DD Blackjack. 200 - 10000.
Was pretty smooth movement for the most part. Won my largest hand, too, although it came after some losing hands that added up to quite a bit before the big winner brought me back up.
+20475
Note: Lately, for security reasons, session reports are not necessarily presented in real time corresponding directly to the day played.
I'm willing to present a side Challenge. If anyone doubts that any one, just any one of the Session reports I present during this trip is not entirely accurate, throw down a red flag! Put up a mere ten grand in cash, let's work out how to verify the Session to your satisfaction using the Wizard as the judge, and winner takes the twenty thousand.
I'll contribute five hundred from my end for the Wizard's time if the Challenger will do the same, so that's $19,000. to the winner of this side Challenge.
This Side Challenge remains good for the duration of this particular Vegas trip.
The Wizard wrote briefly about this here
https://wizardofodds.com/games/baccarat/insurance/
However on that page the Wizard refers to insurance for natural hands, and I understand that this will not be offered at Resorts World, but again, this is just based on what a few pit bosses told me - they don't know exactly how it will work yet.
I assume that the house edge will be hefty.
Quote: MDawgDays 141 - 143 play
Went back to Baccarat, special very high limits!
There was quite a bit of up and down but ended up down, way down! How down? don't even want to post because with that level of loss you might be able to track MDawg down! Being up so much over all, I went for it!
link to original post
Quote: MDawgDay 139 play
DD Blackjack. 100 - 25000.
Fast forward to 30 October and you reported Day 148 play results.
But then on Nov 1st you reset the day number count to 139.
Is this the way it works with you high rollers? When you have 3 consecutive losing sessions and dump $300K of trip profit, you simply rewind the day numbers to erase those losses?
How else did we get to have session 141 again, this time as a winning one? Good way of keeping that stream of consecutive winning sessions: Back to the future.
Quote: MDawgDay 141 play.
DD Blackjack. 200 - 10000.
...
+20475
Note: Lately, for security reasons, session reports are not necessarily presented in real time corresponding directly to the day played.link to original post
I get it, you are not reporting in real time, but when the clocks just went back, it was by an hour, not 9 days.
$:o)
The most recent session number is 152. I just corrected it here at WOV.
Of course an alternate explanation would be "suspension of disbelief," a la Ed Wood, Plan 9 From Outer Space and ST Coleridge. 😆
I'm joking of course about the suspension of disbelief. (Never let it be said that MDawg isn't capable of making dry humor about himself.) It was simply a clerical error.
Ace, as of now, many of my credit lines are at special limits levels. I'd rather not state the exact numbers for confidentiality reasons.
Quote: MDawgHey Ace2, I was about to make a post about your past references to fine timepieces. The other day, in the high limit pit, there was a small gang of players all wearing very high end timepieces. Nothing unusual, but this particular group, including me, between five wrists was probably sporting a million in watches: I was wearing one of my Paul Newman 18K Daytonas, there was a rare Cartier, an Audemars Royal Oak in 18K rose gold with solid rose gold bracelet, an 18K WG Rolex Sky Dweller and another cool 18K Rolex. Next time it happens I might convince the crew to hold out their wrists for a group photo.
Ace, as of now, many of my credit lines are at special limits levels. I'd rather not state the exact numbers for confidentiality reasons.
link to original post
So Timex’s are definitely out, correct?
Such as. https://www.amazon.com/Timex-T78582-Silver-Tone-Extra-Long-Stainless/dp/B00020J1BC/ref=asc_df_B00020J1BC/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=312150194761&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=10636099542493696372&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=t&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9017968&hvtargid=pla-536128918006&psc=1
No, they’re the latest fashion at the $5 tables at Four Queens. They go very well with a pair of Sketchers, a can of Pabst and a $30 bankrollQuote: Marcusclark66[
So Timex’s are definitely out, correct?
I'm trying to think of a price that reflects the labor saved for not having to reach into my pocket briefly...but then you have to consider that it will need a battery once per year...
Because a fine watch is jewelry…actually the only piece of jewelry a man should wear.Quote: Mission146Do most gamblers not own a phone? The hell do you even need a watch for? It's a minimally functional bracelet.
I'm trying to think of a price that reflects the labor saved for not having to reach into my pocket briefly...but then you have to consider that it will need a battery once per year...
link to original post
And it appreciates in value. I can’t think of a smarter discretionary purchase. About a thousand times smarter than buying a luxury car that depreciates like a rock and is expensive to own/maintain
No battery, self-winding. Mine is anyway
Quote: Mission146Do most gamblers not own a phone? The hell do you even need a watch for? It's a minimally functional bracelet.
I'm trying to think of a price that reflects the labor saved for not having to reach into my pocket briefly...but then you have to consider that it will need a battery once per year...
link to original post
I am with the rich guys on this one. It is just jewelry. I only where my watches when I dress up for something (rarely).
Now, some high end fine timepieces also provide special functions - these are sometimes called "complicated" watches or "complications." Functions include stopwatch (chronographs), dual or multiple time zones, alarm / minute repeater, and so on. How often does someone these days use a two or three hundred thousand dollar Paul Newman vintage Rolex Daytona Cosmograph to time something? Probably never. But the functionality is there.
I suppose I consider casino play sessions as special occasions.
Quote: Ace2Because a fine watch is jewelry…actually the only piece of jewelry a man should wear.
And it appreciates in value. I can’t think of a smarter discretionary purchase. About a thousand times smarter than buying a luxury car that depreciates like a rock and is expensive to own/maintain
No battery, self-winding. Mine is anyway
link to original post
It only appreciates in value in the fine watch market, and only then because there is demand for it, despite the fact that it doesn't really do anything. Also, I reject your statement because I have two earrings in my left ear (small hoops) and, honestly, don't really look quite right without them, at this point.
I also like my cars to have as much utility/$$$ as possible.
Quote: DRich
I am with the rich guys on this one. It is just jewelry. I only where my watches when I dress up for something (rarely).
link to original post
I have a few watches that I have received as gifts, but with apologies especially to Axelwolf, I don't wear them. My earrings are the only form of jewelry I wear.
Quote: MDawgPlus, what safer place to wear an expensive watch than inside a casino, with all that security and actual police officers (in some casinos) standing around.
link to original post
At least someone notices!
We do excel, don’t we.
Well yes I suppose you could say jewelry appreciates in value like fine art does.Quote: Mission146Quote: Ace2Because a fine watch is jewelry…actually the only piece of jewelry a man should wear.
And it appreciates in value. I can’t think of a smarter discretionary purchase. About a thousand times smarter than buying a luxury car that depreciates like a rock and is expensive to own/maintain
No battery, self-winding. Mine is anyway
link to original post
It only appreciates in value in the fine watch market, and only then because there is demand for it, despite the fact that it doesn't really do anything. Also, I reject your statement because I have two earrings in my left ear (small hoops) and, honestly, don't really look quite right without them, at this point.
I also like my cars to have as much utility/$$$ as possible.
link to original post
Fashion is subjective and you may prefer hoop earrings over a platinum Daytona, but you’re probably in a tiny minority with that preference…unless you mostly hang out with pirates 🏴☠️
I’ve read that a good watch is the only jewelry a man should wear. Going beyond that (chains, rings etc) tend to look gaudy/guido on a man. Different rules for women
I’ve also read that, when looking at a man, the material items that women most focus on are his shoes and his watch.
DD Blackjack. 200 - 9000.
The big bet came at a catch up time, but worked out fine. Was a good session.
+11500
Note: Lately, for security reasons, session reports are not necessarily presented in real time corresponding directly to the day played.
I'm willing to present a side Challenge. If anyone doubts that any one, just any one of the Session reports I present during this trip is not entirely accurate, throw down a red flag! Put up a mere ten grand in cash, let's work out how to verify the Session to your satisfaction using the Wizard as the judge, and winner takes the twenty thousand.
I'll contribute five hundred from my end for the Wizard's time if the Challenger will do the same, so that's $19,000. to the winner of this side Challenge.
This Side Challenge remains good for the duration of this particular Vegas trip.
He got up, announced he was $40,000.00 ahead and that was good enough pay for his half hour or so of ‘work’.
Bless him, gotta love it.
Quote: Marcusclark66But you do, correct?
link to original post
I wouldn't call myself an MDawg "hater", I also follow this thread as well as 95% of the threads in here. I try to do little to no drama. Sure some sarcasm. Sure some minor arguments. Not trying to get my life revolving around an internet forum though.
I tell the dealer I am coloring up and tell him to take 2 greens for himself. I have all my money back and a small profit. I leave with my free turkey roasting pan I went there to get and ask myself WTF I was doing. LoL Luckily, it worked out!
It was me and the dealer. So if I wasn't willing to play basic strategy and was scared having such a big bet (by my standards) on that pair of 7's, and not willing to split. I would have just stayed. No way I hit a 14 against a 6. Dealer would have flipped the face for a 16 and then drew the 3, making 19. I'd have lost the $750 and been down $2500. Instead, I get it all back plus a small profit. Lucky day!
Quote: Ace2
Well yes I suppose you could say jewelry appreciates in value like fine art does.
Fashion is subjective and you may prefer hoop earrings over a platinum Daytona, but you’re probably in a tiny minority with that preference…unless you mostly hang out with pirates 🏴☠️
I’ve read that a good watch is the only jewelry a man should wear. Going beyond that (chains, rings etc) tend to look gaudy/guido on a man. Different rules for women
I’ve also read that, when looking at a man, the material items that women most focus on are his shoes and his watch.
link to original post
I understand why watches were popular and it's for the same reason that I don't understand why they are popular now---bracelet with a pragmatic function, or a few pragmatic functions. I tend to think maybe the current market is mostly holdovers from the time that a watch was needed to readily know what time it is.
I probably wouldn't have the earrings now, except I've had them since I was 12. If I didn't currently have piercings, then I would not go get them.
If the first thing that a particular woman is noticing about me is material items, no thanks, I'm good.
Quote: mwalz9...If I lose it all, Im out $2500 and move on. I lose the 1st $250 hand. At this point I say screw it and Im on full tilt. I put the full $750 remaining on the next hand. What do I get? A pair of 7's against a dealer 6. Of course as bad as I dont want to, I go to the wallet to get another $750 for the split. The 1st 7, draws a friggin 3! So, again, I go to the wallet for another $750. I get a face card and have 20. The next 7 gets a face as well and Im at 17. So I sit at 20 and 17 with $2250 on the table and a dealer 6. The dealer flips his hole card and its a face. 16! Then draws another face...BUST!
...
Dealer would have flipped the face for a 16 and then drew the 3, making 19. I'd have lost the $750 and been down $3500. Instead, I get it all back plus a small profit. Lucky day!
link to original post
Nice profit. I think your math is wrong. You had put $2500 on the table and dipped into the wallet for another $1500 putting you potentially $4k in the hole?
Great that you had that fat wallet as back-up. And I'm sure it would not have been a life changing loss. But it would have stung?
It could have gone oh-so wrong, though. Still. If you'd lost, you could have just not told us about it. I've had similar 5h17 or bust last hands. They make or break your session.
Quote: OnceDearQuote: mwalz9...If I lose it all, Im out $2500 and move on. I lose the 1st $250 hand. At this point I say screw it and Im on full tilt. I put the full $750 remaining on the next hand. What do I get? A pair of 7's against a dealer 6. Of course as bad as I dont want to, I go to the wallet to get another $750 for the split. The 1st 7, draws a friggin 3! So, again, I go to the wallet for another $750. I get a face card and have 20. The next 7 gets a face as well and Im at 17. So I sit at 20 and 17 with $2250 on the table and a dealer 6. The dealer flips his hole card and its a face. 16! Then draws another face...BUST!
...
Dealer would have flipped the face for a 16 and then drew the 3, making 19. I'd have lost the $750 and been down $3500. Instead, I get it all back plus a small profit. Lucky day!
link to original post
Nice profit. I think your math is wrong. You had put $2500 on the table and dipped into the wallet for another $1500 putting you potentially $4k in the hole?
Great that you had that fat wallet as back-up. And I'm sure it would not have been a life changing loss. But it would have stung?
It could have gone oh-so wrong, though. Still. If you'd lost, you could have just not told us about it. I've had similar 5h17 or bust last hands. They make or break your session.
link to original post
I fixed it. My math was wrong in the sense that if I didn't split, Id have been down $2500, not $3500. That was only error.
Also, I would never risk "life-changing" amounts of money.
200 - 5000.
Pretty short session. Time constraints due to other considerations.
Ended even.
+0
Note: Lately, for security reasons, session reports are not necessarily presented in real time corresponding directly to the day played.
I'm willing to present a side Challenge. If anyone doubts that any one, just any one of the Session reports I present during this trip is not entirely accurate, throw down a red flag! Put up a mere ten grand in cash, let's work out how to verify the Session to your satisfaction using the Wizard as the judge, and winner takes the twenty thousand.
I'll contribute five hundred from my end for the Wizard's time if the Challenger will do the same, so that's $19,000. to the winner of this side Challenge.
This Side Challenge remains good for the duration of this particular Vegas trip.
Quote: mwalz9At this point I say screw it and Im on full tilt.
It was me and the dealer. So if I wasn't willing to play basic strategy and was scared having such a big bet (by my standards) on that pair of 7's, and not willing to split. I would have just stayed. No way I hit a 14 against a 6. Dealer would have flipped the face for a 16 and then drew the 3, making 19. I'd have lost the $750 and been down $2500. Instead, I get it all back plus a small profit. Lucky day!
link to original post
It's not scientific, but my experience has been that a catch up bet works best if done quickly. In other words, if you're behind in whatever table game and you're willing to lay it all out there to catch up, you're better off taking your stab sooner rather than later.
If you sit there like an uncool deer in the headlights afraid to bet, you will probably see hands come by where you WOULD have won (and, you're not betting (free hands - Baccarat), or betting too small (Blackjack)), and all that missed opportunity might unnerve you enough to go further on tilt, and lay the big bet out there when the cards are really bad, and you're losing more hands than ever.
Quote: MDawgQuote: mwalz9At this point I say screw it and Im on full tilt.
It was me and the dealer. So if I wasn't willing to play basic strategy and was scared having such a big bet (by my standards) on that pair of 7's, and not willing to split. I would have just stayed. No way I hit a 14 against a 6. Dealer would have flipped the face for a 16 and then drew the 3, making 19. I'd have lost the $750 and been down $2500. Instead, I get it all back plus a small profit. Lucky day!
link to original post
It's not scientific, but my experience has been that a catch up bet works best if done quickly. In other words, if you're behind in whatever table game and you're willing to lay it all out there to catch up, you're better off taking your stab sooner rather than later.
If you sit there like an uncool deer in the headlights afraid to bet, you will probably see hands come by where you WOULD have won (and, you're not betting (free hands - Baccarat), or betting too small (Blackjack)), and all that missed opportunity might unnerve you enough to go further on tilt, and lay the big bet out there when the cards are really bad, and you're losing more hands than ever.
link to original post
Fantastic real sound advice!!!!!!!!
And that is the way I have learned and that is the way I have profited by being a friend, a loyal supporter and the number one fan of the Great MDawg.
I have been asked before how this guy could’ve helped me and here’s a perfect example and there’s plenty more of them except you guys don’t read and don’t understand (IMO and I am referring to the majority not everyone conclusively) however I’m not going to get into the additional things.
But remember I have 10s of thousands of dollars of available bankroll (all WIN money too) because of the Great MDawg!!!!!!!!
Over and Out, Copy That?
Marcus Clark AKA MarcusClark66
Quote: Marcusclark66I have been asked before how this guy could’ve helped me and here’s a perfect example and there’s plenty more of them except you guys don’t read and don’t understand. I’m not going to get into the additional things.link to original post
I do read. I do understand. I also find this as an insult.
Quote: mwalz9Quote: Marcusclark66But you do, correct?
link to original post
I wouldn't call myself an MDawg "hater", I also follow this thread as well as 95% of the threads in here. I try to do little to no drama. Sure some sarcasm. Sure some minor arguments. Not trying to get my life revolving around an internet forum though.
link to original post
Here buddy, I am going to quote YOU!
Same and some~some applies to me as well.
My non-scientific differs slightly from MDawgs, though I can see merit in it. Fewer bigger bets will expose less action to the HE than my way of more smaller bets, so to that extent he's right. But my way shrinks the variance.Quote: MDawgIt's not scientific, but my experience has been that a catch up bet works best if done quickly. In other words, if you're behind in whatever table game and you're willing to lay it all out there to catch up, you're better off taking your stab sooner rather than later.
If you sit there like an uncool deer in the headlights afraid to bet, you will probably see hands come by where you WOULD have won (and, you're not betting (free hands - Baccarat), or betting too small (Blackjack)), and all that missed opportunity might unnerve you enough to go further on tilt, and lay the big bet out there when the cards are really bad, and you're losing more hands than ever.
link to original post
So, let's say I bought in for £100 (Small fry, online) and won my way up to £190 with an objective of cashing out £200 or at least £100 Assume £1 min Blackjack.
I COULD do neg progressive starting as £10, giving me roughly a 50:50 chance of meeting target immediately. If I lose, I'd be at £180 with a probable wager of £15 ( I don't want to overshoot too far with a double or split)
But, I don't tend to do that. If I'm close to my win goal, I nibble away at it. So, at £190, however I got there, I might bet £2 to put me at £188 or £192 My next wager might be 4 if I'd lost or 2 again if I'd won. Hopefully, I'd soon get to £197, at which Time, I'd drop my wager to just £1, 2, 2,3 progressive. I.e. the closer I am to my win target, the smaller my wager, such that I'm sneaking up on it. Same would apply if I was in a losing situation. If I'd bought in for £200 and was down to £150, rather than whacking down £25 or £50 as a case bet, I'd try to edge forward with a 5, 10, 15 progressive to get me near £180, then drop to a 3,6,9 progressive to get me to 190, then a 2,4,6 to get me to £200
Horses for courses, of course. Probably why I don't win every session.
Quote: MDawgDay 154 play
Ended even.
+0
link to original post
I'm going to exercise my right to say...... I find this unbelievable $:o) *
What would be the chances of MDawg walking away not $1 or $100 up or down. I suspect he mis-remembered. Has this walking away even ever happened before?
So... Mdawg, just before walking, had you been up or down? a little or a lot?
*Not calling MDawg a liar or insulting him. It's a reflection on my inability to understand and visualise his report.
Quote: Marcusclark66Quote: mwalz9Quote: Marcusclark66But you do, correct?
link to original post
I wouldn't call myself an MDawg "hater", I also follow this thread as well as 95% of the threads in here. I try to do little to no drama. Sure some sarcasm. Sure some minor arguments. Not trying to get my life revolving around an internet forum though.
link to original post
Here buddy, I am going to quote YOU!
Same and some~some applies to me as well.
link to original post
Some sarcasm and some minor arguments are insults? Nah.
Telling me I dont understand is.
My comment didn't attack or insult any individuals. It said I use some sarcasm and some minor arguments. Your comment implied people dont read or don't understand. It was way more personal that what I said.
Also, don't call me buddy!
Quote: mwalz9
Also, don't call me buddy!
link to original post
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlDAhLOisHE
Quote: mwalz9Quote: Marcusclark66Quote: mwalz9Quote: Marcusclark66But you do, correct?
link to original post
I wouldn't call myself an MDawg "hater", I also follow this thread as well as 95% of the threads in here. I try to do little to no drama. Sure some sarcasm. Sure some minor arguments. Not trying to get my life revolving around an internet forum though.
link to original post
Here buddy, I am going to quote YOU!
Same and some~some applies to me as well.
link to original post
Also, don't call me buddy!
link to original post
Here, lighten up.
There’s enough physical violence in the world.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CMVpiSME06o
Quote: Marcusclark66Quote: mwalz9Quote: Marcusclark66Quote: mwalz9Quote: Marcusclark66But you do, correct?
link to original post
I wouldn't call myself an MDawg "hater", I also follow this thread as well as 95% of the threads in here. I try to do little to no drama. Sure some sarcasm. Sure some minor arguments. Not trying to get my life revolving around an internet forum though.
link to original post
Here buddy, I am going to quote YOU!
Same and some~some applies to me as well.
link to original post
Also, don't call me buddy!
link to original post
Here, lighten up.
There’s enough physical violence in the world.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CMVpiSME06o
link to original post
Where exactly did I threaten or suggest physical violence?
Quote: mwalz9
Where exactly did I threaten or suggest physical violence?
link to original post
Mwalz, MarcusClark66,
Drop the hostility. Shake hands, kiss and make up or whatever it takes. Both of you.
MDawg has a huge chore to manually turn all those timepieces back!
Myself, all the iPads, iPhones and our Apple watches do it automatically!
Now I will use that extra hour of ‘found’ time here at the Starbucks getting double coffees and double sweet treats.
Ah, the benefits of automation. :)
Gotta pull a double again today, then off to another casino for a new blackjack session I have planned.
Quote: Marcusclark66...then off to another casino for a new blackjack session I have planned.
link to original post
Really? Switching game, now you have Baccarat hunches figured?
Also, what about that session 15 report?
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/36061-i-have-learned-a-lot-here-and-ready-to-play/31/#post829909
Quote: OnceDearQuote: Marcusclark66...then off to another casino for a new blackjack session I have planned.
link to original post
Really? Switching game, now you have Baccarat hunches figured?
Also, what about that session 15 report?
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/36061-i-have-learned-a-lot-here-and-ready-to-play/31/#post829909
link to original post
No sir!
Not switching games at all. Just had a dream the other night and I want to play my four hands out, that’s it four consecutive blackjack hands tonight.
200 - 6500.
I was down as much as -5500 and up as much as +4500. Had to end it due to time constraints had someplace to be.
+1075
Note: Lately, for security reasons, session reports are not necessarily presented in real time corresponding directly to the day played.
I'm willing to present a side Challenge. If anyone doubts that any one, just any one of the Session reports I present during this trip is not entirely accurate, throw down a red flag! Put up a mere ten grand in cash, let's work out how to verify the Session to your satisfaction using the Wizard as the judge, and winner takes the twenty thousand.
I'll contribute five hundred from my end for the Wizard's time if the Challenger will do the same, so that's $19,000. to the winner of this side Challenge.
This Side Challenge remains good for the duration of this particular Vegas trip.
I never noticed before this concert how beat up some of Keith’s guitars are. Impressive how he just doesn’t care and leave all the chips and nicks there to add character.
The opening band Maneskin, from Italy, was very glam rocky - think Aladdin Sane.
Two hours plus (from just the Stones alone) of rollicking good music and showmanship. My wife liked the show and being there with me, but commented that the Stones were demonic - not a good thing in her book.
Well I hope we're not too messianic
Or a trifle too satanic
200 - 4500.
I was down as much as -12000, ended pretty much at the peak.
+10500
Note: Lately, for security reasons, session reports are not necessarily presented in real time corresponding directly to the day played.
I'm willing to present a side Challenge. If anyone doubts that any one, just any one of the Session reports I present during this trip is not entirely accurate, throw down a red flag! Put up a mere ten grand in cash, let's work out how to verify the Session to your satisfaction using the Wizard as the judge, and winner takes the twenty thousand.
I'll contribute five hundred from my end for the Wizard's time if the Challenger will do the same, so that's $19,000. to the winner of this side Challenge.
This Side Challenge remains good for the duration of this particular Vegas trip.
Quote: MDawgGood questions. First of all, the Vegas casino restaurant where we got the Fagri is one where you pick the fish off the ice. It is flown in daily from the Mediterranean. This was a take out meal, but we have dined in at this restaurant too. All the different fish I have picked at this restaurant have been good, but this was the second time choosing Fagri. I picked it because it looked golden and shiny.
The fish has a meaty, somewhat oily taste. A bit heavy, but also somewhat flakey. (Not as solid as say swordfish, but heavier than say salmon.) There are no small bones throughout the flesh, all the bones seem concentrated in certain areas only. Does not taste fishy at all. When eating the Fagri I have gone ahead and eaten the skin too, which tells you that it is not fishy at all. I am not a fan of fish skin (do not eat salmon skin).
I would compare it to a more meaty, slightly more oily Branzino.
Here is a red snapper we had from the same place, a different time.
At $68 / lb. why not just get the Fagri at $78.? although I believe that the red snapper too, is from the Mediterranean not locally sourced. Compared to red snapper fagri is oilier, slightly more solid, slightly more flavorful.
Here is another Fagri from another occasion.
All the fish we have had from that place have been ordered simply prepared, with just olive oil and sea salt, and the capers. No sauce provided just the parsley garnish.
Come to think of it, next time might ask them to go even easier on the salt. At home when I grill fish I use no salt, only olive oil, pepper and herbs.
link to original post
This was some of the best Branzino ever had, light, crispy - ate it all, skin and all, and the skin was delicious too.
Uni (sea urchin)
Masago (capelin roe)
Ama-ebi (sweet shrimp, raw)
Ikura (salmon roe)
Some of these are supposed to be nutritious, others aphrodisiacs.