Spread-Bet Blackjack
Poll
 | 1 vote (16.66%) | ||
| | 1 vote (16.66%) | ||
| | 1 vote (16.66%) | ||
| | 2 votes (33.33%) | ||
| | 2 votes (33.33%) | ||
| No votes (0%) | |||
| | 2 votes (33.33%) | ||
| No votes (0%) | |||
| No votes (0%) | |||
| No votes (0%) |
6 members have voted
October 16th, 2018 at 8:13:54 PM
permalink
Just wrote up a page on Spread-Bet Blackjack, which is a set of three side bets, all of which win or lose based on the player's initial two cards. I saw it at the Cammegh booth at G2E. Please click the link and let me know what you think?
The question for the poll is would you make the Spread Bets if already playing blackjack?
The question for the poll is would you make the Spread Bets if already playing blackjack?
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
October 16th, 2018 at 9:36:38 PM
permalink
I'd play if the Royal Blackjack rule was in play. 21% isn't a terrible hit frequency.
Unfortunately in WA, you can only play four wagers on a given hand. This game as is would be allowed, but if a casino wanted to add a progressive jackpot, they'd be SOL.
Unfortunately in WA, you can only play four wagers on a given hand. This game as is would be allowed, but if a casino wanted to add a progressive jackpot, they'd be SOL.
Casinos are not your friends, they want your money. But so does Disneyland.
And there is no chance in hell that you will go to Disneyland and come back with more money than you went with.
- AxelWolf and Mickeycrimm
