Contact KJ
Quote: ManagementPost busted under reasons of protecting confidentiality.
Quote: ManagementPost busted under reasons of protecting confidentiality.
Quote: sidthesquidi remember reading how he was homeless in center city or south philadelphia, and how he quit his job making minium wage which was 6.50$ an hr at the time of philadelphia early 2000, so then he gambled it up at borgata with their six deckers 10$ min table or 5 and started with a crap bank roll of a 4,500$ and manage to make it grow infinity like a burning candle that he keeps adding wax too and still complains how he lost LOL hes either a fictional character created by the gaming houses or is real
tell me now
This person deserves to be nuked.
you can wish to say whatever you want, this information should be public
anyone with details contact me ASAP!
Quote: sidthesquidi scream Fraud until the day i witness a full blow card counter doubling and trippling they're roll
you can wish to say whatever you want, this information should be public
anyone with details contact me ASAP!
Nobody has to show you anything.
FRAUD!!!!!!!!
Quote: WizardAlthough Kewlj is no longer a member here, I will not let this forum be used as a place to disseminate personal information about him, whether correct or not, nor to assist in finding him. Any more posts by sidthesquid about him will result in the nuclear option.
Probably not my place to question you but I still will say it. No reason to give this poster another chance. Nuke him now as it’s obvious he will come back again regardless.
KJ doesn’t deserve it nor does anyone banned from here, even if they deserved the nuking. This is still a internet forum where you can be anonymous if you choice. Allowing others to take that away from someone should be immediate grounds for nuking.
JMO
Quote: sidthesquidahh hell phone number would be suffice too
I warned you. Nuclear option. Thanks for making it easy for me.
I thought once you were tossed you were fair game: apparently not.
No rule discusses it that I can see.
Quote: MrVInteresting thread, in that the Wiz made it clear that banned members are entitled to some protection.
I thought once you were tossed you were fair game: apparently not.
No rule discusses it that I can see.
Sure there is, management deserves to do what ever they feel like doing.
Quote: MrVInteresting thread, in that the Wiz made it clear that banned members are entitled to some protection.
I thought once you were tossed you were fair game: apparently not.
No rule discusses it that I can see.
Read carefully the 1st paragraph which precedes the rules. Quoted below.
These rules should be considered as a guideline of what we will not tolerate. Just because a behavior is not on this list does not mean it will be tolerated or go unpunished. The administration reserves the right to punish any activity it deems disruptive to the forum, whether against these rules or not.
No question in my mind doxxing is disruptive to this forum and will not (and has not been) tolerated.
Also, I'm going to edit the title to read KJ.
Quote: GWAESure there is, management deserves to do what ever they feel like doing.
Exactly! Thank you. No set of rules will cover every possible trouble people can stir up here. In the end, management are dictators and can do as they please.
Quote: MrVInteresting thread, in that the Wiz made it clear that banned members are entitled to some protection.
I thought once you were tossed you were fair game: apparently not.
No rule discusses it that I can see.
I see this as working for the betterment of everyone, including banned certified a-holes.
Quote: WizardExactly! Thank you. No set of rules will cover every possible trouble people can stir up here. In the end, management are dictators and can do as they please.
In an HR class I attended they used this example when writing an employee handbook and dealing with obvious violations that are not covered.
“There is no rule against burning down this restaurant but rest assured if you do, you will be prosecuted under the full extent of the law., and lose your job with no chance of unemployment compensation “
Or as you have told some of us, “If you don’t like it....”
Quote: MrVInteresting thread, in that the Wiz made it clear that banned members are entitled to some protection.
I thought once you were tossed you were fair game: apparently not.
No rule discusses it that I can see.
As I recall, that only applies to Personal Insults, but I could be mistaken.
Quote: WizardExactly! Thank you. No set of rules will cover every possible trouble people can stir up here. In the end, management are dictators and can do as they please.
It's good to be the King!
Quote: BozIn an HR class I attended they used this example when writing an employee handbook and dealing with obvious violations that are not covered.
“There is no rule against burning down this restaurant but rest assured if you do, you will be prosecuted under the full extent of the law., and lose your job with no chance of unemployment compensation “
Or as you have told some of us, “If you don’t like it....”
I am in the middle of writing my employee handbook. I never knew there was so much that goes into that. Damn laws.
More than likely sidthesquid IS KJ and only wants to bring the spotlight back.
horse logic*
Quote: horseWho is "KJ" and why is he not here to defend himself? Did he offend others to get banned?
More than likely sidthesquid IS KJ and only wants to bring the spotlight back.
horse logic*
He is a person that is banned from the site.
Quote: GWAEHe is a person that is banned from the site.
What did he do?
"If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it."
(IAR stand for Ignore All Rules)
Quote: SM777What did he do?
ironically he did exactly what this OP attempted to do to someone else.
KEEP YOUR HANDS TO YOURSELF AND ACT LIKE A PROPPER GENTLEMAN AT ALL TIMES!Quote: GWAEI am in the middle of writing my employee handbook. I never knew there was so much that goes into that. Damn laws.
You missed your chance at some Mad Men shenanigans.
Quote: SM777What did he do?
If memory serves KJ was a very valued contributor who got into a heated back n forth with a trolling defender of some person or gambling system. I dont remember exact details
The argument escalated till both were blatantly violating the rules. Both were warned to drop it and neither did
There was a huge upset on here at losing KJ because of a troll
Some people choose to operate as if issues outweigh sensibility. Could be the cause of his downfall here.
Quote: darkozThere was a huge upset on here at losing KJ because of a troll
Careful.
It's not cool to call a member ostensibly in good standing "a troll."
see rules 1 and 12
Quote: MrVCareful.
It's not cool to call a member ostensibly in good standing "a troll."
see rules 1 and 12
Especially when they posted already in this thread.
And especially when that description of what occurred and the blaming of a scapegoat who is being called a "a troll" is flat out wrong, and has no relation whatsoever to what happened.Quote: GWAEEspecially when they posted already in this thread.
Several people nearly as disturbed as the banned member were very upset that their pet imaginary friend would no longer be eagerly entertaining them with stories here, and wish to demonize someone for the inevitable self-induced implosion of a mentally & emotionally troubled individual, whose stories were very entertaining to several other mentally and emotionally troubled individuals prone to excessive attachment to made up characters in web forums. And incidentally, were something else entirely to a less loud but much larger number of others who constantly found quite a few things "borrowed" from others in those stories, some others made up, and other things downright scary-creepy, before the individual's emotional immaturity and narcissistic anger got him kicked off.
It was going to happen. It always does with people with those problems. It was only when, not if. If someone doesn't like the result because it deprives them of an imaginary online virtual friend, blame yourself for helping feed the extreme narcissism and attention seeking involved in your online pet's sickness.
Quote: darkozIf memory serves KJ was a very valued contributor who got into a heated back n forth with a trolling defender of some person or gambling system. I dont remember exact details
The argument escalated till both were blatantly violating the rules. Both were warned to drop it and neither did
There was a huge upset on here at losing KJ because of a troll
Clearly calling an active member in good standing a Troll isn’t going to fly. Mitigated by the fact that it has been over a year and a half since your last suspension, we’ll go three days.
added a lot to the forum with his
pro BJ experience.
Quote: EvenBobIs KJ coming back, I miss him. He
added a lot to the forum with his
pro BJ experience.
Can't tell if that's sarcasm or not. From what I've been reading on another forum recently, "pro" might be a bit of a stretch, and from reading further, I assume you mean "blackjack" when you say BJ?
Quote: EvenBobIs KJ coming back, I miss him. He
added a lot to the forum with his
pro BJ experience.
We are blessed or cursed, depending on how you look at it, with ZenKing now. Plus he has a lot of bonuses such as investing advice and lock sports bets.
#MAKING WOV GREATER
Quote: DrawingDeadAnd especially when that description of what occurred and the blaming of a scapegoat who is being called a "a troll" is flat out wrong, and has no relation whatsoever to what happened.
Several people nearly as disturbed as the banned member were very upset that their pet imaginary friend would no longer be eagerly entertaining them with stories here, and wish to demonize someone for the inevitable self-induced implosion of a mentally & emotionally troubled individual, whose stories were very entertaining to several other mentally and emotionally troubled individuals prone to excessive attachment to made up characters in web forums. And incidentally, were something else entirely to a less loud but much larger number of others who constantly found quite a few things "borrowed" from others in those stories, some others made up, and other things downright scary-creepy, before the individual's emotional immaturity and narcissistic anger got him kicked off.
It was going to happen. It always does with people with those problems. It was only when, not if. If someone doesn't like the result because it deprives them of an imaginary online virtual friend, blame yourself for helping feed the extreme narcissism and attention seeking involved in your online pet's sickness.
This kj guy is really feeling the heat. Banned from here, he's now solidly embedded elsewhere, seemingly non stop crying in his beer. What did you guys do to unhinge the poor professional?
In other news, Zim Dicklick, aka mickey crimm, has once again been accused by larry s of closing down a bar.
That site is Pure Entertainment
Quote: horseHoly crap so many professionals!
This kj guy is really feeling the heat. Banned from here, he's now solidly embedded elsewhere, seemingly non stop crying in his beer. What did you guys do to unhinge the poor professional?
In other news, Zim Dicklick, aka mickey crimm, has once again been accused by larry s of closing down a bar.
That site is Pure Entertainment
If you are a teenager and like drama. I prefer to live a normal adult life and not worry about petty internet crap.
Quote: GWAEIf you are a teenager and like drama. I prefer to live a normal adult life and not worry about petty internet crap.
Good reply.
Anyway, I haven't dug into the old threads to see who posted where and what. But I think it's more likely than not that darkoz may have sort've mis-remembered what happened and/or it was foggy in his memory, even though he got the general play-by-play accurate. I don't think darkoz was actually calling QFIT a troll, since darkoz probably / may not even remember it was QFIT. After all, darkoz did say "if memory serves..." Not that that should be a "catch all, get out of jail free" card, but I don't think darkoz had the intent of calling QFIT a troll. Or maybe that was his intention and he was trying to skirt around the bush, but I don't think so.
