The Adventures of MDawg

This sounds so trolling in my opinion while at the same time sounding a little anti Semitic and I’m not buying any of this story at all. Cmon mods why you allowing this

Quote: Marcusclark66

Just to let you know, we play for title wins and food.

The loser of the meet brings food the following week. Last week the Rabbi lost overall so he brought homemade matzo balls, gefilte fish and beautiful corned beef sandwiches that we all had tonight. The last 20 sessions according to my notes, I was the champion at 17 of them.

Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Tic-Tac-Toe Expert & Mastering Chess
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club

Lmao and did you all dance the horah???

As a jew this made laugh so hard. I can just see real person Marcus Clark googling “what food do rabbis eat” 😂😂

Quote: PokerGrinder

Lmao and did you all dance the horah???

As a jew this made laugh so hard. I can just see real person Marcus Clark googling “what food do rabbis eat” 😂😂

Everything I told you is the truth and nothing but. You know when I first met the Rabbi he had that little flying saucer thing on his head, which I thought it was just a cover up for his bald spot but found out it's a religious thing. In my opinion he's a cool dude anyway!

Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Tic-Tac-Toe Expert & Mastering Chess
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club

Quote: Marcusclark66

Everything I told you is the truth and nothing but. You know when I first met the Rabbi he had that little flying saucer thing on his head, which I thought it was just a cover up for his bald spot but found out it's a religious thing. In my opinion he's a cool dude anyway!

Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Tic-Tac-Toe Expert & Mastering Chess
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club

You know I was about to defend you against an earlier accusation of sounding anti-Semitic since saying a Rabbi cooked food and honored a bet playing competitive tic tac toe didn't seem offensive to me as a Jew

And then you posted the above SMH

Flying saucer thing??? Wtf is wrong with this person.

Quote: TomG

It does not defy any logic or math, because mdawg refuses to present any of the logic or math behind his bets. Until he does that, his writing will continue to be boring and have nothing to offer.

the boredom only comes from those who repeat the standard line, not from those who are regularly winning against the odds. you refuse to accept that there is anything in the universe besides a house win, over the long term. i've already shown you and others, the basic arithmetic in math theory, that does not agree that the house edge always trumps. and these 'facts' are not trolling because they're 'facts.' So who's the one doing the trolling?

the 'perpetual' doubters, like yourself, seem to ignore the mathematical 'facts' stating that, 'theoretically speaking,' progressive strategies can beat the house. anyone using basic arithmetic can understand this!!! is this beyond your capability?

and you'll try to cover these 'facts' with, "the gambler will run out of money using a progressive strategy." will they???? if they stick to the inherent progressive sequence they undoubtedly will. that's where many math theorists (and gamblers) lose touch with the possibilities of 'winning' betting strategies.

if gamblers are even half mathematically literate, they can devise variances in the progressive sequence that prevent them from continuing along the chain to massive bet sizes. but coming up with these variances in basic arithmetic (progressive strategies) is seemingly beyond the capabilities of many intelligent math theorists. Why???? God only knows!!!! That is the biggest defiance of logic, going, around here.

I would need to hand a progressive betting sequence variance, that doesn't break the gambler's bank, on a platter for many of you, before it would hit yous between the eyes. Well, I'm not gonna do that. if you can't entertain the idea of putting your gray matter to work out something relatively basic, then keep believing the house always wins, even though that idea is fundamentally flawed!

if the field of math has been sprouting for 'centuries' that the house always wins, even though the theory is flawed, what does it say about those encamped in the field of math????

let me spell out the basic fundamental error that the field of math has made. I will put forward two well known math theories:

1. there is a house edge. therefore, -EV means the house always wins.

2. theoretically speaking, using a progressive betting sequence means the gambler always wins.

the above two statements are a paradox. they cannot both exist. so which one is wrong? using basic arithmetic will tell you 2 is undeniably correct. therefore, 1 must be wrong. i cannot say how 1 is wrong, because i haven't wrapped my head around the concept of EV at this point in time. And i'm in no hurry to do so because I don't need to. That's because EV must be wrong if 2 is correct.

Therefore, the field of math (including the Wizard) have some serious qs to answer! And, TomG, this post shows you, OD, 146, MichaelBluejay, and every other perpetual doubter, is WRONG at the most basic mathematical level!!! Although, there aren't enough exclamation marks to represent that last statement, without the statement itself, looking ridiculous.

Quote: Wellbush

the boredom only comes from those who repeat the standard line, not from those who are regularly winning against the odds. you refuse to accept that there is anything in the universe besides a house win, over the long term. i've already shown you and others, the basic arithmetic in math theory, that does not agree that the house edge always trumps. and these 'facts' are not trolling because they're 'facts.' So who's the one doing the trolling?

the 'perpetual' doubters, like yourself, seem to ignore the mathematical 'facts' stating that, 'theoretically speaking,' progressive strategies can beat the house. anyone using basic arithmetic can understand this!!! is this beyond your capability?

and you'll try to cover these 'facts' with, "the gambler will run out of money using a progressive strategy." will they???? if they stick to the inherent progressive sequence they undoubtedly will. that's where many math theorists (and gamblers) lose touch with the possibilities of 'winning' betting strategies.

if gamblers are even half mathematically literate, they can devise variances in the progressive sequence that prevent them from continuing along the chain to massive bet sizes. but coming up with these variances in basic arithmetic (progressive strategies) is seemingly beyond the capabilities of many intelligent math theorists. Why???? God only knows!!!! That is the biggest defiance of logic, going, around here.

I would need to hand a progressive betting sequence variance, that doesn't break the gambler's bank, on a platter for many of you, before it would hit yous between the eyes. Well, I'm not gonna do that. if you can't entertain the idea of putting your gray matter to work out something relatively basic, then keep believing the house always wins, even though that idea is fundamentally flawed!

if the field of math has been sprouting for 'centuries' that the house always wins, even though the theory is flawed, what does it say about those encamped in the field of math????

let me spell out the basic fundamental error that the field of math has made. I will put forward two well known math theories:

1. there is a house edge. therefore, -EV means the house always wins.

2. theoretically speaking, using a progressive betting sequence means the gambler always wins.

the above two statements are a paradox. they cannot both exist. so which one is wrong? using basic arithmetic will tell you 2 is undeniably correct. therefore, 1 must be wrong. i cannot say how 1 is wrong, because i haven't wrapped my head around the concept of EV at this point in time. And i'm in no hurry to do so because I don't need to. That's because EV must be wrong if 2 is correct.

Therefore, the field of math (including the Wizard) have some serious qs to answer! And, TomG, this post shows you, OD, 146, MichaelBluejay, and every other perpetual doubter, is WRONG at the most basic mathematical level!!! Although, there aren't enough exclamation marks to represent that last statement, without the statement itself, looking ridiculous.

This whole post is ridiculous

Curious, why no one details out the reasons so many apparently dislike MDawg yet, when he is posting, all the action is right here?

Even despite the verification from Mr. WIZARD himself.
Even despite the pictures if his suite, personal things and gaming tables in action.
Even despite details of his play so few ever post.

But the words 'no way', 'liar', and 'story teller' were frequently spouted out? Why?

Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Tic-Tac-Toe Expert & Mastering Chess
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club

No one posted in this thread all day yesterday.

Then you come by just to bump it back up to the top.

Quote: mwalz9

No one posted in this thread all day yesterday.

Then you come by just to bump it back up to the top.

I'm curious as I read everything else, can't I ask a question??

Thank You
Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Tic-Tac-Toe Expert & Mastering Chess
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club

We live in a post-fact world where facts don't count and dictators rule.

Look, your master is in "time out" for a month.

I realize you miss his posts but since your posts seem to be nothing but cheerleading for him I submit it would be prudent for you to join him on the sidelines until he returns.

Quote: MrV

Look, your master is in "time out" for a month.

I realize you miss his posts but since your posts seem to be nothing but cheerleading for him I submit it would be prudent for you to join him on the sidelines until he returns.

I find it comical that I was banned for 7 days, that turned into 10+ for trolling because I was basically saying I dont believe MDawg one single bit, but someone with the exact opposite stance and claims to be nothing but an MDawg fan club supporter is allowed to pollute the forum with nonsense.

I keep seeing the Applebee's TV commercial where they sing the Cheers theme song, like I'm binge watching Cheers itself. I'd avoid Dr. Frasier Crane though, he's not right.

Well, Cheers costs $19.99 a season to watch, so I'll substitute the movie "7 Days To Vegas" on Amazon Prime. And my computer has crashed twice trying to edit this post.

Quote: mwalz9

I find it comical that I was banned for 7 days, that turned into 10+ for trolling because I was basically saying I dont believe MDawg one single bit, but someone with the exact opposite stance and claims to be nothing but an MDawg fan club supporter is allowed to pollute the forum with nonsense.

My apologies for the over-stay. IOU.
Yes. it's pretty comical that some of the most controversial posters are more highly skilled at posting within the rules than some more established members.
And here we all are happily bumping this (insert expletive adjective of your choosing) thread. Will we never learn?
:o)

Quote: MrV

Look, your master is in "time out" for a month.

I realize you miss his posts but since your posts seem to be nothing but cheerleading for him I submit it would be prudent for you to join him on the sidelines until he returns.

Thank you for your concern but you're wrong!

Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Tic-Tac-Toe Expert & Mastering Chess
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club

Quote: Marcusclark66

Curious, why no one details out the reasons so many apparently dislike MDawg yet, when he is posting, all the action is right here?

Even despite the verification from Mr. WIZARD himself.
Even despite the pictures if his suite, personal things and gaming tables in action.
Even despite details of his play so few ever post.

But the words 'no way', 'liar', and 'story teller' were frequently spouted out? Why?

Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Tic-Tac-Toe Expert & Mastering Chess
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures



Club

Why do you put this tag line in every email. Just add it to the bottom. I’ll answer my own question.... because you only want to egg people on. I spoke to the Marcus Clark that is listed on the internet working for a certain casino. You aren’t him. So I also have doubts any of what you post is accurate.

Quote: Expectedvalue

Why do you put this tag line in every email. Just add it to the bottom. I’ll answer my own question.... because you only want to egg people on. I spoke to the Marcus Clark that is listed on the internet working for a certain casino. You aren’t him. So I also have doubts any of what you post is accurate.

Why are you concerned what I put there or how I put it there? Everytime I sign up it automatically populates, what's the big deal? That's just what my programming does.

I work for a casino chain, I am senior security and I teach the firearms training as well. I am an expert in security without saying and I am most certainly a real person. As far as the Tic Tac and chess, I am just about a master at Tic-Tac-Toe as I explained earlier and I'm in the process of mastering the game of chess. As far is the fan club that's an honorary position that I do hold, thanks for your inquiry! Have a great day and stay safe.

More complete nonsense by you. Since you claim to be real I’ll give the wizard (since you love him) 250 dollars for him and 250 for you if you prove in fact that you work for security at a casino. Proof being a work email that you can reply to wizard at. It being a major casino......more than 1k machines and at least 12 tables. And some sort of FaceTime phone call with him where the face matches your LinkedIn profile picture.

Quote: OnceDear

My apologies for the over-stay. IOU.
Yes. it's pretty comical that some of the most controversial posters are more highly skilled at posting within the rules than some more established members.
And here we all are happily bumping this (insert expletive adjective of your choosing) thread. Will we never learn?
:o)

Why not suspend whatever vanity threads a member has while the member is on vacation?

Seems people don't get enough opportunity to stomp on a threads' grave.

Quote: Expectedvalue

I spoke to the Marcus Clark that is listed on the internet working for a certain casino. You aren’t him.

Whoa ...

Sure looks like a rule 4 violation to me:

"Respect privacy. Do not post any personal information about someone else that is intended to be private or quote from private communication. This rule applies to protecting the privacy of everybody, but especially forum members."

Posting here under the identity of another, even a non-member, is an invasion of privacy, no question about it.

I suggest EV tell the Wiz and / or OD what he found out and ask that they also call the REAL Mr. Clark, and if EV is correct the imposter should be NUKED.

The so-called "nuclear opiton" is apt in this situation.

I did not post the info I found. I simply called.
He is so adamant to post his info out there claiming in every single post that he is MARCUSCLARK aka real person

Quote: Expectedvalue

More complete nonsense by you. Since you claim to be real I’ll give the wizard (since you love him) 250 dollars for him and 250 for you if you prove in fact that you work for security at a casino. Proof being a work email that you can reply to wizard at. It being a major casino......more than 1k machines and at least 12 tables. And some sort of FaceTime phone call with him where the face matches your LinkedIn profile picture.

You know who he is and you know he doesn't show his face! ;o)

Quote: MrV

Whoa ...

Sure looks like a rule 4 violation to me:

"Respect privacy. Do not post any personal information about someone else that is intended to be private or quote from private communication. This rule applies to protecting the privacy of everybody, but especially forum members."

Posting here under the identity of another, even a non-member, is an invasion of privacy, no question about it.

I suggest EV tell the Wiz and / or OD what he found out and ask that they also call the REAL Mr. Clark, and if EV is correct the imposter should be NUKED.

The so-called "nuclear opiton" is apt in this situation.

We have an interesting situation here....

A member who claims to really be named Marcus Clark, with a self proclaimed persona and broad job description and at the same time, there's a real person in Vegas with that same name and closely matching persona and job description.

Who would have thought it, two Marcus Clarks in the same line of work in the same town? I would imagine they would know of each-other or would be amused to discover the coincidence. Or MAYBE they really are the same person.

Well, another member has communicated with the real one of them and got an assertion that they are not the member here.

Well here is a GREAT opportunity....

The member MarcusClark66 is not shy about his own identity. He could make great sport of confirming it to me or wizard by many obvious means, though he is under no obligation to.

I strongly suggest that if the member MarcusClark66 is simply someone who has adopted the use of a real person's identity, that that would be ample justification for his permanent banning. Identity theft of sorts.

However, I must also extend a warning to member 'ExpectedValue'. You have researched a member with a view to actually finding him, and when you thought you'd found him, you contacted him. That in itself would strike me and potentially breaking the spirit of rule 4 to 'respect privacy'

Not wanting to suspend anyone, I invite both marcusclark66 and expectedvalue to present what evidence they wish to, to me by Private message and to drop this subtopic for now.

Ball's in your court guys.

ExpectedValue has already presented some evidence that me. Can member MarcusClark66 think of any reason NOT to identify himself to me in absolute confidence?

I am not in Vegas, never claimed to be. Please show me the post where I claimed I work in Vegas.

I am in the Midwest region.

Again, a twist and turn by a member!

Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Tic-Tac-Toe Expert & Mastering Chess
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club

You ask why no one takes mdawg up on his challenge but crickets when you are challenged

There is precedent for mods to ask for some type of member verification.

Nathan ended up creating a video of herself to send to Wizard. Her permanent ban was for different infractions

Quote: OnceDear

My apologies for the over-stay. IOU.
Yes. it's pretty comical that some of the most controversial posters are more highly skilled at posting within the rules than some more established members.
And here we all are happily bumping this (insert expletive adjective of your choosing) thread. Will we never learn?
:o)

Can you give a reasoned response to my post on P551 of this thread, OD?

Quote: Wellbush

Can you give a reasoned response to my post on P551 of this thread, OD?

He is waiting for a reasoned argument.

Simply stating math doesn't work isn't reasoned.

Also the second part of your paradox is false.

So no paradox.

Toss the suspected shill in the river.
If he floats, he is a shill. If he drowns, I'll admit I made a mistake.

Quote: billryan

Toss the suspected shill in the river.
If he floats, he is a shill. If he drowns, I'll admit I made a mistake.

She turned me into a newt.

Quote: Marcusclark66

I am not in Vegas, never claimed to be. Please show me the post where I claimed I work in Vegas.

I am in the Midwest region.

Again, a twist and turn by a member!

Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Tic-Tac-Toe Expert & Mastering Chess
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club

For what it’s worth, MarcusClark66’s story about being from the Midwest has been consistent for nearly a year.

https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gaming-business/other/34858-vegas-shutting-down-again-rumor/2/#post773808

Quote: unJon

For what it’s worth, MarcusClark66’s story about being from the Midwest has been consistent for nearly a year.

https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gaming-business/other/34858-vegas-shutting-down-again-rumor/2/#post773808

Thanks!! Here is what I posted in July of 2020!!

"July 5th, 2020 at 10:08:35 AMpermalink
I work for one of the top five casino branding companies in the nation, although I'm not in Las Vegas I'm in the Midwest region. A lot of our properties are just as big in the Midwest and profitable as the ones in Vegas that we do have. Although Vegas has a much higher debt to income revenue stream as compared to the Midwest, we are just starting to see some decent numbers returning in the midwest after slightly more than a month of operations. Vegas takes a heck of a lot more gross income to break even then what the Midwest properties do. One thing some of you are seemingly forgetting about is, unlike a small business that needs immediate return because of no cash reserves or funding issues, larger casino companies can pull from other regions and sources to pay their debts.

Personally I had not heard anything about my company shutting down the operations we do have in the Vegas area. We are more concerned about multi quarter numbers then we are on the day-to-day or month-to-month type of revenue analysis to make decisions."

In The Midwest
Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Tic-Tac-Toe Expert & Mastering Chess
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club

Quote: unJon

She turned me into a newt.

I say Nii!

Nii, Nii, Nii!

Quote: Wellbush

Can you give a reasoned response to my post on P551 of this thread, OD?

Why would anyone bother to read, let alone give a reasoned response to any of the nonsense that you post. This is a thread in a subforum dedicated to the mathematically challenged. Wallow about here at your leisure, but don't expect to persuade anyone of your genius.

Quote: unJon

For what it’s worth, MarcusClark66’s story about being from the Midwest has been consistent for nearly a year.

https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gaming-business/other/34858-vegas-shutting-down-again-rumor/2/#post773808

Acknowledged.

Quote: OnceDear

Acknowledged.

Thank you for the acknowledgement! :)

Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Tic-Tac-Toe Expert & Mastering Chess
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club

Quote: OnceDear

Why would anyone bother to read, let alone give a reasoned response to any of the nonsense that you post. This is a thread in a subforum dedicated to the mathematically challenged. Wallow about here at your leisure, but don't expect to persuade anyone of your genius.

no response. i see. cannot explain a simple paradox that the field of math have been sitting on for centuries? it also points to why there are some gamblers who beat the house, doesn't it? just because i q the math, doesn't mean i should have my nose rubbed in the dirt, does it? can anyone here, then, explain the simple paradox from my post on P551 of this thread, without fluffy derision?

Quote: darkoz

He is waiting for a reasoned argument.

Simply stating math doesn't work isn't reasoned.

Also the second part of your paradox is false.

So no paradox.

How is the second part of the paradox false?

Quote: darkoz

He is waiting for a reasoned argument.

Simply stating math doesn't work isn't reasoned.

Also the second part of your paradox is false.

So no paradox.

I didn't simply state math doesn't work! Did you actually read my post?

Quote: darkoz

This whole post is ridiculous

Do you actually have any reasoned argument whatever?

Quote: Wellbush

Here’s a paradox: Why is Wellbush, a poster from down under interested in betting systems and math analysis, constantly bumping MDawg’s Adventure thread?

Quote: unJon

Here’s a paradox: Why is Wellbush, a poster from down under interested in betting systems and math analysis, constantly bumping MDawg’s Adventure thread?

In reply to DOz's accusation of "bumping," my posts are not "fluffy and numerous," like his. So DOz is actually inadvertently "bumping" the thread, not me.

Also, I got permission from MD to post on this thread before he was suspended. Says a lot about who's got 'the right' around here, doesn't it? And sorry for being downunder! I didn't realise it was an obstacle!

Quote: Wellbush

For bumping' I got permission from MD, even as he's suspended.

Most people have suspected that.

If this is true is this against forum rules? Bumping threads purposefully just to maintain it at the top of results is against forum rules for certain.

Bumping to maintain in absentia by collusion with a Confederate? What does that get?

Quote: darkoz

Most people have suspected that.

If this is true is this against forum rules? Bumping threads purposefully just to maintain it at the top of results is against forum rules for certain.

Bumping to maintain in absentia by collusion with a Confederate? What does that get?

Where have i said i bump? where have i said i bump in absentia? you said i bump. you said i bump in absentia. and you have misquoted me. technically, this is against forum rules. but you agree with the standard math line on this site, so unfortunately, you may be forgiven.

Quote: Wellbush

... you have misquoted me. technically, this is against forum rules. but you agree with the standard math line on this site, so unfortunately, you may be forgiven.

OK. I see what seems like a technical misquote where a sentence has been removed....

Quote: Wellbush

For 'bumping,' I certainly got a lot of catching up to your numerous 'fluffy' posts. I got permission from MD, even as he's suspended.

Quote: darkoz

Quote: Wellbush
For bumping' I got permission from MD, even as he's suspended.

Removed sentence "I certainly got a lot of catching up to your numerous 'fluffy' posts." should have been replaced by elipses ...

No change to the meaning of the quote, so no penalty for infringement.

Giant wtf. Why are you allowing him to retract. ???????????????

Quote: Expectedvalue

Giant wtf. Why are you allowing him to retract. ???????????????

You replied as I was editing my post. I DO see a technical infringement by darkoz. No penalty due.

Quote: OnceDear

OK. I see what seems like a technical misquote where a sentence has been removed....




Removed sentence "I certainly got a lot of catching up to your numerous 'fluffy' posts." should have been replaced by elipses ...

No change to the meaning of the quote, so no penalty for infringement.

My reference to MD, was simply to say that he welcomes my input on this thread, and told me so 'before' he was suspended. so the fact he is suspended does not mean i should stop posting here. that's all i meant.

Quote: Wellbush

What I meant was that in reply to UJ's accusation of "bumping," my posts are not "fluffy and numerous," like his. So UJ is actually inadvertently "bumping" the thread, not me.

And my reference to MD, was simply to say that he welcomes my input on this thread, and told me so 'before' he was suspended. so the fact he is suspended does not mean i should stop posting here. that's all i meant.

If that was your intent I apologise.

Although the intent appeared to say something different. Even OD understood the meaning I pointed out.

This thread is a touchy subject so...