qwertq
qwertq
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 2
Joined: Mar 7, 2026
March 7th, 2026 at 1:58:53 AM permalink
Hi, I cannot link it due to being a new user, but the site is called bjstrat.

How accurate is it? Reason I'm asking is that it displays the player having a 0.0243% edge over the casino with 1 deck, no DAS, no surrender, no re-splits.

It also appears to overestimate the EVs when picking 8 decks, -0.607% EV, when the casinos with these rules themselves claim a 0.72% house edge. On providers that offer DAS & list a 0.56% house edge, bjstrat says 0.486% house edge.

Am I missing something? And if not, is there a more accurate one out there?

Thanks.
gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 5988
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
March 7th, 2026 at 6:00:31 AM permalink
Here's the link:

bjstrat CCA

Thank you for pointing this out. I have extensively used the bjstrat composition dependent combinatorial analyzer for more than 10 years and it has always been highly accurate. The bjstrat CCA's results were used by the programmer JB as the gold standard for QA purposes when he programmed the WOO site's composition dependent BJ hand analyzer.

But I now see changes to the calculator:

- The player's EV is now formatted differently, it now is a white font on a black or red background. Previously, it has been black font on a white backgroumd.
- The "compute mode" for basic strategy now is functional; it previously gave the same result for "optimal strategy" and "basic strategy"
- Some of the outputs are incorrect, as you have flagged in your post.

It seems clear to me that after a decade of neglect someone is tinkering with the underlying software.

The WOO site has a similar composition-dependent BJ hand calculator: WOO BJ hand calculator It shows player EV for the decision options to more significant digits than bjstrat.net but does not display the dealer's probabilities in the way that Bjstrat does.
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
qwertq
qwertq
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 2
Joined: Mar 7, 2026
March 7th, 2026 at 6:23:22 AM permalink
Thanks for the response. Is it possible to see the EV before any cards are dealt with the WOO one? It seems I have to feed it cards to then see the EV for each option of that one hand, as opposed to being able to see the general EV with a specific deck composition.
aceside
aceside
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 956
Joined: May 14, 2021
March 7th, 2026 at 7:50:12 AM permalink
I believe all the discrepancies between different blackjack calculators lie in the part that involves pair splitting decisions.
gordonm888
Administrator
gordonm888
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 5988
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
March 7th, 2026 at 8:11:59 AM permalink
Quote: qwertq

Thanks for the response. Is it possible to see the EV before any cards are dealt with the WOO one? It seems I have to feed it cards to then see the EV for each option of that one hand, as opposed to being able to see the general EV with a specific deck composition.
link to original post



The outputs for the WOO calculator are very limited compared to Bjstrat. It doesn't do the total player Ev for a specific deck composition.
So many better men, a few of them friends, are dead. And a thousand thousand slimy things live on, and so do I.
aceside
aceside
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 956
Joined: May 14, 2021
March 7th, 2026 at 8:18:06 AM permalink
I compared both calculators. The Bjstrat calculator is missing the comparison between “after the dealt” and “before the dealt” deck compositions.
  • Jump to: