Quote: JimmyHoofaFinal stats: Total net: $4000, 90 minutes. Just like how it’s supposed to be done. Don't stay too long at a casino, hit them hard and fast, cash out big!
This is a summary of a two man foray into three downtown casinos, two of which were rated medium heat at or near color-up.
Is this sort of thing really the norm?
How long would it have to be before one could return to these same casinos and count cards at blackjack again?
Link to Jimmy Hoofa's blog
only gambling entry in his blog in the last 2
years. The rest are pic's of full ashtrays, ugly
beatup cars, fat men in casinos with their butt
cracks hanging out, and pic's of abandoned
buildings. Its like he makes a point of highlighting
the most depressing parts of Vegas. He also
doesn't like Gay men, apparently.
He documents the decline of quality in casinos and the deferred maintenance engaged in by The Evil Empire.
He prefers big expensive cars to jalopies.
He documents the current state of real estate development in Vegas.
... So what is so wrong with all of that.
I was asking about the blackjack results. Do you believe them? Do you think it could be turned into repeat visits or would the duration have to be far too long before going back for another score?
Quote: FleaStiff
I was asking about the blackjack results. Do you believe them?
That he made $4K in 90min Downtown
in casinos that are known for heat? Who
wouldn't believe that.
That is what I mean. It was show up, start doing some bet spreading real soon and leave with a whole pocketful of money ... all before Fleastiff could count to ten.Quote: odiousgambitthe only thing is, it didnt seem they had to wait for a good count, it was like it is all ripe plums ready for the picking.
Quote: FleaStiffThat is what I mean. It was show up, start doing some bet spreading real soon and leave with a whole pocketful of money ... all before Fleastiff could count to ten.
It was the perfect storm, this is the crap
you see in BJ movies. Counting cards
means the game in an ATM, just down
and withdraw $4K.
Quote: FleaStiffThat is what I mean. It was show up, start doing some bet spreading real soon and leave with a whole pocketful of money ... all before Fleastiff could count to ten.
I'm sure the same blog posted similar stories in the past... I love his line about 'I'm sure the eye was watching us closely'. Of course you can tell that, of course.
I can believe a quick hit and run working. But it's merely a good story, just like every bad beat story I've ever heard. One of those and $2 gets you a cheap cup of coffee.
We all know that feeling....its called paranoia
Quote: WongBoI believe he said he was pretty sure the eye was analyzing his play.
We all know that feeling....its called paranoia
Paranoia or attempting to make the story more interesting. Less than thirty minutes of play usually isn't going to be a problem. That's why we keep our sessions short.
I was only concerned about the blackjack. I admit his blog is more devoted to photography and cigarette-debris than gambling.
My sole question was whether the reported foray was believable and if so, how soon one might repeat it before heat descended real hard.
I think the consensus is that the incident may well have taken place but that it is by no means repeatable at will. Many card counters walk in for a short session and walk out in the negative column. So he may have described this incident truthfully but that does not make this one incident truly representative of what would normally happen to card counters in those casinos.
It seems he was reporting on "the cream" ... but it sure was interesting money to make in such a short time.
I too thought it was strange for him to "know" what the eye in the sky was doing, but perhaps that is a normal feeling for card counters.
Can't beat this guy
Much of our interest in comps is based on second hand data. Learning about various blogs around town is a good thing even if each particular blog has some defect to it.
Quote: tringlomaneChrome doesn't like that site for me as it thinks it's a malware threat.
>Yup, I got the same warning.
Well, I ain't gonna be injecting your hard drives with any anti-virus serum. Two years ago he and his provider had the same trouble with FireFox and they eventually fixed it .... something about a very careful provider, I recall.
On-edit: I've just now emailed him about Chrome and malware messages.
He only sporadically publishes his blog so my delay hardly matters. I do however appreciate the data on advantage play in blackjack.
It's believable. And if it isn't does that really matter?
So this guy has them all with him and only if his first bet is favorable and the count is favorable, he continues using the mailers... its not always that he will have four successive free bets, the deck will remain favorable and he will go through four mailer-coupons and then maybe even stay and play for awhile ... but its occasionally going to happen.
Driving to Silverton for a five dollar match play is just fine if you happen to live near there and happen to like the Silverton; otherwise its pretty much a waste of time to drive anywhere much less to the Silverton for a lousy five dollar match play. Teasers that are designed to get you into a casino are just fine, but if luck is not with you, leave.