Poll
3 votes (12%) | |||
22 votes (88%) |
25 members have voted
Quote: beachbumbabsUntrue. I've banned him 6 times before he could/did post, 5 times on a single post that I then deleted, and 4 times when he'd posted multiple times and I had to go back and clean those off. 1 time I banned him but did not delete because of too many responses that carried a discussion of its own merit before I saw the thread/ID, and 3 times after he'd run for a couple days unproven as a B79 account, as well as the 3 day and the nuking of the original account. I've been keeping a score card, in case you're wondering, but hadn't wanted to discuss numbers as it's some kind of sicko badge of honor for him. However, I resent your aspersions, so there's some facts for you. Now it's on your head if he starts attacking again in response to your bringing it up, which has been a past pattern.
Face has popped him several times, including a couple where I had suspicions but no proof, and very likely Mission or Wizard has popped him at least once. I don't know their numbers.
If anyone should have the charge of "letting B79 go on too long", that certainly lies on my shoulders alone. Several members can attest that they sent me PMs to complain, and I either refrained from responding or, more likely, informed them that I was actively keeping him alive on purpose. At the time, AoS was under attack, and I wanted the monkey to post as much as possible. Habits, typing signature, IPs, I wanted as much info as I could get on him in case something happened, and I informed AoS that I was letting him go specifically because of that.
The info collection phase has passed, and we now all bang him as soon as we can be reasonably sure it's him. Babs may hold off on the hammer in an effort to be sure, as do I, but it was I who held off even when I was certain it was him (and I did it at least ten times).
Sorry if that upset anyone. I was just trying to protect AoS.
Hey guys did you pick up on that, nah only I did cod I'm a genius,
It wasn't a secret riddle bro, $300 minimum because the house edge is so low
Quote: Randombacplay12Wizard of nothing your not smart
Hey guys did you pick up on that, nah only I did cod I'm a genius,
Personal Insult, Three Days. Also, change your avatar.
Why would you wast your time posting when you have such a valuable system.Quote: Randombacplay12Keep this post in mind all the haters.
I expect to reach my target in 2.5-3 months until I have the bankroll for 1k bets
So I'll post then
Why come to a forum that has so much negativity towards your "mode of play"
Check out this "part" Baccarat shoe!!!!! - Big Wins - Gambling - Page ...
Dec 29, 2013 ... That is the very reason that I developed my mode of play, the variance "extremes" . You see, one cannot build any successful mode of play ...
wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/big-wins/16288-check.../2/
Quote: Mission146change your avatar.
I was pretty amazed that was passing muster for so long!
Quote: AxelWolfWhy would you wast your time posting when you have such a valuable system.
Why come to a forum that has so much negativity towards your "mode of play"
I think I have finally figured this out. I f a person comes to a site like this and makes wild claims, the Gods of Baccarat are such that they don't like it if other posters start dissing those claims. They then see to it that the guy keeps winning, just to get their kicks. This is why Baccarat is the game to do this with, you see the gods of the game are impish, puckish types .
Even faster you can just grab a bunch of chips in high limit from the tray, while playing.
Even faster just bring a gun and rob the casino.
Quote: djatcEven faster just bring a gun and rob the casino.
Doesn't that risk getting 86'd? If you are trespassed from one casino for robbing the dealer at gun point, doesn't that get communicated to other casinoes? Why risk it.... Unless you are robbing the casino unrated.
This system, this thread... Oh I do hope the OP plays it for real and then has the integrity to report on how much he lost.
It was a sound business model, actually.
Quote: Randombacplay12Why is the casino so scared?
Joke is still on them as I keep winning, but this really annoyed the hell out of me, and it has now cemented it in my brain that the casino knows baccarat is a beatable game under the right conditions.
Manual shuffle and time to think about decisions.
I paraphrased your quote.
They aren't scared. More hands per hour makes the casino money. Perhaps they have introduced new policy to enforce a betting time restriction and cut down on shuffle times. This WILL make them more money.
Quote: Randombacplay12the casino knows baccarat is a beatable game under the right conditions.
r
This is the only post I'll read in this thread, so
if somebody already said this, oh well. The
casino does NOT know bac is beatable. They
do know there can be streaks that go against them
and they sometimes take measures to spook
the players and break up the streaks. It makes
them feel proactive, just ignore it.