The Adventures of MDawg
May 22nd, 2021 at 8:47:15 AM
permalink
I have them plop the No Smoking sign on my tables immediately, but still - even from a distance when some addict smokes it does affect a person. Second hand smoke is not good.
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/
May 22nd, 2021 at 10:44:53 AM
permalink
Ace2 what do you think of this, am thinking of picking it up with part of my winnings. Just...to make it seem more real, not like just more money stuck in the bank.
It is platinum, like the Daytona Platinum you suggested last year.
Do you concur?
It is platinum, like the Daytona Platinum you suggested last year.
Do you concur?
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/
May 22nd, 2021 at 11:01:51 AM
permalink
I am thinking back to that day I lost. That day, as I entered the high limit area, another player I know flat out said to me, "Kid, stay away. She's on fire today beating everything I draw."
I discounted what the player said, and did in fact avoid that particular table, but that was the day when I later realized that my _________ wasn't in play, at least not that day at that particular table. But now I am wondering if what was done was across the board and affected other players too, because comparing notes with other high rollers I found that everyone I talked to who played that day lost. Which isn't saying a lot - most people lose in casinos routinely, but they reported that they lost a lot that day. Perhaps that particular casino was trying something new that day, temporarily, which I later figured out exactly what was being done as it affected me, but it may have been something that across the board affected many.
I discounted what the player said, and did in fact avoid that particular table, but that was the day when I later realized that my _________ wasn't in play, at least not that day at that particular table. But now I am wondering if what was done was across the board and affected other players too, because comparing notes with other high rollers I found that everyone I talked to who played that day lost. Which isn't saying a lot - most people lose in casinos routinely, but they reported that they lost a lot that day. Perhaps that particular casino was trying something new that day, temporarily, which I later figured out exactly what was being done as it affected me, but it may have been something that across the board affected many.
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/
May 22nd, 2021 at 1:11:06 PM
permalink
This all just defies logic and mathematical fact. Regardless of your opinion. Also some of the stories that are posted about comps are very hard to pass the smell test
May 23rd, 2021 at 3:54:31 AM
permalink
Thanks EV. Looks like you're part of the rank and file here. Are these your colleagues in the logic and mathematical fact category?Quote: ExpectedvalueThis all just defies logic and mathematical fact. Regardless of your opinion. Also some of the stories that are posted about comps are very hard to pass the smell test
To which I've already exposed his lack of knowledge about historical math theory, yet he says I'M trolling! (P517 of this thread)Quote: TomGIt is fascinating how management has allowed him to break the forum rules against trolling so frequently and so severely. I have my theories why.
146 can be 'done' all he likes. i already tore apart his 'thesis' on me, so let's just say he's not 'done,' but 'well done!' (P20-26 in the 'Beat the House at Blackjack!!!!' thread)Quote: Mission146
Not even that, OnceDear. Don't blame mathematicians for the players being misguided. Many players (particularly those who believe that betting systems work) are losing despite our best efforts to help talk them out of doing so. If they had listened to us, then they would probably come to the conclusion that they shouldn't even be playing negative expectation games to begin with.
Well, he can enjoy his time in this thread without my company. You're cool, MDawg, so don't take it as a slight against you---but I have officially opened this thread for the last time. I'm done.
Ha, the guy who loses his hair anytime math theory is questioned, then launches into a scathing preparation of word soup, to which he accuses others of! the only reason i haven't debunked OD, is coz he holds the suspension stick, and may just use it anytime the hair falls off!'Quote: OnceDearROTFLMAO!
So, Wellbush, who's done some 'initial learning on the subject' is going to use this math orientated forum to make his expert case to expose to the masses the wrongness of mathematicians and their pathetic formulae and analyses.
And it all started here. In the subforum where "All betting systems are worthless. However, for the mathematically challenged, here is a forum of your own."
Wellbush. By Wizard's definition of this subforum, and by your outpourings here, you seem to exemplify 'mathematically challenged' and you are IMHO, in exactly the right place.
okay, back to you EV. you think MDawg defies logic? well, you're right.....uh, kind of?? uh, for those in the math theory category, yeeaahh!? but, doesn't the math theory logic say this:
WIKIPEDIA: Originally, martingale referred to a class of betting strategies that was popular in 18th-century France.[1][2] The simplest of these strategies was designed for a game in which the gambler wins their stake if a coin comes up heads and loses it if the coin comes up tails. The strategy had the gambler double their bet after every loss so that the first win would recover all previous losses plus win a profit equal to the original stake. As the gambler's wealth and available time jointly approach infinity, their probability of eventually flipping heads approaches 1, which makes the martingale betting strategy seem like a sure thing. However, the exponential growth of the bets eventually bankrupts its users due to finite bankrolls.
And this:
THE PUNTERS PAGE: There are a number of advantages to the Fibonacci betting system. These include:
Win your losses back: No matter how many times you lose a bet, providing you have the bankroll to place another stake, then you are eventually going to win all of your losses back.
So the theory and logic just shown above says it's POSSIBLE to WIN using progressive betting strategies, does it not? I mean, we're talking about logic and mathematical fact, as you put it. Or are you and others gonna reply by now avoiding the theory and logic, and start talking about the real world? i'm happy to argue about the real world too, but let's stick to answering your argument before conveniently changing tune. are YOU saying progressive strategies, to which MDawg seems to use (possibly BOTH negative and positive?), are mathematically flawed, or not?
Last edited by: Wellbush on May 23, 2021
All persons reading my posts gamble at their own risk, as I do. I don't ordinarily dispute math. I may dispute math I don't understand, or if I think it's faulty. I am not a conspiracy theorist.
May 23rd, 2021 at 3:59:25 AM
permalink
I usually bet expecting to win up to 15 times in a row, so that means the other side may lose up to 15 times in a row.
The image below is the streaks result after 14,242 hands of blackjack. Only had streaks up to 13 on both sides, winning & losing.
I buy-in with $1,000 sessions now, but I lose 2-4 sessions in a row before a comeback.
The image below is the streaks result after 14,242 hands of blackjack. Only had streaks up to 13 on both sides, winning & losing.
I buy-in with $1,000 sessions now, but I lose 2-4 sessions in a row before a comeback.
Last edited by: ChumpChange on May 23, 2021
May 23rd, 2021 at 5:13:30 AM
permalink
Quote: WellbushThanks EV. Looks like you're part of the rank and file here. Are these your colleagues in the logic and mathematical fact category?
To which I've already exposed his lack of knowledge about historical math theory, yet he says I'M trolling!
146 can be 'done' all he likes. i already tore apart his 'thesis' on me, so let's just say he's not 'done,' but 'well done!'Ha, the guy who loses his hair anytime math query is questioned, then launches into a scathing preparation of word soup, to which he accuses others of! the only reason i haven't debunked OD, is coz he holds the suspension stick, and may just use it anytime the hair falls off!'Quote: OnceDearROTFLMAO!
So, Wellbush, who's done some 'initial learning on the subject' is going to use this math orientated forum to make his expert case to expose to the masses the wrongness of mathematicians and their pathetic formulae and analyses.
And it all started here. In the subforum where "All betting systems are worthless. However, for the mathematically challenged, here is a forum of your own."
Wellbush. By Wizard's definition of this subforum, and by your outpourings here, you seem to exemplify 'mathematically challenged' and you are IMHO, in exactly the right place.
okay, back to you EV. you think MDawg defies logic? well, you're right.....uh, kind of?? uh, for those in the math theory category, yeeaahh!? but, doesn't the math theory logic say this:
WIKIPEDIA: Originally, martingale referred to a class of betting strategies that was popular in 18th-century France.[1][2] The simplest of these strategies was designed for a game in which the gambler wins their stake if a coin comes up heads and loses it if the coin comes up tails. The strategy had the gambler double their bet after every loss so that the first win would recover all previous losses plus win a profit equal to the original stake. As the gambler's wealth and available time jointly approach infinity, their probability of eventually flipping heads approaches 1, which makes the martingale betting strategy seem like a sure thing. However, the exponential growth of the bets eventually bankrupts its users due to finite bankrolls.
And this:
THE PUNTERS PAGE: There are a number of advantages to the Fibonacci betting system. These include:
Win your losses back: No matter how many times you lose a bet, providing you have the bankroll to place another stake, then you are eventually going to win all of your losses back.
So the theory and logic just shown above says it's POSSIBLE to WIN using progressive betting strategies, does it not? I mean, we're talking about logic and mathematical fact, as you put it. Or are you and others gonna reply by now avoiding the theory and logic, and start talking about the real world? i'm happy to argue about the real world too, but let's stick to answering your argument before conveniently changing tune. are YOU saying progressive strategies, to which MDawg seems to use (possibly BOTH negative and positive?), are mathematically flawed, or not?
What on earth are you talking about. You can’t keep betting the casinos limit you with maximum wagers.
May 23rd, 2021 at 6:35:50 AM
permalink
Quote: ExpectedvalueQuote: WellbushThanks EV. Looks like you're part of the rank and file here. Are these your colleagues in the logic and mathematical fact category?
To which I've already exposed his lack of knowledge about historical math theory, yet he says I'M trolling!
146 can be 'done' all he likes. i already tore apart his 'thesis' on me, so let's just say he's not 'done,' but 'well done!'Ha, the guy who loses his hair anytime math query is questioned, then launches into a scathing preparation of word soup, to which he accuses others of! the only reason i haven't debunked OD, is coz he holds the suspension stick, and may just use it anytime the hair falls off!'Quote: OnceDearROTFLMAO!
So, Wellbush, who's done some 'initial learning on the subject' is going to use this math orientated forum to make his expert case to expose to the masses the wrongness of mathematicians and their pathetic formulae and analyses.
And it all started here. In the subforum where "All betting systems are worthless. However, for the mathematically challenged, here is a forum of your own."
Wellbush. By Wizard's definition of this subforum, and by your outpourings here, you seem to exemplify 'mathematically challenged' and you are IMHO, in exactly the right place.
okay, back to you EV. you think MDawg defies logic? well, you're right.....uh, kind of?? uh, for those in the math theory category, yeeaahh!? but, doesn't the math theory logic say this:
WIKIPEDIA: Originally, martingale referred to a class of betting strategies that was popular in 18th-century France.[1][2] The simplest of these strategies was designed for a game in which the gambler wins their stake if a coin comes up heads and loses it if the coin comes up tails. The strategy had the gambler double their bet after every loss so that the first win would recover all previous losses plus win a profit equal to the original stake. As the gambler's wealth and available time jointly approach infinity, their probability of eventually flipping heads approaches 1, which makes the martingale betting strategy seem like a sure thing. However, the exponential growth of the bets eventually bankrupts its users due to finite bankrolls.
And this:
THE PUNTERS PAGE: There are a number of advantages to the Fibonacci betting system. These include:
Win your losses back: No matter how many times you lose a bet, providing you have the bankroll to place another stake, then you are eventually going to win all of your losses back.
So the theory and logic just shown above says it's POSSIBLE to WIN using progressive betting strategies, does it not? I mean, we're talking about logic and mathematical fact, as you put it. Or are you and others gonna reply by now avoiding the theory and logic, and start talking about the real world? i'm happy to argue about the real world too, but let's stick to answering your argument before conveniently changing tune. are YOU saying progressive strategies, to which MDawg seems to use (possibly BOTH negative and positive?), are mathematically flawed, or not?
What on earth are you talking about. You can’t keep betting the casinos limit you with maximum wagers.
what on earth are YOU talking about? So you're not talking about logic? you're saying logic and math, but answering with real world limits! you can't have it both ways. you're either talking about logic and mathematical fact, or you're talking about casino limits. which one is it?
All persons reading my posts gamble at their own risk, as I do. I don't ordinarily dispute math. I may dispute math I don't understand, or if I think it's faulty. I am not a conspiracy theorist.
May 23rd, 2021 at 7:21:01 AM
permalink
We've gone through this before. Casinos put minimums & maximums on their tables and whatever progression you're using will be limited by those two numbers, and that's a fact, unless you want to try the $300-$25,000 tables in the high limit room. Typical posted signs say $5-$500, or $10-$1000, or $15-$2000, or $25-$3000, or $50-$5000, or RESERVED.
However, my local roulette wheel says $25-$100 and I don't know what exactly that means.
However, my local roulette wheel says $25-$100 and I don't know what exactly that means.
Last edited by: ChumpChange on May 23, 2021
May 23rd, 2021 at 9:00:48 AM
permalink
Quote: ChumpChangeWe've gone through this before. Casinos put minimums & maximums on their tables and whatever progression you're using will be limited by those two numbers, and that's a fact, .
That is not a fact. They do it to corral the big players into the high-limit area, where the games are better protected and the service is better.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
May 23rd, 2021 at 9:01:08 AM
permalink
Day 54 play
This was a monster session where I lost a lot in one section of the casino, then regrouped, went to another, and won a huge amount, I mean huge for me anyway. I don't want to state the exact sum because it could lead to chasing down the win because it was the largest table game win in that casino that day. (I know this because my host told me so - the whales all lost that day, apparently.)
What's interesting is that after I started to win, even with the minimum bet raised, a few other players joined the table to try to feed off MDawg and follow. One player was this idiot who kept Martingaling on Player, and threw everything off. Well, that player lost everything and took off.
Another left after winning some, and the other one tried to follow me but ended up losing a thousand dollars, which on its face seemed amazing because I won SO much and this player was trying to mirror my bets. I tried to explain that simply following my bets was not enough - that in order to win had to also follow the amounts of my bets, which vary always. Which again gets back to that flat betting at table games simply is not the way to go.
As I kept winning I started being magnanimous, paying the commissions off repeatedly of some of the other players (but not of the Martingale player, who bet only on Player anyway and never racked up any commission (or over all wins)), and putting black chips on the side for the dealers.
This was quite a session and after it I took some time off.
Note: Lately, for security reasons, session reports are not necessarily presented in real time corresponding directly to the day played.
I'm willing to present a side Challenge. If anyone doubts that any one, just any one of the Session reports I present during this trip is not entirely accurate, throw down a red flag! Put up a mere ten grand in cash, let's work out how to verify the Session to your satisfaction using the Wizard as the judge, and winner takes the twenty thousand.
I'll contribute five hundred from my end for the Wizard's time if the Challenger will do the same, so that's a net $19,000. to the winner of this side Challenge.
This Side Challenge remains good for the duration of this particular Vegas trip.
This was a monster session where I lost a lot in one section of the casino, then regrouped, went to another, and won a huge amount, I mean huge for me anyway. I don't want to state the exact sum because it could lead to chasing down the win because it was the largest table game win in that casino that day. (I know this because my host told me so - the whales all lost that day, apparently.)
What's interesting is that after I started to win, even with the minimum bet raised, a few other players joined the table to try to feed off MDawg and follow. One player was this idiot who kept Martingaling on Player, and threw everything off. Well, that player lost everything and took off.
Another left after winning some, and the other one tried to follow me but ended up losing a thousand dollars, which on its face seemed amazing because I won SO much and this player was trying to mirror my bets. I tried to explain that simply following my bets was not enough - that in order to win had to also follow the amounts of my bets, which vary always. Which again gets back to that flat betting at table games simply is not the way to go.
As I kept winning I started being magnanimous, paying the commissions off repeatedly of some of the other players (but not of the Martingale player, who bet only on Player anyway and never racked up any commission (or over all wins)), and putting black chips on the side for the dealers.
This was quite a session and after it I took some time off.
Note: Lately, for security reasons, session reports are not necessarily presented in real time corresponding directly to the day played.
I'm willing to present a side Challenge. If anyone doubts that any one, just any one of the Session reports I present during this trip is not entirely accurate, throw down a red flag! Put up a mere ten grand in cash, let's work out how to verify the Session to your satisfaction using the Wizard as the judge, and winner takes the twenty thousand.
I'll contribute five hundred from my end for the Wizard's time if the Challenger will do the same, so that's a net $19,000. to the winner of this side Challenge.
This Side Challenge remains good for the duration of this particular Vegas trip.
Last edited by: MDawg on May 23, 2021
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/
May 23rd, 2021 at 9:12:13 AM
permalink
Last night the clubs were open, people were unmasked and drinking, drunken all over the place, and Vegas is back on, in full swing. Whether this is a good thing or not, given coronavirus, remains to be seen.
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/
May 23rd, 2021 at 10:35:18 AM
permalink
There's a range of digits that your bet has to be within, or you'll have to find another table.
May 23rd, 2021 at 10:44:22 AM
permalink
Let the record show MDawg has privately shared with me an image of a casino cage check marked "Verified Win," dated very recently (late May 2021), that is low six figures.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
May 23rd, 2021 at 10:52:28 AM
permalink
Well, I hope my first casino check is over $100K, none of this $2.75 an hour plus tips stuff.
May 23rd, 2021 at 3:33:48 PM
permalink
Took a stroll up and down the length of the Strip this morning. These are pics from the north end. While I was walking in front of one of the major casinos on the Strip, and I don't mean Circus Circus this young girl with big boobs who could barely talk, I mean she was weaving out of it from alcohol or drugs, pushed up against me and starting rubbing my crotch. And this was at about 10:30am in the morning. She wasn't half bad looking but I recoiled, with a "No. No. No." but she actually grabbed my shirt and tried to pull me back towards her as I kept walking away from and past her. Bad Craziness!
Here is the approach to the new Resorts World on the left, and the still unfinished Fountainebleu / Drew / ? blue tower on the right.
Close up of the Fountainebleu.
Lambos for rent.
Driver of rented Lamborghini who went ‘off-roading’ suspected of DUI
Two Killed in Lamborghini Crash at Las Vegas Supercar Track Driving Event
Man rented exotic car then killed another in suspected DUI crash
Fogettabout Tacos El Gordo on a weekend - the line is ridiculously long, and goes all the way around the corner.
Even Tacos El Pastor has quite a line on weekends.
Resorts World construction coming along nicely.
but still a lot of dirt around it - paving still to come.
and its new nightclub towards the left is nowhere near completed.
Circus Circus on approach
Inside I wanted to see the infamous (of Fear and Loathing fame) rotating bar, which was rotating the last time I was in here some years ago, but not lately.
Free circus show stage, at Circus Circus
The way to win at these balloon tosses is to LOB the dart so that it drops down onto the balloon. Throw it at the balloon in a linear fashion and it will mostly just bounce off without puncturing.
Circus Circus must be a haven for the homeless, because this smelly shoeless bum was camped out inside
and I noticed other homeless inside and right outside the casino as well.
Hot dogs a dollar,
but I couldn't get one, as the concession (not to be confused with the concessions I get from casinos against any losses) stand was closed.
Here is the approach to the new Resorts World on the left, and the still unfinished Fountainebleu / Drew / ? blue tower on the right.
Close up of the Fountainebleu.
Lambos for rent.
Driver of rented Lamborghini who went ‘off-roading’ suspected of DUI
Two Killed in Lamborghini Crash at Las Vegas Supercar Track Driving Event
Man rented exotic car then killed another in suspected DUI crash
Fogettabout Tacos El Gordo on a weekend - the line is ridiculously long, and goes all the way around the corner.
Even Tacos El Pastor has quite a line on weekends.
Resorts World construction coming along nicely.
but still a lot of dirt around it - paving still to come.
and its new nightclub towards the left is nowhere near completed.
Circus Circus on approach
Inside I wanted to see the infamous (of Fear and Loathing fame) rotating bar, which was rotating the last time I was in here some years ago, but not lately.
Free circus show stage, at Circus Circus
The way to win at these balloon tosses is to LOB the dart so that it drops down onto the balloon. Throw it at the balloon in a linear fashion and it will mostly just bounce off without puncturing.
Circus Circus must be a haven for the homeless, because this smelly shoeless bum was camped out inside
and I noticed other homeless inside and right outside the casino as well.
Hot dogs a dollar,
but I couldn't get one, as the concession (not to be confused with the concessions I get from casinos against any losses) stand was closed.
Last edited by: MDawg on May 23, 2021
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/
May 23rd, 2021 at 6:59:49 PM
permalink
These are adding up fast! CHA'CHING! And that's not even counting uncashed chips, and chips that were converted to cash along the way.
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/
May 23rd, 2021 at 7:00:03 PM
permalink
I’m guessing you just semi doxxed yourself on purpose. Well that is enough for me. Thank you in advance for the description .
May 23rd, 2021 at 7:27:06 PM
permalink
Quote: ExpectedvalueI’m guessing you just semi doxxed yourself on purpose. Well that is enough for me.
What is this supposed to mean? Enough for what?
May 24th, 2021 at 7:56:28 AM
permalink
For our blackjack players out there, a girl I know had this happen to her and I wonder what the correct outcome should have been. This is the girl I described who was smoking the cigar at the tables a while back. I have run into her since and gotten to know her. She told me the story third hand - I was not present.
She was playing blackjack and had a very high bet out there. There were apparently three other players at the table - total of four including her. She was sitting at third base (last person to get a card). She was dealt an ace, and then a face card - but - turns out that dealer had misdealed and missed giving a second card to the player before her, who had a 9. Yes, she's that hot and I suppose the presumably male dealer was paying too much attention to her.
So, here she was sitting with a blackjack but her card belonged to the player before her. She tried to argue that at worst the face card should be returned to the player with the 9, and she should get another card, but before she could say much they simply mucked the hand and allowed her to pull her bet. And reshuffled the entire deck. (Presented a newly shuffled deck to start the shoe over.)
I think they should have given her the option of having the hand mucked or accepting the actual card she should have received. I suppose it would be a bit much to just allow her to stand with a blackjack and then muck the hand only for the player who had a 9.
So the situation was one player sitting there with only one card, a 9, and her receiving his second card to complete her blackjack.
The hand was mucked, she left the high bet out there, and lost after the shuffle.
She was playing blackjack and had a very high bet out there. There were apparently three other players at the table - total of four including her. She was sitting at third base (last person to get a card). She was dealt an ace, and then a face card - but - turns out that dealer had misdealed and missed giving a second card to the player before her, who had a 9. Yes, she's that hot and I suppose the presumably male dealer was paying too much attention to her.
So, here she was sitting with a blackjack but her card belonged to the player before her. She tried to argue that at worst the face card should be returned to the player with the 9, and she should get another card, but before she could say much they simply mucked the hand and allowed her to pull her bet. And reshuffled the entire deck. (Presented a newly shuffled deck to start the shoe over.)
I think they should have given her the option of having the hand mucked or accepting the actual card she should have received. I suppose it would be a bit much to just allow her to stand with a blackjack and then muck the hand only for the player who had a 9.
So the situation was one player sitting there with only one card, a 9, and her receiving his second card to complete her blackjack.
The hand was mucked, she left the high bet out there, and lost after the shuffle.
Last edited by: MDawg on May 24, 2021
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/
May 24th, 2021 at 7:59:43 AM
permalink
Cmon bro. I’ve seen this happen multiple times. To myself included. They have let the hand stand. They don’t back up cards or Kill the hand when I’ve been at the table and I’ve seen it multiple times .
May 24th, 2021 at 8:00:25 AM
permalink
Quote: ChumpChangeWe've gone through this before. Casinos put minimums & maximums on their tables and whatever progression you're using will be limited by those two numbers, and that's a fact, unless you want to try the $300-$25,000 tables in the high limit room. Typical posted signs say $5-$500, or $10-$1000, or $15-$2000, or $25-$3000, or $50-$5000, or RESERVED.
However, my local roulette wheel says $25-$100 and I don't know what exactly that means.
okay, i've removed you from my blocked list, CC. Let's see how long you last...
it's true tables have limits. it's also true that a gambler can move to a higher limit table, if he so chooses. so, the theory that table limits prevent someone from using progressive strategies, is pretty flawed. i say pretty flawed, because the player would have to either not be very clever, or not have the required bankroll to withstand the lengthy losing streaks that inevitably come.
I say 'not very clever' because the player generally just needs to design a particular progressive strategy (either negative or positive), that DOESN'T require the player to move up to the higher amounts in the progressive sequence. it's clear to me that it doesn't take too much effort to come up with such a progressive strategy. it may allude others not so mathematically blessed.
the above may seem absurd if you believe that all the mathematicians think such ideals are fantasy. it appears from what people sprout on this website, that the math community think the above simple, straightforward info i put out, is ridiculous. well, the more i look into what people are saying here, the more it is clear to me that they have missed something in plain sight.
i'm sure the math community are very intelligent. it is just so ridiculous that they have missed the basics in arithmetic for, probably centuries, that has meant they would be completely gobsmacked how they've missed what i'm alerting everyone to. i'll wait for the inevitable backlash before i proceed further.
then i'll continue to tear apart the **** that i get, in simple form.
All persons reading my posts gamble at their own risk, as I do. I don't ordinarily dispute math. I may dispute math I don't understand, or if I think it's faulty. I am not a conspiracy theorist.
May 24th, 2021 at 8:10:56 AM
permalink
Quote: MDawgFor our blackjack players out there, a girl I know had this happen to her and I wonder what the correct outcome should have been. This is the girl I described who was smoking the cigar at the tables a while back. I have run into her since and gotten to know her. She told me the story third hand - I was not present.
She was playing blackjack and had a very high bet out there. There were apparently three other players at the table - total of four including her. She was sitting at third base (last person to get a card). She was dealt an ace, and then a face card - but - turns out that dealer had misdealed and missed giving a second card to the player before her, who had a 9. Yes, she's that hot and I suppose the presumably male dealer was paying too much attention to her.
So, here she was sitting with a blackjack but her card belonged to the player before her. She tried to argue that at worst the face card should be returned to the player with the 9, and she should get another card, but before she could say much they simply mucked the hand and allowed her to pull her bet. And reshuffled the entire deck. (Presented a newly shuffled deck to start the shoe over.)
I think they should have given her the option of having the hand mucked or accepting the actual card she should have received. I suppose it would be a bit much to just allow her to stand with a blackjack and then muck the hand only for the player who had a 9.
So the situation was one player sitting there with only one card, a 9, and her receiving his second card to complete her blackjack.
The hand was mucked, she left the high bet out there, and lost after the shuffle.
Compare this with something that did actually happen to me not long ago. In Baccarat as the last hand approaches, the (generally) black colored cut card appears. If it appears in the middle of a hand, that becomes the penultimate hand. If it appears right in the window of the shoe before any cards are pulled, then that upcoming hand becomes the final hand.
I had a fair sized bet out there, and as the cards came out the dealer wasn't paying attention that the cut card had appeared mid draw, and handed me one regular card and one cut card, and placed two cards for the other side. I had not looked at the regular card yet.
After a while, the casino presented me with a choice - muck the hand or wait until camera review to figure out which actual card goes to me to replace the cut card. I already know that the first card out of the deck goes to Player, so I already knew what was coming, and I chose to have them figure it out and play the hand through. But at least I was given the option - to pull the bet and muck the hand, or play it through.
Last edited by: MDawg on May 24, 2021
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/
May 24th, 2021 at 9:53:24 AM
permalink
Quote: Wellbushokay, i've removed you from my blocked list, CC. Let's see how long you last...
I have always said that people who say they are blocking people never do. It is just human nature to want to read what people say about you. So you just "happen" to remove CC from your block list...ya right. Time to block me I guess!
50-50-90 Rule: Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there is a 90% probability you'll get it wrong
May 24th, 2021 at 10:08:07 AM
permalink
Quote: Wellbush
then i'll continue to tear apart the **** that i get, in simple form.
Continue?
May 24th, 2021 at 10:17:59 AM
permalink
Quote: vegasI have always said that people who say they are blocking people never do. It is just human nature to want to read what people say about you. So you just "happen" to remove CC from your block list...ya right. Time to block me I guess!
It's only because someone quoted me that Wellbush saw what I wrote. Oh, but this is WOV, and that reply would have been blocked too.
May 24th, 2021 at 11:40:22 AM
permalink
You were never blocked in the first place. Replying to quotes just gives them an out.
50-50-90 Rule: Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there is a 90% probability you'll get it wrong
May 24th, 2021 at 2:43:48 PM
permalink
After a continuous interaction with drunks interfering with casino patrons, street thug wannabe gangsters, attempted money laundering, physical abuse, sore losers unable to accept a loss and leave the casino table, yelling and screaming people engaged in verbal altercations on the casino floor refusing to listen to a floor person and a host of other problems, it sure is nice to read about a professional and well rounded person such as MDawg at a casino.
Go MDawg!
Keep up the winning MDawg!
By the way, is anybody negotiating with you or put up money to accept any challenge and prove to the contrary you were/are lying?
And for those of you who cannot wrap your brain around the fact MDawg is telling the truth after all the interaction with The Wizard himself and the verifications that were written out within this thread by The Wizard himself, may I suggest if you're bored rather than challenging MDawg any longer you brush up on your singing?
Here start with this one:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dpnUYVezBVw
WINK WINK EIEIO
Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club
Go MDawg!
Keep up the winning MDawg!
By the way, is anybody negotiating with you or put up money to accept any challenge and prove to the contrary you were/are lying?
And for those of you who cannot wrap your brain around the fact MDawg is telling the truth after all the interaction with The Wizard himself and the verifications that were written out within this thread by The Wizard himself, may I suggest if you're bored rather than challenging MDawg any longer you brush up on your singing?
Here start with this one:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dpnUYVezBVw
WINK WINK EIEIO
Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club
Last edited by: Marcusclark66 on May 24, 2021
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert.
*Certified EMT
*Certified Company Firearms Instructor.
*Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications.
*Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert.
*Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess.
*Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club.
*Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members.
*Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer
*Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
May 24th, 2021 at 3:10:28 PM
permalink
Quote: PokerGrinderHe’s bored of porn, this will have to do for the next couple weeks.
I just had the quote this, sorry guys but a couple of weeks is turning into what-------years?
I am kind of bad at telling time, ha ha!
Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert.
*Certified EMT
*Certified Company Firearms Instructor.
*Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications.
*Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert.
*Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess.
*Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club.
*Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members.
*Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer
*Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
May 25th, 2021 at 6:05:05 AM
permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66
By the way, is anybody negotiating with you or put up money to accept any challenge and prove to the contrary you were/are lying?
Nope not a peep in that regards.
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/
May 25th, 2021 at 6:13:13 AM
permalink
I was at the Vegas Knights game again last night, even better seats than last time, but...Knights lost.
It was amazing because the Knights outshot Minnesota three to one but weren't shooting with much precision.
Knights probably should have pulled Fleury their goalie a little sooner as they had little to lose and were down 3 to 2 with just a few minutes left, but in any case, there was no joy in Vegasville last night. What's interesting is that now both teams have lost home games during this playoff.
It was amazing because the Knights outshot Minnesota three to one but weren't shooting with much precision.
Knights probably should have pulled Fleury their goalie a little sooner as they had little to lose and were down 3 to 2 with just a few minutes left, but in any case, there was no joy in Vegasville last night. What's interesting is that now both teams have lost home games during this playoff.
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/
May 25th, 2021 at 7:04:04 AM
permalink
Okay so noww, the heat is on, and nothing but 90s and up for the rest of the week in Vegas.
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/
May 25th, 2021 at 11:05:43 AM
permalink
Quote: MDawgNope not a peep in that regards.
But numerous members came out and accused you of lying or twisting reality. Thought they would have gladly accepted your offer. Seriously thought, but guess not.
I Am Totally Flabbergasted!
Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club
Last edited by: Marcusclark66 on May 25, 2021
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert.
*Certified EMT
*Certified Company Firearms Instructor.
*Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications.
*Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert.
*Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess.
*Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club.
*Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members.
*Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer
*Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
May 25th, 2021 at 11:47:44 AM
permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66But numerous members came out and accused you of lying or twisting reality. Thought they would have gladly accepted your offer. Seriously thought, but guess not.
If someone came out and said they can walk to the moon I'm not engaging with them in a wager over it. That would be crazy.
May 25th, 2021 at 12:13:04 PM
permalink
MarcusClark66, it's amazing how ignorance and speculation fuel controversy on these forums sometimes. I like to talk only about what I know first hand, while many are willing to post endlessly on what they haven't even come close to experiencing.
But in order for me to set the record straight on some minor goings on that people have been PM'ing me about, I'd have to divulge too much about exactly what and where is going on at my end. Nuh-uh, sorry. Maybe a year ago I would have done that, but not since a few unripe persimmons have made it clear that they are desperate to track down the great MDawg, or to try to pull him down from his heights. Which, it's going to be a lot harder to track MDawg down soon it looks like. 😉
https://twitter.com/jordanr_belfort/status/444921773252169728?lang=en
But in order for me to set the record straight on some minor goings on that people have been PM'ing me about, I'd have to divulge too much about exactly what and where is going on at my end. Nuh-uh, sorry. Maybe a year ago I would have done that, but not since a few unripe persimmons have made it clear that they are desperate to track down the great MDawg, or to try to pull him down from his heights. Which, it's going to be a lot harder to track MDawg down soon it looks like. 😉
https://twitter.com/jordanr_belfort/status/444921773252169728?lang=en
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/
May 25th, 2021 at 12:57:08 PM
permalink
Quote: MDawgMarcusClark66, it's amazing how ignorance and speculation fuel controversy on these forums sometimes. I like to talk only about what I know first hand, while many are willing to post endlessly on what they haven't even come close to experiencing.
But in order for me to set the record straight on some minor goings on that people have been PM'ing me about, I'd have to divulge too much about exactly what and where is going on at my end. Nuh-uh, sorry. Maybe a year ago I would have done that, but not since a few unripe persimmons have made it clear that they are desperate to track down the great MDawg, or to try to pull him down from his heights. Which, it's going to be a lot harder to track MDawg down soon it looks like. 😉
https://twitter.com/jordanr_belfort/status/444921773252169728?lang=en
No need to tell "everything". You are proven, verified and most of all, a winner.
Most all hate that. Which is extremely obvious by their comments and accusations.
An Extra Real Life Person!
Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert.
*Certified EMT
*Certified Company Firearms Instructor.
*Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications.
*Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert.
*Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess.
*Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club.
*Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members.
*Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer
*Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
May 25th, 2021 at 1:13:25 PM
permalink
Quote: sabreIf someone came out and said they can walk to the moon
I'm not engaging with them in a wager over it. That would be crazy.
That's a false equivalency to say the least.
How about something that's real....
If someone came out and said that they can, in one attempt in your presence,
make a hole-in-one on a standard par 3 golf hole, or bowl a perfect game?
Would you be willing to engage them in a wager over either of those?
May 25th, 2021 at 2:06:01 PM
permalink
Quote: coachbellyThat's a false equivalency to say the least.
How about something that's real....
If someone came out and said that they can, in one attempt in your presence,
make a hole-in-one on a standard par 3 golf hole, or bowl a perfect game?
Would you be willing to engage them in a wager over either of those?
I would not. I would think the person offering the wager is trying to dupe me.
May 25th, 2021 at 5:06:59 PM
permalink
You know MDawg, Tiny Tim and yourself, what a great parallel!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=awj_kv6pb7o
Here are the reasons why: TINY TIM NEVER COPIED ANYONE. HE WAS TRULY UNIQUE--AN ORIGINAL. HE WAS VERY KIND, HUMBLE, & INTELLIGENT. WHAT HE DID WASN'T AN EASY TASK. HE BECAME AN ICON WITHOUT ANY HELP FROM ANYBODY. I ADORED THAT MAN!!!
Just Do It Baby!
Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=awj_kv6pb7o
Here are the reasons why: TINY TIM NEVER COPIED ANYONE. HE WAS TRULY UNIQUE--AN ORIGINAL. HE WAS VERY KIND, HUMBLE, & INTELLIGENT. WHAT HE DID WASN'T AN EASY TASK. HE BECAME AN ICON WITHOUT ANY HELP FROM ANYBODY. I ADORED THAT MAN!!!
Just Do It Baby!
Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert.
*Certified EMT
*Certified Company Firearms Instructor.
*Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications.
*Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert.
*Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess.
*Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club.
*Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members.
*Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer
*Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
May 25th, 2021 at 6:20:16 PM
permalink
Good heavens man, you've glommed onto this fellow like a remora to a shark.
Do you seriously consider your mentor to be "humble."
"Humble?"
Ground control to Mr. Clark ...
Your circuit's dead, there's something wrong
Can you hear me, Mr. Clark?
(my apologies to David Bowie for dragging him into this tawdry affair, may he RIP)
Do you seriously consider your mentor to be "humble."
"Humble?"
Ground control to Mr. Clark ...
Your circuit's dead, there's something wrong
Can you hear me, Mr. Clark?
(my apologies to David Bowie for dragging him into this tawdry affair, may he RIP)
"What, me worry?"
May 25th, 2021 at 6:33:20 PM
permalink
Can you legitimately say anyone admires yourself?
Once Again Totally Flabbergasted!
Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club
Once Again Totally Flabbergasted!
Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert.
*Certified EMT
*Certified Company Firearms Instructor.
*Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications.
*Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert.
*Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess.
*Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club.
*Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members.
*Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer
*Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
May 25th, 2021 at 6:36:01 PM
permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66Can you legitimately say anyone admires yourself?
Of course I can.
Why, can't you?
"What, me worry?"
May 25th, 2021 at 6:41:00 PM
permalink
I am far too humble myself to recognize if anybody does.
Seriously Humble
Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club
Seriously Humble
Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert.
*Certified EMT
*Certified Company Firearms Instructor.
*Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications.
*Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert.
*Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess.
*Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club.
*Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members.
*Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer
*Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
May 25th, 2021 at 6:50:54 PM
permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66I am far too humble myself to recognize if anybody does.
Are you confusing the term "humble" with "unobservant?"
If anyone admired you I suspect you'd certainly know it by now, so I'll take your answer to be a "No."
Me, I once had eighteen admirers in a row.
"What, me worry?"
May 25th, 2021 at 7:04:31 PM
permalink
As I said I'm far too humble to even notice!
Glad you put yourself on a pedestal, stay safe.
Truly Humble in Life
Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club
Glad you put yourself on a pedestal, stay safe.
Truly Humble in Life
Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert.
*Certified EMT
*Certified Company Firearms Instructor.
*Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications.
*Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert.
*Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess.
*Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club.
*Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members.
*Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer
*Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
May 26th, 2021 at 1:23:19 AM
permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66As I said I'm far too humble to even notice!
Glad you put yourself on a pedestal, stay safe.
Truly Humble in Life
Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club
Humble men profess not their own humbleness.
May 26th, 2021 at 7:31:10 AM
permalink
This is really very funny. Maybe the funniest aspect of all of this.
First, some folks can't fathom that bragging about humbleness is an oxymoron. It goes right over their (I'm using the plural out of generosity here) heads.
Then you get the occasional person who employs a spin-off persona that brags about humbleness in the service of bragging about the original persona.
Which, when you think about it, flat-out blows the presentation that the original persona and the spin-off are not related or coordinated or one-and-the-same.
Employing a persona who's "too humble to brag" in the service of a braggart is pretty funny. Like whoever's writing the stuff can't help but brag. It's like a putting a gambling addict in charge of church bingo. By the end of the first bingo game, he's forgotten that he's not supposed to be screaming to God "Give daddy B17!"
This is actually the funniest thing regarding all of this posting I've read. I thank rainman for the pithy observations and replies, and I will be citing him in my blog entries discussing this topic.
First, some folks can't fathom that bragging about humbleness is an oxymoron. It goes right over their (I'm using the plural out of generosity here) heads.
Then you get the occasional person who employs a spin-off persona that brags about humbleness in the service of bragging about the original persona.
Which, when you think about it, flat-out blows the presentation that the original persona and the spin-off are not related or coordinated or one-and-the-same.
Employing a persona who's "too humble to brag" in the service of a braggart is pretty funny. Like whoever's writing the stuff can't help but brag. It's like a putting a gambling addict in charge of church bingo. By the end of the first bingo game, he's forgotten that he's not supposed to be screaming to God "Give daddy B17!"
This is actually the funniest thing regarding all of this posting I've read. I thank rainman for the pithy observations and replies, and I will be citing him in my blog entries discussing this topic.
"You can't breathe dead hippo waking, sleeping, and eating, and at the same time keep your precarious grip on existence."
May 26th, 2021 at 10:26:10 AM
permalink
Tiny Tim? Sure, why not.
and the casinos go dead.
and the casinos go dead.
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/
May 26th, 2021 at 10:32:29 AM
permalink
Quote: redietzThis is really very funny. Maybe the funniest aspect of all of this.
First, some folks can't fathom that bragging about humbleness is an oxymoron. It goes right over their (I'm using the plural out of generosity here) heads.
Then you get the occasional person who employs a spin-off persona that brags about humbleness in the service of bragging about the original persona.
Which, when you think about it, flat-out blows the presentation that the original persona and the spin-off are not related or coordinated or one-and-the-same.
Employing a persona who's "too humble to brag" in the service of a braggart is pretty funny. Like whoever's writing the stuff can't help but brag. It's like a putting a gambling addict in charge of church bingo. By the end of the first bingo game, he's forgotten that he's not supposed to be screaming to God "Give daddy B17!"
This is actually the funniest thing regarding all of this posting I've read. I thank rainman for the pithy observations and replies, and I will be citing him in my blog entries discussing this topic.
But you guys follow us, read our posts, follow us, read our posts and repeat.....and repeat....and repeat.....
Oh, excuse me, not really reading, just responding.
Marcus Clark
Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66
Professional Casino Security Expert
Certified Company Firearms Instructor
Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert.
*Certified EMT
*Certified Company Firearms Instructor.
*Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications.
*Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert.
*Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess.
*Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club.
*Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members.
*Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer
*Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
May 26th, 2021 at 10:41:48 AM
permalink
The prescription version of Niacin flush is what you want.
https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/niacin-flush
Few are as youthful and vigorous as I am, 7/24, so anecdotally speaking, vitamins and supplements work.
If you're in perfect health and full of energy, then sure, why change a thing. But then again, that's exactly where I am so...why change a thing!
https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/niacin-flush
Few are as youthful and vigorous as I am, 7/24, so anecdotally speaking, vitamins and supplements work.
If you're in perfect health and full of energy, then sure, why change a thing. But then again, that's exactly where I am so...why change a thing!
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/
