March 27th, 2011 at 11:02:40 AM
permalink
The Wizard states in his new review of EZ Pai Gow that most casinos do not allow players to bank this game. For the unfamiliar it is a no commission version of Pai Gow where the banker pushes with queen high pai gow. At the Pala Casino in San Diego, a player may bank and he does not pay when he has a queen high pai gow, however he is subject to the 5% commission on his net win. I was thinking that this might actually make the banking part of the game +EV since, as the banker, the commission and the push on Queen high push rules roughly cancel each other out, and you win on copies. Any thoughts?
Vote for Nobody 2020!
March 27th, 2011 at 11:19:40 AM
permalink
Quote: bigfoot66The Wizard states in his new review of EZ Pai Gow that most casinos do not allow players to bank this game. For the unfamiliar it is a no commission version of Pai Gow where the banker pushes with queen high pai gow. At the Pala Casino in San Diego, a player may bank and he does not pay when he has a queen high pai gow, however he is subject to the 5% commission on his net win. I was thinking that this might actually make the banking part of the game +EV since, as the banker, the commission and the push on Queen high push rules roughly cancel each other out, and you win on copies. Any thoughts?
The 5% commission costs about -1.25% since roughly 1/4 of your hands are wins. You would have the wins-on-copies rule in your favor to offset this. However, since the overall house edge (commission+copies) at PGP is in the 2-2.5% range (depending on rules, house way, etc.), and the commission is 1.25% of that, my feeling is that banking would be a breakeven venture at best.
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality.---George Bernard Shaw