Ask me anything about betting the Inside Numbers
There is an approach to using the 'inside bets' of roulette to do better than 20% hit rate, for an ongoing advantage. The so called house edge is rendered totally irrelevant.
This is not a system or a method, it's an 'approach' that CANNOT fail.
I don't know what the punchline is, but I'll take the bait. What gives your approach an advantage?
I understand why you might think that, but I'm sincere.Quote: JackSpadeI think you are approaching parody.
I don't know what the punchline is, but I'll take the bait. What gives your approach an advantage?
link to original post
Jackspade, As part of my description, I'm going to assign you a number. I'll explain that later.
Thank you for your question.
It's all about bet structuring.
I'll collect a few more questions before bundling up answers in a later reply.
Quote: ChumpChangeSounds like you're betting 8 straight-up numbers. When you lose 30 times out of 38 times, what's a little green zero-zero mean anyway?
link to original post
Chumpchange, As part of my description, I'm going to assign you a number. I'll explain that later.
Thank you for your resonse.
The Green numbers are given equal weight and status within my approach. Apart from one minor adjustment, they are used exactly like the other numbers.
I NEVER bet the outside Even/odd red/black, Low or high.
I'll collect a few more questions before bundling up answers in a later reply.
Anyhoo, my question concerns sleeping columns. Anything you could share on them would be much appreciated.
Quote: billryanIf I ask you a question and you assign me a number, that might open another can of worms. Suppose I'm assigned #6 but feel like a #23. Wouldn't it be better if we could choose our numbers? Perhaps some might prefer a letter.
Anyhoo, my question concerns sleeping columns. Anything you could share on them would be much appreciated.
link to original post
Hi Bill,
I'm open to letting you assign your own number: It will be an integer between 0 and 36.
Just drop me a PM with your preference. Only two numbers have gone, so far, so you are likely to be happy with the outcome.
Sleeping columns do exist, but are not important to my approach. What do you want to know?
Quote: OnceDear
This is not a system or a method, it's an 'approach' that CANNOT fail.
link to original post
Name it as you will, until I see details, I'm filing it with the BS.
28 27 5 18 26 20 0 9 22 10 0 19 29 16 34 7 20 14 31 11 30 35 35 28 21 3 19 8 23 8 26 23 4 22 1 30 1 21 30 34 5 13 0 32 30 18 31 17 16 17 33 26 3 14 16 8 5 2 26 21 28 25 29 17 36 24 23 7 30 20 11 27 11 19 17 8 9 10
Please tell me which inside number will be next.
Quote: OnceDear[
I'll collect a few more questions before bundling up answers in a later reply.
link to original post
Too late, I missed the next spin. Seems this bundling approach doesn't help much in real time
it was 23 by the way.
Success!Quote: JackSpadeI prefer red, odd, low numbers.
link to original post
That's what I assigned to you.
This is absolutely not a real time approach.Quote: chevyQuote: OnceDear[
I'll collect a few more questions before bundling up answers in a later reply.
link to original post
Too late, I missed the next spin. Seems this bundling approach doesn't help much in real time
it was 23 by the way.
link to original post
Number assigned to Chevy was a black one. Remember that. I'll explain soon.
That's not how it works. There's not anywhere near enough information there.Quote: chevyThe last 78 numbers on my roulette stream (single zero) were
28 27 5 18 26 20 0 9 22 10 0 19 29 16 34 7 20 14 31 11 30 35 35 28 21 3 19 8 23 8 26 23 4 22 1 30 1 21 30 34 5 13 0 32 30 18 31 17 16 17 33 26 3 14 16 8 5 2 26 21 28 25 29 17 36 24 23 7 30 20 11 27 11 19 17 8 9 10
Please tell me which inside number will be next.
link to original post
Was the ball spun in the same direction for each spin? Clockwise or Counter-clockwise?
Quote: BleedingChipsSlowlyBiting, 00 please. What is the criteria for your approach that CANNOT fail? 20% or better hit rate? If you cover enough numbers that’s easy. As to the house edge being “irrelevant,” what does that mean? You don’t lose long term? The house edge fails to nibble away at your bankroll?
link to original post
If you ignore the house edge long enough, you find it unimportant. It's highly over-rated.
Unlike certain systems and methods, my approach does factor in the zeros. After all, the pockets don't know or care what colour they are.Quote: BleedingChipsSlowlyBiting, 00 please. What is the criteria for your approach that CANNOT fail? 20% or better hit rate? If you cover enough numbers that’s easy. As to the house edge being “irrelevant,” what does that mean? You don’t lose long term? The house edge fails to nibble away at your bankroll?
link to original post
Also, my approach allows the house to take it's edge. but in the long term, it does not affect the outcome of my longer term play.
Red Odd for you, by the way? I'll explain more later.
Quote: billryanQuote: BleedingChipsSlowlyBiting, 00 please. What is the criteria for your approach that CANNOT fail? 20% or better hit rate? If you cover enough numbers that’s easy. As to the house edge being “irrelevant,” what does that mean? You don’t lose long term? The house edge fails to nibble away at your bankroll?
link to original post
If you ignore the house edge long enough, you find it unimportant. It's highly over-rated.
link to original post
I agree. The house edge exists for the benefit of the house. The house doesn't care who pays it.
Quote: billryan
If you ignore the house edge long enough, you find it unimportant. It's highly over-rated.
link to original post
It's just a pesky tax, right?
Except unlike the IRS which taxes profits realized, the house taxes every wager made - rendering the wagers themselves unprofitable over time.
Quote: OnceDearTo the moderator who misguidedly put this thread in the betting systems sub forum. Thank you. But you'll find out eventually why you were mistaken to do so. You have been assigned a high red number, by the way. Ask me why that matters.
link to original post
Mr. OnceDear, I am pleased to help. Please understand that this recategorization of the discussion is merely a temporary convenience for our numerous readers who look there for this type of fine reading material, until such time as your method approach can be comprehended and reviewed.
Not being high or particularly well red, I'm also pleased to be so kindly favored by this mysterious decorative numerancy.
No. The house will continue to make it's house edge. Just that it's not my problem.
Yes thanks.Quote: unJonThis is fun. I think. Are you having fun?
link to original post
Quote: OnceDearYou have been assigned a high red number, by the way. Ask me why that matters.
link to original post
OK, I could not find a way to bet Big Red on the roulette table.
Can you help?
Quote: OnceDearThat's not how it works. There's not anywhere near enough information there.Quote: chevyThe last 78 numbers on my roulette stream (single zero) were
28 27 5 18 26 20 0 9 22 10 0 19 29 16 34 7 20 14 31 11 30 35 35 28 21 3 19 8 23 8 26 23 4 22 1 30 1 21 30 34 5 13 0 32 30 18 31 17 16 17 33 26 3 14 16 8 5 2 26 21 28 25 29 17 36 24 23 7 30 20 11 27 11 19 17 8 9 10
Please tell me which inside number will be next.
link to original post
Was the ball spun in the same direction for each spin? Clockwise or Counter-clockwise?
link to original post
I thought we were the ones that got to ask the questions....Though technically your thread title never promised answers.
But since you asked, it goes without saying...Clockwise in the Northern Hemisphere and Counter-Clockwise in the Southern Hemisphere.***
*** That would be top side and bottom side for the flat earth society.
Quote: chevyQuote: OnceDearThat's not how it works. There's not anywhere near enough information there.Quote: chevyThe last 78 numbers on my roulette stream (single zero) were
28 27 5 18 26 20 0 9 22 10 0 19 29 16 34 7 20 14 31 11 30 35 35 28 21 3 19 8 23 8 26 23 4 22 1 30 1 21 30 34 5 13 0 32 30 18 31 17 16 17 33 26 3 14 16 8 5 2 26 21 28 25 29 17 36 24 23 7 30 20 11 27 11 19 17 8 9 10
Please tell me which inside number will be next.
link to original post
Was the ball spun in the same direction for each spin? Clockwise or Counter-clockwise?
link to original post
I thought we were the ones that got to ask the questions....Though technically your thread title never promised answers.
But since you asked, it goes without saying...Clockwise in the Northern Hemisphere and Counter-Clockwise in the Southern Hemisphere.***
*** That would be top side and bottom side for the flat earth society.
link to original post
What about the "flat earthers" that believe the earth spins like a "coin on a table" ?
He's in a league of his own. I'm not trying to entertain.Quote: billryanI am not entertained. EB's method is much more comical.
link to original post
Quote: rainmanHow many cats do you have!
link to original post
Slightly off topic, but for a while we were not able to go meat shopping.
So no cats now.
An interesting presentation. Dangerous, but interesting.Quote: JackSpadeQuote: billryan
If you ignore the house edge long enough, you find it unimportant. It's highly over-rated.
link to original post
It's just a pesky tax, right?
Except unlike the IRS which taxes profits realized, the house taxes every wager made - rendering the wagers themselves unprofitable over time.
link to original post
Quote: ksdjdj
What about the "flat earthers" that believe the earth spins like a "coin on a table" ?
link to original post
"Another [flat earther] said they never truly believed it, but they inadvertently backed themselves into a corner, and it took them years to let go.
They explained: "I knew all along, I was just stuck in a loop of having to fight the Flat Earth corner because people just don't shut up about it."
Quote: ksdjdj
What about the "flat earthers" that believe the earth spins like a "coin on a table" ?
link to original post
That would be one big "table".
Quote: ChumpChangeThe price of petrol could double or triple in the next month or two. How do I make a killing at roulette? I don't have much time. Or I could just fill-up and only go to the grocery store. But I was hoping I could be winning thousands of dollars an hour for the coming hyperinflation. If the gas pumps go dry, gambling won't matter though.
link to original post
Fill your tank today, but park your car for the month. When petrol triples, your tank of it will be worth triple what you paid. Some people think cars are for transportation. You realize they are vehicles for storing large amounts of liquid gold.
Quote: billryanIt's a method, not an approach.
link to original post
I was confused myself. I thought an approach was a bowling thing.
Quote: OnceDearThis is not a system or a method, it's an 'approach' that CANNOT fail.
link to original post
Quote: billryanIt's a method, not an approach.
link to original post
No Guys. Mine's definitely an approach and not a method. Certainly not a system.
Quote: BigBluMikuYou've been dancing around the subject for this whole thread. If you have an approach, just tell us. Why bring it up and then make us play a number game to figure it out
link to original post
Hi BigBluMiku,
I;ve not danced around the subject at all. I'm just waiting for the questions, which have not been forthcoming..
Anyhow, in the absence of questions, and so as not to upset the forum, or its members or moderators, I'm going to drop the subject in thread. Bring the questions to me by PM if you have any.
Quote: OnceDear
No Guys. Mine's definitely an approach and not a method. Certainly not a system.
link to original post
Look, I came in here for an argument...
No, you didn't. ;)Quote: TigerWuLook, I came in here for an argument...
link to original post
So is masturbation.Quote: billryanIt's a method, not an approach.
link to original post
Quote: OnceDear
I;ve not danced around the subject at all. I'm just waiting for the questions, which have not been forthcoming..
Anyhow, in the absence of questions, and so as not to upset the forum, or its members or moderators, I'm going to drop the subject in thread. Bring the questions to me by PM if you have any.
link to original post
Okay here's a question:
Is it possible, with ANY degree of certainty to predict which section of the wheel is likely to be hit? If you could do that accurately, even 54% of the time or so, you could eek ahead slowly I would think...
Ok. Non-controversial to answer that, so I will.Quote: DJGeniusQuote: OnceDear
I;ve not danced around the subject at all. I'm just waiting for the questions, which have not been forthcoming..
Anyhow, in the absence of questions, and so as not to upset the forum, or its members or moderators, I'm going to drop the subject in thread. Bring the questions to me by PM if you have any.
link to original post
Okay here's a question:
Is it possible, with ANY degree of certainty to predict which section of the wheel is likely to be hit? If you could do that accurately, even 54% of the time or so, you could eek ahead slowly I would think...
link to original post
It is absolutely possible to predict which section of the wheel is likely to hit with a degree of certainty. Maybe a maths guy will come along shortly to explain and prove that.
54% accuracy is a big (and rather specific) ask, depending on how big your section of the wheel is.
Quote: OnceDearOk. Non-controversial to answer that, so I will.Quote: DJGeniusQuote: OnceDear
I;ve not danced around the subject at all. I'm just waiting for the questions, which have not been forthcoming..
Anyhow, in the absence of questions, and so as not to upset the forum, or its members or moderators, I'm going to drop the subject in thread. Bring the questions to me by PM if you have any.
link to original post
Okay here's a question:
Is it possible, with ANY degree of certainty to predict which section of the wheel is likely to be hit? If you could do that accurately, even 54% of the time or so, you could eek ahead slowly I would think...
link to original post
It is absolutely possible to predict which section of the wheel is likely to hit with a degree of certainty. Maybe a maths guy will come along shortly to explain and prove that.
54% accuracy is a big (and rather specific) ask, depending on how big your section of the wheel is.
link to original post
I can do that easy with 21 numbers on triple zero.
Quote: OnceDearOk. Non-controversial to answer that, so I will.Quote: DJGenius
Okay here's a question:
Is it possible, with ANY degree of certainty to predict which section of the wheel is likely to be hit? If you could do that accurately, even 54% of the time or so, you could eek ahead slowly I would think...
link to original post
It is absolutely possible to predict which section of the wheel is likely to hit with a degree of certainty. Maybe a maths guy will come along shortly to explain and prove that.
54% accuracy is a big (and rather specific) ask, depending on how big your section of the wheel is.
link to original post
On a non-biased wheel?
Assuming what Heather said is true***, then yes, on even a non biased wheel, but otherwise, I thought that the predictability of what quadrant the ball might hit shifts only on a biased wheel?
*** Heather reported seeing the same number appear on the roulette wheel eight times in a row? Also reported dealing eight blackjacks in a row while dealing.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/info/announcements/33008-wizard-on-livestream/36/
April 30, 2020, Wizard Livestream:
16:15 ( Heather saw 8 Blackjacks in a row, 8 same number roulette in a row – she was the croupier)
17:45 (Wizard calculated the probability of 8 in a row at roulette at approximately 114,415,582,592 : 1 )
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/36647-the-adventures-of-mdawg-ii/33/#post856026
Quote: OnceDearOk. Non-controversial to answer that, so I will.Quote: DJGeniusQuote: OnceDear
I;ve not danced around the subject at all. I'm just waiting for the questions, which have not been forthcoming..
Anyhow, in the absence of questions, and so as not to upset the forum, or its members or moderators, I'm going to drop the subject in thread. Bring the questions to me by PM if you have any.
link to original post
Okay here's a question:
Is it possible, with ANY degree of certainty to predict which section of the wheel is likely to be hit? If you could do that accurately, even 54% of the time or so, you could eek ahead slowly I would think...
link to original post
It is absolutely possible to predict which section of the wheel is likely to hit with a degree of certainty. Maybe a maths guy will come along shortly to explain and prove that.
54% accuracy is a big (and rather specific) ask, depending on how big your section of the wheel is.
link to original post
54% is a rough estimate of what would be needed on a double zero wheel.
Suppose you bet on half the wheel, so 19 numbers. If you hit you will be up 17 units but if you lose you will be down 19. So hitting 50% of the time (which you could do through blind chance alone) is a losing venture (obviously, by 5.26%).
Somewhere around 53% I believe the math turns in your favour. But it’s tight, hence my suggestion of 54%.
If you could hit the half of the wheel you were playing 54% of the time, you’d be golden.
But you’re right that’s a big IF.
