Thread Rating:
October 6th, 2013 at 4:17:58 PM
permalink
I am a newbie to this forum, so I apologize if I posted this in the wrong place earlier or am doing so now. Anyway, here is my post:
I typically don't play single or two decks in Vegas, because most of the $10 tables only pay 6 to 5 odds. Therefore, I have not memorized the basic strategy for single or double decks, even though there are only a few differences between that and four or more decks. My question is this: If I play at a single or double deck table with 3 to 2 odds on BJ and dealer hits on soft 17, but I use the 4 or more deck basic strategy, how much am I adding to the house edge?
Thanks,
Ken
I typically don't play single or two decks in Vegas, because most of the $10 tables only pay 6 to 5 odds. Therefore, I have not memorized the basic strategy for single or double decks, even though there are only a few differences between that and four or more decks. My question is this: If I play at a single or double deck table with 3 to 2 odds on BJ and dealer hits on soft 17, but I use the 4 or more deck basic strategy, how much am I adding to the house edge?
Thanks,
Ken
October 6th, 2013 at 6:19:39 PM
permalink
It would appear you'd be giving up .1 to .2 % is all, but I'm not the most knowledgable on this forum.
Start here:
calculator
and plug in your rules, then follow the link at the bottom to estimate it by the basic strategy calculator.
Start here:
calculator
and plug in your rules, then follow the link at the bottom to estimate it by the basic strategy calculator.
If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.
October 6th, 2013 at 6:42:37 PM
permalink
Thanks, Beachbumb, I think I can live with that.
October 7th, 2013 at 2:29:04 AM
permalink
Quote: swngn11Thanks, Beachbumb, I think I can live with that.
I have no idea where the .2% comes from but I wouldn't want to live with it and you shouldn't either. Players go out of their way to avoid H17 and the difference between that and S17 is slightly over .2%.
Without realizing that you asked this question in two different places, I responded to the other one with what I think could be some useful information. Take a look.
Many people, especially ignorant people, want to punish you for speaking the truth. - Mahatma Ghandi
October 8th, 2013 at 2:10:28 PM
permalink
1BB,
Glad you answered; I'm sure you provided a good response in the other thread. I was looking at the calculator and trying to guess the other conditions it required that I didn't have, which was the reason for the range.
Glad you answered; I'm sure you provided a good response in the other thread. I was looking at the calculator and trying to guess the other conditions it required that I didn't have, which was the reason for the range.
If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.
October 8th, 2013 at 3:08:06 PM
permalink
Quote: beachbumbabs1BB,
Glad you answered; I'm sure you provided a good response in the other thread. I was looking at the calculator and trying to guess the other conditions it required that I didn't have, which was the reason for the range.
I do my best even for first time posters who often disappear after asking their one question. That's why some of our members won't respond to newbies until they've been here a while. I don't feel that way but I do understand, especially for those who take the time to do research and post complicated math.
Do you play blackjack, beachbumbabs?
Many people, especially ignorant people, want to punish you for speaking the truth. - Mahatma Ghandi
October 8th, 2013 at 3:34:49 PM
permalink
I have played, 1BB. I'm interested in playing better. I did deal it for a year 30 years ago and got very tired of it, so I tend more towards other games.
If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.
October 8th, 2013 at 4:13:07 PM
permalink
I remember when every BJ game was single deck in Vegas. And when John Scarne petitioned the game commission to have BJ dealt from a shoe ( which he would sell the casinos ). This was before Thorpe's book and had nothing to do with counting. It was to prevent dealers from dealing seconds.
I actually taught Babs to deal on our honeymoon. Hey, we had to do something to pass the time.
I actually taught Babs to deal on our honeymoon. Hey, we had to do something to pass the time.
Shed not for her
the bitter tear
Nor give the heart
to vain regret
Tis but the casket
that lies here,
The gem that filled it
Sparkles yet
October 8th, 2013 at 4:24:34 PM
permalink
Buzzard was awfully good with the cards even then. I knew he had a bright future in gaming.
If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.
October 8th, 2013 at 4:26:03 PM
permalink
Well, let's just says Babs refuses to play strip poker anymore. SIGH
Shed not for her
the bitter tear
Nor give the heart
to vain regret
Tis but the casket
that lies here,
The gem that filled it
Sparkles yet
October 10th, 2013 at 8:22:29 PM
permalink
Thanks everyone. I guess .2% is the only number I have. I do know the basic strategy for single double and 4 or more decks. I was just wondering what the house edge increase was if I used a 4+ deck basic strategy in a two deck game. I do know the basic strategy fo both.
October 10th, 2013 at 8:45:32 PM
permalink
Quote: swngn11Thanks everyone. I guess .2% is the only number I have. I do know the basic strategy for single double and 4 or more decks. I was just wondering what the house edge increase was if I used a 4+ deck basic strategy in a two deck game. I do know the basic strategy fo both.
I'm confused on why you are asking this though if you do know all the strategies. Just curious on the answer?
October 10th, 2013 at 9:10:03 PM
permalink
I guess I'm like you, I'm curious. I play frequently with an individual that knows 4 deck basic strategy, but not 1 or two decks. I tell her that she should adjust her strategy when she plays 1 or two decks. She replys that It can't make that much of a change in house edge. The wizard of odds has a cost of error chart, but I can't fibd this obe.
October 10th, 2013 at 10:16:53 PM
permalink
She's close enough in my opinion, because the Wizard says this simple strategy on his blackjack page only costs you 0.14%. So using the full 4 deck basic strategy on single or double deck will be much less error than 0.14%, even below 0.1%. This is definitely the case because the error rate of this simple strategy gets cut down to 0.07% if you just add these plays: Hit 12 vs. 2 or 3, Stand Soft 18 vs. 7, and Split 77 vs. 7.
Details about the errors the simple strategy makes are here:
https://wizardofodds.com/games/blackjack/appendix/21/
Now the only differences between double deck vs. 4+ deck (H17) are much less severe and appear much less frequently:
Double 9 v 2 in DD vs. hit
Hit 15 v 9 in DD vs surrender (you're probably not getting surrender in DD anyway)
Split 66 vs 7 in DD if DAS is allowed vs. hit in 4+ deck
Split 77 vs 8 in DD if DAS is allowed vs. hit in 4+ deck
If she gives up >0.03%, I'd be surprised.
Details about the errors the simple strategy makes are here:
https://wizardofodds.com/games/blackjack/appendix/21/
Now the only differences between double deck vs. 4+ deck (H17) are much less severe and appear much less frequently:
Double 9 v 2 in DD vs. hit
Hit 15 v 9 in DD vs surrender (you're probably not getting surrender in DD anyway)
Split 66 vs 7 in DD if DAS is allowed vs. hit in 4+ deck
Split 77 vs 8 in DD if DAS is allowed vs. hit in 4+ deck
If she gives up >0.03%, I'd be surprised.
October 11th, 2013 at 4:11:08 PM
permalink
Tks all. I think she will stick with what she knows, which is 4+ decks basic strategy even with fewer decks. Although, so many casinos are only paying 6 to 5 bj when using 1 or two decks on the lower limit tables I doubt we will play at those tables anyway.