2. No identical twins
Question-
I have 2 children. One is a boy. What is the chance that the other one is a boy?
After most say 50% I will propose a different answer and await the analysis.
Thanks all.
Quote:After most say 50% I will propose a different answer and await the analysis.
I'll beat you to it, by proposing an answer of 1/3 :)
Edit: Oops. Looks like I got beaten myself :)
edit2: I mean, I've heard this one before so was thinking 1/3 was right, but when I did the math I came up with 2/3.
edit3: Oh, I see where I was wrong. It is 1/3. There are four possibilities from two birthings with 50% likeliness to go either way, so you can have a Boy then Boy, Girl then Girl, Boy then Girl and Girl then Boy. If we know one is a boy we know it is not Girl then Girl. So, there are three remaining possibilities, and only one has two boys. 1/3.
I roll two fair 6-sided dice. I tell you one of them is a 2. What are the odds the other die shows a 2 as well?
well you would have got me, but now I get it. The unsuspecting mind wants to incorrectly change the scenario into "the first child was a boy, so what are the odds the second will be a boy?" This reformed question actually seems to be conditional, but isnt and can lead into gambler's fallacy! So as I was patting myself on the back for realizing that ...
All very interesting and I am easily duped, perhaps one day I'll get better.
Wow.Quote: DweenSimilar problem in terms of dice:
I roll two fair 6-sided dice. I tell you one of them is a 2. What are the odds the other die shows a 2 as well?
The same knee-jerk reaction that would cause an answer of 50% chance of a second son, would say a 1/6 chance of a second two.
But since there are 11 combinations with AT LEAST one die showing a two, and only one of them showing a pair of twos, then the answer is 1/11.
Using that logic, it would seem that if told that one of them is NOT a two, the odds that the other IS a two would be 10/36.
Is that really right? It seems so counter-intuitive!
If told that the oldest child was a son, and asked what the chance that the other child is also a son, then it reverts back to 50%
Similarly, if a red and green die were thrown, and you're told that the red die shows a two, then the odds that the green die is a two reverts back to 1/6.
You pick up the extra combinations when you don't know which is which.
Quote: DJTeddyBearWow.
But since there are 11 combinations with AT LEAST one die showing a two, and only one of them showing a pair of twos, then the answer is 1/11.
That is correct.
Quote: DJTeddyBearUsing that logic, it would seem that if told that one of them is NOT a two, the odds that the other IS a two would be 10/36.
Hmm... right idea, but I think it would be 10/35, or 2/7. You can eliminate the double 2's at the first step, then take the all combinations with a single two as above. I had never heard the problem turned on its head like that, and it makes for an interesting question!
Reminds me of the riddle: You have 2 normal American coins in your pocket that total 30 cents. One of them is not a nickel (5 cents). What are the two coins? Answer: A quarter (25 cents) and a nickel (5 cents). The quarter is the one that's not a nickel.
Quote: SOOPOOAssumptions- 1. boys and girls are born with equal frequency.
2. No identical twins
Question-
I have 2 children. One is a boy. What is the chance that the other one is a boy?
After most say 50% I will propose a different answer and await the analysis.
Thanks all.
50% Older sister, younger sister, older brother, or younger brother, all equally likely, correct?
For what purpose? Your post has NOTHING to do with anything in this thread, but EVERYTHING to do with why you're disliked around here.Quote: mrjjjI'm making one (copy/paste) statement so I dont have to re-do it on the other 7 boards...
What is the chance of the other one being a boy?
50/50.
Unless your in china
Stimulating riddle all the same
thanks