## Poll

21 votes (46.66%) | |||

14 votes (31.11%) | |||

6 votes (13.33%) | |||

2 votes (4.44%) | |||

12 votes (26.66%) | |||

3 votes (6.66%) | |||

6 votes (13.33%) | |||

5 votes (11.11%) | |||

12 votes (26.66%) | |||

10 votes (22.22%) |

**45 members have voted**

May 14th, 2023 at 7:55:02 AM
permalink

[[{(38/18)^(5+1) - 1} / {(38/18) - 1}] - 1] / 2 =~ 38.9 spins

It’s all about making that GTA

May 15th, 2023 at 5:31:17 AM
permalink

Quote:ThatDonGuyQuote:WizardWhat is the expected number of spins in double-zero roulette to see five reds or five blacks in a row? The previous spin landed on 0.

link to original post

Let E(n) be the expected number after having n consecutive of a color; E(5) = 0

Let p be the probability of getting a particular color, and r = 1 - 2p = the probability that it comes up green

E(4) = 1 + p E(1) + r E(0)

E(3) = 1 + p E(1) + r E(0) + p E(4)

= 1 + p E(1) + r E(0) + p (1 + p E(1) + r E(0))

= 1 + p + (p + p^2) E(1) + (r + pr) E(0)

E(2) = 1 + p E(1) + r E(0) + p E(3)

= 1 + p E(1) + r E(0) + p (1 + p + (p + p^2) E(1) + (r + pr) E(0))

= (1 + p + p^2) + p (1 + p + p^2) E(1) + r (1 + p + p^2) E(0)

E(1) = 1 + p E(1) + r E(0) + p E(3)

= (1 + p + p^2 + p^3) + p (1 + p + p^2 + p^3) E(1) + r (1 + p + p^2 + p^3) E(0)

(1 - p - p^2 - p^3 - p^4) E(1) = (1 + p + p^2 + p^3) + (1 - 2p) (1 + p + p^2 + p^3) E(0)

E(1) = (1 + p + p^2 + p^3) / (1 - p - p^2 - p^3 - p^4) + ((1 - 2p) (1 + p + p^2 + p^3) / (1 - p - p^2 - p^3 - p^4)) E(0)

E(0) = 1 + (1 - 2p) E(0) + 2p E(1)

E(0) = 1 / 2p + E(1)

E(0) = 1 / 2p + (1 + p + p^2 + p^3) / (1 - p - p^2 - p^3 - p^4) + ((1 - 2p) (1 + p + p^2 + p^3) / (1 - p - p^2 - p^3 - p^4)) E(0)

(1 - (1 - 2p) (1 + p + p^2 + p^3) / (1 - p - p^2 - p^3 - p^4)) E(0) = 1 / 2p + (1 + p + p^2 + p^3) / (1 - p - p^2 - p^3 - p^4)

E(0) = (1 / 2p + (1 + p + p^2 + p^3) / (1 - p - p^2 - p^3 - p^4)) x (1 - p - p^2 - p^3 - p^4) / p^4

E(0) = (1 - p - p^2 - p^3 - p^4) / (2 p^5) + (1 + p + p^2 + p^3) / p^4

E(0) = (1 - p - p^2 - p^3 - p^4) / (2 p^5) + (2p + 2p^2 + 2p^3 + 2p^4) / (2p^5)

= (1 + p + p^2 + p^3 + p^4) / (2p^5)

= (1 - p^5) / (2 p^5 (1 - p))

For p = 9/19, this is 4,592,395 / 118,098, or about 38.8863

link to original post

I agree! That one is beer worthy.

Eliot's approximation was correct to the four significant digits given. Of course, an exact expression is required for the beer.

Ace is also correct and extra credit for the formula for n spins.

“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” -- Carl Sagan

May 15th, 2023 at 3:05:33 PM
permalink

What I finds odd about this problem is this related problem: what are the chances that starting with the present spin you get a sequence of exactly 5 reds or 5 blacks?

The answer is, of course, (36/38)*(18/38)^4*(20/38) = 0.025103 or 1-in-39.836. I find it odd that this is even close to the other question Mike asked (the expected number of spins to get a sequence Red or Black of length 5). I was almost going to go with 39.836 as my answer.

The answer is, of course, (36/38)*(18/38)^4*(20/38) = 0.025103 or 1-in-39.836. I find it odd that this is even close to the other question Mike asked (the expected number of spins to get a sequence Red or Black of length 5). I was almost going to go with 39.836 as my answer.

Climate Casino: https://climatecasino.net/climate-casino/

May 15th, 2023 at 3:50:35 PM
permalink

With the last spin being zero, the chance of getting five black or five red in the next five spins is (18/38)^5 * 2 or about 1 in 21. Not close to the answerQuote:teliotWhat I finds odd about this problem is this related problem: what are the chances that starting with the present spin you get a sequence of exactly 5 reds or 5 blacks?

The answer is, of course, (36/38)*(18/38)^4*(20/38) = 0.025103 or 1-in-39.836. I find it odd that this is even close to the other question Mike asked (the expected number of spins to get a sequence Red or Black of length 5). I was almost going to go with 39.836 as my answer.

link to original post

Look at it this way. The chance of you getting two consecutive heads in the next two rolls is 1 in 4, but the expected waiting time to see two consecutive heads is six. Red/black is not much different from heads/tails…would be identical without those dang two zeroes on the wheel

It’s all about making that GTA

May 15th, 2023 at 4:11:10 PM
permalink

Of course, but I was giving exactly 5 in a row, not 5 or more.

I'm just saying that two unrelated questions about five in a row have surprisingly close answers.

I'm just saying that two unrelated questions about five in a row have surprisingly close answers.

Last edited by: teliot on May 15, 2023

Climate Casino: https://climatecasino.net/climate-casino/

May 25th, 2023 at 12:17:58 PM
permalink

A cake is divided among 100 mathematicians, numbered 1 to 100. It is divided up as follows an in order:

Mathematician 1 gets 1% of the cake.

Mathematician 2 gets 2% of the remaining cake.

Mathematician 3 gets 3% of the remaining cake.

Mathematician 4 gets 4% of the remaining cake.

This continues until the last mathematician gets 100% of what is left.

Which mathematician gets the most cake?

No calculators allowed!

For full credit, I need an explanation why your answer is right.

I also hate to keep saying this, but please don't just throw out a link to a video that solves the problem *ahem*. Let's have some fun and try to learn something.

Mathematician 1 gets 1% of the cake.

Mathematician 2 gets 2% of the remaining cake.

Mathematician 3 gets 3% of the remaining cake.

Mathematician 4 gets 4% of the remaining cake.

This continues until the last mathematician gets 100% of what is left.

Which mathematician gets the most cake?

No calculators allowed!

For full credit, I need an explanation why your answer is right.

I also hate to keep saying this, but please don't just throw out a link to a video that solves the problem *ahem*. Let's have some fun and try to learn something.

“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” -- Carl Sagan

May 25th, 2023 at 12:43:46 PM
permalink

Person N gets N/100 of what's left. In which case person (N+1) gets (N+1)/100*(100-N)/100. This means 100N=100N+100-N

When N=10 the 10th person gets 10% and the 11th person get 11% of 90% = 9.9%. Similarly the 9th person gets 9% and the 10th person gets 10% of 91% = 9.1%. Confirming the 10th person gets the most.

^{2}-N which means N^{2}+N-100=0. Using N=-b2+/-SQRT(etc) gives -1+-SQRT(1+400)/2 which is about 10.When N=10 the 10th person gets 10% and the 11th person get 11% of 90% = 9.9%. Similarly the 9th person gets 9% and the 10th person gets 10% of 91% = 9.1%. Confirming the 10th person gets the most.

May 25th, 2023 at 1:24:42 PM
permalink

Quote:charliepatrickPerson N gets N/100 of what's left. In which case person (N+1) gets (N+1)/100*(100-N)/100. This means 100N=100N+100-N^{2}-N which means N^{2}+N-100=0. Using N=-b2+/-SQRT(etc) gives -1+-SQRT(1+400)/2 which is about 10.

When N=10 the 10th person gets 10% and the 11th person get 11% of 90% = 9.9%. Similarly the 9th person gets 9% and the 10th person gets 10% of 91% = 9.1%. Confirming the 10th person gets the most.

link to original post

Agreed. Full credit for a similar solution as mine.

“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” -- Carl Sagan

May 26th, 2023 at 2:20:00 AM
permalink

.

𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵, 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵, 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵, 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵, 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵___________________that is part of the lyrics from the Beatles song "Revolution"

the 9 times mystery:

at least it's a mystery to me..............I'm sure some here can explain it - an easy puzzle I'm sure for some - but not for me

I haven't got a clue

nothing similar happens with any other digits that I know about

here we go:

9*5=45.......................add up the digits - 4+5=9

9*8=72.......................add up the digits - 7+2=9

9*7=63.......................add up the digits - 6+3=9

9*17=153...................add up the digits - 1+5+3 =9

9*77=693...................add up the digits - 6+9+3 and get 18............then add up those digits..............1+8=9

9*4,796=43,164..........add up the digits 4+3+1+6+4 and get 18......then add up those digits...............1+8=9

9*104,675 = 942,075.........add up the digits..........9+4+2+0+7+5 and get 27...........then add up those digits..............2+7=9

9*5,327,894 = 47,951,046...........add up the digits .........4+7+9+5+1+0+4+6 and get 36............then add up those digits.................3+6=9

𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵, 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵, 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵, 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵, 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵

.

𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵, 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵, 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵, 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵, 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵___________________that is part of the lyrics from the Beatles song "Revolution"

the 9 times mystery:

at least it's a mystery to me..............I'm sure some here can explain it - an easy puzzle I'm sure for some - but not for me

I haven't got a clue

nothing similar happens with any other digits that I know about

here we go:

9*5=45.......................add up the digits - 4+5=9

9*8=72.......................add up the digits - 7+2=9

9*7=63.......................add up the digits - 6+3=9

9*17=153...................add up the digits - 1+5+3 =9

9*77=693...................add up the digits - 6+9+3 and get 18............then add up those digits..............1+8=9

9*4,796=43,164..........add up the digits 4+3+1+6+4 and get 18......then add up those digits...............1+8=9

9*104,675 = 942,075.........add up the digits..........9+4+2+0+7+5 and get 27...........then add up those digits..............2+7=9

9*5,327,894 = 47,951,046...........add up the digits .........4+7+9+5+1+0+4+6 and get 36............then add up those digits.................3+6=9

𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵, 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵, 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵, 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵, 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟵

.

"believe half of what you see and none of what you hear" - Edgar Allan Poe

May 26th, 2023 at 2:51:09 AM
permalink

You are correct that the sum of the digits of a number divisible by 9 will, assuming you keep going, always land up as 9. The logic can be thought as follows.

For two digits numbers the number can be expressed as 10a+b, where as the total of the digits is a+b. This if a+b=9, then 9a+a+b is also a multiple of 9, and this is 10a+b.

For three digits use 100a+10b+c and observe that 99a+9b+(a+b+c) is also divisible by 9 if (a+b+c) is. If a+b+c is greater than 9 then repeat the process, and note the same logic applies for the number formed by a+b+c.

For larger numbers you can see that each power of 10 can be considered as (99..99+1) so the number breaks down to 9*something+(a+b+.....+z). So you can see the pattern applies for all numbers.

btw the same applies to numbers divisible by 3, the total wil always reduce to 3 6 or 9.

For two digits numbers the number can be expressed as 10a+b, where as the total of the digits is a+b. This if a+b=9, then 9a+a+b is also a multiple of 9, and this is 10a+b.

For three digits use 100a+10b+c and observe that 99a+9b+(a+b+c) is also divisible by 9 if (a+b+c) is. If a+b+c is greater than 9 then repeat the process, and note the same logic applies for the number formed by a+b+c.

For larger numbers you can see that each power of 10 can be considered as (99..99+1) so the number breaks down to 9*something+(a+b+.....+z). So you can see the pattern applies for all numbers.

btw the same applies to numbers divisible by 3, the total wil always reduce to 3 6 or 9.