September 4th, 2014 at 11:37:20 AM
permalink
how much it worth
and what the bs should change
to hit 77 rather than stand nor split
and what the bs should change
to hit 77 rather than stand nor split
September 4th, 2014 at 11:43:00 AM
permalink
what blackjack variation is this? is this spanish 21?
September 4th, 2014 at 11:46:15 AM
permalink
no
just normal bj
it worth how much ?
just normal bj
it worth how much ?
September 4th, 2014 at 11:48:56 AM
permalink
sorry i'm not familiar with that game type. I've never seen it, but I did find an article the wizard wrote on it
https://wizardofodds.com/games/blackjack/appendix/11/
https://wizardofodds.com/games/blackjack/appendix/11/
September 4th, 2014 at 11:49:48 AM
permalink
Wizard of Odds 678 and 777 bonuses
That should get it close.
3:2 or even 6:5 on 777 sounds extremely unusual; the more common arrangement is a flat bonus payoff.
That should get it close.
3:2 or even 6:5 on 777 sounds extremely unusual; the more common arrangement is a flat bonus payoff.
May the cards fall in your favor.
September 4th, 2014 at 3:15:23 PM
permalink
For 6 decks the answer is 312C3/24C3 * 13/7 = 1 in 4600 or +0.02%... paying 3/2 means +0.03%
The last factor is approximate... you will ALWAYS split 7's when the Dealer shows 2 thru 7. The bonus is not worth altering basic strategy.
When the Dealer shows 8 thru Ace, hit. Again this is Basic strategy. There are 7 ranks of the 13 in which you try for the bonus, thus the 13/7 factor.
GL & GG
The last factor is approximate... you will ALWAYS split 7's when the Dealer shows 2 thru 7. The bonus is not worth altering basic strategy.
When the Dealer shows 8 thru Ace, hit. Again this is Basic strategy. There are 7 ranks of the 13 in which you try for the bonus, thus the 13/7 factor.
GL & GG
Some people need to reimagine their thinking.
September 5th, 2014 at 8:03:56 AM
permalink
Quote: 98ClubsFor 6 decks the answer is 312C3/24C3 * 13/7 = 1 in 4600
There are 7 ranks of the 13 in which you try for the bonus, thus the 13/7 factor.
My math is failing me again, but shouldn't that be 7/13 instead of 13/7?
May the cards fall in your favor.
September 6th, 2014 at 2:06:26 PM
permalink
The formula is set up as "odds" or 1 in X, so 13/7 is roughly correct 1 in 4600.
When expressed as "occurance" the formula would be 24C3/312C3 * 7/13 or 0.00021739
When expressed as "occurance" the formula would be 24C3/312C3 * 7/13 or 0.00021739
Some people need to reimagine their thinking.