Thread Rating:

Nathan
Nathan
  • Threads: 66
  • Posts: 3786
Joined: Sep 2, 2016
May 6th, 2024 at 6:09:00 AM permalink
Quote: darkoz

Quote: Dieter

Quote: Nathan

Quote: darkoz

Quote: MDawg

Likes or dislikes generally do come down to actions unless someone is prejudiced against something superficial like someone’s looks or name or financial or social status in which case the dislike may come regardless of actions.

Actions (or status) may be overlooked if committed by someone known to us. For example if I knew D.Oz from when he was a successful film worker and I saw him languishing in the subways of NYC I might lend him a helping hand and invite him into my house for a shower and a meal. But if I didn’t know him at all I’d probably just look at him with disdain or avoid him.

Families and friends overlook or at least don’t run from the actions of family and friends all the time.
link to original post



Well just to be clear I never would have accepted a chance from any stranger to go to their house for a shower, lol.

Maybe if you had a set of double D'S but my suspicion radar would probably have been even higher in that scenario.
link to original post



Speaking of suspicion, some guy said his attractive apartment neighbor just went up to him and started kissing him out of nowhere and he was suspicious. Other Posters were LAUGHING at his post saying something like,"LMAO, you lucky man!" I responded something like,"This actually isn't funny at all. This is suspicious that she kissed him out of nowhere. The guy in question responded something like,"Karen Nathan is right. I don't know how you guys find this suspicious activity FUNNY. She and I aren't dating or anything like that and she just kissed me out of the blue. I think she has nefarious plans for me to be honest." 💡
link to original post



In my experience, when an unfamiliar woman comes up to me and starts with the kissing, she is either very very intoxicated, or trying to get away from a creep.
Nefarious intents seem to be a distant third, possibly because I don't look like I have a liver with a high market value.
link to original post



I actually had a strange woman just come up and kiss me in a bar. It was a full body hug kiss, her arms stretched around me.

As I don't drink I was fully cognizant so it probably threw her off but very quickly as she laid on the kiss I felt her hands digging into my pants pockets and lifting whatever valuables she could snatch out.

I grabbed her hands and had a quick tug of war, when she suddenly burst out laughing and let go.

It wasn't a funny laugh like she thought it hilarious. It was more like acting and melodramatic. Perhaps a defense mechanism to getting caught or she was trying to play it off in case it was an issue in the club. But it was so crowded in there she was gone from view very quickly.

I got the kiss though (didn't really get to enjoy it)
link to original post



See? She kissed you out of nowhere because she was attempting to mug you. Like the guy said,"She probably had nefarious plans." 💡🤔
In both The Hunger Games and in gambling, may the odds be ever in your favor. :D "Man Babes" #AxelFabulous "Olive oil is processed but it only has one ingredient, olive oil."-Even Bob, March 27/28th. :D The 2 year war is over! Woo-hoo! :D I sometimes speak in metaphors. ;) Remember this. ;) Crack the code. :D 8.9.13.25.14.1.13.5.9.19.14.1.20.8.1.14! :D "For about the 4096th time, let me offer a radical idea to those of you who don't like Nathan -- block her and don't visit Nathan's Corner. What is so complicated about it?" Wizard, August 21st. :D
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 5575
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
May 6th, 2024 at 6:23:00 PM permalink
Quote: darkoz

Quote: Dieter

Quote: Nathan

Quote: darkoz

Quote: MDawg

Likes or dislikes generally do come down to actions unless someone is prejudiced against something superficial like someone’s looks or name or financial or social status in which case the dislike may come regardless of actions.

Actions (or status) may be overlooked if committed by someone known to us. For example if I knew D.Oz from when he was a successful film worker and I saw him languishing in the subways of NYC I might lend him a helping hand and invite him into my house for a shower and a meal. But if I didn’t know him at all I’d probably just look at him with disdain or avoid him.

Families and friends overlook or at least don’t run from the actions of family and friends all the time.
link to original post



Well just to be clear I never would have accepted a chance from any stranger to go to their house for a shower, lol.

Maybe if you had a set of double D'S but my suspicion radar would probably have been even higher in that scenario.
link to original post



Speaking of suspicion, some guy said his attractive apartment neighbor just went up to him and started kissing him out of nowhere and he was suspicious. Other Posters were LAUGHING at his post saying something like,"LMAO, you lucky man!" I responded something like,"This actually isn't funny at all. This is suspicious that she kissed him out of nowhere. The guy in question responded something like,"Karen Nathan is right. I don't know how you guys find this suspicious activity FUNNY. She and I aren't dating or anything like that and she just kissed me out of the blue. I think she has nefarious plans for me to be honest." 💡
link to original post



In my experience, when an unfamiliar woman comes up to me and starts with the kissing, she is either very very intoxicated, or trying to get away from a creep.
Nefarious intents seem to be a distant third, possibly because I don't look like I have a liver with a high market value.
link to original post



I actually had a strange woman just come up and kiss me in a bar. It was a full body hug kiss, her arms stretched around me.

As I don't drink I was fully cognizant so it probably threw her off but very quickly as she laid on the kiss I felt her hands digging into my pants pockets and lifting whatever valuables she could snatch out.

I grabbed her hands and had a quick tug of war, when she suddenly burst out laughing and let go.

It wasn't a funny laugh like she thought it hilarious. It was more like acting and melodramatic. Perhaps a defense mechanism to getting caught or she was trying to play it off in case it was an issue in the club. But it was so crowded in there she was gone from view very quickly.

I got the kiss though (didn't really get to enjoy it)
link to original post



As a confirmed unfun wet blanket, modern nightclubs and I don't mix.
I'm fine with not being the usual target of the entourage.
May the cards fall in your favor.
terapined
terapined
  • Threads: 89
  • Posts: 6217
Joined: Dec 1, 2012
May 7th, 2024 at 8:14:00 AM permalink
Quote: gordonm888

Quote: 100xOdds

Quote: ams288

Quote: darkoz

Why is MDawg in red?
link to original post


Because maybe there is a God after all.
link to original post

so 6month ban?
link to original post



God is not that powerful. Just a one day penance
link to original post


My favorite god song (the g is lower case. I'm an atheist)
Its just a forum. Nothing here to get obsessed about.
Nathan
Nathan
  • Threads: 66
  • Posts: 3786
Joined: Sep 2, 2016
May 8th, 2024 at 3:33:29 PM permalink
There are a couple of Suspensions I got when I was a Member in Good Standing the first time that STILL make me uncomfortable to this very SECOND. One was when I was trying to help a Newbie and I innocently put the wrong amount and I got a two week Suspension. A Newbie asked something like,"How much coin in is needed for a Must Hit Progressive that says It's $40 away? I responded something like,"The Progressive may look like it's only $40 away, but you'd have to play more like $400 before the Progressive hits.

A Poster said something like,"Nathan, you are so off base it isn't funny. The Progressive would need more like $100,000 coin in before it hits. Another Poster said something like,"Nathan gave bad advice to a Newbie. Nathan has her own Corner and is a Long time Member, so I could see a Newbie ACTUALLY thinking you just need $400 coin in to get the Progressive and blaming US when he loses his $400 and doesn't get the Progressive. The OP said something like, I did think Nathan's quote was REALLY optimistic, but I didn't want to call out a Long time Member when I'm just a Newbie, I'm not trying to have bad blood with Long time Members as a Newbie, so I thanked her for trying to help me out. " I soon got a "You gave a brand new Newbies awful advice. You are Suspended for two weeks. I was flabbergasted. I honestly did think you needed about $400 before the Progressive hits.

There was a Thread about a guy who said another guy got a $4,000 Jackpot and asked him to claim it as his own and he would pay him $2,000. He claimed the $4,000 Jackpot as his own and the guy gave him the $2,000 but he asked WOV something like,"Should I have refused to claim the Jackpot as my own? I mean, it is pretty weird that this complete Stranger asked me to claim the Jackpot as his own for $2,000. A Poster responded something like,"The guy could have Alimony payments. I don't even know what Alimony is, but it sounds awful.

I, Nathan responded something like," Alimony is what you pay an ex Spouse after divorce. I've always hated the idea of Alimony. Why should I have to financially support another Adult that I fm no longer legally or blood bonded to, especially if the reason for the divorce was because my ex Spouse cheated on me? So, I have to financially support another Adult who cheated on me and was at fault for the divorce? Hell no!

Someone else responded,"Alimony is like buying oats for a horse you no longer own. Another Poster responded something like,"My Friend's ex Wife cheated on him and he divorced her. They didn't sign a prenup, so he has to pay her $2,000 in Alimony every month.." I responded,"Alimony sucks! It should be outlawed! I then went to another Thread and tried to respond, but I couldn't. I thought WOV was glitching. I went back to the Jackpot Thread and I saw a post saying something like,"You have hijacked this Thread by bringing up Alimony. This thread is about a guy trying to hide his Jackpot and asking a complete Stranger to claim the Jackpot as his own and split the Jackpot and the guy doing sp bit wondering if he should have refused. It has nothing to do with Alimony. You have been Suspended for two weeks for hijacking.

I, Nathan, thought another Poster who brought up Alimony first was the one who got the two week Suspension, because I just merely responded to two different People who brought it up first. I was shocked that I was the one who got a two week Suspension for the Alimony thing! 😱 And, only my quote was posted, making it unfairly look like I just started talking about Alimony out of the blue when I was in fact responding to two different people who brought it up first. Posters were like,"Nathan didn't hijack anything. She was responding to two different people who brought up Alimony first. She deserves an immediate reinstatement and a full apology for this unfair Suspension. The unfair two week Suspension stuck despite multiple Posters protesting it. I am still uncomfortable with the two week Suspension for the Alimony thing. 😵‍💫
In both The Hunger Games and in gambling, may the odds be ever in your favor. :D "Man Babes" #AxelFabulous "Olive oil is processed but it only has one ingredient, olive oil."-Even Bob, March 27/28th. :D The 2 year war is over! Woo-hoo! :D I sometimes speak in metaphors. ;) Remember this. ;) Crack the code. :D 8.9.13.25.14.1.13.5.9.19.14.1.20.8.1.14! :D "For about the 4096th time, let me offer a radical idea to those of you who don't like Nathan -- block her and don't visit Nathan's Corner. What is so complicated about it?" Wizard, August 21st. :D
SOOPOO
SOOPOO 
  • Threads: 122
  • Posts: 11034
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
May 8th, 2024 at 4:22:23 PM permalink
Quote: Nathan

There are a couple of Suspensions I got when I was a Member in Good Standing the first time that STILL make me uncomfortable to this very SECOND. One was when I was trying to help a Newbie and I innocently put the wrong amount and I got a two week Suspension. A Newbie asked something like,"How much coin in is needed for a Must Hit Progressive that says It's $40 away? I responded something like,"The Progressive may look like it's only $40 away, but you'd have to play more like $400 before the Progressive hits.

A Poster said something like,"Nathan, you are so off base it isn't funny. The Progressive would need more like $100,000 coin in before it hits. Another Poster said something like,"Nathan gave bad advice to a Newbie. Nathan has her own Corner and is a Long time Member, so I could see a Newbie ACTUALLY thinking you just need $400 coin in to get the Progressive and blaming US when he loses his $400 and doesn't get the Progressive. The OP said something like, I did think Nathan's quote was REALLY optimistic, but I didn't want to call out a Long time Member when I'm just a Newbie, I'm not trying to have bad blood with Long time Members as a Newbie, so I thanked her for trying to help me out. " I soon got a "You gave a brand new Newbies awful advice. You are Suspended for two weeks. I was flabbergasted. I honestly did think you needed about $400 before the Progressive hits.

There was a Thread about a guy who said another guy got a $4,000 Jackpot and asked him to claim it as his own and he would pay him $2,000. He claimed the $4,000 Jackpot as his own and the guy gave him the $2,000 but he asked WOV something like,"Should I have refused to claim the Jackpot as my own? I mean, it is pretty weird that this complete Stranger asked me to claim the Jackpot as his own for $2,000. A Poster responded something like,"The guy could have Alimony payments. I don't even know what Alimony is, but it sounds awful.

I, Nathan responded something like," Alimony is what you pay an ex Spouse after divorce. I've always hated the idea of Alimony. Why should I have to financially support another Adult that I fm no longer legally or blood bonded to, especially if the reason for the divorce was because my ex Spouse cheated on me? So, I have to financially support another Adult who cheated on me and was at fault for the divorce? Hell no!

Someone else responded,"Alimony is like buying oats for a horse you no longer own. Another Poster responded something like,"My Friend's ex Wife cheated on him and he divorced her. They didn't sign a prenup, so he has to pay her $2,000 in Alimony every month.." I responded,"Alimony sucks! It should be outlawed! I then went to another Thread and tried to respond, but I couldn't. I thought WOV was glitching. I went back to the Jackpot Thread and I saw a post saying something like,"You have hijacked this Thread by bringing up Alimony. This thread is about a guy trying to hide his Jackpot and asking a complete Stranger to claim the Jackpot as his own and split the Jackpot and the guy doing sp bit wondering if he should have refused. It has nothing to do with Alimony. You have been Suspended for two weeks for hijacking.

I, Nathan, thought another Poster who brought up Alimony first was the one who got the two week Suspension, because I just merely responded to two different People who brought it up first. I was shocked that I was the one who got a two week Suspension for the Alimony thing! 😱 And, only my quote was posted, making it unfairly look like I just started talking about Alimony out of the blue when I was in fact responding to two different people who brought it up first. Posters were like,"Nathan didn't hijack anything. She was responding to two different people who brought up Alimony first. She deserves an immediate reinstatement and a full apology for this unfair Suspension. The unfair two week Suspension stuck despite multiple Posters protesting it. I am still uncomfortable with the two week Suspension for the Alimony thing. 😵‍💫
link to original post



Get over it. You don’t have anything else in your life to distract you from that suspension years ago?

Concentrate on your Bingo exploits.
Nathan
Nathan
  • Threads: 66
  • Posts: 3786
Joined: Sep 2, 2016
May 8th, 2024 at 4:29:15 PM permalink
Quote: SOOPOO

Quote: Nathan

There are a couple of Suspensions I got when I was a Member in Good Standing the first time that STILL make me uncomfortable to this very SECOND. One was when I was trying to help a Newbie and I innocently put the wrong amount and I got a two week Suspension. A Newbie asked something like,"How much coin in is needed for a Must Hit Progressive that says It's $40 away? I responded something like,"The Progressive may look like it's only $40 away, but you'd have to play more like $400 before the Progressive hits.

A Poster said something like,"Nathan, you are so off base it isn't funny. The Progressive would need more like $100,000 coin in before it hits. Another Poster said something like,"Nathan gave bad advice to a Newbie. Nathan has her own Corner and is a Long time Member, so I could see a Newbie ACTUALLY thinking you just need $400 coin in to get the Progressive and blaming US when he loses his $400 and doesn't get the Progressive. The OP said something like, I did think Nathan's quote was REALLY optimistic, but I didn't want to call out a Long time Member when I'm just a Newbie, I'm not trying to have bad blood with Long time Members as a Newbie, so I thanked her for trying to help me out. " I soon got a "You gave a brand new Newbies awful advice. You are Suspended for two weeks. I was flabbergasted. I honestly did think you needed about $400 before the Progressive hits.

There was a Thread about a guy who said another guy got a $4,000 Jackpot and asked him to claim it as his own and he would pay him $2,000. He claimed the $4,000 Jackpot as his own and the guy gave him the $2,000 but he asked WOV something like,"Should I have refused to claim the Jackpot as my own? I mean, it is pretty weird that this complete Stranger asked me to claim the Jackpot as his own for $2,000. A Poster responded something like,"The guy could have Alimony payments. I don't even know what Alimony is, but it sounds awful.

I, Nathan responded something like," Alimony is what you pay an ex Spouse after divorce. I've always hated the idea of Alimony. Why should I have to financially support another Adult that I fm no longer legally or blood bonded to, especially if the reason for the divorce was because my ex Spouse cheated on me? So, I have to financially support another Adult who cheated on me and was at fault for the divorce? Hell no!

Someone else responded,"Alimony is like buying oats for a horse you no longer own. Another Poster responded something like,"My Friend's ex Wife cheated on him and he divorced her. They didn't sign a prenup, so he has to pay her $2,000 in Alimony every month.." I responded,"Alimony sucks! It should be outlawed! I then went to another Thread and tried to respond, but I couldn't. I thought WOV was glitching. I went back to the Jackpot Thread and I saw a post saying something like,"You have hijacked this Thread by bringing up Alimony. This thread is about a guy trying to hide his Jackpot and asking a complete Stranger to claim the Jackpot as his own and split the Jackpot and the guy doing sp bit wondering if he should have refused. It has nothing to do with Alimony. You have been Suspended for two weeks for hijacking.

I, Nathan, thought another Poster who brought up Alimony first was the one who got the two week Suspension, because I just merely responded to two different People who brought it up first. I was shocked that I was the one who got a two week Suspension for the Alimony thing! 😱 And, only my quote was posted, making it unfairly look like I just started talking about Alimony out of the blue when I was in fact responding to two different people who brought it up first. Posters were like,"Nathan didn't hijack anything. She was responding to two different people who brought up Alimony first. She deserves an immediate reinstatement and a full apology for this unfair Suspension. The unfair two week Suspension stuck despite multiple Posters protesting it. I am still uncomfortable with the two week Suspension for the Alimony thing. 😵‍💫
link to original post



Get over it. You don’t have anything else in your life to distract you from that suspension years ago?

Concentrate on your Bingo exploits.
link to original post



I'm still bitter and resentful over those Suspensions even if they were years ago. 😵‍💫
In both The Hunger Games and in gambling, may the odds be ever in your favor. :D "Man Babes" #AxelFabulous "Olive oil is processed but it only has one ingredient, olive oil."-Even Bob, March 27/28th. :D The 2 year war is over! Woo-hoo! :D I sometimes speak in metaphors. ;) Remember this. ;) Crack the code. :D 8.9.13.25.14.1.13.5.9.19.14.1.20.8.1.14! :D "For about the 4096th time, let me offer a radical idea to those of you who don't like Nathan -- block her and don't visit Nathan's Corner. What is so complicated about it?" Wizard, August 21st. :D
  • Jump to: