Quote: richardsonnerdI'm making a new game and it basically is a 3 card stud game. One bet, three cards you vs. the dealer. In order to get paid on the bet the dealer must have a queen or higher. According to 3 card poker data a player will win 44.91% of the time with these rules. What's the formula knowing the winning percentage and all the payout probabilities?
link to original post
Is this just a straight up Even Money game, or are there other rules?
Mini Royal: 30 to 1
Straight Flush: 15 to 1
Three of a Kind: 10 to 1
Straight: 3 to 1
Flush: 2 to 1
Pair: 1 to 1
High Card: 1 to 1
The dealer must qualify with a queen or better or it is a push. In order to get the payout the player must beat the dealer. I know that a dealer only qualifies 69.59% of the time. I have all the probabilities per hand and the returns. I just don't know the formula to calculate the house edge. My reverse engineering is failing.
Quote: richardsonnerdI'm trying to calculate the pay tables to create the house edge then rtp. Right now I know that after hiring someone to generate our rtp, that if the pay table is as follows then our RTP is 89.57%. I'm trying to find the formula for that or the house edge so I can tweak the payouts.
Mini Royal: 30 to 1
Straight Flush: 15 to 1
Three of a Kind: 10 to 1
Straight: 3 to 1
Flush: 2 to 1
Pair: 1 to 1
High Card: 1 to 1
The dealer must qualify with a queen or better or it is a push. In order to get the payout the player must beat the dealer. I know that a dealer only qualifies 69.59% of the time. I have all the probabilities per hand and the returns. I just don't know the formula to calculate the house edge. My reverse engineering is failing.
link to original post
You could do this in excel with just the combinations of each hand.
Seems to me that the RTP is too low for this to be a game players will play. And the dealer qualifier missing 3/10 is brutal too. Too many pushes will slow the game too much from casino perspective I think.
What happens if J or better qualifies, and then you can tweak the pay table a bit to make the RTP closer to three card?
When you say do this in excel, I'm trying to set that up using the wizard of odds ante return table to guide me. However, I'm just confused on how to derive the formulas. ( i wish i could attach a screen shot) For instance let's narrow to a straight flush. The site says this:
Player wins with straight flush: combinations: 617,044 probability: .001515
Player has straight flush, dealer doesn't qualify: combinations: 266,196 probability: .000654
Player loses with straight flush: combinations: 968 probability: .000002
Player ties with straight flush: combinations: 144 probability: .0000005
If the odds of getting a straight flush are 0.002172, then those numbers added equal that number? How did the combinations get calculated? Probability?
If I'm looking at the chart correctly then I add up all of the wins, loses, ties, no qualifies in order to find my edge. Is that correct? BTW, I appreciate your help, greatly!
Player Win
Mini Royal:
Straight Flush:
Three of a Kind: 665,776
Straight: 8,975,484
Flush:
Pair:
High Card:
Player Win No Dealer Qualify
Mini Royal:
Straight Flush:
Three of a Kind: 288,960
Straight: 4,001,004
Flush:
Pair:
High Card:
Player Tie
Mini Royal: 12
Straight Flush: 132
Three of a Kind: 0
Straight: 18,288
Flush:
Pair:
High Card:
Player Loss
Mini Royal:
Straight Flush:
Three of a Kind: 3,312
Straight: 270,504
Flush:
Pair:
High Card:
To calculate yourself, you could use either combination theory to write out algebraic formulas, or you could write out all the hand combinations that are Q-high or higher.
I believe the Wizard uses a computer code that would treat this as a 6 card problem (3 cards each for dealer and player) and then automatically creates all possible combinations of six cards configured as (player hand+ dealer's hand) and accumulates the needed statistics. That's a lot of work but its how to do the calculations so that the answers are rigorously correct.
By the way, how is your game idea different than conventional Three Card Poker? They sound identical.
Quote: unJonI think you would need to brute force this if it’s not on Wizard of Odds three card page.
link to original post
Here's what I get, although I am not entirely confident with the numbers:
Hand | Win | Tie | Lose | Not Qualified |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mini-Royal | 36,244 | 12 | 0 | 37,440 |
Straight Flush | 425,184 | 132 | 968 | 384,372 |
3 Of A Kind | 500,656 | 0 | 3312 | 454,080 |
Straight | 6,637,980 | 18,288 | 270,504 | 6,338,508 |
Flush | 9,291,176 | 3288 | 1,260,596 | 9,637,644 |
Pair | 24,210,864 | 11,232 | 11,873,520 | 32,883,840 |
Garbage | 13,306,860 | 149,352 | 144,612,792 | 144,821,556 |
This is a RTP of 82.92%
Quote: ThatDonGuyQuote: unJonI think you would need to brute force this if it’s not on Wizard of Odds three card page.
link to original post
Here's what I get, although I am not entirely confident with the numbers:
Hand Win Tie Lose Not Qualified Mini-Royal 36,244 12 0 37,440 Straight Flush 425,184 132 968 384,372 3 Of A Kind 500,656 0 3312 454,080 Straight 6,637,980 18,288 270,504 6,338,508 Flush 9,291,176 3288 1,260,596 9,637,644 Pair 24,210,864 11,232 11,873,520 32,883,840 Garbage 13,306,860 149,352 144,612,792 144,821,556
This is a RTP of 82.92%
link to original post
You can check the table here: 3 Card Poker Analysis. I did a spot check on the "straight flush wins-dealer qualifies" combinations and thought I observed a small difference. just trying to be helpful.
Edit: same basic message as previous post.
Quote: gordonm888Quote: ThatDonGuyQuote: unJonI think you would need to brute force this if it’s not on Wizard of Odds three card page.
link to original post
Here's what I get, although I am not entirely confident with the numbers:
Hand Win Tie Lose Not Qualified Mini-Royal 36,244 12 0 37,440 Straight Flush 425,184 132 968 384,372 3 Of A Kind 500,656 0 3312 454,080 Straight 6,637,980 18,288 270,504 6,338,508 Flush 9,291,176 3288 1,260,596 9,637,644 Pair 24,210,864 11,232 11,873,520 32,883,840 Garbage 13,306,860 149,352 144,612,792 144,821,556
This is a RTP of 82.92%
link to original post
You can check the table here: 3 Card Poker Analysis. I did a spot check on the "straight flush wins-dealer qualifies" combinations and thought I observed a small difference. just trying to be helpful.
link to original post
I believe I did the same. You mentioned "You can check the table here: " but there was no link to click. Are you able to send again?
Quote: richardsonnerdQuote: gordonm888Quote: ThatDonGuyQuote: unJonI think you would need to brute force this if it’s not on Wizard of Odds three card page.
link to original post
Here's what I get, although I am not entirely confident with the numbers:
Hand Win Tie Lose Not Qualified Mini-Royal 36,244 12 0 37,440 Straight Flush 425,184 132 968 384,372 3 Of A Kind 500,656 0 3312 454,080 Straight 6,637,980 18,288 270,504 6,338,508 Flush 9,291,176 3288 1,260,596 9,637,644 Pair 24,210,864 11,232 11,873,520 32,883,840 Garbage 13,306,860 149,352 144,612,792 144,821,556
This is a RTP of 82.92%
link to original post
You can check the table here: 3 Card Poker Analysis. I did a spot check on the "straight flush wins-dealer qualifies" combinations and thought I observed a small difference. just trying to be helpful.
link to original post
I believe I did the same. You mentioned "You can check the table here: " but there was no link to click. Are you able to send again?
link to original post
Link was in his post.
https://wizardofodds.com/games/three-card-poker/
Quote: gordonm888You can check the table here: 3 Card Poker Analysis. I did a spot check on the "straight flush wins-dealer qualifies" combinations and thought I observed a small difference. just trying to be helpful.
Edit: same basic message as previous post.
link to original post
Good catch - thanks. I was counting ace-high hands as "ace-low", so it was overcounting the number of non-qualifying hands.
Here are revised numbers, that appear to match what the Wizard has, at least with straight flushes (when you include Royals):
Hand | Win | Tie | Loss | Not Qualified |
---|---|---|---|---|
Royal | 46,804 | 12 | 0 | 26,880 |
Straight Flush | 570,240 | 132 | 968 | 239,316 |
3 Of A Kind | 665,776 | 0 | 3312 | 288,960 |
Straight | 8,975,484 | 18,288 | 270,504 | 4,001,004 |
Flush | 12,793,544 | 3288 | 1,260,596 | 6,135,276 |
Pair | 36,168,624 | 11,232 | 11,873,520 | 20,926,080 |
Garbage | 38,197,044 | 246,888 | 172,254,864 | 92,191,764 |
This has an RTP of 89.64%
Quote: ThatDonGuyQuote: gordonm888You can check the table here: 3 Card Poker Analysis. I did a spot check on the "straight flush wins-dealer qualifies" combinations and thought I observed a small difference. just trying to be helpful.
Edit: same basic message as previous post.
link to original post
Good catch - thanks. I was counting ace-high hands as "ace-low", so it was overcounting the number of non-qualifying hands.
Here are revised numbers, that appear to match what the Wizard has, at least with straight flushes (when you include Royals):
Hand Win Tie Loss Not Qualified Royal 46,804 12 0 26,880 Straight Flush 570,240 132 968 239,316 3 Of A Kind 665,776 0 3312 288,960 Straight 8,975,484 18,288 270,504 4,001,004 Flush 12,793,544 3288 1,260,596 6,135,276 Pair 36,168,624 11,232 11,873,520 20,926,080 Garbage 38,197,044 246,888 172,254,864 92,191,764
This has an RTP of 89.64%
link to original post
Holy crap! You rock! I appreciate you so much! Thanks to everyone else for your help as well!
Quote: ThatDonGuyQuote: gordonm888You can check the table here: 3 Card Poker Analysis. I did a spot check on the "straight flush wins-dealer qualifies" combinations and thought I observed a small difference. just trying to be helpful.
Edit: same basic message as previous post.
link to original post
Good catch - thanks. I was counting ace-high hands as "ace-low", so it was overcounting the number of non-qualifying hands.
Here are revised numbers, that appear to match what the Wizard has, at least with straight flushes (when you include Royals):
Hand Win Tie Loss Not Qualified Royal 46,804 12 0 26,880 Straight Flush 570,240 132 968 239,316 3 Of A Kind 665,776 0 3312 288,960 Straight 8,975,484 18,288 270,504 4,001,004 Flush 12,793,544 3288 1,260,596 6,135,276 Pair 36,168,624 11,232 11,873,520 20,926,080 Garbage 38,197,044 246,888 172,254,864 92,191,764
This has an RTP of 89.64%
link to original post
This is all perfect. I added it to my existing numbers and it all works out. Question from these numbers, what's the formula to calculate RTP? How did you arrive at 89.64%?
Quote: richardsonnerdQuote: ThatDonGuyQuote: gordonm888You can check the table here: 3 Card Poker Analysis. I did a spot check on the "straight flush wins-dealer qualifies" combinations and thought I observed a small difference. just trying to be helpful.
Edit: same basic message as previous post.
link to original post
Good catch - thanks. I was counting ace-high hands as "ace-low", so it was overcounting the number of non-qualifying hands.
Here are revised numbers, that appear to match what the Wizard has, at least with straight flushes (when you include Royals):
Hand Win Tie Loss Not Qualified Royal 46,804 12 0 26,880 Straight Flush 570,240 132 968 239,316 3 Of A Kind 665,776 0 3312 288,960 Straight 8,975,484 18,288 270,504 4,001,004 Flush 12,793,544 3288 1,260,596 6,135,276 Pair 36,168,624 11,232 11,873,520 20,926,080 Garbage 38,197,044 246,888 172,254,864 92,191,764
This has an RTP of 89.64%
link to original post
This is all perfect. I added it to my existing numbers and it all works out. Question from these numbers, what's the formula to calculate RTP? How did you arrive at 89.64%?
link to original post
Multiply all the probabilities by the outcomes (including 0 outcome for pushes and -1 outcome for a loss) then add them up.
Quote: ThatDonGuyQuote: gordonm888You can check the table here: 3 Card Poker Analysis. I did a spot check on the "straight flush wins-dealer qualifies" combinations and thought I observed a small difference. just trying to be helpful.
Edit: same basic message as previous post.
link to original post
Good catch - thanks. I was counting ace-high hands as "ace-low", so it was overcounting the number of non-qualifying hands.
Here are revised numbers, that appear to match what the Wizard has, at least with straight flushes (when you include Royals):
Hand Win Tie Loss Not Qualified Royal 46,804 12 0 26,880 Straight Flush 570,240 132 968 239,316 3 Of A Kind 665,776 0 3312 288,960 Straight 8,975,484 18,288 270,504 4,001,004 Flush 12,793,544 3288 1,260,596 6,135,276 Pair 36,168,624 11,232 11,873,520 20,926,080 Garbage 38,197,044 246,888 172,254,864 92,191,764
This has an RTP of 89.64%
link to original post
Thank you so much for all of your help with these three card numbers. Since you are pretty much the Jesus of numbers in my book, I'm thinking of converting to a 5 card game too. Can you whip out the same exact chart for the 5 card combinations? Royal Flush, Straight Flush, Four of a Kind, Full House, Flush, Straight, Three of a Kind, Two Pairs, One Pair, High Card. That would be awesome!
Those are single player five card poker probabilities. Straight flushes can be further divided as 4 combinations for Royal Flushes and 36 combinations for non-royal straight flushes. You would need to decide what is a qualifying hand for the dealer. Also, be aware that 5 card poker games against the dealer already exist. and some have patent protection.
Also, I would advise you to work harder at searching the internet for basic results like this and learning how to do calculations yourself. You might start by looking up games on the Wizard of Odds site, but the internet has many good sites with information about things like poker probabilities -even Wikipedia.
Many of us like to be helpful, but its a bit unreasonable to suppose that every time that you want to explore a game concept that someone on this site is going to be willing to do analysis for free.
Quote: gordonm888
Those are single player five card poker probabilities. Straight flushes can be further divided as 4 combinations for Royal Flushes and 36 combinations for non-royal straight flushes. You would need to decide what is a qualifying hand for the dealer. Also, be aware that 5 card poker games against the dealer already exist. and some have patent protection.
Also, I would advise you to work harder at searching the internet for basic results like this and learning how to do calculations yourself. You might start by looking up games on the Wizard of Odds site, but the internet has many good sites with information about things like poker probabilities -even Wikipedia.
Many of us like to be helpful, but its a bit unreasonable to suppose that every time that you want to explore a game concept that someone on this site is going to be willing to do analysis for free.
link to original post
I understand, thanks for the feedback. I do appreciate the help. Those numbers you displayed are easy to find, I have searched. The person that responded to the possible winning three card combinations had the ability to quickly provide information that honestly I couldn't find after days of searching. The five card numbers appear to be just as difficult broken down into Win, Lose, No Qualify, Tie, like he gave me, that's exactly what I need. If you know of a site that has this chart, I would love that link!
As for the hand that qualifies, it appears that Caribbean Stud uses A,K. A pair or higher could also work for qualifying hand.
As for patented games, this game is a spin off of our 3 Card War game that is actually patented by us, Neesan Labs, we have a 5 Card War and a War Poker game all internationally patented as well. The poker bet is a prop bet in addition to the basic game ante/war bet where other prop bets are included. We just ran out of money in the building process and can't afford a math guy as we look to secure investors for GLI-19 certification. I was actually going to offer a small payment to the person who helped with the 3 Card Poker combinations but I assumed that was against the forum rules. Instead I was going to offer him a credit in our games but ran out of available posts yesterday since my account is new and limited. If I can offer him a small payment through here, I'd be glad to. Or you if you can duplicate the chart he gave me for 3 card stud, I'd be open to offering a payment or game credit to you as well.
Best of luck with the certification process.
Quote: richardsonnerdThank you so much for all of your help with these three card numbers. Since you are pretty much the Jesus of numbers in my book, I'm thinking of converting to a 5 card game too. Can you whip out the same exact chart for the 5 card combinations? Royal Flush, Straight Flush, Four of a Kind, Full House, Flush, Straight, Three of a Kind, Two Pairs, One Pair, High Card. That would be awesome!
link to original post
That's a little more work that I can find time to do at the moment.
Quote: ThatDonGuyQuote: richardsonnerdThank you so much for all of your help with these three card numbers. Since you are pretty much the Jesus of numbers in my book, I'm thinking of converting to a 5 card game too. Can you whip out the same exact chart for the 5 card combinations? Royal Flush, Straight Flush, Four of a Kind, Full House, Flush, Straight, Three of a Kind, Two Pairs, One Pair, High Card. That would be awesome!
link to original post
That's a little more work that I can find time to do at the moment.
link to original post
Let me know if it is a possibility in the next day or so. We are willing to compensate even though it wouldn't be as much as we'd like. I appreciate all you have helped me with thusfar. Thank you!
Quote: richardsonnerdQuote: ThatDonGuyQuote: richardsonnerdThank you so much for all of your help with these three card numbers. Since you are pretty much the Jesus of numbers in my book, I'm thinking of converting to a 5 card game too. Can you whip out the same exact chart for the 5 card combinations? Royal Flush, Straight Flush, Four of a Kind, Full House, Flush, Straight, Three of a Kind, Two Pairs, One Pair, High Card. That would be awesome!
link to original post
That's a little more work that I can find time to do at the moment.
link to original post
Let me know if it is a possibility in the next day or so. We are willing to compensate even though it wouldn't be as much as we'd like. I appreciate all you have helped me with thusfar. Thank you!
link to original post
I suggest that you take any further for-fee discussions to the Private Messaging system.