For the single-line version of Ultimate X, it is important to have a separate strategy for each multiplier on the current hand. In the multi-line version you can get away with a single strategy, because the multipliers averaged out somewhat across hands, but not in this version.
I mostly play multi-line, but I've found a single-line version I'd like to play. Assuming I'm too lazy/stupid to learn all the separate multiplier strategies, how much EV am I costing myself by using multi-line strategy on the single-line game?
Quote: GuyIncognitoIn the WoO page about Single-Line Ultimate X, it says
For the single-line version of Ultimate X, it is important to have a separate strategy for each multiplier on the current hand. In the multi-line version you can get away with a single strategy, because the multipliers averaged out somewhat across hands, but not in this version.
I mostly play multi-line, but I've found a single-line version I'd like to play. Assuming I'm too lazy/stupid to learn all the separate multiplier strategies, how much EV am I costing myself by using multi-line strategy on the single-line game?
I thought all ult x was +.5% more than the regular version.
so I got excited when I saw single line ult x 9/6 ddb.
I thought 99.5%! (best game at that casino at regular coin-in per point was 9/7 db aka 99.1%.)
then reality: https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/video-poker/29618-ult-x-single-line-is-much-lower-than-multi-play/
I rather stick with 99.1% than 99.3% and having to know 7 strategies.
I play at multiple casinos that have 9/7 db and only 1 that has single line ult X.
but if using the ult X multi-multiplier strategy sheet only costs .1%, then that single line 9/6 ddb is now 99.2%.
the swings will probably be wicked though. variance = 73 where as regular ddb is 44, and db is 28.
case in point last week:
$1 9/7 db
$12k coin-in
I hit the avg # of quads. avg = 1 quad per 600hands. $12k coin-in at $1 denom max bet = 2400 hands
ie: hit 4 quads (2 regular, 2 baby)
still lost $1.1k :(
$1 single line 'ult x' 9/6 ddb could be 3x that loss.
but it could also be 3x that gain...
Quote: 100xOdds
I thought all ult x was +.5% more than the regular version.
so I got excited when I saw single line ult x 9/6 ddb.
I thought 99.5%! (best game at that casino at regular coin-in per point was 9/7 db aka 99.1%.)
I think the best bang for your buck is the 7/5 bonus poker UX. 10 play is 99.26%. Base 7/5 bonus with no UX is 98.01%.
Quote: AxelWolfUX straight up is pure evil.
What does that make Bonus Streak?
does ult X bonus streak require different strategy than the non 'ult x' version??Quote: Mission146What does that make Bonus Streak?
same question for ult X spin poker.
Quote: 100xOddsdoes ult X bonus streak require different strategy than the non 'ult x' version??
same question for ult X spin poker.
Bonus Streak is specifically an Ultimate X variant. There is no Bonus Streak that’s not UX, the closest game I could think of might be something like Multi-Strike, which is still quite different.
Quote: 100xOddsdoes ult X bonus streak require different strategy than the non 'ult x' version??
same question for ult X spin poker.
Yes you should use a different strategy for UX Bonus Streak. UX spin poker will be close to regular X.
Returns depend on paytable and multipliers. The single line version often has a lower multiplier in one category. :(
Quote: tringlomaneYes you should use a different strategy for UX Bonus Streak. UX spin poker will be close to regular X.
Returns depend on paytable and multipliers. The single line version often has a lower multiplier in one category. :(
saw someone check every game and play max bet if he found any multipliers till he blanked. (both bonus streak and spin x)
even a lone 2x on $1 10 play ($100 coin-in).
I'm thinking $1 9/7 db would be better.