Thread Rating:
December 2nd, 2013 at 5:06:18 PM
permalink
I gotta start by saying that this of course may be very stupid system.
The idea is that you do normal martingale But!!
The even number you are going to bet on should be random
Say you start with black. If u lose, u go to odd.
If u lose, go to 1~18. If you lose, go to red this time and so on.
Now here is a catch.
Everytime you bet on 1:1. You also bet on 0 and 00
There is Roulette where about 12 players can play at the same time
Using different touch screens. This allows you to bet 1 dollar on
Any number if you bet at least 5 dollars on 1:1 payout bet.
So it goes like this
6 for even. 1 in the middle of 0 and 00
14 for even. 2 in the middle
32. & 4
72. 8
161. 16
353. 32
780. 70
You will need 1511 to do this.
I think this would be better than traditional martingale where
You lose when the other side you bet on starts streaks
The idea is that you do normal martingale But!!
The even number you are going to bet on should be random
Say you start with black. If u lose, u go to odd.
If u lose, go to 1~18. If you lose, go to red this time and so on.
Now here is a catch.
Everytime you bet on 1:1. You also bet on 0 and 00
There is Roulette where about 12 players can play at the same time
Using different touch screens. This allows you to bet 1 dollar on
Any number if you bet at least 5 dollars on 1:1 payout bet.
So it goes like this
6 for even. 1 in the middle of 0 and 00
14 for even. 2 in the middle
32. & 4
72. 8
161. 16
353. 32
780. 70
You will need 1511 to do this.
I think this would be better than traditional martingale where
You lose when the other side you bet on starts streaks
December 2nd, 2013 at 5:10:24 PM
permalink
It's not better.
December 2nd, 2013 at 5:16:17 PM
permalink
You cannot randomize random!
When a rock is thrown into a pack of dogs, the one that yells the loudest is the one who got hit.
December 2nd, 2013 at 5:19:51 PM
permalink
Quote: gamingblerI gotta start by saying that this of course may be very stupid system.
I agree with you.
Fighting BS one post at a time!
December 2nd, 2013 at 5:30:38 PM
permalink
Quote: gamingbler
I think this would be better than traditional martingale where
You lose when the other side you bet on starts streaks
Rather than do my customary thing where I calculate the probability of every individual possible sequence of events, and the return for each, I'm going to go with a different tactic, for now.
Here are some questions about your system:
1.) What is the probability of a bet on Red winning OR one of the zeroes hitting?
2.) What is the probability of a bet on Black winning OR one of the zeroes hitting?
3.) '''''''""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""Even""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""?
4.)"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""Odd"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""?
5.)"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""1-18"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""?
6.)"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""19-36""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""?
7.) Why do you believe the statement quoted above could be true?
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/gripes/11182-pet-peeves/120/#post815219