I understand how the RNG operates and how the function of it is likely written and used by the slot machine games at some level. The part where I am slightly unclear but think I get it is this - the RNG spits out a number, that number is used to populate a reel position, and depending on the number of reels, that's how many times the RNG gets asked to produce a number. Where I am less clear is how that leads to a display of reels on the screen. To use a specific example: if I play Phoenix 2x/3x free games which has three physical reels but many paylines, does the RNG determine the center reel (or top or bottom, I guess it is irrelevant) position and then if you win in a diagonal line, it's more or less a lucky accident?
Alternately, with a video slot, are the reels consistent during standard play (not during a bonus) when betting the same amount at the same denomination? I assume this is the case based on things I've read about how some of the calculations were done for games like Buffalo Link/Ascension that seems to suggest using analysis of slowed reel footage spliced together to determine what full reels resembled and thus how many potential winning combinations existed. If there are 20 reel positions in a 5x4 video slot and each of them was RNG determined independently, I can't imagine it would be easily possible to do the math on when that might go positive since I don't know how you'd know how many reel positions the RNG was working off of and how many were in a win condition.
Sorry if this seems exceptionally repetitive for questions here but I'm just trying to figure out things about how machines work before I invest time in thinking about how to calculate probabilities.
Quote: RobertMuirI wrote an introductory pdf/book on on how to calculate slot maths. I can't link to it but its a pdf called "Elements of Slot Design" on the site for the tool Slot Designer. Its very basic, but will give you the idea of the basic principles and some industry terminology. Note that modern games are far more complex than what I described and you'd not be able to reverse engineer many of them if that's what you're planning on doing.
link to original post
Thanks - this is indeed very helpful as it describes persistent state features, progressives, et al. I work in academia and have some experience with R (I've worked on large data sets as part of published research previously) and was thinking of, yes, basically reverse engineering games and trying to figure out if I could create a consistent model which could be adapted across persistent state games as rolled out assuming I had a good reference on the makeup of the virtual reels.
Correct me if I am wrong here, but with regards the referenced patent US4448419A, does this also mean that video slot reels are often subject to position being determined by virtual reel? Obviously without knowing then how many positions the virtual reel has, there wouldn't be any way of being able to compute the RTP regardless of whether or not I knew the full video slot reel strip(s) and those reels were nonrandomized from game-to-game/within bet amount/within denom.
edit: Also, while I've done some light lit searches to this topic previously, is there much in the world of academic publishing that is relevant to a nascent advantage player?
Virtual reels is mainly used on stepper games, though some game designers use them for video also.
I believe I've published the most advanced material on slot maths, and its very very simple. There's a few papers, but nothing obviously useful in academic publishing last time I looked.
Slot Games are probably a lot more complex than you're thinking.
Quote: RobertMuir
Virtual reels is mainly used on stepper games, though some game designers use them for video also.
I can't imagine any reason someone would want to use virtual reels on a video slot. The whole idea of virtual is to map a large set to a small set, on videos there is no reason to have a small set.
Quote: RobertMuirThere's no consistent model used when designing games in the first place, so there's not much hope of deriving one afterwards. Having said that, for advantage play perhaps you only need a very simplified model of the game. I can't say I know too much about this as its not something I'm interested in.
Virtual reels is mainly used on stepper games, though some game designers use them for video also.
I believe I've published the most advanced material on slot maths, and its very very simple. There's a few papers, but nothing obviously useful in academic publishing last time I looked.
Slot Games are probably a lot more complex than you're thinking.
link to original post
I don't want you to get the sense that I think they're not insanely complex. I'll happily admit what I'm looking to do is aspirational but I mean, shoot high, right? I'm waaaaay far off from that if I'm asking questions like this. I'm the sort of person who wants to know everything about the stuff I've enjoyed previously and gaming has replaced some other hobbies because I've aged out of them and have sufficient income to actually really enjoy this now.
Yes, that's exactly it. When I code a slot, my RNG picks the center stop for each reel. When I do the code to figure the RTP, I just use that one center payline, because the RTP is the same no matter how many paylines you have, and it's faster to test 33M combos rather than 33M combos x 30 paylines, taking a lot more time just to get the exact same result. In actual gameplay, the code again just picks for what symbol to position on the center payline, then tallies up the wins on all the paylines.Quote: VirtualBalboaThe part where I am slightly unclear but think I get it is this - the RNG spits out a number, that number is used to populate a reel position, and depending on the number of reels, that's how many times the RNG gets asked to produce a number. Where I am less clear is how that leads to a display of reels on the screen. To use a specific example: if I play Phoenix 2x/3x free games which has three physical reels but many paylines, does the RNG determine the center reel (or top or bottom, I guess it is irrelevant) position and then if you win in a diagonal line, it's more or less a lucky accident? link to original post
Sorry, I didn't really follow. What I can tell you is that the reels for video slots show every single stop as they spin (unlike physical electromechanical reels, which use a physical reel of 22 stops married to a virtual wheel of like 128 stops). And 20 stops seems like for a video machine, I'd expect at least 32. I use 32 when I code slots for clients. That's 32^5 = 33,554,432 combinations. And yeah, without access to the slot's PAR sheet, figuring when a jackpot goes high enough to make a machine positive is tough to impossible.Quote: VirtualBalboaAlternately, with a video slot, are the reels consistent during standard play (not during a bonus) when betting the same amount at the same denomination?...
And to be clear, the RNG doesn't determine the game's RTP. The RNG just picks the numbers. What determines the RTP is the # of each symbol on each reel, married to the paytable. Some of my articles might be of use to you:
• All about PAR sheets
• How slot machines work
• How to program a slot machine
• Slot machine advantage play
Quote: MichaelBluejayWhen I code a slot, my RNG picks the center stop for each reel.
What would you do when there's 4 symbols visible on the reel rather than 3? I use the top position.
Quote: MichaelBluejayWhen I do the code to figure the RTP, I just use that one center payline, because the RTP is the same no matter how many paylines you have, and it's faster to test 33M combos rather than 33M combos x 30 paylines, taking a lot more time just to get the exact same result.
This is the common case, but its not correct for all games.
I've never coded a four-row game, just three-row games, but if I did, I suppose I'd use the top row.Quote: RobertMuirQuote: MichaelBluejayWhen I code a slot, my RNG picks the center stop for each reel.
What would you do when there's 4 symbols visible on the reel rather than 3? I use the top position
Would love to hear of an example where that's not the case. I believe you, I just haven't done any games like that.Quote: RobertMuirQuote: MichaelBluejayWhen I do the code to figure the RTP, I just use that one center payline, because the RTP is the same no matter how many paylines you have, and it's faster to test 33M combos rather than 33M combos x 30 paylines, taking a lot more time just to get the exact same result.
This is the common case, but its not correct for all games. link to original post
Quote: MichaelBluejaySorry, I didn't really follow. What I can tell you is that the reels for video slots show every single stop as they spin (unlike physical electromechanical reels, which use a physical reel of 22 stops married to a virtual wheel of like 128 stops). And 20 stops seems like for a video machine, I'd expect at least 32. I use 32 when I code slots for clients. That's 32^5 = 33,554,432 combinations. And yeah, without access to the slot's PAR sheet, figuring when a jackpot goes high enough to make a machine positive is tough to impossible.
And to be clear, the RNG doesn't determine the game's RTP. The RNG just picks the numbers. What determines the RTP is the # of each symbol on each reel, married to the paytable. Some of my articles might be of use to you:
• All about PAR sheets
• How slot machines work
• How to program a slot machine
• Slot machine advantage play
link to original post
This along with prior posts actually answers my question; I was wondering whether or not the virtual reels were, for lack of a better word that I can think of, "real". What I mean by "real" that is that is I assume that when a specific RTP for the machine is selected by the gaming company, the reels of a video slot machine for that RTP are the same on spin 1 as spin 10,000 with the same symbols correlating to the same numbers in the RNG in the same proportions in the same location.
Pure example, not actually saying this is how it is programmed: If I sit down and play Buffalo, for the number 222 on Reel 1 the space on the virtual reel for a 100 credit bet at penny denomination is always going to be a Buffalo if it is a Buffalo the first time I play it in base game. Similarly, if I play an otherwise identical Buffalo machine that has been set at an identical RTP, Reel 1's position for number 222 on 100 credit/1c is always going to be a Buffalo. Or perhaps to more succinctly put it - the game doesn't RNG both the reel positions and what is on the reels to provide a completely random experience every single time, but adjustments in the RTP lead to changes in the number of reel positions, what is on the reel positions, et al. with the reels themselves staying constant in base game (or constant within bonus games).
You've got it right: video slot reels are indeed fixed. They don't change, except that the base game reels and the bonus game reels can be different (and if so, it says so in the game rules). And two games with the same titles but different RTPs will have different reels from each other. But yes, when you sit down and start playing the game, the reel stops are not gonna jump all over the place.Quote: VirtualBalboaI was wondering whether or not the virtual reels were, for lack of a better word that I can think of, "real".... link to original post
Quote: MichaelBluejayYou've got it right: video slot reels are indeed fixed. They don't change, except that the base game reels and the bonus game reels can be different (and if so, it says so in the game rules). And two games with the same titles but different RTPs will have different reels from each other. But yes, when you sit down and start playing the game, the reel stops are not gonna jump all over the place.Quote: VirtualBalboaI was wondering whether or not the virtual reels were, for lack of a better word that I can think of, "real".... link to original post
link to original post
OK, I've got a question. Sorry if it sounds like a dumb question, or if it's already been asked and answered because I can't see where it has precisely been asked and answered.
Is the result of each reel fair? By fair, I mean if a reel has 22 stops, are the chances of any particular stop being the result 1/22?
If so, it seems like solving the machine should be easy once you characterize all the stops on each reel. If not... I'm stumped.
Quote: AutomaticMonkeyQuote: MichaelBluejayYou've got it right: video slot reels are indeed fixed. They don't change, except that the base game reels and the bonus game reels can be different (and if so, it says so in the game rules). And two games with the same titles but different RTPs will have different reels from each other. But yes, when you sit down and start playing the game, the reel stops are not gonna jump all over the place.Quote: VirtualBalboaI was wondering whether or not the virtual reels were, for lack of a better word that I can think of, "real".... link to original post
link to original post
OK, I've got a question. Sorry if it sounds like a dumb question, or if it's already been asked and answered because I can't see where it has precisely been asked and answered.
Is the result of each reel fair? By fair, I mean if a reel has 22 stops, are the chances of any particular stop being the result 1/22?
If so, it seems like solving the machine should be easy once you characterize all the stops on each reel. If not... I'm stumped.
link to original post
The answer is yes assuming they do not have a virtual reel mapping. In the old days the answer was always yes, but since the Telnaes patent virtual reels were introduced and most mechanical reels today use virtual reels. On a mechanical reel game with physical reels they generally have 22 reel stops. If it has three reels the largest odds would be (22*22*22) to 1 which is 10,648. If a game has a payout larger than 10,648 to 1 on the paytable you can assume it has virtual reels.
Quote: DRichQuote: AutomaticMonkeyQuote: MichaelBluejayYou've got it right: video slot reels are indeed fixed. They don't change, except that the base game reels and the bonus game reels can be different (and if so, it says so in the game rules). And two games with the same titles but different RTPs will have different reels from each other. But yes, when you sit down and start playing the game, the reel stops are not gonna jump all over the place.Quote: VirtualBalboaI was wondering whether or not the virtual reels were, for lack of a better word that I can think of, "real".... link to original post
link to original post
OK, I've got a question. Sorry if it sounds like a dumb question, or if it's already been asked and answered because I can't see where it has precisely been asked and answered.
Is the result of each reel fair? By fair, I mean if a reel has 22 stops, are the chances of any particular stop being the result 1/22?
If so, it seems like solving the machine should be easy once you characterize all the stops on each reel. If not... I'm stumped.
link to original post
The answer is yes assuming they do not have a virtual reel mapping. In the old days the answer was always yes, but since the Telnaes patent virtual reels were introduced and most mechanical reels today use virtual reels. On a mechanical reel game with physical reels they generally have 22 reel stops. If it has three reels the largest odds would be (22*22*22) to 1 which is 10,648. If a game has a payout larger than 10,648 to 1 on the paytable you can assume it has virtual reels.
link to original post
These threads are my favorite… drich define fair
Quote: AutomaticMonkeyQuote: MichaelBluejayYou've got it right: video slot reels are indeed fixed. They don't change, except that the base game reels and the bonus game reels can be different (and if so, it says so in the game rules). And two games with the same titles but different RTPs will have different reels from each other. But yes, when you sit down and start playing the game, the reel stops are not gonna jump all over the place.Quote: VirtualBalboaI was wondering whether or not the virtual reels were, for lack of a better word that I can think of, "real".... link to original post
link to original post
OK, I've got a question. Sorry if it sounds like a dumb question, or if it's already been asked and answered because I can't see where it has precisely been asked and answered.
Is the result of each reel fair? By fair, I mean if a reel has 22 stops, are the chances of any particular stop being the result 1/22?
If so, it seems like solving the machine should be easy once you characterize all the stops on each reel. If not... I'm stumped.
link to original post
Reels are weighted. As for "fair", the games have a house edge.
Here is a reverse engineered Sizzling 7s from IGT for the S+ chassis (not guaranteed to be correct, but it does match the "bible")
here are sizzling 7s reel strips that could work. do not know what the actual game uses as I don't have the part number.
is it fair? Kinda. The representation on a game like this sort of matches the reelstrips. The strips on a more complex game would look nothing like actual weights because they have way more virtual stops, but are still mapping them to 22 reel stops.
Quote: itsmejeffQuote: AutomaticMonkeyQuote: MichaelBluejayYou've got it right: video slot reels are indeed fixed. They don't change, except that the base game reels and the bonus game reels can be different (and if so, it says so in the game rules). And two games with the same titles but different RTPs will have different reels from each other. But yes, when you sit down and start playing the game, the reel stops are not gonna jump all over the place.Quote: VirtualBalboaI was wondering whether or not the virtual reels were, for lack of a better word that I can think of, "real".... link to original post
link to original post
OK, I've got a question. Sorry if it sounds like a dumb question, or if it's already been asked and answered because I can't see where it has precisely been asked and answered.
Is the result of each reel fair? By fair, I mean if a reel has 22 stops, are the chances of any particular stop being the result 1/22?
If so, it seems like solving the machine should be easy once you characterize all the stops on each reel. If not... I'm stumped.
link to original post
Reels are weighted. As for "fair", the games have a house edge.
Here is a reverse engineered Sizzling 7s from IGT for the S+ chassis (not guaranteed to be correct, but it does match the "bible")
here are sizzling 7s reel strips that could work. do not know what the actual game uses as I don't have the part number.
is it fair? Kinda. The representation on a game like this sort of matches the reelstrips. The strips on a more complex game would look nothing like actual weights because they have way more virtual stops, but are still mapping them to 22 reel stops.
link to original post
It would be very unusual for a game to have the same strip on all three reels.
Quote: heatmapQuote: DRichQuote: AutomaticMonkeyQuote: MichaelBluejayYou've got it right: video slot reels are indeed fixed. They don't change, except that the base game reels and the bonus game reels can be different (and if so, it says so in the game rules). And two games with the same titles but different RTPs will have different reels from each other. But yes, when you sit down and start playing the game, the reel stops are not gonna jump all over the place.Quote: VirtualBalboaI was wondering whether or not the virtual reels were, for lack of a better word that I can think of, "real".... link to original post
link to original post
OK, I've got a question. Sorry if it sounds like a dumb question, or if it's already been asked and answered because I can't see where it has precisely been asked and answered.
Is the result of each reel fair? By fair, I mean if a reel has 22 stops, are the chances of any particular stop being the result 1/22?
If so, it seems like solving the machine should be easy once you characterize all the stops on each reel. If not... I'm stumped.
link to original post
The answer is yes assuming they do not have a virtual reel mapping. In the old days the answer was always yes, but since the Telnaes patent virtual reels were introduced and most mechanical reels today use virtual reels. On a mechanical reel game with physical reels they generally have 22 reel stops. If it has three reels the largest odds would be (22*22*22) to 1 which is 10,648. If a game has a payout larger than 10,648 to 1 on the paytable you can assume it has virtual reels.
link to original post
These threads are my favorite… drich define fair
link to original post
I would consider a game fair if it adheres to all applicable rules.
Although this question wasn't directed at me, I'd like to address it. Is gambling math, "fair" simply means a game in which the payout matches the odds, so there's no house edge. In this case "fair" isn't an ethical/unethical position, it's an objective description of whether the game has a built-in profit for the casino. All casino games are "not fair" in the sense that there's a house edge, but that doesn't mean they're "unfair" in the sense that there's deception or cheating, because there's not, the games are just structured so that the player will lose a small portion of their bets in the long term.Quote: heatmapdrich define fair link to original post
Quote: MichaelBluejayAlthough this question wasn't directed at me, I'd like to address it. Is gambling math, "fair" simply means a game in which the payout matches the odds, so there's no house edge. In this case "fair" isn't an ethical/unethical position, it's an objective description of whether the game has a built-in profit for the casino. All casino games are "not fair" in the sense that there's a house edge, but that doesn't mean they're "unfair" in the sense that there's deception or cheating, because there's not, the games are just structured so that the player will lose a small portion of their bets in the long term.Quote: heatmapdrich define fair link to original post
link to original post
OK I was using the term slightly differently, in that a gaming element (itself) is fair when it matches the outputs one would statistically expect upon normal inspection. So if you have a standard deck of 52 cards one card of each of 4 suits and 13 ranks is present, that is a fair deck. If you have a standard casino die that is not loaded, the faces are flush, and all the numbers are where they belong, that is a fair die. That casino craps has a house edge is caused by the rules of casino craps, not the dice. If you sneak loaded dice into a craps game everything is now different.
So my original question could be reduced to, if you had three 22-sided dice, regular polygons, uniform density and surface quality (i.e., "fair" 22 sided dice) would that simulate a slot machine with three 22-stop reels? Looks like the answer was "Might have been back in the day, but with a modern slot machine, probably not." Good enough for me. That would make them more like a bonus wheel on a table game than a Big 6 wheel.
This is independent of the amount of symbols on each reel. The amount of symbols on each reel is also a probability.
Just because you have an equal chance of each position being picked, does not imply that you have a fair chance of getting each symbol picked on each reel. Each reel can contain different amounts of each symbol, and therefore an unfair chance (according to your definition) of picking specific combinations overall.
That's pretty much it. The Telnaes patent which pioneered virtual reels was granted in 1984. The electromechanical slots I'm familiar with since I first played them in 1998 have 22 physical stops, with virtual reels of many more. I don't know how many slots that non-virtual reel machines had prior to the virtualization of reels. And for video slots, I can't imagine a slot would have as few as 22 stops.Quote: AutomaticMonkeySo my original question could be reduced to, if you had three 22-sided dice, regular polygons, uniform density and surface quality (i.e., "fair" 22 sided dice) would that simulate a slot machine with three 22-stop reels? Looks like the answer was "Might have been back in the day, but with a modern slot machine, probably not." Good enough for me. That would make them more like a bonus wheel on a table game than a Big 6 wheel. link to original post
Your question is at the heart of the recent lawsuit against IGT, which makes the Wheel of Fortune slots. One some flavors of Wheel of Fortune, the progressive jackpot is won by hitting the Jackpot slice on the bonus wheel, and on other flavors you get the progressive jackpot by lining up the Wheel of Fortune symbols in the main game. On the former flavor, the bonus wheel is certainly virtualized, so even though there are 22 slices (stops), the chances of hitting the jackpot slot aren't 1 in 22, it's 1 in A Lot. Nevada law says that machine representations of real-world objects must have the some odds to not be misleading. So, for example, video poker has to use a standard 52-card deck, games that use dice have to have a 1 in 6 chance of landing on any number, etc. The virtual reels on slot machines have gotten a pass because there's not really a real-world equivalent of a slot machine reel. But the bonus wheel on Wheel of Fortune looks a lot like a roulette wheel and a Big Six wheel, doesn't it? Can we really expect players to automatically understand that it's not a fair wheel? I recently heard someone tell his phone, "Siri, what's five times eight?"
So, I side with the plaintiff on this one, if for no other reason that I think it's a travesty that slot makers and casinos keep the jackpot odds and RTP a secret. I think there ought to be transparency (jackpot odds and RTP stated directly on the machine), it's only fair. And since they don't want to be voluntarily transparent absent regulation, then fine, they get sued.
Quote: MichaelBluejay
So, I side with the plaintiff on this one, if for no other reason that I think it's a travesty that slot makers and casinos keep the jackpot odds and RTP a secret. I think there ought to be transparency (jackpot odds and RTP stated directly on the machine), it's only fair. And since they don't want to be voluntarily transparent absent regulation, then fine, they get sued.
link to original post
Can a slot machine be certified if the RTP is not specified?! Before receiving a game certificate, it is checked by special laboratories
(groan) The jackpot odds and RTP are kept secret FROM THE PLAYER.Quote: DobrijQuote: MichaelBluejay
So, I side with the plaintiff on this one, if for no other reason that I think it's a travesty that slot makers and casinos keep the jackpot odds and RTP a secret. I think there ought to be transparency (jackpot odds and RTP stated directly on the machine), it's only fair. And since they don't want to be voluntarily transparent absent regulation, then fine, they get sued.
link to original post
Can a slot machine be certified if the RTP is not specified?!
link to original post
Quote: MichaelBluejayThe jackpot odds and RTP are kept secret FROM THE PLAYER.
link to original post
What kind of jackpot are you talking about?
1. Internal slot machine?
2. Jackpot of a connected group of slot machines?
3. Or local jackpot of the establishment where all the casino machines are connected?
These settings depend on the casino manager, I don't think it's a secret
Of course it's a secret! No manufacturer or casino manager publicly discloses the jackpot odds on ANY slot machine, anywhere, to the player, so far as I know. If you know of actual examples to the contrary, then by all means share your evidence.Quote: DobrijQuote: MichaelBluejayThe jackpot odds and RTP are kept secret FROM THE PLAYER.
link to original post
What kind of jackpot are you talking about?
1. Internal slot machine?
2. Jackpot of a connected group of slot machines?
3. Or local jackpot of the establishment where all the casino machines are connected?
These settings depend on the casino manager, I don't think it's a secret
link to original post
Quote: MichaelBluejay
Of course it's a secret! No manufacturer or casino manager publicly discloses the jackpot odds on ANY slot machine, anywhere, to the player, so far as I know. If you know of actual examples to the contrary, then by all means share your evidence.
link to original post
You didn't answer my question. What kind of jackpot were you talking about?
And it's not a secret. It seems you're a fan of conspiracy theories.
Quote: NutmegPokerI'm fairly certain most slots in a US casino, but Native American (Soverign Territory) might manipulate the RNG after generated (a.k.a. secondary programming). Check Tribal Rules/Law if possible. For example, in the early days of Foxwoods at least two Impressment employees told me the machines drop 1 bet every 50 spins. Thats an automatic 2%, plus the RNG payout House Edge (usually 8-12% back then).
link to original post
Assuming and having evidence are two different things. And you don't have evidence. All players look for someone to blame for their failures, but in 99.9% of cases no one cheated them.
For some types of machines, it is indeed possible to use "greedy selectors", but this is already a technical intervention. And not all gaming platforms allow this technically due to the properties of their RNGs.
Quote: Dobrij
For some types of machines, it is indeed possible to use "greedy selectors", but this is already a technical intervention. And not all gaming platforms allow this technically due to the properties of their RNGs.
How would the properties of the RNG have any effect om secondary outcomes?
Direct: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNCW0oQTQew
link to original postI did answer your question. I said, "No manufacturer or casino manager publicly discloses the jackpot odds on ANY slot machine, anywhere, to the player." That's inclusive. It means all of them.Quote: DobrijYou didn't answer my question. What kind of jackpot were you talking about?
You've got to be trolling me. I don't think there's anyone on this planet, besides you, who thinks that slot jackpot odds are public information. You certainly haven't provided any evidence that they are.Quote: DobrijAnd it's not a secret. It seems you're a fan of conspiracy theories.
Quote: DRichQuote: Dobrij
For some types of machines, it is indeed possible to use "greedy selectors", but this is already a technical intervention. And not all gaming platforms allow this technically due to the properties of their RNGs.
How would the properties of the RNG have any effect om secondary outcomes?
link to original post
The technical means known to me that can change the mathematics of slot machines work where there are elements of linear or adaptive logic of the game.
I did answer your question. I said, "No manufacturer or casino manager publicly discloses the jackpot odds on ANY slot machine, anywhere, to the player." That's inclusive. It means all of them.Quote: MichaelBluejaylink to original postQuote: DobrijYou didn't answer my question. What kind of jackpot were you talking about?
You've got to be trolling me. I don't think there's anyone on this planet, besides you, who thinks that slot jackpot odds are public information. You certainly haven't provided any evidence that they are.Quote: DobrijAnd it's not a secret. It seems you're a fan of conspiracy theories.
link to original post
Firstly, the principle of the jackpot can be different:
1. This is when the jackpot must fall in a certain range. And most likely, some casinos really adhere to security policies and do not disclose this so that jackpot hunters do not collect all the prizes. But for example, in our casino we openly show this to all players.
2. This is when the jackpot falls after a certain combination. Then knowing the probability does not give you anything. For example, you know the probability of a royal in poker, but this does not mean that it will fall every 600k times cyclically linearly.
Quote: DobrijQuote: DRichQuote: Dobrij
For some types of machines, it is indeed possible to use "greedy selectors", but this is already a technical intervention. And not all gaming platforms allow this technically due to the properties of their RNGs.
How would the properties of the RNG have any effect om secondary outcomes?
link to original post
The technical means known to me that can change the mathematics of slot machines work where there are elements of linear or adaptive logic of the game.
link to original post
DUDE... youve been on this for a lonngggg time... https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/slots/13331-adaptive-algorithm/... i love it tbh
Quote: DobrijQuote: DRichQuote: Dobrij
For some types of machines, it is indeed possible to use "greedy selectors", but this is already a technical intervention. And not all gaming platforms allow this technically due to the properties of their RNGs.
How would the properties of the RNG have any effect om secondary outcomes?
link to original post
The technical means known to me that can change the mathematics of slot machines work where there are elements of linear or adaptive logic of the game.
link to original post
I agree adaptive logic exists but is not related to RNG selection. A RNG simply returns a number between X and Y, it has zero idea of what will be done with that number.
Quote: DRichQuote: DobrijQuote: DRichQuote: Dobrij
For some types of machines, it is indeed possible to use "greedy selectors", but this is already a technical intervention. And not all gaming platforms allow this technically due to the properties of their RNGs.
How would the properties of the RNG have any effect om secondary outcomes?
link to original post
The technical means known to me that can change the mathematics of slot machines work where there are elements of linear or adaptive logic of the game.
link to original post
I agree adaptive logic exists but is not related to RNG selection. A RNG simply returns a number between X and Y, it has zero idea of what will be done with that number.
link to original post
If the program has an adaptive, it is no longer a RNG. Programs for cheating against a casino or cheating against a player are implemented on such machines. That is, there is a moment when the program makes a decision, and the choice can be influenced. I do not think that this can be described in an open forum.
Quote: Dobrij
If the program has an adaptive, it is no longer a RNG.
Clearly you don't understand what an RNG is. You can say the game may no longer be completely random, but it clearly still has an RNG.
I think you may just be co-mingling terms.
Quote: DRichQuote: Dobrij
If the program has an adaptive, it is no longer a RNG.
Clearly you don't understand what an RNG is. You can say the game may no longer be completely random, but it clearly still has an RNG.
I think you may just be co-mingling terms.
link to original post
I understand the essence of the issue and the technical part very well(but we are not talking about all types of machines). And I don't want to engage in tautology about clarifying the terminology. You asked a question, and I will answer you briefly in accordance with your question.
Quote: DobrijBut for example, in our casino we openly show this to all players.
I was reading the most recent series of posts more deeply and this specific sentence stood out. We're talking Eastern Europe clearly, and I'm kind of assuming we're talking about Casino Sochi here; can you describe this? Does the machine indicate that a bonus feature equates to a 10x-100x result?
Quote: VirtualBalboaDoes the machine indicate that a bonus feature equates to a 10x-100x result?
link to original post
I dont understand the question.
Great, post a picture. Also what is "our casino"? Is it brick-and-mortar or online? And in what country? Maybe some countries mandate that jackpot odds must be disclosed, but certainly not in the U.S.Quote: DobrijBut for example, in our casino we openly show this [jackpot odds] to all players. link to original post
Quote:This is when the jackpot must fall in a certain range. And most likely, some casinos really adhere to security policies and do not disclose this so that jackpot hunters do not collect all the prizes. But for example, in our casino we openly show this to all players.
If the jackpot must fall in a certain range, is the "range" describing the value of the jackpot as mini, minor, or major with a maximum for the jackpot which must be paid if reached?
Quote: VirtualBalboaQuote:This is when the jackpot must fall in a certain range. And most likely, some casinos really adhere to security policies and do not disclose this so that jackpot hunters do not collect all the prizes. But for example, in our casino we openly show this to all players.
If the jackpot must fall in a certain range, is the "range" describing the value of the jackpot as mini, minor, or major with a maximum for the jackpot which must be paid if reached?
link to original post
Of course.
ps- Here we're talking about the hall's jackpot, not a single machine.
Quote: MichaelBluejayGreat, post a picture. Also what is "our casino"? Is it brick-and-mortar or online? And in what country? Maybe some countries mandate that jackpot odds must be disclosed, but certainly not in the U.S.Quote: DobrijBut for example, in our casino we openly show this [jackpot odds] to all players. link to original post
link to original post
Baseland casino. Communicating the terms and chances to gamblers is fair and profitable in terms of marketing.
Quote: DobrijQuote: MichaelBluejayGreat, post a picture. Also what is "our casino"? Is it brick-and-mortar or online? And in what country? Maybe some countries mandate that jackpot odds must be disclosed, but certainly not in the U.S.Quote: DobrijBut for example, in our casino we openly show this [jackpot odds] to all players. link to original post
link to original post
Baseland casino. Communicating the terms and chances to gamblers is fair and profitable in terms of marketing.
link to original post
Can you tell us more about this casino and where it is? A Google search doesn't come up with any Baseland casino.
Quote: DRichQuote: Dobrij
Can you tell us more about this casino and where it is? A Google search doesn't come up with any Baseland casino.
link to original post
Do you want to come visit to meet me? No problem, write me a PM
Quote: DRichQuote: Dobrij
Can you tell us more about this casino and where it is? A Google search doesn't come up with any Baseland casino.
link to original post
Do you want to come visit to meet me? No problem, write me a PM
link to original post
No, thank you for the offer but I have been to hundreds of casinos worldwide and I just don't trust any casino that does not have any presence on Google.
Quote: Dobrij
Of course.
ps- Here we're talking about the hall's jackpot, not a single machine.
link to original post
When you say, "hall's jackpot," are you referring to the casino's revenue?
Quote: DRich
No, thank you for the offer but I have been to hundreds of casinos worldwide and I just don't trust any casino that does not have any presence on Google.
link to original post
First of all, I am not advertising our casino. I just gave an example, and everyone in our market does the same (as far as I know).
As for the fact that the casinos you visited do not say the conditions for winning the jackpot, maybe is that, but it seems strange to me. We used to think that Las Vegas was the capital and an example of how to run a gambling business. But the more I read such forums, the more I understand that the gaming conditions there are not the best for the gamblers.