Poll
No votes (0%) | |||
1 vote (9.09%) | |||
8 votes (72.72%) | |||
5 votes (45.45%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
2 votes (18.18%) | |||
3 votes (27.27%) | |||
5 votes (45.45%) | |||
3 votes (27.27%) | |||
2 votes (18.18%) |
11 members have voted
Event | Pays | Combinations | Probability | Return |
---|---|---|---|---|
A/K diamonds | 130 | 4 | 0.000747 | 0.097087 |
Suited aces | 45 | 4 | 0.000747 | 0.033607 |
Unsuited aces | 25 | 24 | 0.004481 | 0.112024 |
Suited blackjack | 15 | 60 | 0.011202 | 0.168036 |
Unsuited blackjack | 5 | 192 | 0.035848 | 0.179238 |
Straight flush | 5 | 192 | 0.035848 | 0.179238 |
All other | -1 | 4880 | 0.911128 | -0.911128 |
Total | 5356 | 1.000000 | -0.141897 |
Note: Edited 5:00 PM, 9/24/24
The question for the poll is would you make this side bet if playing anyway? Multiple votes allowed.
Quote: WizardI hear the Orleans has a new blackjack side bet called the Mardis Gras. It is seen on their double-deck game only. The following table shows the pay table and my analysis. I haven't had it confirmed. Anyone agree or disagree with my math?
Event Pays Combinations Probability Return A/K diamonds 130 4 0.000747 0.097087 Suited aces 45 4 0.000747 0.033607 Unsuited aces 25 24 0.004481 0.112024 Suited blackjack 15 60 0.011202 0.168036 Unsuited blackjack 5 192 0.035848 0.179238 Straight flush 5 208 0.038835 0.194175 All other -1 4864 0.908140 -0.908140 Total 5356 1.000000 -0.123973
The question for the poll is would you make this side bet if playing anyway? Multiple votes allowed.
link to original post
Would counting aces make this game beatable if they dealt 1.5 decks?
Quote: DRichWould counting aces make this game beatable if they dealt 1.5 decks?
link to original post
I haven't studied it, but my educated guess it would be very countable with 75% penetration.
Quote: DRichWould counting aces make this game beatable if they dealt 1.5 decks?
link to original post
Challenge accepted!
Here's what I get in simulation ("aces" refers to how many are still in the deck; the number is the expected value on a bet of 1)
75% Penetration:
0 Aces: -0.7687
1 Ace: -0.5954
2 Aces: -0.3485
3 Aces: -0.0263
4 Aces: 0.3684
5 Aces: 0.8357
6 Aces: 1.3811
7 Aces: 1.9393
8 Aces: 2.841
50% Penetration:
0 Aces: -0.768
1 Ace: -0.682
2 Aces: -0.5771
3 Aces: -0.4544
4 Aces: -0.3132
5 Aces: -0.1537
6 Aces: 0.0218
7 Aces: 0.2189
8 Aces: 0.4296
Of course, you have to take into account how often you will get to an advantage count; it's about 1 in 6.5 decks with 50%, and 1 in 9.5 with 75%.
But one question: Is the straight flush any two suited consecutive cards?
Quote: ThatDonGuyQuote: DRichWould counting aces make this game beatable if they dealt 1.5 decks?
link to original post
Challenge accepted!
Here's what I get in simulation ("aces" refers to how many are still in the deck; the number is the expected value on a bet of 1)
75% Penetration:
0 Aces: -0.7687
1 Ace: -0.5954
2 Aces: -0.3485
3 Aces: -0.0263
4 Aces: 0.3684
5 Aces: 0.8357
6 Aces: 1.3811
7 Aces: 1.9393
8 Aces: 2.841
50% Penetration:
0 Aces: -0.768
1 Ace: -0.682
2 Aces: -0.5771
3 Aces: -0.4544
4 Aces: -0.3132
5 Aces: -0.1537
6 Aces: 0.0218
7 Aces: 0.2189
8 Aces: 0.4296
Of course, you have to take into account how often you will get to an advantage count; it's about 1 in 6.5 decks with 50%, and 1 in 9.5 with 75%.
link to original post
ThatDonGuy,
I am confused by your closing paragraph, which seems to imply that +EV counts will occur more frequently with 50% pen than with 75% pen.
Can you clarify?
Dog Hand
Quote: DJTeddyBearBut one question: Is the straight flush any two suited consecutive cards?
link to original post
Yes. Anyone attempting the math should be careful to not double count ace+king, which is both a blackjack and a straight flush.
- Hit frequency is about once every eleven hands. I wish that was a little higher, but it's not terrible.
- Payouts are decent. I like that the payouts aren't nice round numbers like they tend to be. Payouts like 45 and 130 give the players a little extra money to tip with. Easier to get a tip from $450 than from $400.
- House edge is high, but I guess it has to be high to combat possible countability. At least it's not Lucky Ladies high.
Overall, I'd enjoy dealing it, but I probably wouldn't play it due to its high house edge.
Quote: DogHand
ThatDonGuy,
I am confused by your closing paragraph, which seems to imply that +EV counts will occur more frequently with 50% pen than with 75% pen.
Can you clarify?
Dog Hand
link to original post
You understand it correctly - a +EV count will be 50% more likely at the 50% penetration point than at the 75% penetration point.
Keep in mind that my numbers are not "50% or more penetration" versus "75% or more penetration"; it's at those two specific points (i.e. 52 cards dealt versus 78).
This is one of the reasons the actual EVs are higher with 75% penetration than with 50%.
Quote: WizardI hear the Orleans has a new blackjack side bet called the Mardis Gras. It is seen on their double-deck game only. The following table shows the pay table and my analysis. I haven't had it confirmed. Anyone agree or disagree with my math?
Event Pays Combinations Probability Return A/K diamonds 130 4 0.000747 0.097087 Suited aces 45 4 0.000747 0.033607 Unsuited aces 25 24 0.004481 0.112024 Suited blackjack 15 60 0.011202 0.168036 Unsuited blackjack 5 192 0.035848 0.179238 Straight flush 5 192 0.035848 0.179238 All other -1 4880 0.911128 -0.911128 Total 5356 1.000000 -0.141897
Note: Edited 5:00 PM, 9/24/24
The question for the poll is would you make this side bet if playing anyway? Multiple votes allowed.
link to original post
Close! (just kidding!) I decided to monkey it up, and according to the CApuchin combinatorial analysis engine it is: -0.1418969401856884
Remove an Ace of Diamonds and it is -0.2613744578702608
Remove any other ace: -0.2175899529102026
Remove King of Diamonds: -0.1840852882451145
And I shall go no further, as something counterintuitive is revealed with further examination.