Roulette- revised martingale.

Hello, I just want to make it clear that I'm aware that systems, in the long run, do not work. To save yourself time, you could take $1,000 split it between the 2nd and 3rd "12" and win 500 dollars off of an appx: 60% chance. If you aren't that balsy, you can do the slow-play technique which I usually do. Overall, I'm about even, having won about $2,400 over a week 4-5 hours a day, and losing $2,000 in 3 days in total, 45 minutes. Now, I won't bother u with that strategy, although the revised betting system is very similar.

I am new to this site so I apologize in advance if this has come up before, but again, with no sure fire way for this to win, all it does is elongate your chances -with still taking a large risk considering the minimal pay out of $5 per winning bet and potentially losing $1,280 all at one. Here it goes..

Starting bankroll: $ 1,280
1)Your bet placement never changes, only the amount.
2) difference from regular martingale ( to my understanding) is using 2 spaces rather than one ie:black/red/odd/even
3) you double up every loss -which is typical, but because of max bet you can't exceed the $640 double up... Making $1,280 your start-up cap.
4) you are betting on the chance that the ball (which has no memory, so odds and % ultimately mean nothing, that is the risk you must accept and acknowledge) will land in the 2nd or 3rd set of 12 numbers at least one time out of 8 spins: avoiding the 1st 12 and the 0,00.
5)splitting your $1,280 in half gives you 640 dollars to double up with progressively on 2 different spaces.
5,5
10,10
20,20
40,40
80,80
160,160
320,320
640,640

6) I've played similarly to this and up until spin 5 or 6 you feel pretty confident that in 2 more spins your bound to hit your area eventually, "you ca. Only flip a coin so many times in a row and get heads"... Until that last spin comes and then u remember.."oh s***... That coins could easily land heads again"- well it's the same concept.
I can't stress enough that this is no guarantee, but it does greater your chances if you don't mind sitting for awhile and winning 5 dollars every minute or two depending on how long it takes to bounce back off of your insurance progression bets, how fast the dealer is, and how crowded the table is.
7) for best results : table minimum $5, table max $1,000 ( outside). I recommend for the planets to be aligned.. Go during a week day 3pm-9 pm and get a steak dinner when ur done regardless, trust me.. If ur signed in.. With the amount of money and time u spend.. Ur bound to rack up enough points for some good grub providing ur casino has a Resturaunt.
8) lastly.. Thanks for reading. My job doesn't pay 5 bucks every couple minutes idk about you guys, but If you can stand to lose 1300 for th chance to win a few hundred and have some fun.. It's worth a shot. I've done a less successful rate of play and won big (over time) but it does catch up with you.
I realize my strategy is not rocket science and many of you have probably tried it already, but I'm sure some haven't.
Lemme know what you think.

I don't deal roulette as often as I used to, but your system looks like it has the potential to keep you "alive" for some time. My problem with any martingale-based system is the amount risked vs. the amount you can potentially win, but you seem to acknowledge the ever present problem of all systems failing over time, so at least you're not deluded. :)

Best of luck at the tables.

Thank you I appreciate that.. I will let you know how it goes, I'm probably not testing this theory for another couple weeks. I've done it the other way where 640 is your cap and after your 5,5 dollar bet on te 2nd and 3rd 12 you play 19-36 and use the heads tails theory. But having less than half the board.. I'm ok with using an extra 640 dollars to give me that edge, even if it means only gaining an extra 6 numbers ie: 13-18. It does take awhile but if you can have enough sense to stop around 2-300, it's not uncommon to make that in a few hours.

I believe the longest reported single column repeat is 14? That would take down most if not all negative progressions.

Monkey.. You don't work at Akwesasne Mohawk casino in hogansburg by some strange miracle do you?

Quote: treetopbuddy

I believe the longest reported single column repeat is 14? That would take down most if not all negative progressions.

That may be so, but it's still something that is very rare. I'm not a system "believer" but it looks like this one has a decent chance of working, at least in the short term. Maybe one of the math geeks can sound off with the probability that this system will fail, but just from a cursory examination it looks like, if nothing else, you could play for a good long time with a decent bankroll.

Quote: Jaxxbriggs015

Monkey.. You don't work at Akwesasne Mohawk casino in hogansburg by some strange miracle do you?

Nope, don't even know where that is (NY maybe?). But I have been watching a fair amount of Hogan's Hero's on youtube lately if that counts for anything. :) Gotta love that politically incorrect humor... and who woulda thought that a show about war would do so well in the political climate of the late 60's, early 70's.

Haha yes very true, I'm impressed, yes it's ny, idk if you googled it or what, or if its a known thing to know where most casinos are when working in one. Ha

Quote: Jaxxbriggs015

Haha yes very true, I'm impressed, yes it's ny, idk if you googled it or what, or if its a known thing to know where most casinos are when working in one. Ha

Lucky guess... Musta heard it somewhere, I'm in the midwest.

Quote: Jaxxbriggs015

Referring to my strategy? If so, thank you. I like to think it was decent, although we will see once its implemented.

Yes, please report back with your results. And a belated welcome to the site.

Thanks much.. I always get flack from family and friends, they think I have a problem, but I almost never go. I'm going to watch George st Pierre fight for his title in Montreal this weekend so moneys tight ( justifying 1,300 at the casino is no problem tho, lol) off to bed, thanks again

So how did it work out? Bank a small(ish) win?

EDIT:
Hmm I might be missing something here but it seems to me that if you lose a few decisions in a row and then win one you only win back enough to cover half of the losses for the series...

Errmm.. I don't know what are you all counting, but you need to triple your bets in this case, not double, if you wanna win back + win initial bet.

I do the same type of revised martingale, but I simply do it for one section of 12. Always eithr 1st 12, 2nd, or 3rd. I always go to the one that hasnt hit in the longest time (i know it doesnt matter to the wheel, but just a superstition I have with it) and simply double until it hits. for instance on a $5 min table

$5 bet 15 win $10 total profit
$10 bet 30 win $15 Total profit
$20 bet 60 win $25 total profit
$40 bet 120 win $45 total profit
$80 bet 240 win $ $95 total profit

and so on until you hit max. With a high upper limit, this will give you 10ish spins to hit your section of 12, or column (would play th same way)

Whoever stated that we need to triple our bets to cover losses you are absolutely right. Which I fortunately figured out after o my trying it on my pone app rather than the casino.
But this then raises ur bankroll to approx 1850 or so, also eliminating 2 or. 3 chances u have to win your money back because of max table bet.. So.. If u har the expendable income
It could be fun. But idk if I'd risk it. I was tempted to double up on the 1/3's like this last guy said. We'll see. I used to double on 19-36 in hopes of. "Heads tails" becoming a favoring factor
But when u throw those greens into the mix it kny works so much. I've had it land 1-18 9 times in a row. Lost 1500 dollars in. 20 minutes.