Quote: MDawgQuote: darkozYou forget that often I don't even go to the casino.
Hmm, sounds like another "I make $20K a week" (but not every week) line.Quote: darkozAlthough this year didn't work out that way.
link to original post
Ah yes! there it is.
"Often I don't even go to the casino." Except not every week, when I do have to go in.
I suppose that you don't realize that it's impossible to take such statements seriously, rife as they are with asterisk laden exceptions and contradictions.
Hmm...why didn't you add the word OFTEN or SOMETIMES to the "I make $20K a week" statement??
link to original post
Because I happen to be the most truthful person on this forum.
I state I make a certain amount and or work a certain schedule and truthfully point out that there are times and exceptions.
It's surprising to me that people feel when someone says they achieve XYZ but not all the time THAT is considered being untruthful.
Of course when you imagine you are beating Casinos and not really doing it you would imagine yourself being invincible. It's a human foible. People who imagine themselves as heroes never imagine when things go wrong. They just report stories of winning winning and more winning.
You happen to be familiar with anyone like that, MDawg?
Quote: MDawg
Love how you don't deny it.
Quote: MDawgSeriously considering an a la DarkOz, "I make _____ a week" push.
You gotta recognize the sincerity of this post.
MDawg has always wanted to be me, to do my accomplishments and is gravely "jelly"
Quote: MDawg
(But unlike DarkOz, every week, not just some weeks.)
Don't misquote me. Let's have the full context, now.
Quote: MDawgQuote: MDawg
(But unlike DarkOz, every week, not just some weeks.)
Don't misquote me. Let's have the full context, now.
link to original post
Quote: darkoz
Of course when you imagine you are beating Casinos and not really doing it you would imagine yourself being invincible. It's a human foible. People who imagine themselves as heroes never imagine when things go wrong. They just report stories of winning winning and more winning.
You happen to be familiar with anyone like that, MDawg?
I guess I nailed that one, lol.
Quote: MDawgQuote: MDawg
(But unlike DarkOz, every week, not just some weeks.)
Don't misquote me. Let's have the full context, now.
link to original post
I believe Darkoz' post to conform to the usually applied standards of quote abbreviation.
No one here takes your "I make $20K a week" statement seriously, not even you.
I suppose if you started posting exactly what you make each week the way I do and made some sort of MDawg challenge around the posts, you might rise to the occasion. Until then....
Quote: MDawgDarkOz, I just tell it like it is.
No one here takes your "I make $20K a week" statement seriously, not even you.
I suppose if you started posting exactly what you make each week the way I do and made some sort of MDawg challenge around the posts, you might rise to the occasion. Until then....
link to original post
I have answered this ad nauseum.
I make my money based on Freeplay availability. No Freeplay, no money made.
That makes me winning on the Casinos schedule.
That's because I run my ship like a business. I'm not just running Willy nilly to the casino with no real knowledge beforehand of whether I will win or lose.
You are a gambler with an (alleged) advantage.
I am running an advantage play business.
But it's okay. You want to be more like me. I'm honored by the compliment.
No one knows what's going on at your end, as long as you stick to inanely meaningless statements like "I make blah blah blah a week (but not every week)." But you may spend volumes trying to expound on what no one believes makes sense, makes sense (in your mind only). This is why people like BillRyan, EvenBob, SooPoo etc. have field days with you.
Quote: MDawgEveryone knows what I do, as far as what I am hauling in. Full transparency. They might believe it or not believe it, but it's all there. And the MDawg challenge remains in place! Helll, you yourself paid me $2000. to prove myself. Thank you!
No one knows what's going on at your end, as long as you stick to inanely meaningless statements like "I make blah blah blah a week (but not every week)." But you may spend volumes trying to expound on what no one believes makes sense, makes sense (in your mind only). This is why people like BillRyan, EvenBob, SooPoo etc. have field days with you.
link to original post
I was staying out of this…. but you brought me in….
DarkOz did not intentionally mislead the forum with his erroneous $20k per week claim. He just did not realize that the rest of us interpret his phrase differently than he thought we would.
For my ‘field day with him’, in general, I believe his claims because they make sense mathematically. He has given some specific examples (with scorn from many APs). Heck, I really don’t know Dark, have never met him, but would be willing to bet his tax return would show income in the 6 figures from his operation.
For you, Big Dawg, why do you keep bringing up the same childish arguments with him? When I come to this thread I want to hear about your winning and losing sessions, the watches you are buying, the events you get invited to, the suites you get comped, etc…
This thread is NOT the MDawg/DarkOz ‘mine is bigger than yours’ thread!!!
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: MDawgEveryone knows what I do, as far as what I am hauling in. Full transparency. They might believe it or not believe it, but it's all there. And the MDawg challenge remains in place! Helll, you yourself paid me $2000. to prove myself. Thank you!
No one knows what's going on at your end, as long as you stick to inanely meaningless statements like "I make blah blah blah a week (but not every week)." But you may spend volumes trying to expound on what no one believes makes sense, makes sense (in your mind only). This is why people like BillRyan, EvenBob, SooPoo etc. have field days with you.
link to original post
I was staying out of this…. but you brought me in….
DarkOz did not intentionally mislead the forum with his erroneous $20k per week claim. He just did not realize that the rest of us interpret his phrase differently than he thought we would.
For my ‘field day with him’, in general, I believe his claims because they make sense mathematically. He has given some specific examples (with scorn from many APs). Heck, I really don’t know Dark, have never met him, but would be willing to bet his tax return would show income in the 6 figures from his operation.
For you, Big Dawg, why do you keep bringing up the same childish arguments with him? When I come to this thread I want to hear about your winning and losing sessions, the watches you are buying, the events you get invited to, the suites you get comped, etc…
This thread is NOT the MDawg/DarkOz ‘mine is bigger than yours’ thread!!!
link to original post
Thank you Soopoo.
What is strange is that I readily admit (and assuming MDawg's claims are true) that he is bigger financially than me. I have repeatedly said that while over a decade I have taken millions from Casinos that I am not currently a millionaire nor do I make a million a year.
While MDawg was supposedly born into a rich family.
Of course viewpoints are always ridiculous. He seems to think my working my way up from homelessness is shameful while his being Rich because his parents copulated before he was born is some type of status symbol.
Earning nothing winning everything seems to be his belief system.
But he does seem to believe I am some threat to him even though his daily winning claims(, sometimes as high as a quarter million in a day) dwarf my $20,000 a week but not every week claims by a magnitude.
I will confirm my tax returns show six figure income and have for the last few years.
EDIT: And now people may get confused by my claim I have taken millions from the Casinos.
To be clear I certainly have but not all goes into my own pocket. For years I have had a crew of about 12 core people who make THEIR living working for me at the Casinos.
I make six figures. They are making five. Add it all up over the years and my team has taken millions from the Casinos.
To my knowledge, MDawg is actually a medium-rare aristocratQuote: darkozQuote: MDawg
Love how you don't deny it.
link to original post
You can get a pair of alligator shoes for $10k, but where can you buy a watch for only $10k ?Quote: darkoz
Your views are typical bourgeois bullshit that everyone who isn't buying$10,000 watches must be comprised of bottom barrel feeders
But by the way, guess what, the (re-sale) prices of the Platona from some sellers have finally dropped below 100K. Still too high, but not as ridiculous. I definitely should have taken your advice and picked one up for around 70K when I could have.
Quote: Ace2You can get a pair of alligator shoes for $10k, but where can you buy a watch for only $10k ?Quote: darkoz
Your views are typical bourgeois bullshit that everyone who isn't buying$10,000 watches must be comprised of bottom barrel feeders
link to original post
I can buy a watch for $20.
It tells time just as good.
That's all I need to get.
There really isn't much difference. Mechanical engineering isn't such that a difference in watchmaking adds up to such a divide.
It's like buying designer clothes and the joke is they are made in the same factory as the cheap no name knock offs.
You are paying for tags not craftsmanship.
A $20 watch looks like a $20 watch. A high/end watch is also a piece of jewelry. Incidentally, a good watch is the only jewelry a man should wear. Additional items look GuidoQuote: darkozQuote: Ace2You can get a pair of alligator shoes for $10k, but where can you buy a watch for only $10k ?Quote: darkoz
Your views are typical bourgeois bullshit that everyone who isn't buying$10,000 watches must be comprised of bottom barrel feeders
link to original post
I can buy a watch for $20.
It tells time just as good.
That's all I need to get.
There really isn't much difference. Mechanical engineering isn't such that a difference in watchmaking adds up to such a divide.
It's like buying designer clothes and the joke is they are made in the same factory as the cheap no name knock offs.
You are paying for tags not craftsmanship.
link to original post
A $20 shirt from Walmart looks, feels and fits like a $20 shirt from Walmart. You actually think a $200 shirt has the same quality fabric and construction?
Yes I would tend to agree that a clothing designer label does not always equate to Quality, but in general something made in USA or say Italy, or France, is going to be much better than the stuff slapped together in low labor rate parts of the world where it's about quantity not quality.
And Ace is 100% right about how a $20. watch looks like a $20. watch.
Darkoz, I assume, buys a quality pinball machine or vintage comic book worth something, versus the equivalents that might not be worth as much.
In short, I think everyone decides where he wants to splurge. And luxury in one area or another, appeals to different people in different ways. Even the wife beater wearing coal miner probably prefers to swill the expensive stuff if he can afford it that weekend.
Quote: MDawgObviously a Made in Italy fine crafted shirt, sweater, suit or coat is going to be made of better material and tailored better than something put together in a Chinese or Eastern European sweatshop.
Yes I would tend to agree that a clothing designer label does not always equate to Quality, but in general something made in USA or say Italy, or France, is going to be much better than the stuff slapped together in low labor rate parts of the world where it's about quantity not quality.
And Ace is 100% right about how a $20. watch looks like a $20. watch.
Darkoz, I assume, buys a quality pinball machine or vintage comic book worth something, versus the equivalents that might not be worth as much.
In short, I think everyone decides where he wants to splurge. And luxury in one area or another, appeals to different people in different ways. Even the wife beater wearing coal miner probably prefers to swill the expensive stuff if he can afford it that weekend.
link to original post
And I do believe we can agree on this comment mutually.
When I downsized, I donated them to the Bisbee thrift, where they sold for $2 a pair, the same as every other pair of shoes they take in.
Quote: darkoz
You are paying for tags not craftsmanship.
link to original post
It depends on the watch.
Quote: MDawgObviously a Made in Italy fine crafted shirt, sweater, suit or coat is going to be made of better material and tailored better than something put together in a Chinese or Eastern European sweatshop.
Yes I would tend to agree that a clothing designer label does not always equate to Quality, but in general something made in USA or say Italy, or France, is going to be much better than the stuff slapped together in low labor rate parts of the world where it's about quantity not quality.
link to original post
I don't think DarkOz would say that a generic quartz or electronic watch has the same level of craftsmanship as say a Tourbillon with various extra complications such as say a chronograph, perpetual calendar or minute repeater that takes a year for a watchmaker to put together by hand. At some point with some of the fine timepieces the level of work that goes into designing and making them is such that only the greatest known watchmakers in the world could afford to put in the time, because only they could justify the price that would make the effort and limited production worthwhile.
Like some of these very small production exotic car makers - they have to charge millions per vehicle or else it would not be feasible for them to make the few supercars that they are able to design and produce. And even the larger ones like Ferrari and Lamborghini don't sell enough vehicles to make a profit unless they ask for a lot per a car.
As to whether a cheap watch may keep the same time and provide the same functions as one costing $250,000. - yes, and no. The cheap watch might well provide the same end result but it achieves it via a simple quartz or (even cheaper) electronic means, while the mechanical watch to provide all those same functions might require a real master craftman's confluence of complex tiny machinery. Just study some of the complicated watches and you'll start to appreciate what real watchmaking is all about. And that's even without getting into what Ace was talking about - watches as fine jewelry, as wristwork art, as an expression of the wearer including via precious metals, precious stones or design.
Quote: billryanWhen I was doing the estate sale/auction house circuit a few years ago, I bought a bin of lightly used shoes and sneakers for $10, only because they were 13EEE and 14Es. One pair turned out to be Gucci driving shoes that I sold for $150, and I got okay money for several. When I moved to Bisbee, I kept one pair of Ostrich low boots and one pair of lizard skin dress shoes. They both retailed for more than $2500.
When I downsized, I donated them to the Bisbee thrift, where they sold for $2 a pair, the same as every other pair of shoes they take in.
link to original post
I didn't realize that Thrift Shops weren't aware of the value of designer items. I know of some friends who actually frequent those places to get designer items, which typically are snapped up quickly either by end users or resellers, but I didn't realize that the prices on all the clothing in the store were fixed without regard to name brand. Surely they're not selling a pair of Cartier or Chrome Hearts sunglasses they happened to come by for the same price as some cheap plastic no name shades? Then again I suppose that if they can't authenticate the goods they might have to just sell it all at the same comparative prices because items might be counterfeit.
Quote: MDawg
I don't think DarkOz would say that a generic quartz or electronic watch has the same level of craftsmanship as say a Tourbillon with various extra complications such as say a chronograph, perpetual calendar or minute repeater that takes a year for a watchmaker to put together by hand.
People have been making mechanical watches for hundreds of years. The casio digital watch has much more craftsmanship and features. I didn't see anybody a 100 years ago crafting circuit boards. Also, I haven't seen even one of your "fancy" watches with a calculator.
Granted your "fancy" watches are pretty but I will put an iWatch against any one of them for functionality.
Quote: MDawgQuote: billryanWhen I was doing the estate sale/auction house circuit a few years ago, I bought a bin of lightly used shoes and sneakers for $10, only because they were 13EEE and 14Es. One pair turned out to be Gucci driving shoes that I sold for $150, and I got okay money for several. When I moved to Bisbee, I kept one pair of Ostrich low boots and one pair of lizard skin dress shoes. They both retailed for more than $2500.
When I downsized, I donated them to the Bisbee thrift, where they sold for $2 a pair, the same as every other pair of shoes they take in.
link to original post
I didn't realize that Thrift Shops weren't aware of the value of designer items. I know of some friends who actually frequent those places to get designer items, which typically are snapped up quickly either by end users or resellers, but I didn't realize that the prices on all the clothing in the store were fixed without regard to name brand. Surely they're not selling a pair of Cartier or Chrome Hearts sunglasses they happened to come by for the same price as some cheap plastic no name shades? Then again I suppose that if they can't authenticate the goods they might have to just sell it all at the same comparative prices because items might be counterfeit.
link to original post
Bisbee Thrift sells everything for $1-$5. It's a non-profit staffed almost exclusively by community service folks and can be a pickers' paradise. They depend on donations, and their crazy prices discourage anyone from competing with them.
Quote: DRichQuote: MDawg
I don't think DarkOz would say that a generic quartz or electronic watch has the same level of craftsmanship as say a Tourbillon with various extra complications such as say a chronograph, perpetual calendar or minute repeater that takes a year for a watchmaker to put together by hand.
People have been making mechanical watches for hundreds of years. The casio digital watch has much more craftsmanship and features. I didn't see anybody a 100 years ago crafting circuit boards. Also, I haven't seen even one of your "fancy" watches with a calculator.
Granted your "fancy" watches are pretty but I will put an iWatch against any one of them for functionality.
link to original post
They don't even come with a flashlight.
Quote: DRich
Granted your "fancy" watches are pretty but I will put an iWatch against any one of them for functionality.
link to original post
I have an Apple Watch 7 also, which I wear at home, at the gym, and for general wear anywhere but even with that watch I chose the top of the line titanium "Edition" version because functionality isn't everything. Actually, titanium is functionally superior in a watch to certainly aluminum but also stainless steel, but mostly I picked that version because it is, as you put it, "fancy." I also usually wear the expensive (expensive by Apple Watch standards) Apple stainless steel Link bracelet with it, because it looks better than the other Apple bands.
Apple just discontinued these Edition versions though, except for the new Ultra.
But if I'm going to a special event, a party, out to dinner for any kind of occasion, or to play at the casino tables, I will probably not be wearing an Apple Watch.
Quote: darkozQuote: SOOPOOQuote: MDawgEveryone knows what I do, as far as what I am hauling in. Full transparency. They might believe it or not believe it, but it's all there. And the MDawg challenge remains in place! Helll, you yourself paid me $2000. to prove myself. Thank you!
No one knows what's going on at your end, as long as you stick to inanely meaningless statements like "I make blah blah blah a week (but not every week)." But you may spend volumes trying to expound on what no one believes makes sense, makes sense (in your mind only). This is why people like BillRyan, EvenBob, SooPoo etc. have field days with you.
link to original post
I was staying out of this…. but you brought me in….
DarkOz did not intentionally mislead the forum with his erroneous $20k per week claim. He just did not realize that the rest of us interpret his phrase differently than he thought we would.
For my ‘field day with him’, in general, I believe his claims because they make sense mathematically. He has given some specific examples (with scorn from many APs). Heck, I really don’t know Dark, have never met him, but would be willing to bet his tax return would show income in the 6 figures from his operation.
For you, Big Dawg, why do you keep bringing up the same childish arguments with him? When I come to this thread I want to hear about your winning and losing sessions, the watches you are buying, the events you get invited to, the suites you get comped, etc…
This thread is NOT the MDawg/DarkOz ‘mine is bigger than yours’ thread!!!
link to original post
Thank you Soopoo.
What is strange is that I readily admit (and assuming MDawg's claims are true) that he is bigger financially than me. I have repeatedly said that while over a decade I have taken millions from Casinos that I am not currently a millionaire nor do I make a million a year.
While MDawg was supposedly born into a rich family.
Of course viewpoints are always ridiculous. He seems to think my working my way up from homelessness is shameful while his being Rich because his parents copulated before he was born is some type of status symbol.
Earning nothing winning everything seems to be his belief system.
But he does seem to believe I am some threat to him even though his daily winning claims(, sometimes as high as a quarter million in a day) dwarf my $20,000 a week but not every week claims by a magnitude.
I will confirm my tax returns show six figure income and have for the last few years.
EDIT: And now people may get confused by my claim I have taken millions from the Casinos.
To be clear I certainly have but not all goes into my own pocket. For years I have had a crew of about 12 core people who make THEIR living working for me at the Casinos.
I make six figures. They are making five. Add it all up over the years and my team has taken millions from the Casinos.
link to original post
Wow I’m really surprised you are not a millionaire currently. I actually don’t believe you, but maybe you are telling the truth. I’ve noticed many are now afraid to talk about what they make because it invites competition or jealous competitors.
If you are telling the truth there is most certainly a leak in your method or gambling. You clearly have the knowledge, and have put in the time so this is shocking to me. Perhaps you have purchased millions in pinball machines? Many people have a spending problem.
Quote: SeedvalueQuote: darkozQuote: SOOPOOQuote: MDawgEveryone knows what I do, as far as what I am hauling in. Full transparency. They might believe it or not believe it, but it's all there. And the MDawg challenge remains in place! Helll, you yourself paid me $2000. to prove myself. Thank you!
No one knows what's going on at your end, as long as you stick to inanely meaningless statements like "I make blah blah blah a week (but not every week)." But you may spend volumes trying to expound on what no one believes makes sense, makes sense (in your mind only). This is why people like BillRyan, EvenBob, SooPoo etc. have field days with you.
link to original post
I was staying out of this…. but you brought me in….
DarkOz did not intentionally mislead the forum with his erroneous $20k per week claim. He just did not realize that the rest of us interpret his phrase differently than he thought we would.
For my ‘field day with him’, in general, I believe his claims because they make sense mathematically. He has given some specific examples (with scorn from many APs). Heck, I really don’t know Dark, have never met him, but would be willing to bet his tax return would show income in the 6 figures from his operation.
For you, Big Dawg, why do you keep bringing up the same childish arguments with him? When I come to this thread I want to hear about your winning and losing sessions, the watches you are buying, the events you get invited to, the suites you get comped, etc…
This thread is NOT the MDawg/DarkOz ‘mine is bigger than yours’ thread!!!
link to original post
Thank you Soopoo.
What is strange is that I readily admit (and assuming MDawg's claims are true) that he is bigger financially than me. I have repeatedly said that while over a decade I have taken millions from Casinos that I am not currently a millionaire nor do I make a million a year.
While MDawg was supposedly born into a rich family.
Of course viewpoints are always ridiculous. He seems to think my working my way up from homelessness is shameful while his being Rich because his parents copulated before he was born is some type of status symbol.
Earning nothing winning everything seems to be his belief system.
But he does seem to believe I am some threat to him even though his daily winning claims(, sometimes as high as a quarter million in a day) dwarf my $20,000 a week but not every week claims by a magnitude.
I will confirm my tax returns show six figure income and have for the last few years.
EDIT: And now people may get confused by my claim I have taken millions from the Casinos.
To be clear I certainly have but not all goes into my own pocket. For years I have had a crew of about 12 core people who make THEIR living working for me at the Casinos.
I make six figures. They are making five. Add it all up over the years and my team has taken millions from the Casinos.
link to original post
Wow I’m really surprised you are not a millionaire currently. I actually don’t believe you, but maybe you are telling the truth. I’ve noticed many are now afraid to talk about what they make because it invites competition or jealous competitors.
If you are telling the truth there is most certainly a leak in your method or gambling. You clearly have the knowledge, and have put in the time so this is shocking to me. Perhaps you have purchased millions in pinball machines? Many people have a spending problem.
link to original post
I wouldn't call it a spending PROBLEM since all my bills are paid.
I even paid back all the back taxes from before I went homeless (I had no income so I didn't care) including twenty years of interest.
All paid back.
I make money to spend. What am I making money for otherwise? To stare at it like Scrooge?
There are those who have put away millions.
And then there are those who have spent millions.
But I never claimed to be the richest or most successful AP. Just the most feared!
Quote: DRich
People have been making mechanical watches for hundreds of years. The casio digital watch has much more craftsmanship and features.
More features? Sure.
More craftsmanship? Purely subjective opinion.
Quote:I didn't see anybody a 100 years ago crafting circuit boards.
So?
Quote:Also, I haven't seen even one of your "fancy" watches with a calculator.
They make "fancy" watches with slide rule functions.
Quote:Granted your "fancy" watches are pretty but I will put an iWatch against any one of them for functionality.
link to original post
"Fancy" watches aren't trying to compete for functionality so your point is moot.
I did not know that, but I just found several online. Some expensive models, tooQuote: TigerWu
They make "fancy" watches with slide rule functions.
“Demonstrating how to use the slide rule on your watch”. Over on the thread about how to not get women, this could be the #1 way
Quote: TigerWu
"Fancy" watches aren't trying to compete for functionality so your point is moot.
link to original post
Of course they are not, because they can't. To each their own, some people want something pretty and some people want something functional. Some people want a pretty dumb girl. and some people want a smart girl.
An Apple Watch is a marvel of technology, but a fine timepiece is a work of art, and a marvel of hand craftsmanship.
Strip View...signage intact.
Back side...not so intact. Missing the -SURE portion of treasure. Burned out!
Worth seeing. A little drawn out at times, but nonstop music singing and movement. Certainly brings Alexander Hamilton back into the public eye.
My wife is both, we can include a sense of humor, skinny and healthy, but you'll never convince her of all that.Quote: MDawgOf course it's possible to have both, a pretty girl who is smart.
Quote: AxelWolfMy wife is both, we can include a sense of humor, skinny and healthy, but you'll never convince her of all that.Quote: MDawgOf course it's possible to have both, a pretty girl who is smart.
link to original post
If it weren’t for my wife, Axel’s would be the prettiest and smartest WOV wife I know…..
Baccarat.
There were some big bets, some back and forth, but it was mostly a steady movement upwards.
+26500
Note: Lately, for security reasons, session reports are not necessarily presented in real time corresponding directly to the day played.
And this is the MDawg challenge.
Quote: AlanMendelson
Sometimes people on Internet forums don't realize that there is a cordial way to disagree.
Was actually hoping to run into Alan one of these days at the Red Rock. It might've happened, but now, it won't. R.I.P.
Baccarat.
Two separate sessions. One short won about 6K another longer won about 26K. The winning streak continues.
+32000
Note: Lately, for security reasons, session reports are not necessarily presented in real time corresponding directly to the day played.
And this is the MDawg challenge.
Quote: MDawgDay 40 play.
Baccarat.
Two separate sessions. One short won about 6K another longer won about 26K. The winning streak continues.
+32000
Note: Lately, for security reasons, session reports are not necessarily presented in real time corresponding directly to the day played.
And this is the MDawg challenge.
link to original post
Congrats. Did you buy the watch you were talking about?
I might post a pic of the watch at some point, subtly, maybe next to some chips, but the thing is worth more than an average house in the mid-West and don't want to post a pic of it right now. I did get a very good wholesale dealer deal on it, lowest price anywhere I could find, so I consider it a great buy and an investment.
I actually did not tell my wife about it, but she started talking about a 5 carat diamond necklace and I couldn't say No knowing what I just spent. Maybe she has an inkling that I bought yet another timepiece, or maybe she just realizes that a lot of $25K chips have been flying my direction.
The Golden Gate, D and Circa are all owned together and I suppose anyone staying at the Golden Gate is directed to dine at one of the sister properties. Room service? is it brought over from Saginaw's?
Bubble Craps, this one's for you ChumpChange!
This one is called, "Las Vegas Pastoral."
Is it worth $15,000.? I suppose - if you like it. I acquired Andy Warhols when I was college age for not so much that are worth 30X that now, and lots of other art in my life that went up a lot in value, and then I also bought art around college time and since that is probably worth about what I paid, or less. But in the end, you're supposed to buy art because you like it, not because of whose name is inscribed in the lower right hand corner.
Baccarat.
Some pretty heavy duty action, with pretty consistent winning!
+52000
Note: Lately, for security reasons, session reports are not necessarily presented in real time corresponding directly to the day played.
And this is the MDawg challenge.
Quote: cwwbjrI think $10k /wk would be an easy goal without pressure and time constraints and would allow for the occasional weak shoe. You could do it playing only 1 day / week most of the time or play an extra day to keep the average up and cover the occasional weak session. Most players don't have the ability to accomplish one winning session much less a steady weekly $10+K. You are already doing this , documented.
(1) you can definitely do it! 100% 1 or 2 days / wk. avg.4 hrs /day or less at private table.
(2) YES DEFINITELY ! Like Baccarat on Viagra !
link to original post
Lately - actually, for some time now - been blowing that 10K a week goal away. Have not been playing daily.
Quote: MDawgQuote: cwwbjrI think $10k /wk would be an easy goal without pressure and time constraints and would allow for the occasional weak shoe. You could do it playing only 1 day / week most of the time or play an extra day to keep the average up and cover the occasional weak session. Most players don't have the ability to accomplish one winning session much less a steady weekly $10+K. You are already doing this , documented.
(1) you can definitely do it! 100% 1 or 2 days / wk. avg.4 hrs /day or less at private table.
(2) YES DEFINITELY ! Like Baccarat on Viagra !
link to original post
Lately - actually, for some time now - been blowing that 10K a week goal away. Have not been playing daily.
link to original post
Are you saying you were uncertain you could maintain that?
Every day you posted figures like +52,000 as a DAILY WIN. I recall a few months ago you posted winning a quarter million in a day.
How is it possible you weren't certain you could win consistently a simple ten grand s week?
I'm not challenging you but, well, okay I guess I am because this doesn't make sense unless you haven't been reporting your losses. Just your wins?
As predicted , looking at days 40 and 41 totals $ 84 K = 8 weeks win cushion ( to cover a rare weak shoe) which is why it is easy for Mdawg to win $10 K/ week without pressure and likely in only one or two shoes per week (1 day ) . Averaging min. $10k per shoe is predictably likely.
Mdawg has " something more" according to the Wizard.
Unless i've overlooked it, no one on this forum has posted ever having come close to a documented and verified winning run over an extended period of time to the extent that he has.
Sic' M dawg !
My money is on Mdawg !