Thread Rating:

Mission146
Mission146
Joined: May 15, 2012
  • Threads: 123
  • Posts: 12840
August 22nd, 2020 at 4:17:28 PM permalink
Quote: DeMango

Do I hear 18?



I counted 37 once, but it was a sizable pit.
Vultures can't be choosers.
rxwine
rxwine
Joined: Feb 28, 2010
  • Threads: 166
  • Posts: 9720
August 22nd, 2020 at 4:21:24 PM permalink
Quote: redietz

Top notch post. Deserves an award.



Quasimodo? Does that name ring a bell?
kewlj
kewlj
Joined: Apr 17, 2012
  • Threads: 203
  • Posts: 3824
Thanks for this post from:
rawtuff
August 22nd, 2020 at 5:33:48 PM permalink
Quote: AlanMendelson

By the way... when Kewlj first made his claim about being able to count two tables simultaneously while playing at one, another member of that forum joked he could count three tables. And now Kewlj says he can count three?

Do I hear four?



Alan, I am not going to call you a liar because that would be an insult, but you are lying. Quite frankly, my experience with you over 3 years on several forums has been that of a man incapable of telling the truth, right from the intentional blurry pictures you took. That was fundamentally dishonest and you have only gotten worse from there.

I assume I am not allowed to link to another forum, so I will just post word for word 2 quotes of Alan's that are most revealing.

1). "Let me tell you something: it's me, people who are honest, and then the rest of you casino "APs" and in the real world you casino APs lose."

2). "So, if the AP community will finally accept that I saw a random shooter throw 18 Yos in a row (I didn't do it -- a random shooter did) and that I hit my first $100K royal within the first 300 hands I ever played of $25 Bonus Poker, then I WILL ACCEPT YOU CAN COUNT TWO BLACKJACK TABLES."

#1 Clearly demonstrates Alan's anti-AP bias. He claims he is telling the truth and all AP's are lying. I am not a psychiatrist, nor would want to see inside his head, but it would seem he is a little bitter about his own gambling results as compared to players that actually try to play with an advantage.

#2 While Alan seeing (or not seeing) 18 y.o.'s in a row and his claim of $100,000 royal flushes have absolutely nothing to do with this discussion, it clearly shows Alan's motivation, for now 3 years of trying to discredit me. Alan is flat out saying because people find Alan not credible, he is going to refuse to accept my claim, which he has now done for 3 years. He is entitled to not believe my claim, but as always Alan is being dishonest and this statement clearly shows that.
Mission146
Mission146
Joined: May 15, 2012
  • Threads: 123
  • Posts: 12840
August 22nd, 2020 at 5:36:23 PM permalink
Why would anyone dispute that he hit his first 100K royal within his first 300 hands of playing that particular denomination? That doesn’t strike me as a particularly fanciful claim.
Vultures can't be choosers.
kewlj
kewlj
Joined: Apr 17, 2012
  • Threads: 203
  • Posts: 3824
August 22nd, 2020 at 5:40:34 PM permalink
Quote: Mission146

Why would anyone dispute that he hit his first 100K royal within his first 300 hands of playing that particular denomination? That doesn’t strike me as a particularly fanciful claim.



I don't know. I wasn't part of that discussion. But the quote clearly shows Alan saying well if they aren't going to believe me, then I am not going to believe you and he has carried that on for 3 years now. It is just dishonest.
AlanMendelson
AlanMendelson
Joined: Oct 5, 2011
  • Threads: 97
  • Posts: 3556
August 22nd, 2020 at 5:42:58 PM permalink
Quote: kewlj

Alan, I am not going to call you a liar because that would be an insult, but you are lying. Quite frankly, my experience with you over 3 years on several forums has been that of a man incapable of telling the truth, right from the intentional blurry pictures you took. That was fundamentally dishonest and you have only gotten worse from there.

I assume I am not allowed to link to another forum, so I will just post word for word 2 quotes of Alan's that are most revealing.

1). "Let me tell you something: it's me, people who are honest, and then the rest of you casino "APs" and in the real world you casino APs lose."

2). "So, if the AP community will finally accept that I saw a random shooter throw 18 Yos in a row (I didn't do it -- a random shooter did) and that I hit my first $100K royal within the first 300 hands I ever played of $25 Bonus Poker, then I WILL ACCEPT YOU CAN COUNT TWO BLACKJACK TABLES."

#1 Clearly demonstrates Alan's anti-AP bias. He claims he is telling the truth and all AP's are lying. I am not a psychiatrist, nor would want to see inside his head, but it would seem he is a little bitter about his own gambling results as compared to players that actually try to play with an advantage.

#2 While Alan seeing (or not seeing) 18 y.o.'s in a row and his claim of $100,000 royal flushes have absolutely nothing to do with this discussion, it clearly shows Alan's motivation, for now 3 years of trying to discredit me. Alan is flat out saying because people find Alan not credible, he is going to refuse to accept my claim, which he has now done for 3 years. He is entitled to not believe my claim, but as always Alan is being dishonest and this statement clearly shows that.



Enough is enough with these attacks.
kewlj
kewlj
Joined: Apr 17, 2012
  • Threads: 203
  • Posts: 3824
August 22nd, 2020 at 5:45:28 PM permalink
Quote: AlanMendelson

Enough is enough with these attacks.



What attacks? I posted your own words, which clearly shows what this is all about.
rsactuary
rsactuary
Joined: Sep 6, 2014
  • Threads: 20
  • Posts: 1723
Thanks for this post from:
RogerKintDeMangodarkozMinty
August 22nd, 2020 at 5:46:38 PM permalink
Not that anyone cares, but I'm sick of reading this. Can we get back to the original topic of the thread?
sabre
sabre
Joined: Aug 16, 2010
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 915
August 22nd, 2020 at 5:52:36 PM permalink
Quote: Mission146

Why would anyone dispute that he hit his first 100K royal within his first 300 hands of playing that particular denomination? That doesn’t strike me as a particularly fanciful claim.



It's not. But he literally thinks that 18 yos and hitting a royal in 300 hands are the same probability, while counting a 2nd table for a few rounds by turning your head 60 degrees is impossible.
AlanMendelson
AlanMendelson
Joined: Oct 5, 2011
  • Threads: 97
  • Posts: 3556
August 22nd, 2020 at 6:02:12 PM permalink
Quote: sabre

It's not. But he literally thinks that 18 yos and hitting a royal in 300 hands are the same probability, while counting a 2nd table for a few rounds by turning your head 60 degrees is impossible.



Where does this come from?

  • Jump to: