December 13th, 2020 at 9:11:18 PM
permalink
I was wondering if anyone with technical skills, maybe in python, could run a simulation.
The game I am playing is 2 deck, 3:2 payout BJ, Dealer S17, Resplit up to 4 hands, No resplitting or hitting split aces, double after split, and double on any two cards.
What would the house edge be with total dependent strategy vs perfect composition dependent strategy?
The game I am playing is 2 deck, 3:2 payout BJ, Dealer S17, Resplit up to 4 hands, No resplitting or hitting split aces, double after split, and double on any two cards.
What would the house edge be with total dependent strategy vs perfect composition dependent strategy?
December 14th, 2020 at 12:19:22 PM
permalink
Quote: CarnageCard21I was wondering if anyone with technical skills, maybe in python, could run a simulation.
The game I am playing is 2 deck, 3:2 payout BJ, Dealer S17, Resplit up to 4 hands, No resplitting or hitting split aces, double after split, and double on any two cards.
What would the house edge be with total dependent strategy vs perfect composition dependent strategy?
MGP's Blackjack Combinatorial Analyzer gives:
Total Dependent Strategy = -0.1925%
2 Card Dependant Strategy = -0.1819%
Composition Dependent = -0.1789%
G Man
December 14th, 2020 at 1:47:29 PM
permalink
Do you know if there is a way to run this program from a linux terminal? I don't have windows.