arcticfun
arcticfun
  • Threads: 42
  • Posts: 175
Joined: Oct 2, 2013
August 17th, 2014 at 1:17:53 PM permalink
Yesterday at Mohegan, this one shoe had something like 10 aces show up in the first 1.5 decks. So after the shoe ended, I kept focused on that slug of cards throughout the shuffle, and cut the deck so that the high ace-concentration would show up somewhere near the start of the next shoe. I was alone vs the dealer and I opened at 3 hands with two units each (how's that for counting cover?!). The aces took a while to show up (ie, I cut out too much) but then they came and I got 4 blackjacks in three rounds. Most of the other aces showed up in unhelpful ways, but they were still sufficiently concentrated.

Anyone have any experience with something like this?
RaleighCraps
RaleighCraps
  • Threads: 79
  • Posts: 2501
Joined: Feb 20, 2010
August 17th, 2014 at 1:29:01 PM permalink
I was playing heads up last year, and back then I didn't play BJ very often. But I had the same thing happen, where a bunch of Aces came out at one time. I was able to keep track of where they were in the discard box, and watched pretty intently while the dealer shuffled the cards. I then tried to cut right in front of where I felt the aces were. And like you, I was successful. I had a couple of blackjacks out of the gate. That was the only time I have ever tried any type of tracking.

Now, with the shuffle machines, I am seeing what I feel to be odd things. Like multiple shoes where 4 aces will be clumped together. On our last trip to Cherokee, 4 Qs came out in a row for 7 out of 8 shuffles. I guess I will always be old school and long for the hand shuffles.
Always borrow money from a pessimist; They don't expect to get paid back ! Be yourself and speak your thoughts. Those who matter won't mind, and those that mind, don't matter!
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
  • Threads: 169
  • Posts: 22586
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
August 17th, 2014 at 1:35:36 PM permalink
Today at Mohegan they are watching for this. Why include the name?
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
1BB
1BB
  • Threads: 18
  • Posts: 5339
Joined: Oct 10, 2011
August 17th, 2014 at 1:58:41 PM permalink
Quote: AxelWolf

Today at Mohegan they are watching for this. Why include the name?



Because they have nothing to worry about at these six deck games.

When the cut card comes out at Mohegan Sun there is, on average, two decks left. Sometimes less, many times more. The first thing the dealer does is break those two decks into four stacks. Each stack is inserted into the discards beginning near the bottom and working up to near the top. The cards are then removed from the discard rack and thoroughly shuffled.

Although the stacks could each contain around 25 cards or so, they would seem to be lost in the shuffle. I know someone out there is going to say this is able to be tracked. If so I'm all ears.
Many people, especially ignorant people, want to punish you for speaking the truth. - Mahatma Ghandi
arcticfun
arcticfun
  • Threads: 42
  • Posts: 175
Joined: Oct 2, 2013
August 18th, 2014 at 4:26:33 AM permalink
1BB is exactly right -- the remaining cards in the shoe are split into 4 parts and then distributed throughout the discard rack before the shuffle. In this case, however, the aces were clumped at the very bottom of the discard rack and the dealer inserted the stacks way closer to the top. The bottom of the discard rack was completely untouched, which is why I think it worked in this case.

And yes. If you end a shoe with a ridiculously high TC at Mohegan, it doesn't matter because those cards get completely lost in the shuffle.
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
August 18th, 2014 at 4:39:09 PM permalink
Quote: arcticfun

1BB is exactly right -- the remaining cards in the shoe are split into 4 parts and then distributed throughout the discard rack before the shuffle. In this case, however, the aces were clumped at the very bottom of the discard rack and the dealer inserted the stacks way closer to the top. The bottom of the discard rack was completely untouched, which is why I think it worked in this case.

And yes. If you end a shoe with a ridiculously high TC at Mohegan, it doesn't matter because those cards get completely lost in the shuffle.



So, back to Axel's question... WHY are you talking about this?

Yes, shuffle tracking can be VERY profitable. Yes, there are ways to beat even very complicated-looking shuffles. So, you first thought is to go talk about it publicly? Why not just go explain to the pit boss how it can be beaten and suggest some modifications?
djatc
djatc
  • Threads: 83
  • Posts: 4477
Joined: Jan 15, 2013
August 18th, 2014 at 5:27:06 PM permalink
Quote: AxiomOfChoice

So, back to Axel's question... WHY are you talking about this?

Yes, shuffle tracking can be VERY profitable. Yes, there are ways to beat even very complicated-looking shuffles. So, you first thought is to go talk about it publicly? Why not just go explain to the pit boss how it can be beaten and suggest some modifications?



i know he even put in the casino's name.
"Man Babes" #AxelFabulous
arcticfun
arcticfun
  • Threads: 42
  • Posts: 175
Joined: Oct 2, 2013
August 19th, 2014 at 3:49:55 AM permalink
Eugh fair enough, point taken. Noted for next time.
  • Jump to: