Tom's newly invented card counting system
April 27th, 2019 at 11:56:03 PM
permalink
Tom's newly invented card counting system or can i invested a new card counting system?
i want to invent a new counting system.
it is to bet by hilo. but to play the and by hand EOR. which means, every hand,we will use a different system. all these different systems will be similar to hilow but with exceptions. then good but not too hard to use. if too hard at that moment, go back to hilo to play that hand.
i tried it in real casino, not that much not-practical.
i explain why and how llater step by step. updates by updates.
1) let's think about the IE. insurance strategy. A is counted by as -1. but it should be counted as 1. in this case, for a new shoe, we need tc4+ to make it +ev to bet insurance. as the cards travel, we need 3+, 2+, 1+. just because the A is +1, not -1. but we count it as -1(or 0). we can adjust it by not hard burden for memory if only we know why it is like this. if you agree with this, all hands will be like this, if only you understand why it is like this, you can do some good devi on strategy.
2) hands: A8V6, we double it at tc1+. but how about last hand has 6 *card 2. the 2 is working as -1. because A8 is crying for card 2. well. it is too hard to give -1 to card 2, 1 to card 3,4,5,6, but we don't really keep it in memory on purpose. because the chance of A8V6 to be present is low. we just need to understand this hand, we really meet this hand, we try to recall our shor memory. if there are many '2"s.
3) hands of 10,9, they are just using hi low. but hands of 11, cards A and 10 are working differently... just do it like above.
4) hands of 12, 13, 16...cards 5,6,7,8,9 are working so differents. we may just use basic strategy. or if that count is just around the point. for example. 12V3, the true count is 1.5 about, we are not really sure 1.4 or 1.6. if you can see a lot of ,7,8,9 on the table or in your memory, you split 77, 88,99 last hand, just stand 12V3. the card 9 reomoved is 19.5 times important that card 2.
there are many other examples. i have the full table of hands eor for each hand using my own CA. i may share it some time later.
so my counting systems. is the same as hilow. but with reference to hand eor.
we need to understand EOR to do good reference. one basic simple is: the left card(or using another logic, dealt cards) should make your hand 21. and that card is not making dealer 11 of 2 cards. and making dealer 16. these are the points make the card EOR high. which means. when playing, we need to focus both on our cards and dealer's card. this is really similar to basic strategy. what we go deeper is we need to know if dealt card is good for us or bad for u. and for the dealer, if dealt is bad for u and good.....i will make the logic clearer later. let's focus on some examples.
example 1:
one deck 84V3. we stand by CD(NOT TD). because we want the "8", but 8 is in this hand. dealer wants 8 to make 11. but dealer has less '8', because we have it in the hand. dealer is easier to get busted.
one deck 93V3. we hit. why? 9 is less, 9 is making us 21. but wait, we look at the dealer 3. 9 less is also good for the dealer, when dealer has less chance to make hand into 3+9=12. so card 9 is good for u, but less, we should stand. but 9 less is good for dealer, we then hit. in this hand. 9's eor is less than 8.
it seems now it explains cd basic strategy better than counting card? but actually cd is counting cards within this hand.
that is all for this post. if positive, i will finish all other hands'a analysis.
i want to invent a new counting system.
it is to bet by hilo. but to play the and by hand EOR. which means, every hand,we will use a different system. all these different systems will be similar to hilow but with exceptions. then good but not too hard to use. if too hard at that moment, go back to hilo to play that hand.
i tried it in real casino, not that much not-practical.
i explain why and how llater step by step. updates by updates.
1) let's think about the IE. insurance strategy. A is counted by as -1. but it should be counted as 1. in this case, for a new shoe, we need tc4+ to make it +ev to bet insurance. as the cards travel, we need 3+, 2+, 1+. just because the A is +1, not -1. but we count it as -1(or 0). we can adjust it by not hard burden for memory if only we know why it is like this. if you agree with this, all hands will be like this, if only you understand why it is like this, you can do some good devi on strategy.
2) hands: A8V6, we double it at tc1+. but how about last hand has 6 *card 2. the 2 is working as -1. because A8 is crying for card 2. well. it is too hard to give -1 to card 2, 1 to card 3,4,5,6, but we don't really keep it in memory on purpose. because the chance of A8V6 to be present is low. we just need to understand this hand, we really meet this hand, we try to recall our shor memory. if there are many '2"s.
3) hands of 10,9, they are just using hi low. but hands of 11, cards A and 10 are working differently... just do it like above.
4) hands of 12, 13, 16...cards 5,6,7,8,9 are working so differents. we may just use basic strategy. or if that count is just around the point. for example. 12V3, the true count is 1.5 about, we are not really sure 1.4 or 1.6. if you can see a lot of ,7,8,9 on the table or in your memory, you split 77, 88,99 last hand, just stand 12V3. the card 9 reomoved is 19.5 times important that card 2.
there are many other examples. i have the full table of hands eor for each hand using my own CA. i may share it some time later.
so my counting systems. is the same as hilow. but with reference to hand eor.
we need to understand EOR to do good reference. one basic simple is: the left card(or using another logic, dealt cards) should make your hand 21. and that card is not making dealer 11 of 2 cards. and making dealer 16. these are the points make the card EOR high. which means. when playing, we need to focus both on our cards and dealer's card. this is really similar to basic strategy. what we go deeper is we need to know if dealt card is good for us or bad for u. and for the dealer, if dealt is bad for u and good.....i will make the logic clearer later. let's focus on some examples.
example 1:
one deck 84V3. we stand by CD(NOT TD). because we want the "8", but 8 is in this hand. dealer wants 8 to make 11. but dealer has less '8', because we have it in the hand. dealer is easier to get busted.
one deck 93V3. we hit. why? 9 is less, 9 is making us 21. but wait, we look at the dealer 3. 9 less is also good for the dealer, when dealer has less chance to make hand into 3+9=12. so card 9 is good for u, but less, we should stand. but 9 less is good for dealer, we then hit. in this hand. 9's eor is less than 8.
it seems now it explains cd basic strategy better than counting card? but actually cd is counting cards within this hand.
that is all for this post. if positive, i will finish all other hands'a analysis.
May 1st, 2019 at 9:10:31 AM
permalink
The first thing I would suggest is editing your post before hitting the POST button. I'm not sure about much of what you've written because of the simple syntax, spelling and punctuation errors.
Just one example:
"one deck 93V3. we hit. why? 9 is less, 9 is making us 21. but wait, we look at the dealer 3. 9 less is also good for the dealer, when dealer has less chance to make hand into 3+9=12. so card 9 is good for u, but less, we should stand. but 9 less is good for dealer, we then hit. in this hand. 9's eor is less than 8.
What's the purpose of your post if no one can understand what you are saying except you?
Just one example:
"one deck 93V3. we hit. why? 9 is less, 9 is making us 21. but wait, we look at the dealer 3. 9 less is also good for the dealer, when dealer has less chance to make hand into 3+9=12. so card 9 is good for u, but less, we should stand. but 9 less is good for dealer, we then hit. in this hand. 9's eor is less than 8.
What's the purpose of your post if no one can understand what you are saying except you?
May 1st, 2019 at 10:44:14 AM
permalink
Quote: racquetThe first thing I would suggest is editing your post before hitting the POST button. I'm not sure about much of what you've written because of the simple syntax, spelling and punctuation errors.
Just one example:
"one deck 93V3. we hit. why? 9 is less, 9 is making us 21. but wait, we look at the dealer 3. 9 less is also good for the dealer, when dealer has less chance to make hand into 3+9=12. so card 9 is good for u, but less, we should stand. but 9 less is good for dealer, we then hit. in this hand. 9's eor is less than 8.
What's the purpose of your post if no one can understand what you are saying except you?
Its part of the camouflage to make the play unintelligible
For Whom the bus tolls; The bus tolls for thee
May 1st, 2019 at 11:45:37 AM
permalink
All that stuff is highly overrated.Quote: racquetsimple syntax, spelling and punctuation errors.
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
May 1st, 2019 at 2:20:24 PM
permalink
Quote: AxelWolfAll that stuff is highly overrated.
I done yes totally agree think.
Syntax is just a tax to be avoided.
AZDuffman and I should agree on the abolishment of this overburdening tax
I should be able to do syn without having tax as well
We all should strive to live syn free
For Whom the bus tolls; The bus tolls for thee
May 2nd, 2019 at 3:52:36 AM
permalink
Quote: racquetThe first thing I would suggest is editing your post before hitting the POST button. I'm not sure about much of what you've written because of the simple syntax, spelling and punctuation errors.
Just one example:
"one deck 93V3. we hit. why? 9 is less, 9 is making us 21. but wait, we look at the dealer 3. 9 less is also good for the dealer, when dealer has less chance to make hand into 3+9=12. so card 9 is good for u, but less, we should stand. but 9 less is good for dealer, we then hit. in this hand. 9's eor is less than 8.
What's the purpose of your post if no one can understand what you are saying except you?
that is language. i may feel ashamed to say i studied english as my major in college. but how about maths? i self learned to do a lot on blackjack, bac and poker(After read Great Eliot's articles)... is there no one who understands what i am trying to say?
maybe i just ask:
in single deck, 93V3, the right strategy is to hit, 84v3, it is to stand.
what is the reason behind it?
if there is a reason, then this reason works for the playing efficiency of all hands of blackjack.
Last edited by: tomchina123 on May 2, 2019
May 2nd, 2019 at 4:09:26 AM
permalink
if this hand is not important, how about 'A' as side count? do we really make good use of this side count? the A is the same 'direction' =-1 as for our hand total" 9, 10, A8', but total different direction=1 for hand total '11". mostly= '0' as counting system tells us for stiff hand. but when dealer's 6, A =1 again(rule of stand 'soft 17').
May 2nd, 2019 at 9:10:10 AM
permalink
Quote: tomchina123that is language. i may feel ashamed to say i studied english as my major in college
What college? I have kids applying for college soon and want to make sure it's not on their list.
May 2nd, 2019 at 9:16:28 AM
permalink
Quote: racquetWhat college? I have kids applying for college soon and want to make sure it's not on their list.
SHK
School of Hard Knocks
For Whom the bus tolls; The bus tolls for thee
May 2nd, 2019 at 10:02:28 AM
permalink
Quote: racquetWhat college? I have kids applying for college soon and want to make sure it's not on their list.
well, if your kids want to learn maths by Chinese language, or just learn Chinese as a major... i need to make sure of your understanding first.
如果你想用中文写文章，我想阅读下。
and i don't want the thread to go to politics. they are just 2 languges.
what i replied to this guy's comment was neutral. what i rereplied to him is soft defense to his offense.
if this guy goes further, i hope the administator of the forum makes good judgement.
