome comments, corrections, suggestions, all that jazz.
"Player may double any first two cards. Play may not double after splitting. "
It should read "Player may not double after splitting."
The house edge hypotheticals at the end, do I understand correctly there would be a player advantage if BJ paid less (6:5)? My inner gambler says that can't possibly be right.
Mike, rules 3 & 5 need to be amended - please check email.
Quote: NareedThe house edge hypotheticals at the end, do I understand correctly there would be a player advantage if BJ paid less (6:5)? My inner gambler says that can't possibly be right.
No. The hypotheticals add to the house edge. 0.63% + 1.37% = 2.00% House Edge.
Quote: PokeraddictIs this game still live at Binions? Is it anywhere else?
Yes. No.
It looks like it is an 8 deck game now even though the original reviews were 6 deck, is that true?
The dealers were cutting more than half of the deck out. Is this correct or was this a dealer error?
If a dealer pitches a suited blackjack, and gets another one, does it stay? What about if he gets a hard 20 after a suited BJ?
Is Burn 20 in a test run or is it fully approved?
The dealers were hard for me to understand and I did not want to slow the game down asking a bunch of questions.
It seemed like a fun variation where a lot of players made some pretty obvious mistakes. Thanks in advance for your time.
Yes, it's my game, installed into Binions last July.
It can be either 6 or 8 decks - up to the casinos.
More than 1/2 the deck or 1/2 the shoe? If it's more than 1/2 the shoe then this is either new procedures or maybe you had a dealer who was cutting extra thick?
If the suited 'Blackjack' is with the 10 on top then it is burned along with all subsequent 20's and 'Blackjacks'.
'Burn 20' is fully approved in Nevada.
It's not the easiest game to explain quickly but it doesn't take long to get used to it. Most changes in strategy come when the dealer shows a 10 but hasn't got 20 - you split 2's, 3's, 7's and 9's along with doubling 10 and standing on Soft 18.
Both of the dealers cut extra thick. One cut over half of the shoe out. The front of the shoe was probably 3.5 of the 8 decks. The other dealer was probably between 4-4.5. I thought it was really odd to toss an 8 deck out there and deal only half of it +/- before a reshuffle. I thought it might have to do with how counting this game would come with more advantages than just a real game. I guess you are saying it was a dealer error.
If the suited 'Blackjack' is with the 10 on top then it is burned along with all subsequent 20's and 'Blackjacks'.
Thank you for explaining that to me. The dealers could not. A player said if the dealer had any suited blackjack it was burnt, but if they tossed it and got a hard 20 it stayed. The dealers were stumbling on the game, although one was fairly competent, he was slow to make sure he did it right. It was hard to understand a couple of them.
The game seems very interesting. I would prefer to not play it at Binions though. I am sure you will keep us posted if you get it installed in other places.
I found that there was a vast difference between both dealer aptitude as well as pit friendliness depending on the time and day of the week that you played.
As far as other installations go then although I really like the game, as well as another variant of mine, 'Power Blackjack', I think that 'Free Bet Blackjack' will take priority amongst the 3. Even though that game won't be on trial until June, the feedback has suggested that it is the one most likely to succeed.
Look out for that one at The Golden Nugget soon :-)
Quote: SwitchThe game is slightly more vulnerable due to the nature of the 'Burn 20'. I advised on around a 2/2.5 deck cut-off. Maybe the pit boss took it on himself to cut thicker as he felt that you knew what you were doing?
I found that there was a vast difference between both dealer aptitude as well as pit friendliness depending on the time and day of the week that you played.
For one deck there were two other people playing $15-$25. They left at shuffle. I was betting the minimum $10 most bets just soaking the game up, I was hardly a threat. I don't think the boss was even watching. Perhaps the other people were beating them up before I got there. They colored maybe $700 between them, but they could have been there all day spewing and made a minor comeback. They were a complete fail at BS for even a regular BJ game (they doubled a lot of soft hands in bad spots, and loved doubling 9 in the wrong places), much less the advanced play this needs.
I will look forward to your other games.
Quote: buzzpaffHey, it's 1:40 in the AM over there, isn't it. LOL
That's nothing Buzz - I'm an all-nighter. Will probably get to sleep around 4.00/4.30am - it is Saturday night afterall :-)