Poll

1 vote (1.72%)
No votes (0%)
14 votes (24.13%)
39 votes (67.24%)
No votes (0%)
1 vote (1.72%)
No votes (0%)
1 vote (1.72%)
No votes (0%)
2 votes (3.44%)

58 members have voted

BleedingChipsSlowly
BleedingChipsSlowly
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 1033
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
May 5th, 2014 at 8:05:17 PM permalink
Quote: BleedingChipsSlowly

[To Sonuvabish:] Are you in?

Well now, I'll have to wait a week for your response I see. Anyone else is welcome to sit down for the same terms.
“You don’t bring a bone saw to a negotiation.” - Robert Jordan, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia
1call2many
1call2many
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 31
Joined: Mar 7, 2014
May 6th, 2014 at 5:38:26 AM permalink
Quote: Sonuvabish

I read it, but I don't agree. If you are saying you pull both coins out and look only at one, which is always white, then randomly guess which one of three sides is white, then there is a 2/3 chance you are right. Regardless, your thinking is obviously superior to most of the forum!



You may not agree but the 100 trials I did do agree (at least with the multi trial format), I was an avid 1/2 believer until I did the trials and changed to the 2/3 camp. P.S don't take bleedingchips challenge he will bleed your chips at a rate of $6 for him to every $5 you win!
endermike
endermike
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 584
Joined: Dec 10, 2013
May 6th, 2014 at 5:59:36 AM permalink
Quote: BleedingChipsSlowly

Posters are answering two questions on this thread: the one asked and one that is pretty close but not the one asked.

I do agree that issue has caused significant disagreement. However, I take issue with your suposition that the questions asked was the one you answered in the first spoiler. I belive the question asked was the one you addressed in your second spoiler.

The post that started it all:
Quote: Wizard

This is by far the most controversial problem on my mathproblems. I don't post it here because I don't know the answer, but for the edification and education of the rest of the forum.

There are two coins in a bag. One is white on one side and black on the other. The other is white on both sides.

You randomly draw one coin, and observe one side only, which is white.

What is the probability the other side of that coin is white?

Please put solutions in

Have a nice day
.

I believe the sentence:
Quote: Wizard

You randomly draw one coin, and observe one side only, which is white.

Is best interpreted as:
"You randomly draw one coin from the bag. You observe nothing about the coin you did not draw. The coin you do draw, you pull out in a closed fist (so you can't observe anything about the coin visually). When you open your hand the only side visible is white." I believe it is meant to tell you that you only observe a side of coin and nothing more.

Understanding it this way there are a variety of explanations in this thread which show 2/3rds to be the correct answer to the question asked. My personal favorite is quoted below:

2/3. There are three coin-sides that are white, and black appears on the other side on only one of them. Therefore white appears on the other two sides.

This is equivalently demonstrated, but perhaps more intuitively, with a four-sided top (e.g. a dreidel) with three white sides and one black side. What are the chances that a spin of such a top, if it lands on a white side, has a white side face down? The same logic as above applies: there are three ways for a white side to land face-up, and in two of those, another white side will be face down.

The equivalence between the two coins and the four-sided top is as follows: label the black side of the coin 1 and the opposite white side 3. Label the white/white coin 2/4. Then label the black side of the top 1 and the other three sides 2/3/4.


Imagine we are going to pull out one coin and then the other and note the colors of their sides. When we pull out the first coin, we note the color of the side facing us (W for white and B for Black). Next, before pulling the second coin, we flip over the first and note the color of the second side (W or B). Now we pull the second coin and repeat the noting of side colors with the second coin (WB, WW, or BW).

This process gves us four possible four letter sequences: WWWB, WWBW, WBWW, and BWWW (full enumeration of the sample space). In the absence of additional information (knowledge the color of a side for any pull) those sequences clearly have equal probability, 1/4th. The probability question "What is the probability the other side of that coin is white?" Is now equivalent to what is the chance W is in the second position (WWWB, WWBW, or BWWW).

When we are given that the first side observed is "W," that eliminates the possibility of BWWW from the sample space. That then leaves the sample space as WBWW, WWBW, and WWWB. Now the answer is clearly the chance of WWWB and WWBW out of WWWB, WWBW, and WWBW, given all 3 events are equally likely. Clearly the answer in this case is 2 out of 3.
endermike
endermike
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 584
Joined: Dec 10, 2013
May 6th, 2014 at 6:07:09 AM permalink
Quote: kubikulann

To play the lawyer: it does not say how you choose the side you observe. Everybody assumed it was at random. But it could be a "Monty Hall"-like problem, where the operator deliberately chooses the white side to show to you, in the event you drew the bicolor coin.

Then the answer is not the same.

This was an interesting observation. While I think any plain text reading of the problem in the OP or the link makes it clear that the observed side should be at random, this was an interesting tangent. Thank you.
1call2many
1call2many
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 31
Joined: Mar 7, 2014
May 6th, 2014 at 7:33:24 AM permalink
.Sorry I messed up see below for correction I hope
1call2many
1call2many
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 31
Joined: Mar 7, 2014
May 6th, 2014 at 7:38:53 AM permalink
Imagine we are going to pull out one coin and then the other and note the colors of their sides. When we pull out the first coin, we note the color of the side facing us (W for white and B for Black). Next, before pulling the second coin, we flip over the first and note the color of the second side (W or B). Now we pull the second coin and repeat the noting of side colors with the second coin (WB, WW, or BW).

This process gves us four possible four letter sequences: WWWB, WWBW, WBWW, and BWWW (full enumeration of the sample space). In the absence of additional information (knowledge the color of a side for any pull) those sequences clearly have equal probability, 1/4th. The probability question "What is the probability the other side of that coin is white?" Is now equivalent to what is the chance W is in the second position (WWWB, WWBW, or BWWW).

When we are given that the first side observed is "W," that eliminates the possibility of BWWW from the sample space. That then leaves the sample space as WBWW, WWBW, and WWWB. Now the answer is clearly the chance of WWWB and WWBW out of WWWB, WWBW, and WWBW, given all 3 events are equally likely. Clearly the answer in this case is 2 out of 3.



Endermike, I thought the problem states you only draw one coin for possible letter sequences of WW WW( if coin 1) and WB BW (if coin 2) since each coin is equally likely to be drawn (1/2 chance), and white was observed, the combinations are WW if coin 1 or WB if coin 2. The options are not WW, WW (coin 1)and WB (coin 2) or else you are saying coin 1 is twice as likely to be drawn as coin 2.

Note that the four combinations you refer to come into play when you perform multiple trials because you have 3 ways to see white first with two of those ways having W on the flip side. In the OP you only have two ways to see the white first, either on coin 1 or coin 2 with equal chance. Not two ways on coin 1 and one way on coin 2.
dwheatley
dwheatley
  • Threads: 25
  • Posts: 1246
Joined: Nov 16, 2009
May 6th, 2014 at 7:38:54 AM permalink
For anyone that thinks it's 1/2, try it backwards:

You randomly draw a coin, and observe one side. It's black. What is the probability you drew the white/white coin? If you say 1/2, I will reach through the internet and slap you.
Wisdom is the quality that keeps you out of situations where you would otherwise need it
1call2many
1call2many
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 31
Joined: Mar 7, 2014
May 6th, 2014 at 7:54:52 AM permalink
Quote: dwheatley

For anyone that thinks it's 1/2, try it backwards:

You randomly draw a coin, and observe one side. It's black. What is the probability you drew the white/white coin? If you say 1/2, I will reach through the internet and slap you.



Thank you. The answer is obviously zero! Once information is gained (seeing white) the chances do change that it is a particular coin. once you see white you are twice a likely to have drawn the WW coin, even though the orinal selection was 50/50.

Please disregard my above post to endermike thinking a one trial answer was different to a multiple trial approach. Firmly back on the 2/3 bandwagon. I have flipped more times than the coins in this problem!
BleedingChipsSlowly
BleedingChipsSlowly
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 1033
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
May 6th, 2014 at 5:41:50 PM permalink
Quote: 1call2many

You may not agree but the 100 trials I did do agree (at least with the multi trial format), I was an avid 1/2 believer until I did the trials and changed to the 2/3 camp. P.S don't take bleedingchips challenge he will bleed your chips at a rate of $6 for him to every $5 you win!

Ah, you have done well grasshopper! The fact that one person has changed their thinking makes all my postings worthwhile.
“You don’t bring a bone saw to a negotiation.” - Robert Jordan, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia
BleedingChipsSlowly
BleedingChipsSlowly
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 1033
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
May 6th, 2014 at 6:08:33 PM permalink
Quote: endermike

I do agree that issue has caused significant disagreement. However, I take issue with your suposition that the questions asked was the one you answered in the first spoiler. I belive the question asked was the one you addressed in your second spoiler.

The post that started it all:

Quote: Wizard

This is by far the most controversial problem on my mathproblems. I don't post it here because I don't know the answer, but for the edification and education of the rest of the forum.

There are two coins in a bag. One is white on one side and black on the other. The other is white on both sides.

You randomly draw one coin, and observe one side only, which is white.

What is the probability the other side of that coin is white?

Please put solutions in

Have a nice day
.

I believe the sentence:
Is best interpreted as:
"You randomly draw one coin from the bag. You observe nothing about the coin you did not draw. The coin you do draw, you pull out in a closed fist (so you can't observe anything about the coin visually). When you open your hand the only side visible is white." I believe it is meant to tell you that you only observe a side of coin and nothing more.

What the bloody HELL!! "Best interpreted as?" How about sticking to what was stated. Clearly the OP logical proposition is based on a coin having already been selected. If The Wizard intended otherwise his statement of the problem is on error. I sense I sharp intake of breath among the forum readers: yes, I am calling out The Wizard. To illustrate the difference, consider my bar bet proposition modified so that the bets are placed AFTER a coin has been drawn and a white side is observed. In that case I'm still willing to go head-to-head with any takers - provided I get to wager the $5 the flip side being black against a $3 wager it is white.
“You don’t bring a bone saw to a negotiation.” - Robert Jordan, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia
FinsRule
FinsRule
  • Threads: 128
  • Posts: 3914
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
May 6th, 2014 at 6:34:12 PM permalink
This is ridiculous:

There are 4 sides on two coins:

Side 1 on Coin 1
Side 2 on Coin 1

Side 3 on Coin 2
Side 4 on Coin 2

------------------------
Side 1 is B for Black
Side 2 is W for White

Side 3 is W for White
Side 4 is W for White

--------------------------

There are 4 possibilities:

B / W
W / B
W / W
W / W

When you draw, take away the B/W possibility. That means there are 3 left, and one has the B on the other side.

2/3. Done.
BleedingChipsSlowly
BleedingChipsSlowly
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 1033
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
May 6th, 2014 at 6:37:35 PM permalink
I have no argument about the logic you posted. The argument I have is your logic doesn't address the OP question.
“You don’t bring a bone saw to a negotiation.” - Robert Jordan, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia
endermike
endermike
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 584
Joined: Dec 10, 2013
May 6th, 2014 at 7:08:03 PM permalink
Quote: BleedingChipsSlowly

I have no argument about the logic you posted. The argument I have is your logic doesn't address the OP question.

Quite simply, you are wrong. The intent of the question is as a conditional probability question.

1) A plain text reading of the OP shows that:
"You randomly draw one coin, and observe one side only, which is white." This clearly is meant to say that all sides are equally probable, but you know that the black one was not seen. If you choose to ignore the color information, the sentence construction is less logical than standard English. "You randomly draw one coin." Would be the reasonable way of writing what your interpretation requires.

2) As does the wizard's thoughts on the most common solution in this thread:
Quote: Wizard

I forgot that I posted this before. Evidently this is a bright group, as the majority are right.

3) As does his answer on the mathproblems site.

Maybe you do not agree. In that case, best of luck with your interpretation, I will agree to disagree.
kenarman
kenarman
  • Threads: 28
  • Posts: 966
Joined: Nov 22, 2009
May 6th, 2014 at 7:33:28 PM permalink
Quote: BleedingChipsSlowly

Quote: endermike

I do agree that issue has caused significant disagreement. However, I take issue with your suposition that the questions asked was the one you answered in the first spoiler. I belive the question asked was the one you addressed in your second spoiler.

The post that started it all:

Quote: Wizard

This is by far the most controversial problem on my mathproblems. I don't post it here because I don't know the answer, but for the edification and education of the rest of the forum.

There are two coins in a bag. One is white on one side and black on the other. The other is white on both sides.

You randomly draw one coin, and observe one side only, which is white.

What is the probability the other side of that coin is white?

Please put solutions in

Have a nice day
.

I believe the sentence:
Is best interpreted as:
"You randomly draw one coin from the bag. You observe nothing about the coin you did not draw. The coin you do draw, you pull out in a closed fist (so you can't observe anything about the coin visually). When you open your hand the only side visible is white." I believe it is meant to tell you that you only observe a side of coin and nothing more.

What the bloody HELL!! "Best interpreted as?" How about sticking to what was stated. Clearly the OP logical proposition is based on a coin having already been selected. If The Wizard intended otherwise his statement of the problem is on error. I sense I sharp intake of breath among the forum readers: yes, I am calling out The Wizard. To illustrate the difference, consider my bar bet proposition modified so that the bets are placed AFTER a coin has been drawn and a white side is observed. In that case I'm still willing to go head-to-head with any takers - provided I get to wager the $5 the flip side being black against a $3 wager it is white.



I am willing to take that bet for anything over 20 trials. Trials to be independently verified.
Be careful when you follow the masses, the M is sometimes silent.
BleedingChipsSlowly
BleedingChipsSlowly
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 1033
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
May 6th, 2014 at 7:53:42 PM permalink
Quote: endermike

Quite simply, you are wrong. The intent of the question is as a conditional probability question.

1) A plain text reading of the OP shows that:
"You randomly draw one coin, and observe one side only, which is white." This clearly is meant to say that all sides are equally probable, but you know that the black one was not seen. If you choose to ignore the color information, the sentence construction is less logical than standard English. "You randomly draw one coin." Would be the reasonable way of writing what your interpretation requires.

2) As does the wizard's thoughts on the most common solution in this thread:
3) As does his answer on the mathproblems site.

Maybe you do not agree. In that case, best of luck with your interpretation, I will agree to disagree.

We agree: The intention is clear but the problem statement is flawed. Perhaps this problem would not have been so controversial if stated properly. This is The Wizard's world so I can understand why you would pitch your tent in his camp. I have no compunction stating "The Wizard has no clothes" for this one.
“You don’t bring a bone saw to a negotiation.” - Robert Jordan, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia
MathExtremist
MathExtremist
  • Threads: 88
  • Posts: 6526
Joined: Aug 31, 2010
May 6th, 2014 at 8:22:51 PM permalink
Quote: BleedingChipsSlowly

Posters are answering two questions on this thread: the one asked and one that is pretty close but not the one asked.


The question asked:

You randomly draw one coin and observe one side only which is white. What is the probabilty that the other side of that coin is white? [My emphasis.]

The question many posters thnk was asked but was not:

If you randomly draw a coin and observe one side only as white, what is the probability the other side will be white?


I'm not following. What do you think is the substantive difference in information between these two questions, such that the answer would be different? What's the difference between "one coin" and "a coin"?
"In my own case, when it seemed to me after a long illness that death was close at hand, I found no little solace in playing constantly at dice." -- Girolamo Cardano, 1563
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1491
  • Posts: 26433
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
May 6th, 2014 at 8:34:17 PM permalink
Quote: BleedingChipsSlowly

To illustrate the difference, consider my bar bet proposition modified so that the bets are placed AFTER a coin has been drawn and a white side is observed. In that case I'm still willing to go head-to-head with any takers - provided I get to wager the $5 the flip side being black against a $3 wager it is white.



I'll take that bet.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
sodawater
sodawater
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 3321
Joined: May 14, 2012
May 6th, 2014 at 8:36:32 PM permalink
I haven't read this thread at all, but are there really seven pages of debate over the most well known conditional probability problem of all time?
BleedingChipsSlowly
BleedingChipsSlowly
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 1033
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
May 6th, 2014 at 8:52:29 PM permalink
Quote: Wizard

Quote: BleedingChipsSlowly

To illustrate the difference, consider my bar bet proposition modified so that the bets are placed AFTER a coin has been drawn and a white side is observed. In that case I'm still willing to go head-to-head with any takers - provided I get to wager the $5 the flip side being black against a $3 wager it is white.



I'll take that bet.

And you would win, oh Great and Mighty Wizard! We are not worthy! Mea culpa, I love the taste of crow. There is a 1/2 chance that the flip side of a coin will be black, but the double-white coin is in play twice as often.
“You don’t bring a bone saw to a negotiation.” - Robert Jordan, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia
mustangsally
mustangsally
  • Threads: 25
  • Posts: 2463
Joined: Mar 29, 2011
May 6th, 2014 at 8:55:18 PM permalink
Quote: sodawater

I haven't read this thread at all, but are there really seven pages of debate over the most well known conditional probability problem of all time?

maybe
seems like the basic problem for many is defining the sample space

I see to start
3 sides = white
1 side = black

the condition is
now I see 1 white side

that leaves 2 white sides I have not yet seen
and
1 black side I have not yet seen
this = 3 total sides not seen

1 side = black
so the probability of the other side being black = PB =
1 side / 3 total sides not seen

probability of the other side being white = 1 - PB

Sally
I Heart Vi Hart
pmpk
pmpk
  • Threads: 0
  • Posts: 2
Joined: May 6, 2014
May 6th, 2014 at 11:20:11 PM permalink

It has to be 1/2. There are two coins. The color configurations are just the identifying information for each coin, and the question is asking for the probability that you chose one coin over the other.

It might as well be two otherwise identical coins of two different years (year A and year B for example). If you select one at random and happen to see its tails side first, there's still a 50% chance that the heads side will show that the coin is year A.
sodawater
sodawater
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 3321
Joined: May 14, 2012
May 6th, 2014 at 11:33:26 PM permalink
Quote: pmpk


It has to be 1/2. There are two coins. The color configurations are just the identifying information for each coin, and the question is asking for the probability that you chose one coin over the other.

It might as well be two otherwise identical coins of two different years (year A and year B for example). If you select one at random and happen to see its tails side first, there's still a 50% chance that the heads side will show that the coin is year A.



Sorry, this is totally wrong. Looking at one of the coins provides information you can't ignore. The answer is 2/3.

Here's how. There are 4 ways you could pull a coin out and look at one side.

1. Observe top is white, bottom is white
2. Observe top is white, bottom is white
3. Observe top is white, bottom is black.
4. Observe top is black, bottom is white.

You pull out a coin and look at the top and see it is white. This leaves 3 options:

1. Observe top is white, bottom is white
2. Observe top is white, bottom is white
3. Observe top is white, bottom is black.


Two of these three are the all-white coin.

The answer is 2/3


Think of it this way. If you reach in and pull out a coin without looking at it, it's 1/2. But now that you look at it and see that the top is not black, that hurts the chances you have the black and white coin. Sometimes when you have the black and white coin, the top will be black. Since it is not, you have eliminated those times.

If you're still not getting it, think of this:

Say it's the same set up, but you pull out one coin and the top is black. Now the chances of picking the all-white coin have dropped from 50 percent (unseen) all the way down to 0 percent (seen.) Seeing extra information changes probability
.

One final example. You buy a Mega Millions ticket and wait till the drawing to look at your ticket. Before you look at your ticket, the chance you have hit the jackpot is 1 in 259 million. Now you pick up the ticket with your thumb covering the Mega ball and you see with excitement that you've matched the first 5 numbers. With your thumb over the Mega Ball, your probability has increased from 1 in 259 million to 1 in 15 for the jackpot. Note that you have either won the jackpot or you haven't, but it's not 50-50.
pmpk
pmpk
  • Threads: 0
  • Posts: 2
Joined: May 6, 2014
May 6th, 2014 at 11:49:17 PM permalink
Quote: sodawater

Quote: pmpk


It has to be 1/2. There are two coins. The color configurations are just the identifying information for each coin, and the question is asking for the probability that you chose one coin over the other.

It might as well be two otherwise identical coins of two different years (year A and year B for example). If you select one at random and happen to see its tails side first, there's still a 50% chance that the heads side will show that the coin is year A.



Sorry, this is totally wrong. Looking at one of the coins provides information you can't ignore. The answer is 2/3.



Thanks for the detailed explanation! I stand corrected.
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
May 7th, 2014 at 1:33:31 AM permalink
Quote: sodawater

I haven't read this thread at all, but are there really seven pages of debate over the most well known conditional probability problem of all time?



Yes
RS
RS
  • Threads: 62
  • Posts: 8626
Joined: Feb 11, 2014
May 7th, 2014 at 1:51:21 AM permalink
Looks like part of it has to do with interpretation. I didn't think that "observing black" was even an option, as nothing about observing black was in the OP, as if when the black/white coin was chosen, the white side had to be the observed side.
BleedingChipsSlowly
BleedingChipsSlowly
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 1033
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
May 7th, 2014 at 4:11:11 AM permalink
I think the crux of the incorrect thinking (mine included) is that if you are looking at the white side of one particular coin, of which there are only two, there is a 1/2 chance the other side will be white. However, when you consider multiple samples you will be working with the white/white coin twice as often because the question is predicated on observing a white side first. That is, the possibility of selecting the white/black coin and observing the black side first, a very real possibility, is not included in the sample population. As I said in an earlier post, it took me a while to see that 2/3 was the correct probability and even longer to realize that holds true both before and after a particular coin is drawn.
“You don’t bring a bone saw to a negotiation.” - Robert Jordan, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia
JoePloppy
JoePloppy
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 82
Joined: May 2, 2014
May 7th, 2014 at 8:04:31 AM permalink
Quote: BleedingChipsSlowly

... In that case I'm still willing to go head-to-head with any takers - provided I get to wager the $5 the flip side being black against a $3 wager it is white.



Hence your name?

Edit : What about $4000 winner on black , $3000 winner on white (me)? 100 random draws?
2/3
BleedingChipsSlowly
BleedingChipsSlowly
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 1033
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
May 7th, 2014 at 4:20:13 PM permalink
Did you note the "Slowly" part of my handle? Your proposed bet would be a few notches past slowly, at least for my bankroll.
“You don’t bring a bone saw to a negotiation.” - Robert Jordan, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia
Sonuvabish
Sonuvabish
  • Threads: 29
  • Posts: 1342
Joined: Feb 5, 2014
May 12th, 2014 at 11:48:43 AM permalink
Quote: sodawater

Quote: pmpk


It has to be 1/2. There are two coins. The color configurations are just the identifying information for each coin, and the question is asking for the probability that you chose one coin over the other.

It might as well be two otherwise identical coins of two different years (year A and year B for example). If you select one at random and happen to see its tails side first, there's still a 50% chance that the heads side will show that the coin is year A.



Sorry, this is totally wrong. Looking at one of the coins provides information you can't ignore. The answer is 2/3.

Here's how. There are 4 ways you could pull a coin out and look at one side.

1. Observe top is white, bottom is white
2. Observe top is white, bottom is white
3. Observe top is white, bottom is black.
4. Observe top is black, bottom is white.

You pull out a coin and look at the top and see it is white. This leaves 3 options:

1. Observe top is white, bottom is white
2. Observe top is white, bottom is white
3. Observe top is white, bottom is black.


Two of these three are the all-white coin.

The answer is 2/3


Think of it this way. If you reach in and pull out a coin without looking at it, it's 1/2. But now that you look at it and see that the top is not black, that hurts the chances you have the black and white coin. Sometimes when you have the black and white coin, the top will be black. Since it is not, you have eliminated those times.

If you're still not getting it, think of this:

Say it's the same set up, but you pull out one coin and the top is black. Now the chances of picking the all-white coin have dropped from 50 percent (unseen) all the way down to 0 percent (seen.) Seeing extra information changes probability
.

One final example. You buy a Mega Millions ticket and wait till the drawing to look at your ticket. Before you look at your ticket, the chance you have hit the jackpot is 1 in 259 million. Now you pick up the ticket with your thumb covering the Mega ball and you see with excitement that you've matched the first 5 numbers. With your thumb over the Mega Ball, your probability has increased from 1 in 259 million to 1 in 15 for the jackpot. Note that you have either won the jackpot or you haven't, but it's not 50-50.




The coin is always white when you pull it out, 100% of the time. It is immaterial which white side comes out on the all-white coin because you are not observing 2 coins. That means there is a 50% the other side is white. Re-read the question. 2/3 is the probability that one of the remaining 3 faces is white; you either have the all-white coin, or you don't.

2/3 is simply the ratio of white faces to total unseen faces. This is the initial thought that everyone should have; everyone knows the chance of randomly selecting a white face, excluding the given, is 2/3--that was learned in elementary. If this is actually the correct answer, it is a trick question with poor wording. I would not call that controversial.
JoePloppy
JoePloppy
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 82
Joined: May 2, 2014
May 15th, 2014 at 8:01:29 AM permalink
Quote: Sonuvabish

The coin is always white when you pull it out, 100% of the time. It is immaterial which white side comes out on the all-white coin because you are not observing 2 coins. That means there is a 50% the other side is white. Re-read the question. 2/3 is the probability that one of the remaining 3 faces is white; you either have the all-white coin, or you don't.

2/3 is simply the ratio of white faces to total unseen faces. This is the initial thought that everyone should have; everyone knows the chance of randomly selecting a white face, excluding the given, is 2/3--that was learned in elementary. If this is actually the correct answer, it is a trick question with poor wording. I would not call that controversial.



False. Don't blame the question.

Quote: Wizard

You randomly draw one coin, and observe one side only, which is white.
What is the probability the other side of that coin is white?



2/3

I was trying out some of the math questions and found this today. The 2 coin problem and solution on the Wizards Math Problem Site. http://mathproblems.info/?page_id=188#s16
2/3
JoePloppy
JoePloppy
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 82
Joined: May 2, 2014
May 15th, 2014 at 8:07:43 AM permalink
This thread was an eye opener for me. This question is a perfect example of how something counter intuitive is true explained by math. It was like those old 3D puzzles you stare at, then a crazy 3D pirate ship appears.
I just couldn't let the last word be incorrect.
2/3
RS
RS
  • Threads: 62
  • Posts: 8626
Joined: Feb 11, 2014
May 15th, 2014 at 8:15:21 AM permalink
The question is worded poorly. I understand why one would say 2/3, but the question suggests the white side must be observed (and the black side cannot be observed).

If black side can be observed, then it's 2/3.
If only white side can be observed, then it's 1/2.
arcticfun
arcticfun
  • Threads: 42
  • Posts: 175
Joined: Oct 2, 2013
May 15th, 2014 at 8:16:18 AM permalink
Quote: sonuvabish


The coin is always white when you pull it out, 100% of the time. It is immaterial which white side comes out on the all-white coin because you are not observing 2 coins. That means there is a 50% the other side is white. Re-read the question. 2/3 is the probability that one of the remaining 3 faces is white; you either have the all-white coin, or you don't.

2/3 is simply the ratio of white faces to total unseen faces. This is the initial thought that everyone should have; everyone knows the chance of randomly selecting a white face, excluding the given, is 2/3--that was learned in elementary. If this is actually the correct answer, it is a trick question with poor wording. I would not call that controversial.



False. This is very similar to the Monty Hall problem (check wikipedia). Three closed doors - one has a car, the other two have nothing behind them. You point at one of the three doors. The host walks to the doors and opens one of the other two doors, and reveals that the car isn't behind that one. You can now choose to either keep your door or switch doors. What do you do? Open your door or open the other one? Straight from the movie 21! You can't ignore the information you're given.
JoePloppy
JoePloppy
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 82
Joined: May 2, 2014
May 15th, 2014 at 8:22:41 AM permalink
Quote: RS

The question is worded poorly. I understand why one would say 2/3, but the question suggests the white side must be observed (and the black side cannot be observed).



Hahaha, what question are you reading?

Quote: Wizard



There are two coins in a bag. One is white on one side and black on the other. The other is white on both sides.

You randomly draw one coin, and observe one side only, which is white.

What is the probability the other side of that coin is white?



That sounds like you randomly draw one coin, and observe one side only, which happens to be white.

2/3
2/3
  • Jump to: