Then someone suggested playing for money, which we never got around to this time, but the question came up of how to handle the dealer (who would likely be me.) I suggested that it's possible to get the game to even money (0.00% realistic HE or the closest approximation possible) just by rules alone, assuming no AP or ploppy behavior.
So far the closest I have come up with is this: single-deck, S17, DAS allowed, double any two cards, no surrender, no RSA or hitting split aces, and players only split once. WoO has that listed as a player advantage of 0.0014% realistically.
I'm beginning to think that this is the best I can do. Is there anything I'm not thinking of?
The next closest configuration is: 2 decks, S17, DAS, DA2, split to 3 hands, RSA and HSA, lose original bet only on DBJ, late surrender, blackjack pays 3:2. The realistic house edge of this is 0.00168%.
Edit; I take that back. Six people betting $10 a hand, 100 hands an hour, gives the house a -$8.40 expectation.
I'd laugh hysterically if someone whom was an AP/counter got you to set up a 0.00% HE game just so they could then count and pound away at it lol. Sounds like your wife's family takes no prisoners!
Quote: hwccdealerThen someone suggested playing for money,
Limit the stakes. Possibly even flat bet everyone.
Shuffle every hand in single deck.
If you wanted to (you'd probably looked at as an a--hole though), prohibit anyone who plays proper strategy. Learn the strategy yourself. If someone repeatedly does the correct BS play (that's out of the ordinary), bar them. I don't know the proper strategy for that game, but I'd imagine 7,7vT is a stand, hard 8v6 is a double, 11vA is a double, to name a few. Not to mention the not so out of the ordinary hands, like hitting 2-card 16vT or standing multi-card 16vT, hitting soft-18v9/T/A, hitting 12v2/3, proper soft-doubles, splitting 9,9 properly.
If you wanted to take a cheap-shot, you could give the players super great rules, then say, "Because the rules are so awesome, the only negative rule change will be 6:5 instead of 3:2 on BJ's. It's only $1.50 if you're betting $5."
Or make the rules so cluster-f****ing confusing with high-variance (and hope variance doesn't bite your ass), by having weird rules like "777 vs dealer suited-20 pays 2000:1" (which might give some monstrous player edge, i don't know exactly), but then have all the other rules be super sh***y, like no splitting/doubling and 6:5 BJ (or even 1:1 if you're a scrooge).
Quote: JBThe next closest configuration is: 2 decks, S17, DAS, DA2, split to 3 hands, RSA and HSA, lose original bet only on DBJ, late surrender, blackjack pays 3:2. The realistic house edge of this is 0.00168%.
Quote: RomesSo they wanted you to come up with a "fair" (0% HE) game, and what, let them play for real money this time? Are you the bank, or someone else?
I'd laugh hysterically if someone whom was an AP/counter got you to set up a 0.00% HE game just so they could then count and pound away at it lol. Sounds like your wife's family takes no prisoners!
Yeah, except it's probably going to be something like $1 min $10 max.
If you want to make a truly even money blackjack game do this:
- All players must hit to 17 (that means no splits or doubles)
- If both player and dealer bust it's a push
- Blackjack pays 1:1 (unless both player and dealer have it, then it's a push)
Quote: sc15Yeah, except it's probably going to be something like $1 min $10 max.
All I hear is a 10-1 spread with zero heat and a single deck on an already player advantage game off the top ;)
Quote: sc15
If you want to make a truly even money blackjack game do this:
- All players must hit to 17 (that means no splits or doubles)
- If both player and dealer bust it's a push
- Blackjack pays 1:1 (unless both player and dealer have it, then it's a push)
That would never fly. Anyone interested in blackjack isn't interested in "not playing" because their hands are played out for them (must hit to 17, can't split, can't double...).