September 6th, 2016 at 6:44:51 PM
permalink
Quote: mipletWhen you play some dice will turn a gold color. I thought this following would have been a golden Royal, but was just a high straight.
Your die in this image appear to be in sequential order. They are even received the gold color overlay. Why no 50X gold win?
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication - Leonardo da Vinci
September 6th, 2016 at 7:27:28 PM
permalink
After playing some free hands at the demo linked by the Wizard, it appears that the order of the dice is determined by where they land in three layers moving away from you.
In this example:

The two dice closest to the camera are read left to right. The next layer of two dice is read left to right, and finally the last die is the one furthest away. I noticed that dice in the potential "Royal" position (e.g., the "Q" in the photo above) are given a "gold" overlay in the "Result" box. I also note that "Golden" hands may only win if ordered Left-to-Right, as the sequential "Right-to-Left" hand I had below was not evaluated as a "Golden" winner... Or the software is cheating:

While the "gold" color almost always appears when a die is in the proper sequential winning position, I did not notice it on the "9" when it was in the first position, which is where it would need to be for a "Golden Straight" win, so it could be possible that the gold color does not always appear... or the software is cheating.
In this example:

The two dice closest to the camera are read left to right. The next layer of two dice is read left to right, and finally the last die is the one furthest away. I noticed that dice in the potential "Royal" position (e.g., the "Q" in the photo above) are given a "gold" overlay in the "Result" box. I also note that "Golden" hands may only win if ordered Left-to-Right, as the sequential "Right-to-Left" hand I had below was not evaluated as a "Golden" winner... Or the software is cheating:

While the "gold" color almost always appears when a die is in the proper sequential winning position, I did not notice it on the "9" when it was in the first position, which is where it would need to be for a "Golden Straight" win, so it could be possible that the gold color does not always appear... or the software is cheating.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication - Leonardo da Vinci
September 6th, 2016 at 7:28:50 PM
permalink
Probably a programming error in the fake money version. After playing for a while I realized if the first die was a 9, it would be golden and any other dice in the correct spot for a golden straight would be good. If the first die was something else, all correct spots for golden Royal would be gold.Quote: AyecarumbaQuote: mipletWhen you play some dice will turn a gold color. I thought this following would have been a golden Royal, but was just a high straight.
Your die in this image appear to be in sequential order. They are even received the gold color overlay. Why no 50X gold win?
“Man Babes” #AxelFabulous
September 6th, 2016 at 7:50:50 PM
permalink
Quote: mipletAccording to this:
Thank you! Very good searching. My reading of that is a golden royal is a sequential high straight. I guess there is an arbitrary method for determining order.
It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet.
September 6th, 2016 at 7:53:15 PM
permalink
Quote: AyecarumbaAfter playing some free hands at the demo linked by the Wizard, it appears that the order of the dice is determined by where they land in three layers moving away from you....
Also, very good work! Thank you!
It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet.
September 6th, 2016 at 8:13:09 PM
permalink
Here is my analysis of the game.
Anybody disagree?
Hand | Pays | Permutations | Probability | Return |
---|---|---|---|---|
Golden royal | 50 | 1 | 0.000129 | 0.006430 |
Golden straight | 35 | 1 | 0.000129 | 0.004501 |
Five of a kind | 20 | 6 | 0.000772 | 0.015432 |
High straight | 6 | 119 | 0.015303 | 0.091821 |
Low straight | 4 | 119 | 0.015303 | 0.061214 |
Four of a kind | 4 | 150 | 0.019290 | 0.077160 |
Full house | 3 | 300 | 0.038580 | 0.115741 |
Three of a kind | 2 | 1,200 | 0.154321 | 0.308642 |
Two pair | 1 | 1,800 | 0.231481 | 0.231481 |
Pair of aces | 0.5 | 600 | 0.077160 | 0.038580 |
All other | 0 | 3,480 | 0.447531 | 0.000000 |
Total | 7,776 | 1.000000 | 0.951003 |
Anybody disagree?
It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet.
September 6th, 2016 at 8:47:50 PM
permalink
Quote: WizardHere is my analysis of the game.
......
Anybody disagree?
Low straight pays 5
“Man Babes” #AxelFabulous
September 7th, 2016 at 4:31:26 AM
permalink
Quote: mipletLow straight pays 5
You're right.
Hand | Pays | Permutations | Probability | Return |
---|---|---|---|---|
Golden royal | 50 | 1 | 0.000129 | 0.006430 |
Golden straight | 35 | 1 | 0.000129 | 0.004501 |
Five of a kind | 20 | 6 | 0.000772 | 0.015432 |
High straight | 6 | 119 | 0.015303 | 0.091821 |
Low straight | 5 | 119 | 0.015303 | 0.076517 |
Four of a kind | 4 | 150 | 0.019290 | 0.077160 |
Full house | 3 | 300 | 0.038580 | 0.115741 |
Three of a kind | 2 | 1,200 | 0.154321 | 0.308642 |
Two pair | 1 | 1,800 | 0.231481 | 0.231481 |
Pair of aces | 0.5 | 600 | 0.077160 | 0.038580 |
All other | 0 | 3,480 | 0.447531 | 0.000000 |
Total | 7,776 | 1.000000 | 0.966307 |
It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet.
September 20th, 2016 at 12:14:57 PM
permalink
Quote: odiousgambitI think that a golden royal/straight has the same relationship to a normal royal/straight as a golden shower has to a normal shower.
LMAO