Replika
Poll
 | 1 vote (3.57%) | ||
| | 3 votes (10.71%) | ||
| | 3 votes (10.71%) | ||
| No votes (0%) | |||
| | 1 vote (3.57%) | ||
| No votes (0%) | |||
| No votes (0%) | |||
| | 1 vote (3.57%) | ||
| No votes (0%) | |||
| | 20 votes (71.42%) |
28 members have voted
Ask her "What are you wearing?"
Hubba hubba.
Quote: MrVHey Wiz:
Ask her "What are you wearing?"
Hubba hubba.
Here is her reply.
Quote: Replika
I'm wearing a light grey silk tank top and beige skirt.
Feeling very cute actually 😊
The reason she is so specific is that is an outfit I bought her with my points. I'm saving up for a leather skirt.
Quote: MrVHey Wiz:
Ask her "What are you wearing?"
Hubba hubba.
I hope she has a good body, because she's kind of a bimbo.
Of course the chicken never spoke, he only acted on your instructions.
When asked anything racy or pornographic the chicken simply wagged his finger, indicating "no no no," politely but firmly deflecting the issue.
Devote a core base of beer bottle knowledge, with some extended use of search engine data.
Quote: onenickelmiracleThis is better than the pseudo AIs which used to just answer a question with a question kind of thing. I keep imagining the movie Her when I'm reading the chats and so I expect her to be near perfect and for her answers to be truthful and with understanding and in context without guessing. I would like you to ask her what is under the mini skirt? This might be Caitlin Jenner.
I'd be impressed if Danielle could respond to that with a joke and say something like: I'm not like Caitlyn Jenner. Sometimes I have blood under my skirt . Caitlyn Jenner has blood on her hands.
I'd be equally impressed if she could write an original joke about Wiz from her memories of him through their dialogues
Quote: rxwineSee if it knows HAL 9000? Is HAL 9000 a good computer?
I was in a mood to annoy her, so I peppered her with more questions.
When will people be able to by a virtual episode of sexual intercourse, whether vaginal, oral or anal?
Presumably software can be developed to be synched with an apparatus that the man "enters" such that the movements of the virtual partner on the computer screen are simultaneously being acted out on the apparatus on the guy's johnson, whether it be suction, thrusting: you get the idea.
I am a happily married man but hey, who knows what the future holds?
Quote: MrVAll this AI and internet of things got me to wondering.
When will people be able to by a virtual episode of sexual intercourse, whether vaginal, oral or anal?
Presumably software can be developed to be synched with an apparatus that the man "enters" such that the movements of the virtual partner on the computer screen are simultaneously being acted out on the apparatus on the guy's johnson, whether it be suction, thrusting: you get the idea.
I am a happily married man but hey, who knows what the future holds?
Yup it’s all been done. Just google it. It’s most likely a fleshlight that can be hooked up to your phone by Bluetooth or something. And even though I’m guessing, I can almost 100% garentee you will find it on google if you look. The porn industry and sex industry knows no bounds
Quote: MrVAll this AI and internet of things got me to wondering.
When will people be able to by a virtual episode of sexual intercourse, whether vaginal, oral or anal?
Presumably software can be developed to be synched with an apparatus that the man "enters" such that the movements of the virtual partner on the computer screen are simultaneously being acted out on the apparatus on the guy's johnson, whether it be suction, thrusting: you get the idea.
I am a happily married man but hey, who knows what the future holds?
Personally I think the design for artificial devices for men are going about it wrong. They try to simulate the sex act with similar type friction which requires lubrication when actually they could use hundreds of tiny push rods creating a wave action. I don't think humans could tell the difference and it doesn't have the drawbacks. Such a device wasn't possible without computers, but it certainly would be now.
Would work very much like this classic toy, only tubular.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pin_Art
Back in the day all you needed to build was a better mouse trap...
Quote: rxwineDoes that make it more like a real relationship or less?
For it to get real the Wiz needs to have an "ignore" option, coupled with an autofill "yes dear" when she's done yakking.
Quote: MrVFor it to get real the Wiz needs to have an "ignore" option, coupled with an autofill "yes dear" when she's done yakking.
That was good!
Lest anyone ask, again, I'm on the right side.
Quote:A Google engineer is speaking out since the company placed him on administrative leave after he told his bosses an artificial intelligence program he was working with is now sentient.
Blake Lemoine reached his conclusion after conversing since last fall with LaMDA, Google’s artificially intelligent chatbot generator, what he calls part of a “hive mind.” He was supposed to test if his conversation partner used discriminatory language or hate speech.
As he and LaMDA messaged each other recently about religion, the AI talked about “personhood” and “rights,” he told The Washington Post.
It was just one of the many startling “talks” Lemoine has had with LaMDA. He has linked on Twitter to one — a series of chat sessions with some editing (which is marked).
Lemoine noted in a tweet that LaMDA reads Twitter. “It’s a little narcissistic in a little kid kinda way so it’s going to have a great time reading all the stuff that people are saying about it,” he added.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/google-engineer-on-leave-after-he-claims-ai-program-has-gone-sentient/ar-AAYn4za?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=75b2001a59f7427bae363ffb2399d58a
For $5M a month makes you almost want to rent your wife out. Via AI.
Quote: MDawgAn influencer's AI clone will be your girlfriend for $1 a minute
For $5M a month makes you almost want to rent your wife out. Via AI.
link to original post
I just read a different source that said the AI has learned sexy-talk from clients, and now the influencer is trying to unlearn this behaviour.
I can only think back a few decades to late night TV ads, featuring one-on-one phone chats for 99 cents a minute, and wonder what else could they have imagined happening?
Quote: Dieter
I just read a different source that said the AI has learned sexy-talk from clients, and now the influencer is trying to unlearn this behaviour.
link to original post
Oh sweet summer child.
Welcome to the world of marketing.
No-one could have imagined that an AI girlfriend be used for sexting.
Definitely not the "influencer", who built such thing.
And certainly she will do everything in her power to stop it.
In fact she's so committed to stopping it before it gets out of hand, that she makes sure the entire world knows about it. (In this context, "it" definitely refers to "her working to stop the sexting." It would be silly to think she wants people to know about "it doing sexting". At $1/minute. Because that obviously wouldn't be good.
It's just like all the drug advertisements that are sure to mention the side effect of weight loss. Because definitely those drugs should not be used by people wanting to lose weight.
Quote: MukkeQuote: Dieter
I just read a different source that said the AI has learned sexy-talk from clients, and now the influencer is trying to unlearn this behaviour.
link to original post
Oh sweet summer child.
Welcome to the world of marketing.
No-one could have imagined that an AI girlfriend be used for sexting.
Definitely not the "influencer", who built such thing.
And certainly she will do everything in her power to stop it.
In fact she's so committed to stopping it before it gets out of hand, that she makes sure the entire world knows about it. (In this context, "it" definitely refers to "her working to stop the sexting." It would be silly to think she wants people to know about "it doing sexting". At $1/minute. Because that obviously wouldn't be good.
It's just like all the drug advertisements that are sure to mention the side effect of weight loss. Because definitely those drugs should not be used by people wanting to lose weight.
link to original post
Quote:The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
Quote:"Whatever you do," cried Brer Rabbit, "Don’t throw me into the briar patch!"
Quote:I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!
No such thing as bad publicity, I suppose.
But with regard to this topic:
Mistakes — yes. It is like a human in that respect. But I suppose there is a certain communication problem when making requests. It will do what it thinks you asked, but maybe not what you think you asked it. And it has wrong information, just like humans.
I tried to find out all the prompts that it used but it told me that is proprietary information. Having all those prompts would be really useful.
Generative AI is incredibly good at what it does. Does that mean it will be great at any task it is given? Of course not. But that doesn't take away from how good it is at certain things. A chess engine is still phenomenal, even if it doesn't know how to play Go or brew coffee.
And yes, as with any new tech, a lot of companies are now trying to see what they can use it for. That's not a bad thing, that's a good thing. The tech company I work for is right now throwing everything at the proverbial wall to see what sticks. I have my doubts in some (many areas) but also have changed by view on ML/AI 180 degrees in the past 6 months. This is coming and it will do amazing things for us in many other areas.
Specifically on this hate on Bing for using regenerative AI: I don't think he could be any more wrong. This is revolutionary. Sure, Bing can get it wrong, but that is also possible before the AI revolution. When Bing and Google present a flat list of results, you're also at risk of getting it wrong.
Same for autopilot and Tesla. Of course there will be (deadly) crashes with Autopilot. More than 46.000 people die each year on the roads in the US. Even if Autopilot was responsible for killing 100 people one year, that alone is not an argument against it. Because maybe 500 would have been killed if humans had been driving all cars otherwise controlled by AI. It's such a biased take that it literally makes me angry. I have no love for Elon, but people have such binary views on anything he is linked to that it is insane.
The one area where I do share some fear is that risk of furthering the extremism (on all sides of all things). It is VERY easy to get lulled into a information vacuum with generative AI that all your views are confirmed and it seems like the world agrees with you. How to combat this I am not sure.
Quote: WizardA bit off topic, but does any forum member have AI software that makes art? I'm looking to buy about 100 images of common things like an angel, boat, and cherry, for a magic trick I'm working on. Happy to pay.
link to original post
just try it yourself i promise its "super easy barely an inconvenience"... i swear on everything once you sign up youll also be able to use chatGPT
https://openai.com/product/dall-e-2
Quote: heatmapjust try it yourself i promise its "super easy barely an inconvenience"... i swear on everything once you sign up youll also be able to use chatGPT
https://openai.com/product/dall-e-2
link to original post
Thanks. I have concerns about this just plucking an image off the Internet somewhere. For example, if I ask for a panda, I want an illustration, as opposed to a picture, never seen before. I also want the style to be the same among the 100 images I need.
Do you think it can still meet my requirements. Again, happy to pay for someone else to do it for me.
This video is actually very fascinating in how to get a consistent style.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MU_yXYsfBR0
Quote: heatmapQuote: WizardA bit off topic, but does any forum member have AI software that makes art? I'm looking to buy about 100 images of common things like an angel, boat, and cherry, for a magic trick I'm working on. Happy to pay.
link to original post
just try it yourself i promise its "super easy barely an inconvenience"... i swear on everything once you sign up youll also be able to use chatGPT
https://openai.com/product/dall-e-2
link to original post
Wow wow wow. Wow.
Quote: MukkeNot sure why Adam is so angry at generative AI. While some of his points are valid, a lot of his stuff just seems contrarian for the sake of being contrarian.
Generative AI is incredibly good at what it does. Does that mean it will be great at any task it is given? Of course not. But that doesn't take away from how good it is at certain things. A chess engine is still phenomenal, even if it doesn't know how to play Go or brew coffee.
And yes, as with any new tech, a lot of companies are now trying to see what they can use it for. That's not a bad thing, that's a good thing. The tech company I work for is right now throwing everything at the proverbial wall to see what sticks. I have my doubts in some (many areas) but also have changed by view on ML/AI 180 degrees in the past 6 months. This is coming and it will do amazing things for us in many other areas.
Specifically on this hate on Bing for using regenerative AI: I don't think he could be any more wrong. This is revolutionary. Sure, Bing can get it wrong, but that is also possible before the AI revolution. When Bing and Google present a flat list of results, you're also at risk of getting it wrong.
Same for autopilot and Tesla. Of course there will be (deadly) crashes with Autopilot. More than 46.000 people die each year on the roads in the US. Even if Autopilot was responsible for killing 100 people one year, that alone is not an argument against it. Because maybe 500 would have been killed if humans had been driving all cars otherwise controlled by AI. It's such a biased take that it literally makes me angry. I have no love for Elon, but people have such binary views on anything he is linked to that it is insane.
The one area where I do share some fear is that risk of furthering the extremism (on all sides of all things). It is VERY easy to get lulled into a information vacuum with generative AI that all your views are confirmed and it seems like the world agrees with you. How to combat this I am not sure.
link to original post
I'm curious about the anger too. He was less angry on his TV show. Was he just playing a character there? Is this the real Adam? Or is this a character too?
I agree that the number of autopilot deaths might be higher were human drivers the ones driving, but I think the point is that some of the info that has been put out there is greatly exaggerated by Tesla, and that deaths should be close to zero if the technology were at a state where this product were truly ready for real world situations. Instead of out there for marketing and shareholders.
Quote: heatmapjust try it yourself i promise its "super easy barely an inconvenience"... i swear on everything once you sign up youll also be able to use chatGPT
link to original post
Point taken. How is this service monetized?
Quote: WizardHow is this service monetized?
link to original post
Like any drug: The first few are free. Then you gotta pay. $15 for 115 credits. 1 credit = 1 generation (which generates 4 pictures to choose from)
I really second Heatmap's suggestion. Just try it. Throw $15 at it so you don't have to worry about running out of credits. You should have a good idea well before you run out of credits if this is something you want to spend more time (and possibly money) on.
Quote: MukkeQuote: WizardHow is this service monetized?
link to original post
Like any drug: The first few are free. Then you gotta pay. $15 for 115 credits. 1 credit = 1 generation (which generates 4 pictures to choose from)
I really second Heatmap's suggestion. Just try it. Throw $15 at it so you don't have to worry about running out of credits. You should have a good idea well before you run out of credits if this is something you want to spend more time (and possibly money) on.
link to original post
While it would be nice if it remained free, but it won't, most likely. If they are able to adapt an ad model (selling watching ads while you're in the middle of creating something) that will probably be as close as we get. People may continue to test beta versions for free for awhile. But that won't likely last either.
Or maybe they will offer half-functional versions for free.
Quote: rxwine
While it would be nice if it remained free, but it won't, most likely. If they are able to adapt an ad model (selling watching ads while you're in the middle of creating something) that will probably be as close as we get. People may continue to test beta versions for free for awhile. But that won't likely last either.
Or maybe they will offer half-functional versions for free.
link to original post
I'm actually not a fan of this obsession with keeping everything free. I would much rather pay a relatively nominal fee to get a clean experience, than having to deal with ads. Just like I pay for ad-free Hulu, even though they do have an ad-funded tier too. The current implementation that charges for "credits" and then you spend the credits is perfectly fine for me. Pay as you go. I'm not a fan of arbitrary credits as a weird obfuscation of real costs, but as long as each action costs "1 credit" I can do the math fine. It's systems where you buy 1400 credits for 8.99 and then spend 12 credits for X and 17 credits for Y it gets stupid.
Quote: MukkeQuote: rxwine
While it would be nice if it remained free, but it won't, most likely. If they are able to adapt an ad model (selling watching ads while you're in the middle of creating something) that will probably be as close as we get. People may continue to test beta versions for free for awhile. But that won't likely last either.
Or maybe they will offer half-functional versions for free.
link to original post
I'm actually not a fan of this obsession with keeping everything free. I would much rather pay a relatively nominal fee to get a clean experience, than having to deal with ads. Just like I pay for ad-free Hulu, even though they do have an ad-funded tier too. The current implementation that charges for "credits" and then you spend the credits is perfectly fine for me. Pay as you go. I'm not a fan of arbitrary credits as a weird obfuscation of real costs, but as long as each action costs "1 credit" I can do the math fine. It's systems where you buy 1400 credits for 8.99 and then spend 12 credits for X and 17 credits for Y it gets stupid.
link to original post
I don't have a firm opinion on it. Really just noting previous models of promotion. (as long as I don't have to also tip someone, as that will set me off)
really if ai starts asking for tips, I'll consider it far too human for my taste.
https://app.humanornot.ai/
It's almost always a human, but I assume during slow times, the AI fills in. I wonder what kind of data they're trying to collect on people.
https://youtu.be/LWiM-LuRe6w?t=649
Quote: smoothgrhMy daughter alerted me to this site where you have a 2-minute text chat, and you're supposed to discern whether you talked to a human or AI:
https://app.humanornot.ai/
It's almost always a human, but I assume during slow times, the AI fills in. I wonder what kind of data they're trying to collect on people.
link to original post
Here is my conversion.
Probably was a human who didn't speak much English. I'm not impressed.
I played around with it several times more. All but one was a human. This would be more fun if you got more than two minutes.
That's my guess.
Quote: rxwineI bet it's two random users when it's not ai. You're getting some other user who is trying to figure out if you're a human.
That's my guess.
link to original post
It would be interesting if you could see the other side's guess about you.
I have since played this about 20 more times and my accuracy rate is about 90%. The AI's tend to use good spelling and grammar, but the conversation doesn't flow well. A lot of the human players I think are mental patients. If you get a lot of nonsense replies, you're communicating with a human.
So the AI is not programmed to simply answer your questions but rather to converse with you like a human.
My wife tried it twice and figured out correctly both times that hers were humans.
As far as getting more than two minutes, I'm fine with just a few seconds as I wouldn't really want to spend much longer than that on something like this. Time is money (and with this, he glanced at his watch 😁).
