Median betting system for Baccarat

Hi Every one,

I want your inputs on this system for bacarrat.

i am following the below pattern

10 20 30 40 50 .

I always start with the median .30 .If i win i go to 40 .if again i win to 50 .if again i win i retart the cycle from 30 again.

lose scenario

If i lose on 30 i bet 20 if i lose 20 i bet 10 .if i bet 10 i keep on betting 10 till i get my first win.once i get a win i go back to 30 dollars and start the same sequence again.

What do you do if you win at 30 but lose at 40?
How about win at 30 and 40 but lose at 50?

Also, what is your initial bankroll, and how much do you need to be ahead before you stop betting?

Another question: I assume you always bet on banker. Do you play normal baccarat, where banker bets pay less than even money, or some version where banker bets pay even money but they push under some condition (for example, the banker has a three-card 7)?

if i win 30 and lose 40 i go back to 30 and start the median pattern again.

If i win 30 and 40 .i just quit take a break and come back after some time. If i win more session and have made some profit .i will go ahead and bet 50.if i lose 50 i will go back to 30 and start the median again.

My nkroll will be 500 dollars and try this on a electronic bacarrat.i will play normal baccart with 5% commision to the dealer

You will go broke, period!

every system will go broke at one point.we all know that except some one his a super card counter. the thread is just to evaluate a system and check if it is some percentage better than the other systems like Martingale,paroli ,oscar grind,kutty,oscar grind,sterns method,labo l these system will fail at some point.but just wanted to know which one has the least possibility here.

On top of this dont forget to include just playing 2 sessions per day and go home .

Quote: rajbhah89

Hi Every one,

I want your inputs on this system for bacarrat.

Hi again. Happy to oblige.

You would have less fun if you flat bet table minimum just on every every third hand, but you would, *on average, lose your money more slowly.
You would have more fun, excitement even, if you bet 10 times those stakes with your pattern. but you would, *on average, lose your money more quickly.

Is that the sort of input you seek? If not, what is?

You want something more mathematical? Here ya go.....
You would, *on average, lose 1.06% on every wager.
You would, *on average, lose 1.06% of total wagers over every session.
You would, *on average, lose 1.06% of $10 on every $10 wager.
You would, *on average, lose 1.06% of $20 on every $10 wager.
You would, *on average, lose 1.06% of $30 on every $10 wager.
You would, *on average, lose 1.06% of $40 on every $10 wager.
You would, *on average, lose 1.06% of $50 on every $10 wager

'* on average' refers to the 'log term' You might not encounter 'long term' but the casino will, so they will be happy.
Your mileage WOULD vary. that's where the fun lies.

Stay safe.

Quote: rajbhah89

every system will go broke at one point.we all know that except some one his a super card counter. the thread is just to evaluate a system and check if it is some percentage better than the other systems like Martingale,paroli ,oscar grind,kutty,oscar grind,sterns method,labo l these system will fail at some point.but just wanted to know which one has the least possibility here.

On top of this dont forget to include just playing 2 sessions per day and go home .

I heard OSCAR SYSTEM can last longer, but eventually will go broke.