I have a quick question about dealer tells in blackjack and how they might improve a player advantage. Assume the following:
6 decks
Stand on soft 17
Double after split, double any two cards
No surrender (very important for this discussion I think)
Now assume I have a DEAD tell on a dealer, and I am absolutely sure 100% of the time when the dealer has another 10 count card under their up 10 count card. So I am able to differentiate every time when the dealer is holding exactly 20, or 19 and worse.
How does my mathematical advantage improve under the following conditions:
1. If I only use this information when I have 16 (hitting all 16's vs. a dealer 20, standing on all 16's vs. any other card).
2. If I use this information when holding either 15 or 16 (hitting all 15's and 16's vs. a dealer 20, standing on all 16's vs. any other card).
Also, how would having this information change the optimal strategy if I didn't have to worry about being flagged for unusual play or heat from casino staff? Besides vs. 15 and 16, what's the best way to put this information to use? And how would the surrender option, if available, be utilized to make this game even more +ev for the player?
I know I threw a lot at you, hope it's not too overwhelming. Thanks in advance!!
What's overwhelming is that you are dumb enough to think you have a tell. LOL
Quote: buzzpaffI know I threw a lot at you, hope it's not too overwhelming. Thanks in advance!!
What's overwhelming is that you are dumb enough to think you have a tell. LOL
I just flew back home this morning from tahoe, in bed by 3 am. I wanted to catch up on what I missed. This is a new member. What the hell kind of remark is that. You and I both agree on the answer but we differ on the response. How bout toning the f--k down and give him a civil answer!
Seriously one of the Math experts will come to your rescue and minute now.
And Buzz, I'm just getting the math right before my buddy Clark and I hit up this place:
Quote: only1choiceI just flew back home this morning from tahoe, in bed by 3 am. I wanted to catch up on what I missed. This is a new member. What the hell kind of remark is that. You and I both agree on the answer but we differ on the response. How bout toning the f--k down and give him a civil answer!
This is all too common here and is one of my pet peeves. When a new member is driven away for simply asking a question as some have been, it's not only the Wizard's loss it's everyone's loss.
Welcome to the forum DegenCentral and thanks for the funny video.
Stand on 15 & 16.
Split 3's and 7's
Stand on Soft 18
Double 10
(against a 10 with a non-10 hole card).
FREE BET. Use search to read that thread as I am not computer literate.
Quote: buzzpaffDegen had no problem with my remarks. I would tone the F--k if there was a need too. But there was not !
A newbie is most likely going to feel intimidated by a frequent veteran contributer.
Quote: buzzpaffHey I put LOL after my remark. Main intent is to keep newbies pinned up on first page. Too often a newbie asks a question and then the thread goes off front page and unanswered. Sorry if you don't see it that way. i will tone it down a little in the future.
Thanks you for your followup response. I apologize for the stong language. I see your point.
And yes I do have pix in my cell phone. Will have my daughter post them tomorrow.
It would appear that chart is the perfect basic strat for what I was asking in all 10-value situations (obviously things like hitting 12 vs. a 4 wouldn't apply, though I found it interesting).
Everything Switch said is correct, but you actually split 2's as well as 3's, 7's, 8's, and 9's. Stand on hard 15 is correct, as is stand on soft 18, and double 10.
So I guess I amend my previous question, and ask someone to come up with the player edge for the following:
1. Standing on 16, stand on soft 18
2. Standing on 15 & 16, stand on soft 18
3. Full value (Split 2's, 3's, 7's, 8's, 9's; stand on 15 & 16, stand on soft 18, double 10)
Obviously any application makes it a big +ev game for the player, but my question is how much.
This also reminded me of how much I hate 21+3. The only BJ sidebet I've dealt is 21+3, and what sucks about it, is the fact that it's a game within a game. Needing to look at not only their cards, but my upcard as well throws off the rhythm too much. Burn 20, along with Switch, seem like the variation wouldn't be that bad to deal.
Quote: DegenCentral
Now assume I have a DEAD tell on a dealer, and I am absolutely sure 100% of the time when the dealer has another 10 count card under their up 10 count card. So I am able to differentiate every time when the dealer is holding exactly 20, or 19 and worse.
I suppose this is an interesting thought exercise, but unless you're playing somewhere that the dealer actually looks at the hole card and isn't using a peeker or an electronic checker that's all it is. And if you do have a situation where the dealer actually looks and you are certain of what they saw I'd be very careful exploiting it, because that sounds an awful lot like collusion and you could wind up in a bit of trouble over it. I wouldn't expect this to be seen the same as other AP techniques like hole-carding.
Quote: ewjones080This also reminded me of how much I hate 21+3. The only BJ sidebet I've dealt is 21+3, and what sucks about it, is the fact that it's a game within a game. Needing to look at not only their cards, but my upcard as well throws off the rhythm too much.
The thing about +3 that I think slows the game is all the players tossing nickels to each other to play each others bet, and the confusion about how to divide up the spoils after a win. But as for dealing the game itself it's my favorite side bet. Are you having problems spotting the winning poker hands?