TwoFeathersATL
TwoFeathersATL
Joined: May 22, 2013
  • Threads: 37
  • Posts: 3616
March 30th, 2016 at 8:06:13 PM permalink
Quote: beachbumbabs

It was redacted/disabled for him being a new member. I'm going to assume positive intent based on the flow of conversation and it being pertinent information. We'll see where it goes.

BaBBs, you say redacted/disabled, but maybe not. I saw the post, no link there. I quoted the post, the link was there and was accessible, then I cancelled my reply. Think that was what GWAE was trying to say. Same thing happened a week or so ago with someone new trying to post a link to a jackpot pic or something. You could see the link if you replied, or quoted with a reply, but not just in the post. It must be magic ;-)
Youuuuuu MIGHT be a 'rascal' if.......(nevermind ;-)...2F
beachbumbabs
Administrator
beachbumbabs
Joined: May 21, 2013
  • Threads: 99
  • Posts: 14230
March 30th, 2016 at 10:52:16 PM permalink
Quote: TwoFeathersATL

BaBBs, you say redacted/disabled, but maybe not. I saw the post, no link there. I quoted the post, the link was there and was accessible, then I cancelled my reply. Think that was what GWAE was trying to say. Same thing happened a week or so ago with someone new trying to post a link to a jackpot pic or something. You could see the link if you replied, or quoted with a reply, but not just in the post. It must be magic ;-)



Yes, it's been working like that ever since they changed the link-posting threshold. I would suggest that any member not wanting to quote a link, just edit it out before you quote someone.
If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.

  • Jump to: