Thread Rating:
I might have missed it a year ago but this article should be posted on every BJ board for the masses to read:
https://www.cdcgamingreports.com/commentaries/massachusetts-and-pennsylvania-a-lesson-from-two-blackjack-payouts/#.Yj2QnrKYM_U.twitter
Boston Black Jack is just baked beans.
Quote: GManHi,
I might have missed it a year ago but this article should be posted on every BJ board for the masses to read:
https://www.cdcgamingreports.com/commentaries/massachusetts-and-pennsylvania-a-lesson-from-two-blackjack-payouts/#.Yj2QnrKYM_U.twitter
link to original post
There’s other things to consider like the inside of how a casino operates that the article doesn’t talk about. Such as desired hold rates that GM’s and VP’s want to see for certain bet denominations. They want red chippers and green chippers to have a higher hold. A higher hold can only be attained with a worse game. Hence why they do it for the low stakes tables in MA.
I by no means want 6:5 blackjack and tell everyone to stay away from it. But it’s a fact of life that it’s here. The best we can advise is for people to not play it. It’s like drugs: just say no.
Quote: WABJ11
I by no means want 6:5 blackjack and tell everyone to stay away from it. But it’s a fact of life that it’s here. The best we can advise is for people to not play it. It’s like drugs: just say no.
I look at it as for people that play the lottery, 6:5 blackjack offers a great return.
If I was running $4,000 ahead for the session, 6:5 would bring it down to $3,500. If I was running -$500 in the session, I'd bust out on my $1,000 buy-in with the extra $500 loss.
Quote: DRichQuote: WABJ11
I by no means want 6:5 blackjack and tell everyone to stay away from it. But it’s a fact of life that it’s here. The best we can advise is for people to not play it. It’s like drugs: just say no.
I look at it as for people that play the lottery, 6:5 blackjack offers a great return.
link to original post
It is funny how in a tizzy this forum gets over 6:5 BJ. Yet double zero roulette exists. And 92% slots. And Big Red. And baccarat tie.
Casinos are in business to make money. If it wasn’t for ‘history’ decent odds BJ would not exist.
First and foremost, paying 6:5 is changing a fundamental part of the game. 6:5 games shouldn’t even be called blackjack…they should be called 21Quote: SOOPOOQuote: DRichQuote: WABJ11
I by no means want 6:5 blackjack and tell everyone to stay away from it. But it’s a fact of life that it’s here. The best we can advise is for people to not play it. It’s like drugs: just say no.
I look at it as for people that play the lottery, 6:5 blackjack offers a great return.
link to original post
It is funny how in a tizzy this forum gets over 6:5 BJ. Yet double zero roulette exists. And 92% slots. And Big Red. And baccarat tie.
Casinos are in business to make money. If it wasn’t for ‘history’ decent odds BJ would not exist.
link to original post
Second, the average edge on 3:2 blackjack is about 2% (so I’ve read). This is higher than baccarat, craps pass line and European roulette. No basis for jacking it up more
Quote: Ace2First and foremost, paying 6:5 is changing a fundamental part of the game. 6:5 games shouldn’t even be called blackjack…they should be called 21Quote: SOOPOOQuote: DRichQuote: WABJ11
I by no means want 6:5 blackjack and tell everyone to stay away from it. But it’s a fact of life that it’s here. The best we can advise is for people to not play it. It’s like drugs: just say no.
I look at it as for people that play the lottery, 6:5 blackjack offers a great return.
link to original post
It is funny how in a tizzy this forum gets over 6:5 BJ. Yet double zero roulette exists. And 92% slots. And Big Red. And baccarat tie.
Casinos are in business to make money. If it wasn’t for ‘history’ decent odds BJ would not exist.
link to original post
Second, the average edge on 3:2 blackjack is about 2% (so I’ve read). This is higher than baccarat, craps pass line and European roulette. No basis for jacking it up more
link to original post
If people will play a 3% house edge game instead of a 2% house edge game that by definition IS THE BASIS for having the 3% game. You won’t play it. I won’t play it. But if the seats are full it is here to stay.
As far as the name…. There are a boatload of different rules that are all called Blackjack. Hit soft 17. Stand soft 17. Double any hand. Double only 11. Split once, twice, three times. Surrender. No surrender. Which set of rules do you reserve for the name ‘Blackjack’?
Quote: SOOPOO
Which set of rules do you reserve for the name ‘Blackjack’?
link to original post
A player natural 21 is paid at more than 1:1.
Dealer loses when exceeding a hard 21 total. (No push on 22.)
This could be quite interesting to see how people feel.
"Triple Zero Roulette gives you more ways to win."
--- Casino Managers
Quote: SkittleCar1
"Triple Zero Roulette gives you more ways to win."
--- Casino Managers
Sadly, it is a true statement.
6:5 raises the edge by about 1.5%. None of the other common variations are remotely close…most are 0.1% or less.Quote: SOOPOOQuote: Ace2First and foremost, paying 6:5 is changing a fundamental part of the game. 6:5 games shouldn’t even be called blackjack…they should be called 21Quote: SOOPOOQuote: DRichQuote: WABJ11
I by no means want 6:5 blackjack and tell everyone to stay away from it. But it’s a fact of life that it’s here. The best we can advise is for people to not play it. It’s like drugs: just say no.
I look at it as for people that play the lottery, 6:5 blackjack offers a great return.
link to original post
It is funny how in a tizzy this forum gets over 6:5 BJ. Yet double zero roulette exists. And 92% slots. And Big Red. And baccarat tie.
Casinos are in business to make money. If it wasn’t for ‘history’ decent odds BJ would not exist.
link to original post
Second, the average edge on 3:2 blackjack is about 2% (so I’ve read). This is higher than baccarat, craps pass line and European roulette. No basis for jacking it up more
link to original post
If people will play a 3% house edge game instead of a 2% house edge game that by definition IS THE BASIS for having the 3% game. You won’t play it. I won’t play it. But if the seats are full it is here to stay.
As far as the name…. There are a boatload of different rules that are all called Blackjack. Hit soft 17. Stand soft 17. Double any hand. Double only 11. Split once, twice, three times. Surrender. No surrender. Which set of rules do you reserve for the name ‘Blackjack’?
link to original post
Also, many of those variations net out and you still have a 3:2 game with an edge around 0.5% (playing basic strategy) for most games despite some varying rules. However, 6:5 QUADRUPLES that 0.5% edge !
A-Ten vs 6
Stand (BJ) EV = 120%
Double: EV= 66.65%
BJ always wins against 2-9 which is why it is better than doubling