Thread Rating:

rdw4potus
rdw4potus
Joined: Mar 11, 2010
  • Threads: 80
  • Posts: 7237
March 17th, 2014 at 8:11:58 PM permalink
Quote: Gamblor

That is the definition of mathematicians fallacy.



You think math is not real, but we're supposed to trust what you say about quantum physics? c'mon man. I just did 100 situps. It hurts to laugh that hard.
"So as the clock ticked and the day passed, opportunity met preparation, and luck happened." - Maurice Clarett
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 11933
March 17th, 2014 at 8:12:26 PM permalink
deleted
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
Lemieux66
Lemieux66
Joined: Feb 16, 2014
  • Threads: 24
  • Posts: 1226
March 17th, 2014 at 8:14:34 PM permalink
What's your betting style, Gamblor? Flat bet? Increase your bets when in the zone?
10 eyes for an eye. 10 teeth for a tooth. 10 bucks for a buck?! Hit the bad guys where it hurts the most: the face and the wallet.
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
March 17th, 2014 at 8:14:57 PM permalink
Quote: Gamblor

+1 lol.


I don't want to plus one myself but that was good. You can't even give me credit for reality is greater than math, come on.



I'm glad you liked it.

In all seriousness, in this case, mathematics describes reality. You should take the time to understand it -- none of the math described discussed here is really all that difficult. Your probability of going broke over any finite amount of time less than 1, but as that length of time increases it gets larger (because you keep adding more numbers to it) and some simple calculus will show you that it converges to 1 as the number of bets goes to infinity. It's just a simple limit; this is literally intro to calculus.

That's it, that's all. There is more difficult math around Markov processes, but you don't need any of it.
Gamblor
Gamblor
Joined: Mar 13, 2014
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 93
March 17th, 2014 at 8:24:37 PM permalink
Quote: rdw4potus

You think math is not real, but we're supposed to trust what you say about quantum physics? c'mon man. I just did 100 situps. It hurts to laugh that hard.



Your arguments and misquotes get weaker by the minute.

Of course math is "real". But math does not equal reality. If it did, it wouldn't be called probability or likely, it would be an absolute.
Gamblor
Gamblor
Joined: Mar 13, 2014
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 93
March 17th, 2014 at 8:25:08 PM permalink
Quote: Lemieux66

What's your betting style, Gamblor? Flat bet? Increase your bets when in the zone?



You know it bro
Lemieux66
Lemieux66
Joined: Feb 16, 2014
  • Threads: 24
  • Posts: 1226
March 17th, 2014 at 8:27:08 PM permalink
Think about it in terms of universes. Say there are 100 of them initially and after you join another one there are a hundred more. You have a thousand dollars. You flat bet table minimum in some game where you have a 48% chance of winning. Eventually you will go to the universe where you have nothing because it's a bit more likely you go to the universes that you lost in. Think of it like that.

I hated writing that but I think I had to.
10 eyes for an eye. 10 teeth for a tooth. 10 bucks for a buck?! Hit the bad guys where it hurts the most: the face and the wallet.
Gamblor
Gamblor
Joined: Mar 13, 2014
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 93
March 17th, 2014 at 8:37:23 PM permalink
Quote: Lemieux66

Think about it in terms of universes. Say there are 100 of them initially and after you join another one there are a hundred more. You have a thousand dollars. You flat bet table minimum in some game where you have a 48% chance of winning. Eventually you will go to the universe where you have nothing because it's a bit more likely you go to the universes that you lost in. Think of it like that.

I hated writing that but I think I had to.



I understand the concept you are trying to convey, I'm just saying it's false. Just as likely as to be the reality as someone following gamblers fallacy.
The game I'm talking about is where you bet on 2 spots. Player or banker. Giving you a %50 chance success rate. So factor in the zone, it is more likely I will travel to a universe where I'm in the zone, takin home some cash.

The "zone" is almost like a conscious force. You can't "bankrupt" the casino, because if you try to get to greedy, the zone will leave you hanging. You have to find the sweet spot. Realize there is no spoon...
rdw4potus
rdw4potus
Joined: Mar 11, 2010
  • Threads: 80
  • Posts: 7237
March 17th, 2014 at 8:39:56 PM permalink
Quote: Gamblor

Your arguments and misquotes get weaker by the minute.

Of course math is "real". But math does not equal reality. If it did, it wouldn't be called probability or likely, it would be an absolute.



ok. real=reality by definition. math=real by your admission above. therefore, math=reality by simple substitution.
"So as the clock ticked and the day passed, opportunity met preparation, and luck happened." - Maurice Clarett
Lemieux66
Lemieux66
Joined: Feb 16, 2014
  • Threads: 24
  • Posts: 1226
March 17th, 2014 at 8:40:38 PM permalink
Quote: Gamblor

I understand the concept you are trying to convey, I'm just saying it's false. Just as likely as to be the reality as someone following gamblers fallacy.
The game I'm talking about is where you bet on 2 spots. Player or banker. Giving you a %50 chance success rate. So factor in the zone, it is more likely I will travel to a universe where I'm in the zone, takin home some cash.

The "zone" is almost like a conscious force. You can't "bankrupt" the casino, because if you try to get to greedy, the zone will leave you hanging. You have to find the sweet spot. Realize there is no spoon...



Do you promise to give us honest casino updates? I would love to see them. I'm curious how you do.
10 eyes for an eye. 10 teeth for a tooth. 10 bucks for a buck?! Hit the bad guys where it hurts the most: the face and the wallet.

  • Jump to: